&w=3840&q=100)
NSE's ₹1,388-cr settlement plea could pave way for IPO this fiscal
The National Stock Exchange (NSE) has agreed to settle the long-pending colocation and dark fibre case with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) for ₹1,388 crore — a move seen as crucial for advancing its initial public offering (IPO). Sources indicate that this settlement — the biggest ever, and the second such resolution for NSE — clears a major hurdle for its much-anticipated listing.
The exchange filed its settlement application with Sebi on June 20.
'The settlement amount aligns with Sebi's regulations, and approval is expected soon, expediting the IPO process. The exchange has set its sights on concluding the IPO this fiscal,' said a person familiar with the matter.
Queries sent to Sebi and the BSE remained unanswered.
NSE is awaiting a no-objection certificate from Sebi to proceed with its draft IPO filings. Sebi Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey recently hinted at the impending settlement, stating that no further obstacles remain for the IPO.
The colocation issue, currently before the Supreme Court, pertains to allegations that certain brokers received preferential server access at NSE between 2015 and 2016. If Sebi approves the settlement, it will need to file an affidavit in the Supreme Court to withdraw its appeal.
In January 2023, the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) upheld non-monetary penalties in the case but set aside a disgorgement order, instead imposing a ₹100 crore fine on NSE for due diligence lapses. Later that year, the Supreme Court directed Sebi to refund ₹300 crore to NSE related to the case.
NSE had previously deposited ₹1,108 crore with Sebi in 2019 as part of penal actions. Sources indicate nearly ₹1,000 crore remains in an escrow account.
In October 2023, NSE, former chief executive Vikram Limaye, and eight others settled a separate case involving misuse of trading access points (TAP) for ₹643 crore. Sebi also dropped charges against NSE and former executives in the colocation matter, citing insufficient evidence of collusion with OPG Securities.
NSE's unlisted shares have surged 87 per cent over the past year, currently trading at ₹2,325 apiece, reflecting strong investor interest. The country's largest bourse is currently valued at nearly ₹6 trillion, dwarfing the valuations of several listed firms.
'From a market perspective, this resolution brings much-needed clarity and signals NSE's intent to prioritise governance and compliance. With this issue behind them, the path is now clearer for the exchange to move toward a public listing, and investor interest is likely to revive given NSE's strong fundamentals and dominant market position,' said Mrugank Paranjape, chairman, IMC Task Force on Capital Markets and managing partner, MCQube.
Sebi has previously raised concerns about the independence of clearing corporations, emphasising public interest over commercial priorities. A working group is now reviewing fee structures to ensure sustainability.
NSE may explore listing on the BSE or the Metropolitan Stock Exchange (MSEI), as self-listing is currently barred under Sebi rules. The country's only listed equity bourse, the BSE, is exclusively listed on the NSE.
'Under Sebi regulations, stock exchanges in India are not allowed to self-list in order to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure regulatory integrity. As a result, NSE cannot list on its own platform and will need to seek a listing on a competing exchange like BSE or MSEI,' said Uday Tardalkar, economist and market expert.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Amid backlash over Banke Bihari corridor, UP govt says no plan to take over 197 Braj temples
Agra: Amid continuing opposition to the construction of the Banke Bihari corridor in Vrindavan, the Uttar Pradesh govt on Wednesday denied that it was planning to take over 197 temples in the Braj region and said the figure was misinterpreted from a Supreme Court order issued on May 15. Shyam Bahadur Singh, CEO of Uttar Pradesh Braj Teerth Vikas Parishad, said, "There is no plan to acquire 197 temples, including the Banke Bihari shrine. The number was taken from a Supreme Court document where the district judge listed 197 temples involved in legal disputes. It's being misunderstood. The court only pointed out that receivers appointed to manage such temples often lack time or experience, and it barred the appointment of advocates as receivers. That's the only context — there's no acquisition proposal." Receivership is a legal set-up where a court appoints an individual to manage property or institutions embroiled in disputes or unable to self-govern due to legal or financial challenges. The May 15 order called for an end to what SC described as a "Receiver raj" and directed a comprehensive audit of such arrangements in Mathura. On the Banke Bihari temple, Singh said, "We are not trying to take control. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Our aim is transparency in how offerings and funds are used. That's why a trust is being set up. As per section 13 of the ordinance, we're not going to interfere in temple operations. The worship and services as practiced since the time of Swami Haridas Ji will continue." Singh also dismissed claims of a broader temple corridor. "There's no Sapta Devalaya corridor plan. The proposal is only to improve access to these historic temples by creating a development circuit. This means painting murals, improving footpaths, setting up toilets and rest areas where space allows. The project's budget is Rs 18 crore — it's an infrastructure upgrade, not a corridor." Shri Banke Bihari temple, managed by hereditary Shebaits, was established in 1862 in Vrindavan and is one of North India's most visited pilgrimage sites. The redevelopment project — modelled on the Kashi Vishwanath corridor — is estimated to cost Rs 500 crore and involves acquiring nearly five acres of land near the shrine. SC allowed the land purchase to be funded through the temple's fixed deposits, provided the property remains registered in the name of the deity or the newly constituted trust. Around 275 