Commentary: Chicago public officials must cut the fat before begging for taxpayer bailouts
As Yankees baseball legend and iconic quipster Yogi Berra is famously quoted as saying, 'It's deja vu all over again.'
Once again the perennially and preternaturally cash-strapped city of Chicago, State of Illinois, Chicago Transit Authority, Metra and Chicago Public Schools are pointing at Washington, D.C., with their hands out, shaking their tin cups and blaming the federal government for letting the COVID cash faucet run dry.
The message they're sending Washington, and local taxpayers, is as audacious as it is absurd: 'We're broke because you stopped giving us free money.'
Not a word about decades of mismanagement. Not a whisper about institutional waste and inefficiency. And no sign that anyone in Springfield, City Hall, or the transit and CPS boardrooms is willing to make the hard choices that real leaders are supposed to make when times get tough.
I watched this sad scenario play out for 37 years as a local journalist and 10 more as a good government watchdog, and nothing has changed.
The pandemic didn't break their budgets — it merely exposed how broken they already were.
The CTA is projecting a $600 million shortfall next year as federal pandemic aid evaporates. But instead of tackling excessive operating costs, administrative bloat and outdated labor rules, executives are spending their time lobbying for a federal or state bailout — one they know won't fix a single structural problem.
Anyone who's taken the Red Line after dark knows the CTA doesn't just need more money — it needs more competence. Meanwhile, transit leadership continues to drive or be driven to work instead of riding, top managers cash six-plus figure paychecks and union contracts are treated like sacred texts instead of the fungible documents they need to be in the post-COVID era.
Then there's City Hall, where Mayor Brandon Johnson is asking for hundreds of millions in new federal and state funds to prevent drastic service cuts while also rolling out feel-good programs with questionable funding sources.
The migrant crisis, pension time bombs and public safety concerns are real. But rather than prioritize, consolidate and streamline, Johnson's team is cobbling together budget Band-Aids and sending invoices to D.C. or Springfield hoping Uncle Sam or Uncle J.B.— more accurately, taxpayers — will foot the bill.
As for the state, the other bailout target of local governments, the picture's not much better. Gov. JB Pritzker proudly touted Illinois' temporary budget surpluses during the pandemic, but those were largely a mirage — the result of federal stimulus funds and delayed spending.
Now that the spigot's shut off, the state's back to deficit projections and renewed calls for 'revenue enhancements' — political code for higher taxes on the very companies and people that are already exiting Illinois in record numbers.
Finally, few local institutions are as financially fragile, and equally shameless, as CPS, which is projecting a $391 million budget gap next year; and like its sister agencies, pointing fingers at Washington and Springfield instead of looking in the mirror.
'The cliff is coming,' CPS officials say, referring to the end of federal COVID relief funding. But what they don't say is they built their post-pandemic budget on a sandcastle of temporary dollars with no plan for how to sustain expanded staffing and programs once that tide inevitably went out.
Rather than using the federal windfall to right-size operations or address glaring long-term issues like special education, building maintenance, union overreach and enrollment-based reallocations, CPS went on a hiring spree, expanded programs without metrics, approved generous union contracts and padded administrative overhead. The real outrage? CPS is bleeding students — enrollment is down by more than 85,000 since 2010, but the budget keeps ballooning. We're paying more to educate fewer children, with less to show for it.
Nobody seems willing to talk about the elephant in every government room: Waste, in its multiple iterations; there's enough fat in these budgets to make a butcher weep. But trimming it would require the kind of political courage we haven't seen in decades. It would mean saying no to special interests, rethinking sacred cows and upsetting the apple cart of status quo politics — a cart too many of our leaders are riding in comfortably.
Instead, our politicians are taking the easy way out: Blame Washington, Springfield or the allegedly undertaxed wealthy, ask for more money and cross their fingers that voters won't notice the hypocrisy.
It's fiscal malpractice dressed up as righteous indignation. And let's be clear about one thing: The federal government doesn't owe them another dime. COVID relief was meant to be temporary — a bridge over troubled waters — not a permanent subsidy for governments that refuse to adapt.
