If passed, Texas bill could charge transgender people with 'gender identity fraud'
A bill proposed in the Texas legislature could charge transgender Texans with a state felony if they commit what proponents call 'gender identity fraud.'
Republican state Rep. Tom Oliverson, who represents a part of Houston in District 130, introduced House Bill 3817. If passed, it would amend the Texas Penal Code to add a new form of fraud related to gender identity.
According to the bill, a person would commit "gender identity fraud" if they "knowingly make a false or misleading verbal or written statement to a governmental entity or the person's employer by identifying the person's biological sex as the opposite of the biological sex assigned to the person at birth."
The penalty if someone were to commit "gender identity fraud" would be a state felony, which could land a person in jail for up to two years and a $10,000 fine. The bill is not expected to pass, according to the Texas Legislature tracker, as it has no co-sponsors and has not moved to any committees.
Oliverson did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment on Monday.
HB 3817, if passed, would essentially ban transgender people in the state from sharing their gender identity with employers, but could also apply to interactions with police or applications for government benefits.
This latest proposed bill is not the only anti-transgender policy in the state.
Last month, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched an investigation into the Hutto school district for allegedly violating a 2021 state law that bans students from competing in sports teams that don't align with their sex assigned at birth. Hutto joins a growing list of Texas schools to undergo such an investigation.
Paxton has also issued an opinion stating that public school students taking steroids as part of gender-affirming care would no longer be allowed to participate in University Interscholastic League (UIL) sports. Students suspected of taking steroids for such purpose would be barred from participating in athletic competitions until an investigation is concluded.
People are also reading: Employee refused to remove pronouns from email signature. A Texas agency fired him for it.
In August 2024, the Texas Department of Public Safety ordered its employees to stop allowing transgender people to change their gender on their driver's licenses and state IDs.
'The Department of Public Safety has a responsibility, as stated in its own name, to keep all Texans safe. This policy does the opposite,' the ACLU said of the change. 'Not having accurate driver's licenses jeopardizes trans people's health and safety — by potentially outing us and exposing us to discrimination, harassment, and violence.'
Then less than a month later, the state stopped allowing people to change the sex listed on their birth certificates, according to the Texas Tribune.
With the 89th Texas Legislative Session underway since early January, almost 100 anti-trans bills have been filed so far, according to the Trans Legislation Tracker. The number has already surpassed the 69 anti-trans bills filed during the last legislative session in 2023.
Oliverson himself has been a key sponsor of another anti-trans bill in the Texas legislature before. During the 2023 legislative session, he was a sponsor of Senate Bill 14, which banned gender-affirming care in the state and was upheld by the state Supreme Court.
— USA TODAY contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas anti-trans bill would charge people with 'gender identity fraud'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk apology to Trump could reopen path for renewed alliance says Dan Ives
-- Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a note Wednesday that Elon Musk's recent apology to President Donald Trump could reopen the path for a renewed alliance, which he views as a "smart move with [the] Robotaxi launch on deck." Musk posted on X, "I regret some of my posts about President Trump last week, They went too far." The Wedbush analyst believes this marks an "important step" in mending fences between the two. Ives feels the apology is crucial because "Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk." The firm has observed that the "former BFFs turn against each other has been an overhang on shares of Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA)," as investors feared a "Trump in revenge mode will make it more difficult for an autonomous future with Tesla front and center." While not expecting a return to their "Mar-a-Lago connected at the hip days," Wedbush anticipates they will "slowly mend the fences" as Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party, and Musk needs Trump for various reasons, including a "green light on a federal framework for autonomous." The timing of the reconciliation is considered notable as Tesla is set to launch its highly anticipated Robotaxi in Austin on June 22. Wedbush sees this as a "major endeavor for Musk and Tesla" and believes the "Trump feud is not getting in the way of this." The core focus for investors, according to Ives, is the "AI Revolution is now coming to Tesla," which will position Tesla as "one of the best pure plays on AI over the next decade" alongside companies like Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT). Wedbush estimates the "AI and autonomous opportunity is worth at least $1 trillion alone for Tesla" and fully expects that "under a Trump White House, these key initiatives will get fast-tracked." They believe "Tesla could reach a $2 trillion market cap by the end of 2026 in a bull case scenario," as the "march to a $2 trillion valuation for TSLA has now begun." Related articles Musk apology to Trump could reopen path for renewed alliance says Dan Ives Ouster shares surge on Pentagon approval for lidar sensor Tesla gains as Musk says he regrets some Trump-related posts Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With Rick Perry's backing and $50 million from the state, Texas set to become a leader in psychedelics research
