Tata Motors working with govt for alternate sources for rare earth magnets: N Chandrasekaran
Tata Motors is looking for alternate resources for rare earth magnet other than China. Check Offers
Tata Motors, the homegrown car manufacturer that leads the Indian electric passenger vehicle market, is working with the government to find alternate sources for rare earth magnets. The move comes at a time when China's sudden export curbs for the critical rare earth magnets have created anxiety in the auto industry, and several automotive players have been expecting massive disruption, even production shutdown, in the coming months if the situation continues.
The rare earth magnet is one of the highly critical components for electric vehicles. These magnets are also heavily used in the internal combustion engine-powered vehicles. China controls 90 per cent of the global rare earth magnet market, and its sudden export curb has left the auto industry players in trouble. Tata Motors claims to be working with the Indian government to find a solution by finding an alternate source for rare earth magnets.
PTI has reported that N Chandrasekaran, Chairman of Tata Sons and Tata Group, has said to the company's shareholders that as of now, the rare earth magnet crisis is not a concern, but this is something that he automaker is watching very carefully. "As of now, we are okay. We are not facing issues...We are able to source the magnets that we need, and we also have plans for having the right level of inventory. We are working with the government. Also, we are working on sourcing from alternate sources," Chandrasekaran noted while responding to queries from shareholders on the impact of China's move to restrict exports of rare earth elements and the shortage of magnets.
The Indian automobile industry had already sought government support in expediting approvals from the Chinese government for importing rare earth magnets used in various applications, including passenger cars. However, the crisis still continues.
Meanwhile, speaking about the impact of the Israel-Iran conflict on the operations of Tata Motors and Jaguar Land Rover, Chandrasekaran said that these companies will be able to tackle any geopolitical issues in the short term, but are completely ready and poised for excellent growth and will leverage the opportunity that this industry has to offer.
Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape.
First Published Date: 22 Jun 2025, 10:00 AM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Smartphone brands shift focus to offline sales in smaller towns
New Delhi: Smartphone brands are increasingly pivoting to offline channels, tapping into smaller towns with easier access to financing in a bid to sell more premium handsets, marking a notable departure from ecommerce platforms. Shipments to online retailers fell for the seventh consecutive month in April. This was largely due to online-centric brands making a sharp shift towards offline distribution, said market trackers. 'Online channel shipments faced double digit declines for the second consecutive month. In April, it declined by more than 20%. Meanwhile offline channels have grown by more than 10%, marking the eighth consecutive month of growth for offline, which also faced headwinds of low overall demand,' said Upasana Joshi, research manager, IDC India. Joshi said overall shipments were flat at around 12 million in April, compared to March, reflecting another flat quarter for the smartphone market. According to IDC, nearly all brands are implementing an omnichannel strategy, expanding into smaller towns/cities, offering attractive channel margins and support, which should sustain in the coming quarters. Live Events Lower appeal for online sales has made nearly every brand reduce volumes to online channels, including those earlier heavily reliant on ecommerce for distribution. For instance, Motorola reduced shipments to online channels to 64% in Q1 2025 from 82% a year earlier. For OnePlus, the figure fell to 71% from 85% in the same period, according to market researcher Canalys. Xiaomi, which started its Indian venture selling through ecommerce flash sales, currently garners 39% of its volumes through ecommerce, compared to 45% in Q1 2024, Canalys data showed. "Over the last one and half years, Xiaomi has pivoted from being an online-centric brand to taking an omnichannel strategy which aims to provide a unified experience to the consumer, ensuring the same product, same price, across every touchpoint," Sudhin Mathur, chief operating officer, Xiaomi India, told ET. Market trackers said brands are realising that ecommerce penetration in India has hit a plateau, with a majority of the country still catered to by brick-and-mortar stores, despite online channels helping brands reach remote locations. Spike in online sales during the pandemic has not sustained as consumer behaviour in rural areas is slow in transition. According to Canalys, the share of online sales of smartphones fell to 36% in Q1 2025 from 45% a year earlier. It said brands are relying on retail and distribution networks to drive sales. 'Channel schemes, offline activations, and tighter sell-out coordination will again define share gains,' said Sanyam Chaurasia, analyst at Canalys. He added that increased competition in designs and specifications are pushing brands towards showcasing products in offline stores where paper financing is also much easier. Tarun Pathak, research director, Counterpoint Research said the lure of consumers towards online channels came due to easier availability, deep discounts, and exclusive launches. Most consumers were also not spending more than Rs 10,000-15,000 on handsets. With offline channels now seeing more price parity, and more bundled offers, along with easier access to financing, consumers are increasingly veering towards it, especially for high-end models, he said.
