logo
I fear I'm doing friendship wrong: why do we lose the art of just hanging out?

I fear I'm doing friendship wrong: why do we lose the art of just hanging out?

The Guardian18-04-2025

There's a black and white image of the photographer and war correspondent Lee Miller and her friend Tanja Ramm. The two are having breakfast in bed at Miller's studio in Paris, casually reading newspapers. Their faces are framed by untamed hair and they're dressed in cotton shirts, with coffee cups in front of them. The image, captured in 1931, is quiet and intimate. They share a blanket, their arms touch. There's no rush, no urgency. It's a scene about love but, above all, it's about friendship.
When was the last time I lay in bed with a friend like that? For most of us, it was probably during school or university, when staying over or crashing at someone's house was a regular occurrence – sometimes a necessity, but mostly just part of our routines. It kept us close. Staying in a friend's room or apartment felt like being on an island – safe, cosy and fun. It was about whispering, giggling and sharing secrets. And sometimes it was about nothing at all except being together.
As an adult whose usual habitat is a large European city, when I meet friends now, it starts with a text that goes something like: 'Hey, how are you? Would love to see you. Maybe we can grab dinner or drinks?'
Then the struggle begins to find a date. It's a messy process, especially in Berlin. Days pass. Sometimes, weeks. Finally, if we are lucky, the day arrives and we meet – at a restaurant or a bar, somewhere public, where we're expected to behave, sit properly and engage in 'polite' chat. We update each other on our projects, gossip a little, sigh, complain about circumstances at home or work and then we part ways.
Sometimes, a few hours later, or the next morning, I'll send or receive a message: 'I'd missed you. It was so good to see you. We should do this more often.' An honest message, but an empty one at the same time. Because we won't do it more often. We'll continue rushing through our daily lives and responsibilities, fitting each other in where we can.
How close can you really be to someone you only see for a couple of hours every now and then? What can you actually share? In these meetups, we present condensed versions of ourselves. So much of who we really are stays in the dark. We talk. And talking is the only way to feel connected and to bond.
It was simpler as kids and teenagers. After school, back in Leipzig, I'd ask a friend, 'Do you want to come over to play?' or I'd just knock on their door. At university in Berlin, we'd spend all day together on campus or meet after class at one of our homes. Getting together was easy. And it wasn't just about talking. It wasn't sitting across from each other, throwing words back and forth. We'd sit on sofas or the bed or on the floor, watch TV, play games, draw, flip through magazines, do sports, or listen to the latest music. We'd try things for the first time – a cigarette, a drug. We'd dream. We'd sometimes be silent together. It was sweet.
Do we even know how to just be? To sit beside someone in silence, without needing to entertain or update or explain ourselves? I miss that. Friendship doesn't always need a plot.
In her diaries, Brigitte Reimann (1933-1973), one of the icons of East German literature, vividly describes idyllic scenes of friends simply hanging out together. When she was living in Neubrandenburg in her late 30s, one friend – the writer Christa Wolf – would visit spontaneously to check in and just be with her. There was also Juergen Schulz, a young journalist at the local radio station who was 10 years her junior. The two of them would stay up all night listening to jazz records and dancing. I don't think it's a coincidence that the typical toast back then was 'auf die Freundschaft' ('to friendship').
But times have changed. As mature, 21st-century adults, nearly everything has to be scheduled in advance. We meet when we're well composed. If we're not feeling up to it, we cancel. No one knocks on anyone's door spontaneously any more. That would be crazy. Insane, even. We no longer play or fool around. We don't hang out for hours without a plan.
Maybe that's also why some friendships just fade away, and others turn weird. One of the quietest heartbreaks of adulthood is realising that a friend has become indifferent, or no longer wants the best for you. The hardest part is knowing when it's time to let go – especially when you've shared years.