As Texas sets to crack down on the recreational use of cannabis, state leaders are opting to invest $50 million in another plant with purported medicinal benefits – a psychedelic called ibogaine. For several years, people have silently traveled to clinics in Mexico to take ibogaine. The extract of an ancient African shrub has been used across the Texas border to alleviate addiction and brain trauma. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is set to sign Senate Bill 2308 on Wednesday, creating a consortium of universities, hospitals, and drug developers to conduct clinical trials on an ibogaine drug, with the hopes of receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Lawmakers approved $50 million in taxpayer dollars to support this effort, making Texas the global leader in psychedelic research investment. Since Texas is trying to be the first to develop the drug, the legislation ensures Texas retains control of the research and development process. The goal of this investment is to ensure Texans reap the economic benefits from an ibogaine treatment program, not a pharmaceutical company. The investment entitles Texas to at least 20% of any successful ibogaine drug resulting from the trials, with a quarter of that revenue allocated to a fund for state veterans. After a failed attempt in Kentucky to start a state-funded ibogaine drug, Texas has picked up the effort under the leadership of a familiar statewide figure-turned psychedelics cheerleader — former Gov. Rick Perry. 'None of this is possible without Perry,' said Bryan Hubbard, the former chair of the Kentucky Opioid Abatement Advisory Commission and current executive director of the American Ibogaine Initiative. 'He made it happen in Texas. That is a big deal and catches the attention of the nation.' Ibogaine is an illegal drug that has found itself in a unique position where Republicans champion it. This comes as some of them, led by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, have made it a mission this session to ban recreational use of THC, which awaits Abbott's approval. Katharine Neill Harris, a drug policy fellow at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, said it's easy for Republicans to sign on to ibogaine because the intent of it is to medicinally treat addiction. 'Also, this bill doesn't grant public access to ibogaine, and there's nothing in the bill that could really be construed as soft on drugs,' she said. For that reason seemingly, Patrick has publicly thrown his support toward ibogaine as he fends off critics from the left and right for his hardline views on THC. Patrick did not respond to a request for a comment for this story. Harris said Texas' investment in ibogaine could kickstart a trend across states to invest in drug research to address addiction, as private funds have become inconsistent. 'In 2024, the FDA rejected a proposal to approve MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD is one of the more studied alternative psychedelic treatment protocols, and the FDA rejection was a huge blow to private industry, likely leading some to rethink investment in this area,' she said. It was early 2022, and the only thing former Army Ranger Chase Rowan could think about was killing himself. Sixteen years prior, his parachute failed to fully deploy during a nighttime training exercise as his body careened toward the ground at 60 miles per hour. To cope through the pain from the severe brain injury that resulted, the Lubbock resident turned to opioids which morphed into a fentanyl addiction that eventually dissolved his family. 'I was stuck alone. I had no money and no vehicle, just white knuckling sobriety,' Rowan said. When Rowan got to Mexico to test out a novel drug called ibogaine in August of 2022, he wasn't scared, but determined to heal. Upon taking the ibogaine pill, Rowan started seeing images — one of a devil with wings and another of roads leading to childhood memories. The psychedelic journey on his first night opened his eyes to past trauma and the pain he caused to those around him, like a movie. He woke up the next day feeling the happiest he had been in 20 years. 'It felt like a weight was lifted off of me,' he said. 