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Developments since June 6 decision show why we need to be cautious: MPC's Nagesh Kumar
The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) decision earlier this month to tighten its stance to 'netrual' from 'accommodative' even as it cut the policy repo rate by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points (bps) to 5.50 per cent caught markets off-guard. However, according to Nagesh Kumar, one of the three external members on the central bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), developments since the June 6 rate cut show why policymakers need to be cautious. 'Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious,' Kumar said. Global crude oil prices rose to around $75 per barrel after Israel attacked Iran on June 13. Investors are now anticipating another sharp increase in oil prices after the US said on June 21 it had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. Speculation is rife if Iran – which has called the US attack outrageous and said it reserves all options to defend its sovereignty – will look to retaliate by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway which handles almost a quarter of the global oil trade. In an interview with Siddharth Upasani, Kumar – Director and Chief Executive of New Delhi-based think-tank Institute for Studies in Industrial Development – also discussed how a consensus was finally achieved on his calls for a 50 bps rate cut and why growth numbers are not showing a broad-based revival, among other subjects. Edited excerpts: In the last meeting (in April) itself I had started making a case for a 50 bps cut. But at that time, trends were not very clear. There was uncertainty about the inflation number – it had begun to come down, but the drop was not significant enough. However, in June, we had numbers before us like 3.2 per cent in April. It has gone down even further in May. Looking ahead, the outlook seemed to be quite comfortable and benign because of the expectation of a better-than-normal monsoon, the declining prices of crude oil, and the softening of the US dollar. It was in that context and keeping in mind the continued concern about tariff-related uncertainties –the external economic environment had become very uncertain and volatile, with International Monetary Funds and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development downgrading the outlook very significantly, and World Trade Organization (WTO) projecting -1.5 per cent growth in world trade – and the need to support growth and the continued concerns about urban consumption and private investment not picking up that we cut the repo rate by 50 bps. In my view – and I articulated this in the April meeting – compared to two cuts of 25 bps each, one larger cut of 50 bps would be more effective. My reason was very common-sensical: if it is a quarter percentage point reduction, the banker might absorb a part of it as it is such a small change. But if it is 50 bps, the banker will have to pass it on with lower lending and deposit rates. We have seen the transmission of the 25 bps cuts being a bit slow. Of course, there will be a lag. But the stickiness of the deposit and lending rates was there. But 50 bps would be large enough to push the banks to take it into account. And if we feel confident that we will need another cut of 25 bps two months down the line, why not frontload it? That's why I made a case for a 50 bps cut. And this time, compared to April, the reason and policy space were much more solid. Seeing that, the consensus between us was easier to achieve. Well, at that time, inflation was high. And inflation targeting requires action when inflation is high. Even till October 2024, when the MPC was reconstituted, inflation was quite high around 6 per cent. The RBI's action also needs to be seen in the context of growth. We ended 2023-24 with a very robust 9.2 per cent growth. Growth was much less of a worry at that time. Yes, 7.4 per cent was a pleasant surprise and showed some kind of revival. However, it was not a broad-based revival; it was driven by rural consumption and government capex towards the end of the financial year. Because it was not broad-based and the external environment is becoming more challenging and uncertain – Liberation Day was in April – this is the time when you need to build policy actions which will protect the growth sentiment and build momentum. The change in the stance to neutral caught everyone off-guard, with the MPC saying there is very limited space to support growth going forward. Should we rule out rate cuts now? The way inflation outlook is shaping will determine the future course of action. The RBI Governor, in a recent interview, has clarified that. It depends upon what kind of inflation you have because you need to have a certain real rate of interest. If that becomes negative, then savings will not be incentivised. Assuming that 1.5 per cent is the real rate of interest you want to preserve, then the floor (for repo rate) with inflation rate would be 5.5 per cent. However, if inflation goes to 3 per cent, then you have additional room to manoeuvre. Therefore, it really depends on the dynamics of the inflation and growth numbers. I wouldn't say that. Strictly speaking, the stance is not within the purview of the MPC. But we, of course, make some observations. I think it was purely the fact that with the 50 bps rate cut, the room (to cut further) going forward is limited. In view of that, it was a step to manage expectations. The uncertainty surrounding us is another factor to keep the stance neutral, which gives you more freedom to go either way. Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious. When circumstances are uncertain and you want to promote growth, you try to reduce the cost of capital to make it easier for the entrepreneur who is sitting on the fence on whether to invest or not. That is what it does at the margin. Ultimately, investment decisions are a very complex process. But the cost of capital is one of the factors which is weighed by the entrepreneur, and policymakers try to assist the process. By lowering the cost of capital and trying to push demand, you are creating more favourable conditions for an investment decision than before. As I said, making an investment decision is a very complex process and cost of capital is only one of the factors. You can only exercise the levers which are within your control. You can't really do much about global uncertainty. What Mr Trump does on a day-to-day basis is something you have no control over. But holding other things constant, these (such as lowering the cost of capital) are some of the things which we can do something about. The other could be a fiscal stimulus which may be helpful to revive demand. The government has budgeted for a very substantial capex. So, frontloading the capex to keep the momentum up while things settle down in the international market could be another thing that could be done. Well, they are reacting to the changed times. We are now in a situation where the multilateral framework for trade has been completely put aside. MFN (Most Favoured Nation) – which has been the bedrock of multilateralism – has also been thrown out the window because Mr. Trump has X rate for China, Y rate for India, Z rate for Europe. The dispute settlement mechanism of WTO has been abandoned for some time because the Appellate Body was not renewed. In normal times, you don't have that urgency and you negotiate in a very relaxed manner. But when you need to, you find ways to expedite the process. That is what is happening. There is a realisation that we need to seize the moment and close these deals quickly before the damage is done, to protect and preserve our economic interests in the best possible manner. Sooner we do that, the better it is. Then the uncertainty that is prevailing is cleared. Yes, some of these are the early harvest type of arrangements, and they will continue to be negotiated. But normally in trade negotiations, you know what you can do for a large part of the agenda and only a small part, maybe 10-20 per cent, holds up progress. So, the best way forward is to move ahead with the part of the agenda on which you have no issues and find ways to address the red lines. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
'India changed my heart forever': US woman ditches ‘average' American life for something 'bold and extraordinary'
A New Chapter The Business of Living Differently That's the question Kristen Fischer asked herself before taking a life-altering leap. Leaving behind what she called an 'average' but comfortable life in the United States, Fischer moved to India with her husband Tim and their three daughters in 2021. Four years later, she says she has no regrets—only a now-viral video posted to Instagram , Fischer shared the soul-searching moment that spurred her family's move. 'I knew I had control of which direction to take my life. I could choose an average life in the USA, or I could choose to do something bold and extraordinary,' she said. Their decision, as it turns out, became a story of purpose, reinvention, and heartfelt connection with a country they now call settling in India, the Fischers have documented their life through vibrant videos showcasing their cultural explorations, street food trials, small-town joys, and even the emotional journey of adopting a daughter with special needs. 'In these past four years, I have met some amazing people, seen some incredible places, had some awesome food, and changed my heart forever,' she wrote. 'India has changed my life, and I will never be the same.'The couple's content, shared through their joint Instagram page, offers more than just picturesque visuals—it shares a worldview that places meaning over routine, and courage over bold relocation wasn't just emotional; it made practical sense too. In another video, Fischer broke down the financial logic behind their shift to India. She and Tim run a web development agency that serves mostly Western clients. 'We earn in US dollars and spend in Indian rupees,' she explained. 'It's simply easier for someone from the West to move to a place like India, where the cost of living is lower. It allows us to stretch our earnings and grow our business.'Their strategy highlights a growing trend among digital nomads and young families: reimagining lifestyle and work in ways that break the mold of traditional success. 'Plus, we get to live in a country we love. Seems like a win-win to me,' she and Tim Fischer's journey from the suburbs of America to the vibrant chaos and calm of India has resonated with many online. 'You only get one life,' Kristen reminds her audience. 'How will you live it?'
