Reverse Fire: Crews battle wildfire west of Fredericksburg
FREDERICKSBURG, Texas (KXAN) — Crews were battling a wildfire just west of Fredericksburg in Gillespie County on Tuesday and officials named it the Reverse Fire.
The affected area is estimated at 75 acres and it's 45% contained as of Tuesday night, per a press release.
The fire broke out around 2:45 p.m. near the 400 block of East Grand Oaks Drive, the release said. It has generally moved east and north and is located before U.S Highway 290 and Reeh-Weinheimer Road.
Fredericksburg Fire/EMS Department, in conjunction with the volunteer fire departments of Gillespie County, crews from across the region and the Texas A&M Forest Service continue to battle the blaze.
'Thanks to the coordination and quick response of our crews, we were able to get containment started on this fire,' said Fredericksburg Fire Chief Lynn Bizzell. Bizzell said the cedar trees and numerous piles of dead vegetation throughout the area have continued to ignite and throw embers to start new spot fires.
'Our team will continue to work throughout the night to make sure there are no flare-ups,' Bizzell assured.
There are no known road closures at this time, and the cause of the fire has not been determined, officials said.
The city urged the public to avoid the area as crews continue to work. People in the area should listen to crews on the ground and residents were encouraged to avoid activities that could potentially ignite additional fires.
Gillespie County remains in exceptional drought conditions.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
2025 SEC softball championship live score updates: Oklahoma vs Texas A&M in Athens, Georgia
It's the final day of the 2025 SEC softball Tournament and only two teams are left standing. 1-seeded Oklahoma will face off with 2-seeded Texas A&M at Jack Turner Stadium in Athens at 1 p.m. on the SEC Network. The game, which was originally scheduled for 5 p.m., was moved forward due to projected inclement weather in the Classic City. Advertisement The Sooners have never won an SEC Tournament, having just joined the conference this academic calendar. But they do have nine Big 12 Tournament championships all under current coach Patty Gasso. The Aggies have not won an SEC Tournament since their lone title in 2008 under former coach Jo Evans. BEFORE YOU GO: SEC softball Tournament parking, schedule in Athens, Georgia AWARDS: USA TODAY Sports Network 2025 All-SEC softball coach and player of the year What channel is the 2025 SEC softball championship? Streaming: SEC Network 1-seeded Oklahoma and 2-seeded Texas A&M's SEC championship game will be streamed through SEC Network. Fans looking to stream the games can go to the ESPN app or use Fubo, which offers a free trial for new members. Advertisement TICKETS: How to attend 2025 SEC softball championships in Athens 2025 SEC softball championship start time 1-seeded Oklahoma will play 2-seeded Texas A&M at 1 p.m. on Saturday, May 10, to close the SEC Tournament. The game was originally set for 5 p.m., but has been moved forward for unknown reasons. Oklahoma vs Texas A&M softball history Series record: Oklahoma leads, 53-30 Oklahoma's last win: Feb. 24, 2023; 8-0 (5 inn.) Texas A&M's last win: April 14, 2012; 4-0 BRACKET: Full TV schedule, seedings for 2025 championship 2025 SEC softball championship live score updates This section will be updated when the game begins. 2025 SEC softball Tournament schedule All times Eastern Tuesday, May 6 Game 1: No. 12 Georgia 8, No. 13 Kentucky 0 Game 2: No. 11 Ole Miss 1, No. 14 Missouri 0 Game 3: No. 10 Alabama 3, No. 15 Auburn 2 Wednesday, May 7 Game 4: No. 9 LSU 5, No. 8 Mississippi State 0 Game 5: No. 5 Arkansas 5, No. 12 Georgia 1 Game 6: No. 11 Ole Miss 6, No. 6 Florida 3 (8 innings) Game 7: No. 7 South Carolina 6, No. 10 Alabama 2 Thursday, May 8 Game 8: No. 1 Oklahoma 4, No. 9 LSU 1 Game 9: No. 5 Arkansas 6, No. 4 Tennessee 1 Game 10: No. 3 Texas 7, No. 11 Ole Miss 6 Game 11: No. 2 Texas A&M 12, No. 7 South Carolina 4 (5 innings) Friday, May 9 Game 12: No. 1 Oklahoma 8, No. 5 Arkansas 5 Game 13: No. 2 Texas A&M 14, No. 3 Texas 2 Saturday, May 10 Game 14: No. 1 Oklahoma vs. No. 2 Texas A&M | 1 p.m. | ESPN (Fubo) Advertisement We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn't influence our coverage. This article originally appeared on Athens Banner-Herald: 2025 SEC softball championship live score updates: Oklahoma vs Texas AM
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Shade in Austin: Is it the same for everyone?