'I got that stuff out of me.' What Rowan was dealing with is a particular high that comes from ibogaine that is often referred to as a 'spiritual awakening' or a greater sense of self. Stanford Medicine conducted a study in 2024 that found 'ibogaine, when combined with magnesium to protect the heart, safely and effectively reduces PTSD, anxiety and depression and improves functioning in veterans with' traumatic brain injury. Hubbard sees no threat of ibogaine becoming recreationally used or abused since it does not provide an enjoyable high and leaves the user in a state of temporary paralysis. Because of this, most never go back for another dose. 'There is no street economy for this drug,' Hubbard said. Ibogaine also comes with potential dangers. Harris calls it one of the 'more complicated psychedelics to administer' because it brings risks of cardiac issues and sudden death. The risks make it more expensive to study and to provide as a treatment, drawing out the years that ibogaine becomes more widely available, Harris said. 'If the FDA were to approve ibogaine for opioid use disorders or other disorders…the treatment could be quite costly,' Harris said. Since leaving his two-year stint as U.S. Energy Secretary during the first Trump administration, Perry has thrown the weight of his reputation behind psychedelics, becoming one of the most high-profile advocates of its research nationally. But the journey to this point started when he still occupied the Governor's Mansion in Austin. 'It's the question I hear the most,' Perry said with a laugh. 'What is a right-wing anti-drug governor doing associated with psychedelics?' In 2006, Perry became close with Navy SEAL veteran Marcus Luttrell who struggled from a brain injury, PTSD and addiction, without access to effective treatments. He recalls Luttrell sleeping with the TV and lights on, trying to comfort his battered mind. When Luttrell told him he was planning to go to Mexico with several other veterans to try ibogaine, Perry was skeptical. 'I remember the first time he told me, and I looked at him the same way a dog does when they hear a funny noise. I remember telling him to be careful with that because I still had my beliefs on drugs at the time, but at the same time, people that I trusted were going to Mexico for this, I had to listen,' Perry said. The data was indisputable to Perry. He unequivocally believes ibogaine takes away addiction and he is ready to tell anyone who will ask him about it. He has since gone on to the Joe Rogan podcast to wax poetic about the drug and other psychedelic treatments. He is a scheduled speaker for a psychedelic conference in Denver. He is also planning to reach out to officials in Israel and Ukraine to initiate ibogaine treatment programs there. 'I have always been open to new knowledge. The same thing with criminal justice reform and in-state tuition, as a Republican, I have my beliefs, but I am willing to change them once looking at the data and science,' Perry said. Hubbard cautioned that ibogaine is not a drug to be taken without medical supervision and Texas is probably at least six years away from seeing any movement on FDA approval for clinical trials. However, he is hopeful that the drug qualifies for a Breakthrough Therapy designation, a pathway that accelerates the regulatory review of drugs showing early promise in treating severe conditions. As of June 30, 2024, the FDA has only granted 587 designations out of the 1,516 requested since 2012. Hubbard believes the current presidential administration will see the momentum in Texas and help expedite the process with the FDA. 'If Texas can create a treatment plan for ibogaine, it might be the most significant achievement in modern medicine for nearly a century,' said Hubbard. Disclosure: Rice University and Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass. governor's race intensifies as GOP candidates seize on LA protests
If you're a member of the Bay State's political and chattering class, and you needed a reminder that Massachusetts is officially in the thick of a gubernatorial campaign season, then you didn't have to look much further than your email inbox on Monday. There, you would have found dueling press releases from Mike Kennealy and Brian Shortsleeve, the two former Baker administration officials dueling for the GOP nomination for the Corner Office in 2026. The target, inevitably, was Democratic Gov. Maura Healey, who'd signed onto a statement with her fellow Democratic governors criticizing the Trump administration's decision to federalize National Guard forces in response to immigration protests in Los Angeles. The statement, issued through the Democratic Governors Association, took the Republican White House to task for its unusual decision to sidestep Golden State Gov. Gavin Newsom when it called in the National Guard — which 700 U.S. Marines have since supplemented. The White House's end-run was 'an alarming abuse of power. Governors are the commanders-in-chief of their National Guard, and activating them within their own borders without consulting or working with a state's governor is ineffective and dangerous,' the DGA's statement asserted. Kennealy, who served as Baker's housing and economic development czar, was first out of the gate at little after 4 p.m., arguing that, by opposing the federal response, the Democratic incumbent was 'legitimizing criminal behavior under the guise of protest.' Shortsleeve, who ran the MBTA under Baker, followed up around 6:30 p.m. He got in a similar shot, condemning Healey for appearing to side with 'rioting protesters waving foreign flags' who were 'violently attacking American law enforcement officers.' Shortsleeve also slammed Healey for her management of the state's hugely expensive migrant crisis and, by implication, her criticism of the aggressive tactics of federal immigration agents as they've rounded up undocumented people across the state. 