logo
Education research takes another hit in latest DOGE attack

Education research takes another hit in latest DOGE attack

Miami Herald04-05-2025

Education research has a big target on its back.
Of the more than 1,000 National Science Foundation grants killed last month by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, some 40 percent were inside its education division. These grants to further STEM education research accounted for a little more than half of the $616 million NSF committed for projects canceled by DOGE, according to Dan Garisto, a freelance journalist reporting for Nature, a peer-reviewed scientific journal that also covers science news.
The STEM education division gives grants to researchers at universities and other organizations who study how to improve the teaching of math and science, with the goal of expanding the number of future scientists who will fuel the U.S. economy. Many of the studies are focused on boosting the participation of women or Black and Hispanic students. The division had a roughly $1.2 billion budget out of NSF's total annual budget of $9 billion.
Related: Our free weekly newsletter alerts you to what research says about schools and classrooms.
Neither the NSF nor the Trump administration has provided a list of the canceled grants. Garisto told me that he obtained a list from an informal group of NSF employees who cobbled it together themselves. That list was subsequently posted on Grant Watch, a new project to track the Trump administration's termination of grants at scientific research agencies. Garisto has been working with outside researchers at Grant Watch and elsewhere to document the research dollars that are affected and analyze the list for patterns.
"For NSF, we see that the STEM education directorate has been absolutely pummeled," Noam Ross, a computational disease ecologist and one of the Grant Watch researchers, posted on Bluesky.
At least two of the terminated research studies focused on improving artificial intelligence education, which President Donald Trump promised to promote in an April 23 executive order,"Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth."
"There is something especially offensive about this EO from April 23 about the need for AI education… Given the termination of my grant on exactly this topic on April 26," said Danaé Metaxa in a post on Bluesky that has since been deleted. Metaxa, an assistant professor of computer and information science at the University of Pennsylvania, was developing a curriculum on how to teach AI digital literacy skills by having students build and audit generative AI models.
Related: Chaos and confusion as the statistics arm of the Education Department is reduced to a skeletal staff of 3
Another canceled grant involved college students creating educational content about AI for social media to see if that content would improve AI literacy and the ability to detect misinformation. The lead researcher, Casey Fiesler, an associate professor of information science at the University of Colorado Boulder, was almost midway through her two-year grant of less than $270,000. "There is not a DEI aspect of this work," said Fiesler. "My best guess is that the reason it was flagged was the word 'misinformation.'"
Confusion surrounded the cuts. Bob Russell, a former NSF project officer who retired in 2024, said some NSF project officers were initially unaware that the grants they oversee had been canceled. Instead, university officials who oversee research were told, and those officials notified researchers at their institutions. Researchers then contacted their project officers. One researcher told me that the termination notice states that researchers may not appeal the decision, an administrative process that is ordinarily available to researchers who feel that NSF has made an unfair or incorrect decision.
Related: DOGE's death blow to education studies
Some of the affected researchers were attending the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Denver on April 26 when more than 600 grants were cut. Some scholars found out by text that their studies had been terminated. Normally festive evening receptions were grim. "It was like a wake," said one researcher.
The Trump administration wants to slash NSF's budget and headcount in half, according to Russell. Many researchers expect more cuts ahead.
Contact staff writer Jill Barshay at 212-678-3595, jillbarshay.35 on Signal, or barshay@hechingerreport.org.
This story about NSF education research cuts was written by Jill Barshay and produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for Proof Points and other Hechinger newsletters.
The post Education research takes another hit in latest DOGE attack appeared first on The Hechinger Report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern
Trump's Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern

