Badenoch not at all worried about ‘protest party' Reform
Kemi Badenoch has dismissed Reform UK as a 'protest party' as Nigel Farage prepares to hold a rally in her constituency.
The Conservative leader told broadcasters she was 'not at all' worried about Reform's presence in her North West Essex constituency, adding that talking about Labour's farming policy was 'much more important than having a rally about myself'.
The rally, which is expected to see speeches from all five of Reform's MPs, follows a spat between Mrs Badenoch and Mr Farage over party membership figures during the Christmas period.
Mrs Badenoch had disputed Reform's claim that its membership had overtaken that of the Conservatives, accusing Mr Farage of 'fakery'.
Reform strongly denied the accusation and said it was considering legal action. However, Mr Farage later said he was not going to sue, but would hold a rally with the approximately 400 Reform members in North West Essex to say 'we are coming for you at the next election'.
The Reform rally comes as polling suggests the party has pulled level with, and possibly overtaken, the Conservatives.
A Techne UK poll published on Friday showed Reform in second place with 24%, one point ahead of the Conservatives on 23% and two points behind first-placed Labour on 26%.
Asked about the polling numbers on a visit to a farm in Cheshire, Mrs Badenoch said it was 'not a surprise that at the moment protest parties are gaining in the polls'.
📊 NEW POLL: LABOUR UP AS CONS & LIB DEMS FALL, REFORM STEADY
Lab 26% (+1)Cons 23% (-1)Lib Dems 12% (-1)Reform 24% (=)Greens 7% (=)SNP 3% (+1)Others 5% (=)
👥 1633 surveyed | 🔎 29-30 Jan 2025🗓️ +/- 23 Jan 2025🔗 Data: https://t.co/beXlF4Cena #UKPolitics pic.twitter.com/Ea0nvSF2LP
— Techne UK (@techneUK) January 31, 2025
She added: 'The job that the British people have given me is to fight for them, be the leader of the opposition, hold the Government to account.
'That's why I'm here talking about the family farm tax. It's really important that we tell people what's going on with farming and how Labour's policies are going to destroy it. That's much more important than having a rally about myself.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's new bus scheme puts him on the path of failed prime ministers
Credit: Reuters, ITV Central, ITN News Northern transport schemes have become something of a panic button for prime ministers worried about falling popularity in the polls. With Sir Keir Starmer less popular than Sir Ed Davey, his Liberal Democrat counterpart, the Labour leader sent his Chancellor out to bat for him with Wednesday's announcement. Yet close watchers of politics might feel that some of the sums unveiled by Rachel Reeves, as part of what she described as 'the biggest ever investment by a British government in transport links in our city regions and the surrounding towns', are suspiciously similar to previous pledges. Those include £978 million for transport projects in the Tees Valley region, a sum previously announced in 2023 by the Tories and then placed under review by Labour after last year's general election. A similar situation holds true for the Liverpool city region, which was awarded £1.581 billion in 2023 under the city region sustainable transport settlement, after Wednesday's £1.581 billion award under Labour's newly unveiled transport for city regions funding settlements. Gareth Davies, the shadow treasury minister, said: 'Rachel Reeves is scrambling to salvage her failing economic plan after the Prime Minister has made U-turn after U-turn, punching holes in her credibility. 'She needed to do better than copying and pasting announcements made by the previous Conservative government. The country is not falling for their lies any more. Britain deserves better.' Here are some of the times in the recent past when prime ministers have reached for northern transport funding announcements to shore up their sagging popularity. Mr Brown, who succeeded Sir Tony Blair as prime minister, said he would improve public transport in Sunderland if his party won the 2010 general election. His manifesto that year also promised 'upgrades to Tyne and Wear light-rail systems' and electronic ticketing to promote 'cheap and easy' public transport across the country. It wasn't the first time Mr Brown had fallen back on promises of boosting transport spending outside London and the South East. The previous December, he opened the HS1 railway line in Kent while promising that it would become 'a blueprint for the future of high-speed rail travel in the United Kingdom'. He added, referring to the then not-yet-started project, that HS2 was going to 'make the case for a national high-speed rail network across this country'. Not long after Sir Tony handed over the premiership to Mr Brown, an act followed by a slump in the opinion polls and strong rumours of a 2008 snap election, the new prime minister was forced to deny that transport spending was skewed towards London and the South East. 'The Government has doubled expenditure on transport. It continues to move forward with its road programme, but also its rail and infrastructure programme,' Mr Brown said that year. 'And I don't think it's true to say that transport spending has been skewed to one particular area. In every part of the country, we are expanding transport according to the needs of these different areas. 