If local and state leaders treated those funds as lifelines rather than blank checks, they would've used the past three years to modernize, trim and right-size their operations. Instead, they papered over the cracks, kicked the cans down the road and now expect Washington and wealthy taxpayers to refill the punch bowl.
Chicagoans, and all Illinoisans, deserve much better. They deserve transit systems that work, budgets that balance and leaders who don't use crises as a cover for failure. They deserve governments that take responsibility for their own finances before asking others to bail them out.
There's a concept in the private sector called accountability. When companies run out of money, they cut costs, restructure or go bankrupt. They don't send letters to Washington or Springfield demanding a lifeline because their customers stopped coming. But in the public sector, failure is rewarded with more funding and fewer questions.
That needs to change. And it starts with us — the voters, the taxpayers and the residents. We need to stop accepting the tired narrative that more money will fix everything, and stop rewarding the elected and appointed leaders who espouse that canard.
We need to demand audits, zero-based budgeting and creative, humane staff and agency cutbacks. We need to demand efficiency, and call out the bureaucratic inertia that keeps our governments stuck in a cycle of dysfunction.
So the next time a city, state or transit agency asks for a bailout, the first question we should ask is simple: What have you cut from your own budget?
If their answer is 'nothing,' or obfuscation, our answer to their request should be just as simple: 'No!' And many of those doing the asking should be pointed to the exit door.
_____
Andy Shaw is a longtime Chicago journalist and former president of the Better Government Association.
_____
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Democratic Texas Rep. Vikki Goodwin enters race for Lt. Governor, says "It's time for change"
State Representative Vikki Goodwin, D-Austin, is taking on Lt. Governor Dan Patrick next year as he seeks a fourth term in office. In an interview for Eye On Politics, Goodwin explained why she's running. "I think the time is right. We need a change. I disagree with Dan Patrick on so many of the policies that he has, but also on the corruption that we see of him taking millions of dollars before he was the head judge in an impeachment trial, the way that he rules the Senate with an iron fist, really doesn't encourage any debate over there." Goodwin, who was first elected in 2018, will have to give up her legislative seat in southwest Austin to run for Lt. Governor. "I have to give up my seat in order to run, but it's very frustrating as a Democrat in the minority party when we get crumbs, during legislative sessions." Goodwin told CBS News Texas that her main platforms include public education. She opposed SB 2, the school choice law that will give students tax dollars to attend private schools. "This session we saw $1 billion going into private schools. And I anticipate with the current leadership, that will continue to grow over the years. I'm not in favor of sending our public tax dollars to unaccountable private schools. That's number one." Other issues she says are her top priorities include housing affordability, water and health care. "Housing affordability. I would say that all our leaders have talked about that as a big issue, but what we saw come out of session, in my opinion, doesn't do enough to address that issue. Water and energy, and infrastructure is a big deal. Again, water was prioritized this session. We talked about a lot of things: New water, leaky pipes, but not really a whole lot about conservation. I think there's a lot that we need to do around health care. Whether it's women having the ability to make their own personal private health care decisions or whether it is in rural areas, people just having access to good primary care." Patrick's campaign announced in January that it has $33.5 million cash on hand. President Trump has also endorsed the Lt. Governor for reelection next year. When asked how she can beat Patrick, Representative Goodwin said, "I think it's all about relationships, building relationships with people around things they care about. I've spent the last year traveling the state and looking at the issues all around the state. I'm not interested in the divisive issues. Let's put those aside and let's solve the problems that really make a difference in your life." Watch the full interview with Rep. Goodwin below:
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds of Thousands Mock Trump With ‘No Kings' Protests in Every State