Because of a political fallout, tech mogul and SpaceX owner Elon Musk has now attracted the verbal ire of President Trump. While sparring over social media, the President suggested that he could and would cancel Musk's government contracts relative to SpaceX. Briefly, this led Musk to claim that SpaceX would "decommission" the crucial Dragon spacecraft, but later reversed his position, saying, "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." This is the very same type of vessel which recently led to the rescue of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunni Williams who were stranded on the International Space Station for much longer than originally planned. And it's the fate of the International Space Station that is actually the number one reason why an utterly defunded SpaceX might be a very dangerous thing. In 2024, NASA awarded SpaceX a contract valued at $843 million. The purpose? To deorbit the International Space Station by the end of the decade. Basically, the ISS is not designed to stay in orbit forever, and before it is replaced by something more permanent, it will have to be safely moved to a low Earth orbit. This means that SpaceX is currently tasked by the U.S. government to build the United States Deorbit Vehicle (USDV). "Selecting a U.S. Deorbit Vehicle for the International Space Station will help NASA and its international partners ensure a safe and responsible transition in low Earth orbit at the end of station operations," Ken Bowersox said in a NASA statement last a hypothetical world in which Trump decides to rescind all government contracts for SpaceX, that would presumably include killing the all-important job of SpaceX building the USDV. And if SpaceX doesn't build the USDV, who will help mitigate the very real fallout of a large space station? Again, hypothetically, there are other organizations that have spacecraft, but as the stranding of Wilmore and Williams recently demonstrated, SpaceX has proven to be the most reliable way for the U.S. to get people in and out of space. In fact, the whole reason that Wilmore and Williams were stranded was because the Boeing Starliner — a rival aerospace venture to SpaceX — was unable to complete a return trip because of safety concerns. Concurrent with all of this, Blue Origin's New Glenn craft isn't even close to being ready. Notably, Blue Origin's other craft, the New Shepard, isn't designed to go far enough into space to be useful to the ISS. One might wonder if SpaceX really needs the money. And it's possible the company doesn't. As Musk pointed out on June 3, the entirety of what NASA pays to SpaceX ($1.1 billion) is dwarfed by SpaceX's current revenue ($15.5 billion). Basically, SpaceX's Starlink services are making plenty of money for the company, so if Trump rescinded even just that contract valued at roughly $800 million, it wouldn't come close to putting SpaceX out of business. Legally, Trump might be able to try and sever ties between SpaceX and the U.S. government, specifically, NASA. But practically speaking, this seems very unlikely long-term. Right now, SpaceX is the best bet for creating a safe deorbit for the ISS. And, if any more astronauts get stranded — from any country — it seems like Musk's Dragons are still the most reliable space Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025

Senate Republicans propose alternative to scale back AI provision in Trump bill
Senate Republicans propose alternative to scale back AI provision in Trump bill

USA Today

time14 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Senate Republicans propose alternative to scale back AI provision in Trump bill

Senate Republicans propose alternative to scale back AI provision in Trump bill Show Caption Hide Caption Hakeem Jeffries backs Elon Musk's call to 'kill' Trump's tax bill House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries backed Elon Musk's call to "kill the bill", saying Trump's tax plan will harm Americans. WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans modified language around a controversial artificial intelligence provision in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill after it prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans. AI has long been a subject of controversy due to national security and child safety risks posed by the technology, including the rise of deepfakes, misinformation and scams. The Trump administration's stance on AI has largely aligned with that of companies, arguing that regulation would stymie innovation. But the provision in the bill has been a point of contention among lawmakers as many contend that AI technology is still new and needs to be under state regulation. The provision in the House bill passed by the lower chamber on May 22 would have prohibited states from enforcing any law or regulation 'limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating" AI models, AI systems or automated decision systems affecting trade, transportation or traffic for a ten year period. Republicans on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, however, released their draft text of Trump's bill on June 5 proposing to tie the ban to federal funding. States who comply with the decade-long AI regulation freeze can receive grant money from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program. The program is a $42.45 million initiative to expand high-speed Internet access nationwide, according to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. The Senate proposal says that grantees can use the funds to 'construct and deploy infrastructure' regarding AI systems. The Senate proposal is a large step away from the original provision, which lawmakers across the aisle raised concerns about. Conservative firebrand Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she wouldn't have voted for the House bill if she'd known about it. 'We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous,' she wrote in a tweet on June 3. California Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu, vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said at a presser on June 4: 'I agree with Marjorie Taylor Greene once every hundred years. This is that time.' Texas Rep. Greg Casar, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, argued that 'writing big tech companies a blank check to exploit AI however they want - that's contrary to what the vast majority of American people want.' Though House Freedom Caucus member Texas Rep. Chip Roy voted in favor of the bill, he echoed similar sentiments, telling reporters that governors should be able to 'protect their own constituencies, particularly on a technology that is very new and fluid.' It still remains to be seen whether the proposal will be included in the final version of the Senate bill before it is voted on by lawmakers. Trump and GOP leaders have set a self-imposed deadline of July 4 to try to get the tax bill through both chambers of Congress and to the president's desk for signature into law.