'The important thing to recognise about transport is that we are investing in every part of the country.' In October 2010, the Tory-Lib Dem government announced deep public spending cuts as part of George Osborne's austerity programme, with the transport budget set for cuts of around 15 per cent. Mr Osborne spearheaded the Northern Powerhouse Rail project, a slogan that promised a lateral high-speed railway line across northern England, alongside plans for HS2 to move off the drawing board and into reality. As the 2015 general election loomed, however, David Cameron – now Baron Cameron of Chipping Norton – started adopting the familiar refrain of North-centric transport announcements in an attempt to woo voters. 'I think it is important that to reassure people in the next parliament we're going to spend three times more on other transport schemes, road and rail schemes, as we'll spend on HS2,' he told ITV News in 2014, ahead of the following year's general election. A year later, the prime minister was back out on the stump, promising in a YouTube video addressed to voters in Accrington, Lancashire: 'Today I'm here in the North West talking about how we're going to invest in our universities, in our science base, how we're going to build the roads and railways and infrastructure that we need for our future so we get a balanced recovery right across our country.' The promise may have worked: in 2015 the Conservatives secured a clear majority, meaning they could govern without their erstwhile Lib Dem coalition partners. A year after that, Mr Cameron dramatically stepped down after losing the 2016 EU membership referendum. Mr Cameron's 2016 successor was Theresa May, who felt the heat of unpopularity as early as two years into her premiership. As part of a policy intended to 'help spread growth beyond London', a total of ten city regions around the country – including Greater Manchester, Cambridge, Peterborough, Plymouth, Southampton and Sheffield, among others – were handed a total of £1.7 billion between them for transport projects. 'Our great cities and their suburbs are home to millions of people and world-beating businesses,' Mrs May said at the time. Faced with growing calls for a general election in 2019, she went on to reassure Midlands political and business leaders that the Tories were backing the full length of HS2's northern leg. She said in a letter to the Midlands Connect trade association: 'I would like to take this opportunity to assure you that the Government remains committed to delivering the whole of HS2 Phase 2, and will continue to work closely with you to ensure that the project meets your aspirations for growth and regeneration.' After Mrs May stepped down in 2019, Boris Johnson won the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election – and called a general election in the same year. Having been mayor of London, the one-time Telegraph correspondent was already firmly linked in the public imagination with transport projects – but that did not stop him from reaching for the familiar northern transport announcements when the polls were down. Mr Johnson said in an early 2020 speech: 'I want to be the prime minister who does with Northern Powerhouse Rail what we did for Crossrail in London, and today I am going to deliver on my commitment to that vision with a pledge to fund the Leeds to Manchester route.' That route has, so far, not materialised. During her 45 days in office, Liz Truss had little time to say much. Yet in the run-up to her abortive prime ministerial term, she renewed the Conservatives' pledge to build Northern Powerhouse Rail. 'Leeds is still the largest city in Europe without its own metro network and I would work to fix that. And I will get Northern Powerhouse Rail built,' she told a Tory leadership hustings in July 2022. She did not, in fact, get the train project onto the tracks during her two months in No 10. Rishi Sunak took a much bolder stance than his predecessors, being best remembered in transport circles for cancelling the northern leg of HS2 and freezing National Highways' smart motorways rollout. Yet by 2024, paving the ground for that year's general election, the Tory leader was keen to position himself as a generous benefactor for northern transport projects. 'Through reallocating HS2 funding, we're not only investing billions of pounds directly back into our smaller cities, towns and rural areas across the North and Midlands, but we are also empowering their local leaders to invest in the transport projects that matter most to their communities – this is levelling up in action,' he said in a statement that February. His government's 2023 announcement that HS2 Phase 2 funding was being redirected into various northern transport projects formed the basis of Wednesday's announcement by Rachel Reeves. Keen observers of politics watching Ms Reeves's speech could be forgiven for believing they had become trapped in the film Groundhog Day. But the refrain is so familiar from prime ministers in political hot water that it has become a predictable staple of these types of set-piece speech. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
‘We Won't Forget': Canada Marks 36th Anniversary of Tiananmen Square Massacre