The nationwide 'No Kings' protests have stolen attention away from President Donald Trump's big birthday parade celebration with creative rebukes over the MAGA leader's policies using signs, symbols, and even a big 'Baby Trump.' Approximately 2,000 protests, organized in response to Trump's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, are happening in every state nationwide, Forbes reported. While the exact number of people taking part in the protests has not been confirmed, the New York City Police Department estimated a crowd of about 50,000, while an estimated 80,000 protestors came out in Philadelphia. The widespread demonstrations come just as Trump kicked off his 79th birthday parade, which also serves to mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. The fit-for-a-king occasion is expected to cost around $45 million, complete with tanks and armed service people planned to roll through the middle of Washington, D.C. Yet with several viral images and videos coming out of the 'No Kings' protests, the second-time president may find it difficult to drown it all out. In Los Angeles, a demonstrator donned an oversized head in Trump's likeness, complete with a sign that read 'Me!!' suggesting Trump only cares about himself. Across another part of the city, an inflated 'Baby Trump,' which was comically orange and comically rotund, floated above thousands of protestors on packed streets. In New York City, yellow signs declaring 'People Over Billionaires' took center stage as thousands marched down the streets with photos of crowns crossed out. In another part of the city, demonstrators held an upside down American flag with the word 'No Kings' displayed on it in yellow. Additionally, demonstrators held signs that said 'A King of Fools Is a Danger to Us All.' The 'No Kings' movement also spilled over to activism and awareness online among celebrities and top political voices. Wonder Woman star Lynda Carter tweeted, 'Please look out for each other today and remember, it's WE the people. No kings. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders shared images from a 'No Kings' gathering in his state, writing, 'I was proud to stand with more than 500 people in Stowe today at a No Kings protest.' He added, 'Today, all over the country, tens of thousands of Americans are saying NO to the authoritarianism that has taken hold of our country.' Actors Susan Sarandon and Mark Ruffalo were also spotted at 'No Kings' gatherings in photos in New York City. Others shared photos and clips of the sheer amount of people to turn out for the protests, including thousands in San Diego, Chicago and even Pittsburgh. An X account for the movement tweeted out a steady stream of information on local 'No Kings' demonstrations, how people can get involved, and the principles behind the movement. 'A core principle behind the all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action,' the account shared on X. 'We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events.' The 'No Kings' movement was met with plenty of opposition online from MAGA mainstays as they declared that the protests were a moot effort. 'No kings, but all for a monster statist establishment that wants to usher in communism. Spoken like true sheeple,' wrote one MAGA supporter on X user. Yet actor Glenn Closer took to Instagram to provide her own take on the movement. 'It's not about screaming slogans,' she captioned a video message. 'It's not about spitting hatred. It's the calm, unified PRESENCE of MILLIONS of Americans who refuse to let our beloved, magnificent country be sold out to the wannabe KING/OLIGARCH and his RUTHLESS, cruel, scheming puppeteers.'
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most Americans Think Trump's Parade Is a Huge Waste of Money
Six in 10 Americans don't think that a $45 million military parade on President Donald Trump's birthday is a good use of taxpayer money, according to an Associated Press poll. The extravaganza, which will feature as many as 25 tanks rolling through the streets of Washington, D.C., is slated for June 14—the day Trump turns 79. The parade is billed as a 250th-anniversary celebration of the U.S. Army's founding. Just 40 percent of Americans polled by the AP approved of the lavish celebration, while 29 percent disapproved and the rest were neutral. Along political lines, only 20 percent of Democrats approved, in contrast with 67 percent of Republicans. When it came to the price tag, 80 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Independents did not think it was worthwhile spending. Republicans were of a different mind—nearly two thirds signed off on the hefty bill. The parade will feature approximately 8,000 soldiers marching alongside the tanks. Its cost includes a new paint job for the tanks and repairing D.C. roads not equipped to bear their weight. On Tuesday, Trump offered a bizarre justification for the parade: without the military, Americans would have lost WWII and would now be speaking German or Japanese. 'If it weren't for us, you would be speaking German right now, ok?' he told reporters in the Oval Office. 'You might be speaking Japanese, too. You might be speaking a combination of both.' 'It's gonna be an amazing day,' Trump added. 'We'll have tanks, we'll have planes, we'll have all sorts of things. I think it's gonna be great.' Despite the president's enthusiasm, not many of his Republican colleagues are planning to attend. Out of 50 surveyed by Politico, just seven said they would go—including, of course, Trump diehard Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. The army anticipates that 200,000 people will attend.