families, including 200 shopkeepers, are likely to be relocated under the plan, with flats in Rukmini Vihar and Sunrakh Bangar earmarked for their rehabilitation. The district administration has promised compensation and alternate shop space to affected stakeholders. However, Gyanendra Kishor Goswami, from the temple's management, rejected govt's clarification. "The Goswami community and Vrindavan locals no longer trust this govt. If they aren't trying to take control, why form a new trust at all? Only two out of 18 members are from our community. Do you think our centuries-old traditions will survive in that set-up? Vrindavan is about spiritual solace, not tourism. We're trying to protect that. " Supreme Court's ruling came after protests by the Goswami community and locals against the corridor and the new trust. A bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and SC Sharma permitted the redevelopment, but stakeholders such as Shebaits alleged they were not consulted. Following public pushback, CM Yogi Adityanath's adviser Awanish Kumar Awasthi held initial talks with priests, residents, and traders to collect suggestions. The redevelopment push began after a stampede-like incident during Janmashtami celebrations in 2022 killed two devotees. In Sept 2023, Allahabad high court directed the state to implement a corridor plan to improve crowd safety and access.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Senior citizen sent to judicial custody when bail was norm, Jharkhand HC orders training for Magistrates across state
The Jharkhand High Court has strongly criticised a Judicial Magistrate in Hazaribagh district for sending a 66-year-old man to judicial custody in a case of a private complaint despite Supreme Court guidelines that mandate bail in such circumstances. The High Court ordered statewide training for all Magistrates and Chief Judicial Magistrates to ensure compliance with Constitutional protections. Local resident Baleshwar Rana filed a complaint before the Hazaribagh Judicial Magistrate (First Class) in 2024 against Ruplal Rana and three others, accusing them of fraud, criminal conspiracy and trespass. The magistrate directed the petitioners to appear before the trial court, as the case arose from a complaint and not an arrestable investigation. Ruplal Rana appeared before the Magistrate in Hazaribagh in May but was sent to judicial custody, with his bail application being rejected. The Supreme Court's decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI — first delivered in 2021 and reiterated in subsequent years — says that in complaint cases such as these, accused persons who appear after being summoned should not be arrested and must be granted bail or interim bail on appearance. Advocate Randhir Kumar, counsel for the petitioners, told The Indian Express that Ruplal Rana remained in custody for nearly 15 days in the complaint case until the summer vacation judge granted him regular bail. He said: 'After the Magistrate rejected our anticipatory bail plea, we approached the High Court on April 21. The court said that since the case arose from a complaint and cognizance was already taken, there was no need for custodial action. Acting in compliance, Ruplal Rana appeared in May, but he was still taken into custody by the Magistrate, despite citing the SC's Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.' 'After he was granted bail, we informed the High Court on June 11 that the Magistrate had disregarded both apex court and High Court directions,' he said. High Court Judge Justice Ananda Sen passed a detailed order on June 18 in which the High Court modified its earlier order to explicitly direct the trial court to accept bail bonds from the remaining petitioners upon their appearance. The court also took note of a 'concerning pattern', noting that several Magistrates and Chief Judicial Magistrates in Jharkhand continue to act in disregard of Supreme Court judgments, including Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI and Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. 'The Magistrates have not yet been sensitized, in spite of the efforts taken by the Jharkhand Judicial Academy. I am repeatedly coming across orders that ignore the Supreme Court's binding directions… it is most unfortunate that in the year 2025 also, the Magistrates are not in a position to understand and implement those judgments and orders passed by the SC,' Justice Sen observed. The Court has ordered the Judicial Academy, Jharkhand, to immediately conduct statewide sensitization workshops for all Judicial Magistrates and CJMs. The petitioners have now been granted relief, and the trial court has been directed to proceed in line with the constitutional safeguards reiterated by the apex court.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
CEAT to raise ₹500 cr via NCDs, infuse ₹400 cr into Sri Lanka unit
CEAT on Wednesday announced its plans to raise up to Rs 500 crore through the issuance of unsecured non-convertible debentures (NCDs) on a private placement basis. The company's Finance and Banking Committee approved the proposal at a meeting held on June 25. The NCDs will carry a fixed interest rate, determined via bidding on the NSE's Electronic Book Provider (EBP) platform. The instruments will have a tenure not exceeding five years, with annual interest payments and bullet repayment of principal at maturity. The proceeds will be used for ongoing capital expenditure, repayment or replacement of high-cost debt, and working capital requirements. This issuance is in addition to the Rs 250 crore in NCDs already raised earlier. CEAT also plans to infuse up to Rs 400 crore (equivalent in Sri Lankan rupees) into its wholly owned subsidiary, CEAT OHT Lanka, in one or more tranches through equity and/or preference shares. The capital will partly fund the previously announced acquisition of the Camso brand's off-highway construction equipment tyre and tracks business. The subsidiary, incorporated in Sri Lanka, is yet to commence commercial operations. In a separate move, the company's board also approved availing of credit facilities of up to Rs 1,000 crore in one or more tranches for business purposes.