Canada's embassy in China has issued a statement commemorating the June 4 anniversary of the massacre in Beijing's largest public square, where more than 30 years ago the government violently suppressed a student-led pro-democracy movement. 'We won't forget [June 4,] 1989,' wrote Canada's embassy in China in a June 3 social media The Global Affairs Canada also marked the massacre's 36th anniversary, calling it a 'violent crackdown' that killed 'many unarmed and peaceful citizens.' 'To honour the lives lost, Canada continues to call on China to uphold its human rights obligations under international law,' the agency said in a June 4 social media Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre also issued a Related Stories 6/4/2025 6/4/2024 'Even as the world watched the brutality broadcast live, the Communist government sought to repress the truth of their massacre,' Poilievre said in a June 4 statement. 'They have never shown remorse, and their oppressive tactics continue to be used today,' he added. 'We must not let their denial of history win.' The federal Conservative Party has been a vocal critic of China's human rights abuses, as well as the Chinese regime's use of transnational The U.S. government also marked the 36th anniversary of the massacre, saying that while the 'CCP actively tries to censor the facts,' the world 'will never forget.' 'Today we commemorate the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed as they tried to exercise their fundamental freedoms,' Marco Rubio, U.S. secretary of state, said in a June 3 'Their courage in the face of certain danger reminds us that the principles of freedom, democracy, and self-rule are not just American principles,' he added. 'They are human principles the CCP cannot erase.' To date, the Chinese communist regime has not disclosed the number or identity of those killed in the massacre. New Generations Unaware Cheuk Kwan, co-chair of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China, says Beijing's efforts to censor information about the 1989 massacre have led to new generations in China growing up unaware of the incident. 'Even though the world watched in horror 36 years ago, the Chinese government is eager to suppress that information,' he told The Epoch Times, noting the regime's use of censorship methods such as internet blockades and media control. 'A lot of people, a generation later, do not even know that this existed.' He says this makes efforts to raise awareness of China's oppression more difficult, because 'we have to do double duty to not only commemorate [these events], but also to pass the message to the next generation–to make sure they do not forget.' The Toronto Association for Democracy in China was founded in May 1989 to support the student protests in Tiananmen Square and continues to advocate for democratic reform in China today. In recent years, the association has commemorated the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre alongside the 2019 Hong Kong protests, saying the suppression of pro-democracy advocates in both incidents amounts to a 'generational issue' involving the 'Chinese oppression both in Beijing and now in Hong Kong.' Kwan said that while many in Western countries understand that freedom of expression 'does not exist in China,' the lived reality in China and Hong Kong may still feel distant to them. He added that people in other countries can still support efforts to uphold the values of democracy and freedom. 'It is a duty for all the people who are freedom-loving people to defend this principle of freedom and democracy: the freedom of speech, the freedom of assembly, and of course, the freedom to voice your opinion without fear of retribution,' he said. Eva Fu contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hamas is the cause of Gaza's predicament
The situation in Gaza is 'intolerable and appalling', the Prime Minister told MPs. Whose fault is that? Sir Keir Starmer laid the blame at Israel's door, whereas just a few months ago culpability would have been attached to Hamas. The terror group has got precisely what it wanted: international opinion has turned against Israel and the government of Benjamin Netanyahu must take steps to make sure they are not aiding and abetting this. He and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) must avoid turning a just cause – the defence of their homeland from the murderous predations of its enemies – into a diplomatic coup for the perpetrators. Hamas thinks nothing of using hospitals, schools or other civilian buildings to house its command posts, knowing they will be targeted by the IDF seeking to extirpate the group's command structure. Inevitably civilians are killed, but the terrorist group considers them expendable. Now, Hamas is using the efforts to bring humanitarian aid to Palestinians to further its media campaign against Israel. It is no longer able to control the delivery of food and other emergency supply because Jerusalem has cut the United Nations out of the loop. The reason for this is that when the UN ran the convoys they were intercepted by Hamas which then sold the goods at marked up prices. Israel's attempts to stop this has led to riots at aid posts, with the IDF firing on queues. This is reported by the BBC with little in the way of context. Of course, it is appalling to see civilians die in these circumstances and a ceasefire deal on terms set out by the US – accepted by Israel but rejected by Hamas – would be the best way forward. But such an outcome is increasingly difficult to achieve when the BBC's narrative that Israel is always in the wrong permeates into the political discourse. The Trump administration has criticised the Corporation for accepting Hamas's word at face value, something BBC chiefs deny. Israel is also furious with what it considers to be biased reporting. The BBC invariably reports the worst of Israel, only to add the caveat that it cannot verify reports because it is denied access to Gaza. This makes it naively vulnerable to Hamas propaganda, which it seems all too ready to swallow. There is a way around this, which is for Israel to lift its ban on foreign journalists entering Gaza independently to let them see for themselves. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