But friendship can't be based only on memories. It's also about energy. And in trying to hold on to old friendships, we often forget how fragile new connections can be. They happen, but it's rare. It's not often that you meet someone new and think, yes, I want to see you again. I want to spend a whole day doing nothing with you. Mostly, it's coffee once or twice, maybe an invitation to a birthday gathering if we manage to overcome the polite distance. People's diaries are already full – with families, work and the handful of old friends they barely manage to keep. There's just not much room left, not emotionally, not practically. So we stick to the friends we already have, even when the contours of those friendships keep changing.
I wonder why I'm thinking about all this now. Perhaps it's because I don't have children or any family structures forcing me into a regulated daily life. I could hang out. I could see friends more often. When the American writer and film-maker Nora Ephron compiled her list of things she would and wouldn't miss at the end of her life, she named her friends twice in the list of things she would.
Ephron was also the person who said: 'It's hard when you don't like someone a friend marries. First of all, it means you pretty much have to confine your friendship to lunch, and I hate lunch.'
I hate lunch too. There's a clear beginning and a clear end. It's a set scenario and my least favourite meeting opportunity of all because there is no room for surprises: you eat, then go back to work. I believe this downgrading to lunch happens not only when a friend marries someone you don't like, but also when a friend has children. Let's be honest: you lose that friend and mourn them. We're supposed to be adults and handle what life throws at us with generosity, empathy and understanding. But it's hard.
And even if you like the person your friend marries, you still have to do lunch because otherwise, you'll never see them again alone. Suddenly, it's always 'dates as couples', where you have to behave even more properly. And there's also this: if you're a woman and your friend is a man, it's very likely that his girlfriend or wife won't love you two spending time alone.
I've always found it difficult to imagine long-term, deep friendships between men and women. There is almost always a moment – spoken or unspoken – when one of you wonders: what if? That doesn't mean anything will happen. But the question will hang in the air. And that changes the dynamic, no matter how much we pretend it doesn't.
Is that already toxic? We're so good now at identifying red flags, drawing boundaries, spotting 'bad, dangerous vibes'. But are we also too quick to call someone toxic just because they're going through something we can't quite deal with?
I've seen friendships fall apart as a result of this and I know it's difficult, but there is beauty in loyalty, when someone still shows up – not for a perfect version of you, but for you just as you are. That's gold. Too often, we confuse support with advice, or think texting back is enough. Real solidarity is quieter. It lives in presence, not performance.
OK, I do remember the last time I lounged in bed with a friend – it was two weeks ago. Maybe that was why I started to think about adult friendships again.
My close friend of 15 years and I were invited to a literary awards ceremony in Cologne. She lives in Berlin and Rome, which means we don't see each other a lot. The organisers of the awards had booked hotel rooms for us – mine on the fourth floor, hers on the first. At the end of the night, we said goodbye in the lift, then paused for a second. 'Shall I come and sleep in your room?' I asked. 'Yes please,' she replied immediately.
I went to my room, put on my pyjamas and waddled through the corridors to her room. We brushed our teeth, made funny faces in the mirror and chatted in bed until our eyes closed. The next morning, we woke up smiling. We had both slept blissfully. I felt safe with her. The room was our island. We stayed in bed talking under the thick, white sheets until I almost missed my train to Berlin.
In the afternoon, I received a text from her: 'It was so cosy in bed this morning. This is how life should be.' Yes. Exactly that. Not lunch.
Carolin Würfel is a writer, screenwriter and journalist who lives in Berlin and Istanbul. She is the author of Three Women Dreamed of Socialism and a regular contributor to Die Zeit