How AI Is Helping Cancer Patients: Saving Lives And Money
How AI Is Helping Cancer Patients: Saving Lives And Money

Forbes

time19 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How AI Is Helping Cancer Patients: Saving Lives And Money

Medical technology concept. Medical doctor. getty Cancer treatment is costly. The average cost of cancer care in the U.S. is around $150,000 per patient—more than four times the cost of treatment for other common health conditions, according to AARP. The American Cancer Society projected that In 2025, more than 2 million people in the U.S. are expected to be diagnosed with cancer, with over 618,000 deaths projected. With these high costs, artificial intelligence (AI) is offering new solutions that are not only saving lives but also making cancer care more affordable. Early detection is one of the most effective ways to reduce cancer treatment costs. When cancer is caught in its earliest stages, treatments tend to be less aggressive and more affordable. At The Christ Hospital, AI has significantly improved lung cancer detection. 'Nearly 70% of lung cancer cases are now found at stage I or II, well above the national average of 46%,' said Seth Howard, executive vice president of research and development at Epic. 'In just six months, over 60 patients started treatment earlier, significantly improving their chances of survival.' By diagnosing cancer earlier, AI allows doctors to offer more cost-effective treatment options, which helps lower the financial burden on both patients and healthcare systems. ArteraAI is another example of how AI is transforming cancer care. Their AI technology is helping doctors determine which cancer treatments are best for their patients, preventing unnecessary therapies. 'AI is the most transformative tech we've had in a long time,' said Andre, founder of Artera. 'The impact AI has had on the healthcare system is as powerful as computers have had on the healthcare system. With the ArteraAI Prostate Test, we can personalize treatments, reducing unnecessary costs while improving outcomes.' The ArteraAI Prostate Test is fully reimbursed by Medicare under its established payment rate, meaning no out-of-pocket costs for eligible Medicare patients. This makes prostate cancer care more affordable and reduces financial strain during treatment. Surgery is often a key part of cancer treatment. Proprio, a company that has developed AI-powered surgical technology, provides surgeons with real-time data during operations, reducing the need for traditional imaging like CT scans and X-rays. This technology allows for faster surgeries, less strain on hospital staff, and quicker recovery times, which ultimately lowers the cost of care for patients. Another breakthrough demonstrating AI's transformative potential in cancer care is AION Biosystems' TempShield device. A recent study showed that TempShield, an AI-powered wearable thermometer for oncology patients, can reduce mortality rates by an astonishing 90% among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and inpatient hospital stays by 79%. This innovation addresses a crucial, yet often overlooked, fact: more than 50% of cancer deaths are preventable because they result from infections like pneumonia rather than cancer itself. If you spot a temperature spike (and hence an infection) early and treat it, you save lives. TempShield's continuous temperature monitoring provides clinicians with alerts up to 72 hours before symptoms of infection appear, enabling earlier intervention. 'The real danger in cancer care isn't just the disease—it's the complications we miss,' said Sam Barend, CEO of AION Biosystems. 'TempShield is a game-changer: small, simple, and affordable, and it's helping save lives by catching infections before symptoms appear—just like the blood glucose monitor did for diabetes.' AI is revolutionizing cancer care, not only improving outcomes but also making treatment more affordable. Early detection, personalized treatment, and more efficient surgeries all contribute to lowering the financial burden on patients while providing better care. With innovations like the ArteraAI Prostate Test and TempShield, AI is making cancer care smarter, more accessible, and more cost-effective for patients across the globe. As AI technologies continue to evolve, they will undoubtedly play an even greater role in both saving lives and reducing the financial strain of cancer treatment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store