'If cooperation between the federal and state governments is what she wants, you wouldn't know it by her refusal to work in an orderly way to ensure criminal illegal immigrants in our state were delivered to federal law enforcement for deportation instead of released onto our streets,' Shortsleeve said. Kennealy, who didn't explicitly mention the migrant crisis, but who has been publicly critical, observed that 'when the federal government offers help to restore order and protect citizens, we take it — because doing the right thing for our people should always come before scoring partisan points.' Read More: Rümeysa Öztürk chose grace over bitterness. What we can learn | John L. Micek Taken together, the broadsides from the two Republican hopefuls were a reminder that the migrant crisis, which has subsided in its intensity, remains a potent line of attack, and that the Democratic incumbent remains vulnerable on the issue. More than half of respondents (52%) to a UMass Amherst/WCVB-TV poll in February, for instance, said they disapproved of the Arlington Democrat's management of the shelter crisis. Their mood was reflective of national trends. A broader UMass poll in April found Americans to be of 'two minds' on the issue, supporting a path to citizenship, even as they supported the White House's moves against migrants with criminal records. A CBS News poll completed before Saturday's unrest in Los Angeles, however, provided a reminder that public patience for the White House's tactics extends only so far. That's because support for enforcement against non-criminals drops off precipitously, the poll found. While 55% of respondents approved of Trump's deportation goals, only 44% approved of his approach to the deportation effort. Healey, in public appearances, repeatedly has drawn that line. She's stressed that she supports taking criminals off the streets, even as she's decried the apparent shroud of secrecy that's enveloped the apprehension of such noncriminal migrants as Tufts University graduate student Rümeysa Öztürk and Milford High School student-athlete Marcelo Gomes da Silva. Read More: Gov. Healey demands answers after ICE arrests Mass. high school student 'This is part of the problem that we're seeing with ICE across the country. And certainly here in Massachusetts, people are being picked up. We have no information about their circumstances,' Healey said after an unrelated news conference at the State House last month. 'There have been real questions raised about due process and whether or not ICE and immigration officials are ... complying with due process here and in other states. And we need answers.' It's not clear, however, if the Massachusetts voters were grasping the subtlety of that policy fine line. An internal poll by Kennealy's campaign pointed to a similar vulnerability for Healey on immigration issues, The Boston Herald reported last month. And 49% of respondents to a University of New Hampshire poll last week said they approved of her job performance, compared to 45% who said they disapproved. With the poll's 3.3% margin of error, that's a statistical dead heat. Even still, Healey's loyalists pounced on the UNH canvass, dismissing it as an outlier, as they pointed to other public polling that showed her more broadly popular overall. 'Governor Healey is going to earn reelection because she understands Massachusetts people need someone who's going to fight to lower costs for them, going to fight to increase housing opportunities for them, going to fight back against Donald Trump,' state Democratic Party Chairperson Steve Kerrigan said during an interview on WBZ-TV's 'Keller @ Large' program that aired last weekend. 'And frankly, neither Mike Kennealy nor Brian Shortsleeve are willing to do any of that.' The lingering question is what happens if Massachusetts, which already has been targeted by the White House, finds itself facing a Los Angeles-style protest that results in Trump doing a gubernatorial end-run by federalizing the state National Guard or, at its extreme end, dispatching U.S. troops to Boston or some other city. If elected, would Kennealy or Shortsleeve acquiesce in the face of such an action? Or would they protest a usurpation of their executive authority? At that point, the question moves from political to practical. Healey staked out her territory with that DGA statement. The responses from Shortsleeve and Kennealy would speak volumes about how they intend to lead during what presumably would be the final two years of Trump's term. That's something that Massachusetts voters would have to decide for themselves. Which makes their answers bear watching. Can the Mass. GOP flip this Taunton state House seat? | Bay State Briefing Mass. lawmakers get bad grades on industry report card. But who's failing whom? | John L. Micek Math is hard. Midterm math is harder. The lessons Mass. needs to learn for 2026 | John L. Micek Read the original article on MassLive.