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The confusion of fusion food
The confusion of fusion food

Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Spectator

The confusion of fusion food

There's a joint in east London that describes itself as a 'family-run osteria' and posts about the 'Italian tradition of generous hospitality and simple, beautiful food'. The menu is a combination of several Italian dishes with Japanese ingredients, and I can't think of anything more inappropriate. One of the dishes described as dolce (meaning 'sweet') is a cheese panna cotta with herring caviar. This restaurant has soy sauce nudging the balsamic. Is there no end to the revolting madness that is fusion food? I can understand why young chefs – those tattooed to within an inch of their lives – think they are a cross between Anthony Bourdain and Marco Pierre White and love the idea of mixing miso and chocolate pudding. It has all gone too far. Yes, I hear you object, but who was it that invented salted caramel? Or chilli and chocolate? If Italians had not discovered tomatoes in 1500, the red-sauce joints would not exist and where would we be without bruschetta? Yes, food evolves, and there are some great combinations and discoveries that work beautifully. But some decidedly do not. The food of the Dongbei region of China is cooked according to the available ingredients and the climate, with maize and wheat, meat, pickled vegetables and potatoes predominating. Try fusing that with Sicilian dishes made using ingredients grown in abundance in the sunshine. It's a culinary disaster. Some things should simply never be put together on a plate. I know there are restaurants that don't describe a nation or geographical location as inspiration for their menu. They might just call it 'modern European', which means pretty much anything from the plov (rice, grated carrots and onion) of Uzbekistan to the cheese fondue of Switzerland. But spare me the Korean-Mexican combination I happened upon in a small town in France. Pure hell. Food from south India – for example, coconut masala dosa – should not be paired with that from Alaska, such as berries or reindeer sausage. Soul food is already a fusion of flavours from west and central Africa, western Europe and indigenous cuisine of the Americas, with its hearty flavours such as spicy chicken, black-eyed peas and sweet potato pie. It should never be put anywhere near Cantonese egg-fried rice and wonton soup. However, my greatest gripe is Asian tapas. Spain is already fairly fusion in that it blends flavours and ingredients from its North African neighbours, but the idea of having some delicious smoked almonds, tortilla and pimientos de Padrón served alongside spring rolls with plum sauce is the stuff of nightmares. But it's a nightmare that has come true in the depths of south London. I've avoided crossing the river for food since I found out. Tex-Mex, with its beefy, cheesy, spicy combinations, works because it is cooking born of cultures living side by side. Other dishes originate through convenience and circumstance. Fish and chips, for example, came from Jews in 15th-century Portugal, who found a way to preserve fish by cooking it in batter the day before the Sabbath (when no cooking is allowed). It was eventually paired with chips when, as rumour has it, a young Ashkenazi (from eastern Europe) immigrant opened the first British chippy, aka fish and chip shop, in London in 1863. The point is that these two foods go brilliantly together – whereas Japanese pickled ginger on pizza does not. Pan-Asian restaurants like Sexy Fish – which one reviewer likened to 'a millionaire's TGI Fridays' – seem to shove anything on the menu so long as it vaguely resembles something that originated from the vast East Asian continent. Flavour Bastards, a London fusion gaff which thankfully closed down shortly after opening, boasted of dishes such as South Indian-style white lentil doughnuts with Spanish chorizo and Italian pecorino. A few years back, I found myself working in Dubai and popped into the infamous Friday brunch, served in five-star hotels across the city. Seeing 18 separate food stations – from Italian to Indian and British Sunday roast – was a revelation. I noticed people balancing plates with more countries represented via the food on them than in the United Nations. Mix and match was encouraged, with chefs on each station – for example, the Cantonese dim sum counter – pointing to the Irish stew and soda bread next door, insisting it all goes together. Culinary innovation is one thing. Spaghetti with chicken tikka masala is quite another abomination. Fusion is a crime against food.

Russell Martin can't be a Rangers write off already as Angus Gunn shoots down damaged goods theory
Russell Martin can't be a Rangers write off already as Angus Gunn shoots down damaged goods theory

Daily Record

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Russell Martin can't be a Rangers write off already as Angus Gunn shoots down damaged goods theory

