logo
Israeli strike rocks Iranian state TV during live broadcast

Israeli strike rocks Iranian state TV during live broadcast

1News13 hours ago

Dust and debris filled an Iranian state television studio and an anchor rushed off camera when an Israeli strike hit during a live broadcast, an hour after Israel issued a warning for the area of Tehran where the station is located.
Sahar Emami, an anchor at the Islamic Republic of Iran News Network, was seen hurrying off-camera as the screen behind her cut out. People on set were heard saying "Allahu akbar," the Arabic phrase for God is great.
The broadcast quickly switched to pre-recorded programs. Soon, Emami came back live from another studio and was seen speaking with another anchor. She said 'bodies of reporters" were at the site of the initial broadcast, and images showed smoke and flames in the sky. The station later said that the building was hit by four bombs.
Israel's defence minister took immediate credit for the attack.
Sahar Emami reacts to an Israeli strike while on air at the Islamic Republic of Iran News Network (Source: Supplied)
ADVERTISEMENT
"The Iranian regime's propaganda and incitement broadcasting authority was attacked by the IDF after a widespread evacuation of the area's residents," Israel Katz said in a statement. "We will strike the Iranian dictator everywhere."
Esmaeil Baqaei, spokesman for the Iranian foreign minister, condemned the strike, calling on the international community to demand justice from Israel for its attack on the media. "The world is watching: targeting Iran's news agency #IRIB's office during live broadcast is a wicked act of war crime," Baqaei wrote on X.
An hour earlier, the Israeli military had issued an evacuation warning affecting up to 330,000 people in a part of central Tehran that includes the country's state TV and police headquarters, as well as three large hospitals. The IDF has issued similar evacuation warnings for civilians in parts of Gaza and Lebanon ahead of strikes.
The warning came on the fourth day of the conflict, when the Israeli military claimed it had achieved air superiority above the Iranian capital and could fly over the city without facing major threats.
Iran, meanwhile, announced it had launched some 100 missiles and vowed further retaliation for sweeping attacks on its military and nuclear infrastructure that have killed at least 224 people in the country since Friday.
So far, 24 people have been killed in Israel and more than 500 injured, Israeli officials said, after Iran launched more than 370 missiles and hundreds of drones.
The Committee to Protect Journalists said it was "appalled by Israel's bombing of Iran's state TV channel while live on air."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ninety-Five NZ Lawyers Call for Stronger Govt Stance on Israel Amidst Rising Tensions in Middle East
Ninety-Five NZ Lawyers Call for Stronger Govt Stance on Israel Amidst Rising Tensions in Middle East

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Ninety-Five NZ Lawyers Call for Stronger Govt Stance on Israel Amidst Rising Tensions in Middle East

Ninety-five New Zealand lawyers – including 9 King's Counsel – have signed a letter to the Prime Minister and other ministers urging the Government to consider a stronger stance against Israel's actions in Gaza. The letter has been sent amidst rising tensions in the region, following Israel's surprise attacks on Iran, and Iran's attacks on Israel in response. The letter's signatories come from all levels of seniority in the legal community including senior barristers, law firm partners, legal academics, and in-house lawyers. The letter cites UN sources that document the steadily deteriorating plight of civilians in Gaza, featuring escalating levels of bombardment, forced displacement, blockades of aid and deliberate targeting of hospitals, aid workers and journalists, and notes key responses to date. In July 2024 the International Court of Justice (ICJ) declared Israel's continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory to be unlawful. In September last year New Zealand voted in favour of a UN General Assembly resolution calling upon all UN Member States to comply with their obligations under international law and take concrete steps to address Israel's ongoing presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. At the time, New Zealand noted it expected Israel to take meaningful steps towards compliance with international law including withdrawal from the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The letter comments that Israel has done nothing of the sort. The letter goes on to point out that in May this year Independent UN Experts demanded immediate international intervention to 'end the violence or bear witness to the annihilation of the Palestinian population in Gaza.' UN experts have observed the occurrence of over 52,535 deaths, of which 70 percent continue to be women and children. The Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, Tom Fletcher has called for a response 'as humanitarians' urging 'Humanity, the law and reason must prevail'. The letter urges the Government to consider a stronger response including to condemn Israel's unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, to review immediately all diplomatic and political and economic ties with Israel, and to go further in imposing sanctions after New Zealand imposed sanctions on two extremist Israeli politicians. One of the letter's signatories, barrister Max Harris, says: 'This letter reflects rising concern among the general community about Israel's breaches of international law.' 'The Government has tried to highlight red lines for Israel, but these have been repeatedly crossed, and it's time that the Government considers doing more, in line with international law,' adds Harris. Aedeen Boadita-Cormican, another barrister who has signed the letter, says: 'The Government could do more to follow through on how it has voted at the United Nations and what it has said internationally.' 'This letter shows the depth of concern in the legal community about Israel's actions,' adds Boadita-Cormican.