AUSTIN (KXAN) — While Austin ranks high for providing shade, some portions of the city could provide even more, especially as summer approaches, according to an organization that worked on a map to show what parts of the city have tree cover. Meteorological summer officially began June 1, and this means that temperatures in Austin, Texas, will only continue to rise and affect those spending time outside. The Shade Map, developed by American Forests and the UCLA Luskin Center of Innovation, indicates that Austin has approximately 33 million trees providing natural shade and cooling. This number places the city at a 92 on the Tree Equity Score, indicating strong overall tree coverage for the city overall. While this number is high, tree distribution is not necessarily equal across neighborhoods, meaning not everyone receives the same coverage, the study found. People can use the map to see how shady routes to school or work are. The map shows west Austin has more shade than east Austin. It also found most shade to sidewalks, in particular, comes from trees. How cool are trees? Austin tree canopy is growing 'Austin sidewalks get on average 30-60% shade over the course of a day – leaving residents in the full sun at least half the time when commuting to school or work. Even the lushest neighborhoods with extensive tree cover have only 49% shade at noon,' American Forests said in a release. According to the Shade Map, trees provide 300 times more shade than buildings at midday, highlighting the crucial role trees play in urban heat protection, according to Benita Hussain at American Forests. With temperatures frequently rising above 100 degrees in Austin, shade aids in preventing extreme heat exposure. Using the tree equality score feature on the shade map, Hussain urges the City of Austin to collaborate with organizations such as TreeFolks and the Austin Parks Foundation to fill in the gaps. Hussain also stated it is important to maintain and protect existing tree infrastructure and consider trees as 'living infrastructure' — not just greenery, but essential for urban health. Check pavement temperatures before walking your dog 'It's everything from protecting our current trees in those spots in addition to certainly planting more trees,' Hussain said. 'We want cities to say, 'Look. Look at the shade, look at the trees, and the cooling benefits,'' Hussain said. 'How do we invest in places that don't have enough trees? We don't have enough shade in order to meet what we see is a public health need across the city. What would it take to be able to address some of those areas that might be problem spots that have less tree cover?' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Extreme weather's true damage cost is often a mystery – that's a problem for understanding storm risk, but it can be fixed
On Jan. 5, 2025, at about 2:35 in the afternoon, the first severe hailstorm of the season dropped quarter-size hail in Chatham, Mississippi. According to the federal storm events database, there were no injuries, but it caused $10,000 in property damage. How do we know the storm caused $10,000 in damage? We don't. That estimate is probably a best guess from someone whose primary job is weather forecasting. Yet these guesses, and thousands like them, form the foundation for publicly available tallies of the costs of severe weather. If the damage estimates from hailstorms are consistently lower in one county than the next, potential property buyers might think it's because there's less risk of hailstorms. Instead, it might just be because different people are making the estimates. We are atmospheric scientists at Texas A&M University who lead the Office of the Texas State Climatologist. Through our involvement in state-level planning for weather-related disasters, we have seen county-scale patterns of storm damage over the past 20 years that just didn't make sense. So, we decided to dig deeper. We looked at storm event reports for a mix of seven urban and rural counties in southeast Texas, with populations ranging from 50,000 to 5 million. We included all reported types of extreme weather. We also talked with people from the two National Weather Service offices that cover the area. Typically, two specific types of extreme weather receive special attention. After a tornado, the National Weather Service conducts an on-site damage survey, examining its track and destruction. That survey forms the basis for the official estimate of a tornado's strength on the enhanced Fujita scale. Weather Service staff are able to make decent damage cost estimates from knowledge of home values in the area. They also investigate flash flood damage in detail, and loss information is available from the National Flood Insurance Program, the main source of flood insurance for U.S. homes. Most other losses from extreme weather are privately insured, if they're insured at all. Insured loss information is collected by reinsurance companies – the companies that insure the insurance companies – and gets tabulated for major events. Insurance companies use their own detailed information to try to make better decisions on rates than their competitors do, so event-based loss data by county from insurance companies isn't readily available. There's one big window into how disaster damage has changed over the years in the U.S. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, compiled information for major disasters, including insured losses by state. Bulk data won't tell communities or counties about their specific risk, but it enabled NOAA to calculate overall damage estimates, which it released as its billion-dollar disasters list. From that program, we know that the number and cost of billion-dollar disasters in the United States has increased dramatically in recent years. News articles and even scientific papers often point to climate change as the primary culprit, but a much larger driver has been the increasing number and value of buildings and other types of infrastructure, particularly along hurricane-prone coasts. Critics in the past year called for more transparency and vetting of the procedures used to estimate billion-dollar disasters. But that's not going to happen, because NOAA in May 2025 stopped making billion-dollar disaster estimates and retired its user interface. Previous estimates can still be retrieved from NOAA's online data archive, but by shutting down that program, the window into current and future disaster losses and insurance claims is now closed. Emergency managers at the county level also make local damage estimates, but the resources they have available vary widely. They may estimate damages only when the total might be large enough to trigger a disaster declaration that makes relief funds available from the federal government. Without insurance data or county estimates, the local offices of the National Weather Service are on their own to estimate losses. There is no standard operating procedure that every office must follow. One office might choose to simply not provide damage estimates for any hailstorms because the staff doesn't see how it could come up with accurate values. Others may make estimates, but with varying methods. The result is a patchwork of damage estimates. Accurate values are more likely for rare events that cause extensive damage. Loss estimates from more frequent events that don't reach a high damage threshold are generally far less reliable. Do you want to look at local damage trends? Forget about it. For most extreme weather events, estimation methods vary over time and are not documented. Do you want to direct funding to help communities improve resilience to natural disasters where the need is greatest? Forget about it. The places experiencing the largest per capita damages depend not just on actual damages but on the different practices of local National Weather Service offices. Are you moving to a location that might be vulnerable to extreme weather? Companies are starting to provide localized risk estimates through real estate websites, but the algorithms tend to be proprietary, and there's no independent validation. We believe a few fixes could make NOAA's storm events database and the corresponding values in the larger SHELDUS database, managed by Arizona State University, more reliable. Both databases include county-level disasters and loss estimates for some of those disasters. First, the National Weather Service could develop standard procedures for local offices for estimating disaster damages. Second, additional state support could encourage local emergency managers to make concrete damage estimates from individual events and share them with the National Weather Service. The local emergency manager generally knows the extent of damage much better than a forecaster sitting in an office a few counties away. Third, state or federal governments and insurance companies can agree to make public the aggregate loss information at the county level or other scale that doesn't jeopardize the privacy of their policyholders. If all companies provide this data, there is no competitive disadvantage for doing so. Fourth, NOAA could create a small 'tiger team' of damage specialists to make well-informed, consistent damage estimates of larger events and train local offices on how to handle the smaller stuff. With these processes in place, the U.S. wouldn't need a billion-dollar disasters program anymore. We'd have reliable information on all the disasters. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: John Nielsen-Gammon, Texas A&M University and William Baule, Texas A&M University Read more: In 2025, Tornado Alley has become almost everything east of the Rockies − and it's been a violent year Forecasters expect a busy 2025 hurricane season – a storm scientist explains why and what meteorologists are watching 5 tips for hurricane disaster planning with aging parents starting now, before the storms John Nielsen-Gammon receives funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the State of Texas. William Baule receives funding from NOAA, the State of Texas, & the Austin Community Foundation.
