Trump Meets With Security Team After Demanding Iran ‘Surrender'
President Donald Trump was meeting with his national security team in Washington on Tuesday to discuss the escalating Middle East conflict, according to people familiar with the matter, fueling fresh speculation that the US is on the verge of joining Israel's attack on Iran.
Before gathering his advisers in the White House Situation Room, Trump posted a demand for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' and warned of a possible strike against the country's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out , at least not for now,' Trump posted on social media.
Israel also sought to ratchet up pressure on Iran, signaling it will intensify a campaign of air strikes that have targeted the country's nuclear facilities as well as military leaders and infrastructure. US weapons are seen as key to achieving a more complete destruction of the Islamic Republic's atomic program than anything Israel can do alone.
The escalating war began with an Israeli attack late last week and has seen the sworn enemies trade missile salvos for five days. Trump departed early from the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada to deal with the crisis.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who's also attending that summit, told the country's public broadcaster ZDF that a US decision on whether to join the war militarily would come 'in the course of the day' and said that if Iran doesn't return to the negotiating table, then 'the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear program may be on the agenda.'
Iran had been negotiating with the US for weeks over a nuclear deal before Israel launched its surprise assault.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed to step up the campaign on Tuesday, saying the military will attack 'very significant targets in Tehran' and adding that residents should evacuate. Earlier in the day, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces said that, while it's too early to assess the success of the current campaign in Iran, strikes on the country's nuclear facilities are 'deepening' every day.
Iran's state-run Islamic Republic News Agency cited the country's armed forces chief of staff as saying that it plans a 'punitive operation' against Israel and warned Israelis to evacuate Tel Aviv and Haifa.
Trump earlier Tuesday posted on social media that 'we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' crediting US military equipment for helping Israel gain air superiority.
Katz didn't elaborate on what targets Israel might aim to hit and Trump hasn't spelled out his next steps.
Vice President JD Vance told reporters Tuesday that Trump is 'making clear to the American people and the entire world that the US policy is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, and part of that is that they are not allowed' to enrich uranium, adding that 'there are many different ways and different options at the president's disposal for how to accomplish that policy goal.'
US stocks declined on Tuesday as Trump played down the possibility of negotiations with Iran, fueling widespread fears the war will spread to other countries in the oil- and gas-producing region.
Trump's exit from the G-7 followed another 24 hours of intense bombardments, with Iran firing ballistic missiles and Israel striking targets across the Islamic Republic, including the capital of Tehran. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group is sailing to the Middle East ahead of schedule, marking the first significant move of American military assets to the region since Friday. Reuters reported that the US military was deploying more fighters and other warplanes to the region.
New satellite images suggest Israeli strikes damaged underground uranium-enrichment facilities at Natanz, Iran's primary nuclear-fuel production site, the United Nations nuclear watchdog said in a post on X. The International Atomic Energy Agency has yet to detect damage at Iran's other underground enrichment site in Fordow, according to the statement.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a longtime advocate of war against Iran, said he '100% supports' US participation in striking Fordow.
'I'm all in for destroying their nuclear program. You can't do it without destroying Fordow,' he told reporters in Washington. 'If it takes bombs, bunker-buster bombs, so be it. If we need to fly with Israel, so be it.' Graham added that 'the window for diplomacy has passed, we're in the land of force.'
Israel has sought to draw the US — which has provided defensive support against Iranian missile fire — deeper into the conflict. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told ABC News on Monday that the countries share a common enemy in Iran, and that it's in America's interest to support Israel.
Trump has left open the possibility of further talks on Iran's atomic activities after five earlier rounds, but continued to hammer the idea that Tehran is at fault for not having already agreed to a deal that would have prevented Israel's attacks. He told reporters that he 'may' send a high-level official, such as special envoy Steven Witkoff or Vance, to meet with Iran.
Trump is 'telling Iran you can put a stop to this,' Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley said after speaking with the president on Tuesday.
Israel said it saw a drop-off in Iranian fire on Tuesday, with a military spokesperson saying 'a few dozen' missiles had been launched since midnight compared with the hundreds seen over the weekend.
Still, Israel's Oil Refineries Ltd. shut down its refinery after the complex was damaged and three employees were killed, the company said Monday. The site has a peak production capacity of close to 200,000 barrels of oil per day, with 70% of products distributed in the Israeli market, according to the company's website.
Israeli petrol station chain Sonol, which has 245 gasoline stations in the country, warned Tuesday that the closure of the Haifa refinery will likely cause disruptions to fuel supply to its Israeli customers, according to the Globes newspaper.