Self-Defence And Acceptable Murder: Netanyahu Dreams Of Regime Change
Self-Defence And Acceptable Murder: Netanyahu Dreams Of Regime Change

Scoop

time7 hours ago

  • Scoop

Self-Defence And Acceptable Murder: Netanyahu Dreams Of Regime Change

These are the sorts of things that tend to be discussed in bunkered facilities and grimy locker rooms. Now, very much in the open and before the presses, the head of state of one country is openly advocating murdering another head of state before news outlets with little reaction. Lawbreaking has become chic, and Israel has taken the lead. The pre-emptive, illegal strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure by Israel was not merely an attempt to arrest an alleged existential threat from yielding fruit (that weapons of mass destruction canard again); it was also a murderous exercise of institutional decapitation. Instead of receiving widespread condemnation in the halls of Washington, Brussels and other European capitals, there was cool nonchalance: Israel was within its right to limitlessly expand its idea of self-defence, a concept now so broad it has become a crime against peace. We have seen how that self-defence so far operates. In Gaza, it functions on the level of starvation, the levelling of critical infrastructure, the killing of scores of civilians in each strike, the displacement of populations by the hundreds of thousands, the murdering of aid workers, and shooting those desperately in need of humanitarian aid as it is rationed by private security companies. Regarding Iran, the flexible scope of Israeli self-defence includes the killing of a thick layer of military leaders, preferably while sleeping in the bosom of their families. Such figures include Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces; Hossein Salami, head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC); Amir Ali Hajizadeh, head of the air force wing of the IRGC; Esmail Qaani, commander of the IRGC's Quds Force; and Ali Shamkhani, an aide to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Of the scientists associated with Iran's nuclear program, some 25 are on the assassination list, what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu libellously designated 'Hitler's nuclear team'. Thus far, the murders of 14 have been confirmed by sources cited in the Times of Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces have published some of their names, including nuclear engineering specialist Fereydoon Abbasi; physics expert Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi; chemical engineer Akbar Motalebi Zadeh; and nuclear physicist Ahmadreza Zolfaghari Daryani. Many of the figures are said by Israel to have been the intellectual progeny of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the touted father of the Iranian nuclear project. Having killed the father in 2020, Israel has, with biblical brutality, sought to exterminate the brood and rob the cradle. With a mechanical formality bordering on the glacial, an IDF statement declared that, 'The elimination of the scientists was made possible following in-depth intelligence research that intensified over the past year, as part of a classified and compartmentalized IDF plan.' The attacks have broadened, suggesting a nationwide program of destabilisation. Oil and gas facilities have been struck, including the world's biggest gas field, the South Pars. Not satisfied, Defence Minister Israel Katz promised to attack Iran's media outlets, having an eye on Iranian state broadcaster IRIB: 'The Iranian propaganda and incitement mouthpiece is on its way to disappear.' True to his word, the outlet was attacked even as TV anchor Sahar Emami was broadcasting, a crime captured in real time. In doing so, Israel replicates its own efforts in Gaza, which have seen the killing of 178 journalists since October 2023, the most lethal conflict ever recorded for media workers. Netanyahu will not stop there. He smells the vapours of regime change and societal chaos, and, as his American counterparts did on eve of their illegally led invasion of Iraq in 2003, merrily feeds the notion that foreign interference can masquerade as liberation. 'I believe the day of your liberation is near,' he haughtily proclaimed to Iran's downtrodden subjects. His most wishful target yet remains the religious leaders of the country. In an interview with ABC news, the Israeli PM was frank that killing Khamenei would not escalate the conflict so much as end it. He had been reluctantly dissuaded from doing so by US President Donald Trump, according to Reuters, Associated Press, Axios and Israel's Channel 13. To Axios, a US official said that the administration had 'communicated to the Israelis that President Trump is opposed to that. The Iranians haven't killed an American, and discussion of killing political leaders should not be on the table.' Given Israel's elastic stretching of self-defence, such restraint is likely to change. Not wishing to be too modest, Netanyahu would have you think that he has done the world a moral service. 'I'll tell you what would have come if we hadn't acted,' he boasted in a video message. 'We had information that this unscrupulous regime was planning to give the nuclear weapons that they would develop to their terrorist proxies. That's nuclear terrorism on steroids. That would threaten the entire world.' These words are a chilling echo of the rationale used by the George W. Bush administration in attacking Saddam Hussein's Iraq, ostensibly to disarm him of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that had already been eliminated. (The US had, as cheer leaders and supporters, those other fine students of international law: the United Kingdom and Australia.) As part of Washington's 'Global War on Terror', President Bush explained in his 2002 State of the Union address that North Korea, Iran and Iraq constituted an 'axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.' By seeking WMDs, such states 'could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred.' Many justifications for using force in international relations, especially regarding the language of illegal war, are reruns of plagiarism. For Netanyahu, killing Iranian leaders and the scientific intelligentsia was a salvaging antidote, a point he was trying to impress upon his US allies. 'Our enemy is your enemy… We're dealing with something that will threaten all of us sooner or later. Our victory will be your victory.' Forget international law and its contrivances, its disciplining protocols and hindering conventions. In its place, an unvarnished rogue state which, by any other name, would be as criminally dangerous.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store