Long-standing tensions between Iran and Israel erupted into open fighting last week, when Israel launched surprise attacks on Iranian military and nuclear sites and killed senior commanders and atomic scientists. Since then, it has achieved air superiority over much of Iran, allowing it to bomb major cities and infrastructure at will.
For Iran's government, the showdown poses a strategic dilemma. It can't risk appearing weak, yet its retaliatory options are shrinking. Proxy forces it supports across the region have been largely degraded by Israeli wars since Oct. 2023.
More than 200 people have been killed in Iran by Israel's strikes, according to the last official tally from the Iranian government. In Israel, the government has said 24 people have been killed — the same number reported the day prior — and over 600 injured.
Oil prices have climbed in the past week as the conflict escalated, raising concerns about a wider hit to the global economy. Many analysts say Iran has the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a key energy trade route. Qatar on Tuesday asked liquefied natural gas vessels to wait outside the strait until they're ready to load amid the escalating tensions.
Two large tankers collided and caught fire near the strait early on Tuesday. The owner of one of them said the incident was 'unrelated to the current regional conflict.'
With assistance from Erik Wasson, Natalia Drozdiak, Alisa Odenheimer, Jonathan Tirone, Dan Williams and Steven T. Dennis.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Is Trump addressing the nation tonight amid Israel-Iran conflict? What we know
Multiple posts on X (formerly Twitter) are claiming that President Donald Trump is set to deliver an urgent nationwide address tonight. However, there has been no official confirmation. Trump has not made any announcement on Truth Social, nor has the White House issued a statement. Major US outlets, including CNN, USA Today, Fox News, The Washington Post, and The New York Time, have also not confirmed the reports. In response to the speculation, many social media users suggested the president might speak about the escalating Iran-Israel conflict. Some even speculated that the United States could be preparing to intervene on Israel's behalf, potentially entering into direct conflict with Iran. One person wrote on X, 'I don't want a war and to see American lives lost, but I am trusting Trump on what's best for America and our safety.' Another wrote, 'Trump to address the world. If he declares the U.S. is going to war with Iran, this will be one of those major moments in world history that will be remembered 20 years from now. The long term consequences are monumental."
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
G7 Summit 2026 To Be Hosted In France's Evian Spa Town, Macron Announces
Last Updated: Nestled in the French Alps near the Swiss border, Evian-les-Bains has long enjoyed international recognition. The 2026 summit of the Group of Seven (G7) nations will be held in Evian, a picturesque French spa town famous for its natural spring water, French President Emmanuel Macron announced during this year's summit in Kananaskis, Canada. Emmanuel Macron made the announcement through a video posted on social media and later confirmed the news while speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the summit. What Happened At This Year's G7 Summit The 2025 G7 summit in Kananaskis took place amid heightened geopolitical tensions, including trade strains involving the US and renewed focus on support for Ukraine. However, it was overshadowed by Israel's ongoing military campaign against Iran, which has dominated the agenda and side conversations among leaders. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was among the key invitees this year. About the Author Mallika Soni Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : France First Published: June 18, 2025, 04:02 IST
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘It's time for a full tariff overhaul and aligning them with broader economic goals': Ajay Srivastava at explained.Live
Tariffs are essentially taxes that countries impose on imports to protect their domestic industries. When a country wants to shield local producers from foreign competition, it puts a tax on imported goods. Under the World Trade Organization (WTO), every member country submits a tariff schedule. This schedule outlines the maximum tariff a country can impose on each product. These are called 'bound tariffs.' Once negotiated and finalised, countries agree not to exceed these limits. For example, if India commits in its WTO schedule that the tariff on glass is 40 per cent, that becomes the bound tariff. India can lower it in the future but it cannot raise it above 40 per cent. Until recently, most countries abided by their WTO commitments and operated within those agreed limits. The problem started when US President Donald Trump began openly violating these rules. The tariffs he imposed broke at least two major WTO principles, first by exceeding the bound tariffs on a wide range of goods and second, by imposing country-specific tariffs, applying different rates on different sources. The WTO requires countries to treat imports from all member nations equally, so this step is a clear violation undermining the very foundation of the WTO system. Today, every country talks about free trade agreements (FTAs) as if they are the driving force behind global trade. In reality, less than 20 per cent of global trade happens through the preferential route, through Free Trade Agreements or FTAs. The remaining 80 per cent happens under the WTO's Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) tariffs. For countries like India, we need to focus on the 80 per cent trade that doesn't depend on FTAs to grow our exports meaningfully. India has increasingly positioned FTAs as a key tool to boost exports. Initially, our strategy was 'Look East.' We began signing FTAs with our neighbouring countries under SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area), then moved on to ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and later Australia. At one point, we were close to signing a deal with China through the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) but we withdrew at the last minute. After covering most of the East, we shifted our focus westward. We signed FTAs with Mauritius, the UAE, Switzerland and Norway. We've now announced the completion of negotiations with the UK and it's expected that we'll sign agreements with the US and the EU in the near future. Once these are finalised, India will have FTAs with more than 75 countries, covering roughly 75 per cent of global trade. So while we started late, compared to Europe or the UK, we're catching up fast. On the surface, countries like the US have average tariffs of around four per cent while India's average is closer to 17 per cent. However, this is the result of a larger, negotiated settlement under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the WTO, which the US helped broker and now conveniently ignores. During these negotiations, developed countries like the US, EU and Japan, then global leaders in global production of industrial and high-tech goods, wanted two things: One, to lower global tariffs to make it easier to sell their high-end goods. Two, to expand the scope of the global trading system beyond just goods to include intellectual property rights and services, such as finance, telecom and IT and agricultural subsidies. Developing nations, like India and China, were seen as producing low-end goods and having weaker intellectual property frameworks. Thus, the developed nations drafted the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPS, to bring Intellectual Property (IP) enforcement under the WTO, given its strong dispute settlement mechanism. The result was a trade-off: Developing countries accepted stricter rules on IP and services. In exchange, they were allowed to maintain somewhat higher tariff levels for a longer period. As part of this agreement, every country submitted a 'schedule of commitments' to the WTO for each product. For example, for glass, India might have said its maximum tariff, or 'bound tariff,' would be 40 per cent. These schedules were negotiated and accepted by all WTO members. Once the scope is set, the actual negotiations begin. Each country studies its domestic industries and identifies products and industries it would like to protect, which it considers sensitive sectors. For India, these include certain agricultural products to protect farmers and some industrial items. After industry-wide consultation, the country prepares an 'offer list', based on which tariff lines are listed in an Excel sheet. (India has around 12,800 of them.) In that list, it indicates which tariffs we'll reduce and the timing and extent of these reductions. Items to be excluded completely will be recorded in the negative or exclusion list. After both countries exchange their offer lists, they may choose to send each other request lists, asking the other to reconsider. The process continues over multiple rounds, often taking months or even years. Only after these are resolved do they announce the completion of negotiations, after which the legal teams finalise the text and the leaders of the countries sign the agreement. The agreement itself, typically, becomes effective two to three months after the signing. That's when the actual trade benefits — like lower tariffs and improved market access — start kicking in. We need to take a comprehensive look at our entire tariff structure. Right now, in every Union Budget, we make incremental changes — raise tariffs here, reduce them there — but what we haven't done is a full review of all 12,800 tariff lines. When I did a simple analysis, I found that over 90 per cent of our total Customs revenue comes from less than five per cent of our tariff lines. Meanwhile, the bottom 60 per cent of tariff lines contribute less than three per cent of revenue. So we have to ask why we are maintaining tariffs on those lines at all. A thorough review could also help us fix other long-standing issues, like inverted duty structures, where the import duty on raw materials is higher than on finished goods. That discourages domestic manufacturing because it makes local production less competitive. It has been over 25 years since we last did a full tariff overhaul. Now is the time to revisit the structure holistically. Given the number of FTAs we've signed and the structural issues in our system, it's time to conduct a proper, data-driven review. It's not just about revenue, it's about making tariffs more logical, targeted and aligned with our broader economic goals. In the late 1980s, India was ahead of China in several areas. We were exporting more computer hardware. Our pharmaceutical exports, APIs and formulations, were stronger than China's. In textiles and garments, we were neck and neck. When liberalisation came, we focussed more on deregulation without simultaneously building real manufacturing capacity. China, on the other hand, used that same period to build, sector by sector, with vision and intent. They began with textiles and garments, moved into machinery and then into electronics. They scaled up across industries methodically. Importantly, they had strong backing from American companies. What did China do differently? They applied highly strategic, foresighted policies and executed them well. In contrast, we continue to talk about increasing the share of manufacturing in our GDP, while importing the most basic items — knives, nail cutters, nuts, bolts. It's not for a lack of advanced technology, we've just never drilled down deep into the product level to build competitiveness. We need long-term commitment. We need to stop putting bureaucrats in charge of this transformation and instead identify people who have hands-on experience and empower them, set clear goals and get moving. That's how we change the trade equation, by building from the ground up.