Gunn played with Martin during the former Southampton boss' last few months as a Norwich player and played against his Saints side Scotland keeper Angus Gunn insists Rangers supporters are wrong to write off Russell Martin as permanently damaged goods just because he crashed and burned in the Premier League with Southampton. Martin was in his last few months as Norwich captain when Gunn first broke into the starting XI at Carrow Road in 2017 - shortly before the defender left the club on an ill-fated loan spell to Ibrox. ‌ Now Martin seems poised to return to Glasgow as head coach as the search for Philippe Clement's successor nears completion. ‌ And Gunn is adamant that Martin's managerial reputation has not been damaged irreparably by last season's top flight shocker on the south coast, where he was bulleted as boss after winning one of his first 16 games and with Saints rock bottom in the league table and heading straight back to the second tier. Asked is anxious Rangers fans - who have responded angrily to the prospect - should look beyond Martin's nightmarish previous campaign Gunn said: 'Yes, I think so. 'I think, obviously, it's hard to compare a promoted team going into the Premier League with a team like Rangers going into European games. 'I think, as a manager, he showed what he can do, not only with Southampton but with Swansea as well. 'He took a team that wasn't expected to do much quite far into the Championship as well. 'I think it will be a positive thing for Rangers. But, obviously, I think the only thing that can bring those supporters round is probably him getting in the door and starting well. That's the only thing that can happen.' ‌ And Gunn - who came up against Southampton as Martin led them on a promotion push out of the Championship - insists the former Scotland international is far from the tactical one trick pony his critics accuse him of being. He went on: "They were a tough team. I think we had a couple of good games against them. One was 4-3, one was 0-0, so quite contrasting. ‌ 'We watched the evolution of their team throughout the season. I think when we first played them, they were quite open. 'Then, when we played them again, they were a little bit pragmatic. I think that shows a coach that can adapt and change the way his team plays. 'Watching his teams over the few years that he was there, I thought he did that. Even though some people probably said that he was reluctant to change a lot. ‌ 'I thought he did that quite well, especially in the Championship anyway. That was the main thing, really.' And Gunn knows from personal experience how difficult it is to make it up into the premised land of England's Premier League. He nodded: "Yes, 100 per cent, I think. Obviously we had the pressure of them coming down as well. ‌ 'A lot of the teams find it quite hard but I think, as a manager, not just him, but his staff as well - there was a lot of pressure on him and the team and he managed to deliver.' Gunn was cutting his first team teeth at Norwich on loan from Manchester City when he played under Martin as skipper. And he insists he could see, even at that stage, that Martin was destined for a new career in the dugout. ‌ He said: 'Obviously, I only worked with him as a player at Norwich. He's a very intellectual guy. 'I went in there as a young goalkeeper and he helped me massively, even though he wasn't in the team every week and playing regularly. ‌ 'He was the captain of the club and he had good relationships with everyone in the dressing room. 'Obviously, watching what he's done at Southampton, I thought he'd done incredibly well there and probably was unfortunate to lose his job there because it's always difficult for teams coming up from the Championship to even compete with some of the Premier League teams. 'I watch him now on the TV and the way he wants to play and his philosophy. I really hope whatever he goes onto in his career is successful. I don't know if he's going to go to Rangers or not, but obviously he had a spell there as well, so he kind of knows the club a little bit. ‌ 'I think it would be a really good thing for the Rangers, to be fair. 'Yes, you could tell he had the qualities to become a coach back then and there were a few other players in that dressing room who were the same - like Steven Naismith who was there as well. 'You can tell on the pitch when you're playing with these players. They kind of start coaching whilst they're still playing, if you like, sort of organising on the pitch. 'He was one of them, but Russell wasn't just on the pitch, he was off the pitch as well, where he had close relationships with everyone. 'Even though, like I said, he wasn't a regular playing in the team, he was always on hand and always upbeat and a good person to go to.'

Liverpool transfer belief behind huge Wirtz bid as Slot eyes next two targets
Liverpool transfer belief behind huge Wirtz bid as Slot eyes next two targets

Daily Mirror

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Liverpool transfer belief behind huge Wirtz bid as Slot eyes next two targets

Mirror Football takes a look at Liverpool's summer transfer window so far in what is expected to be a busy couple of months as boss Arne Slot and sporting director Richard Hughes work away The confetti had barely been cleared from the Anfield pitch after Liverpool 's Premier League title celebrations and the focus was firmly on making sure the trophy will remain there next season. This summer is going to be busy for the Reds if the first few days of the transfer market being open are anything to go by. This will be the window when Arne Slot starts to really put his touch to the team. ‌ Not only to make it more his squad, but also to ensure that they can compete on four fronts next season. This is a summer of adding more depth and moving on players who do not fit the criteria or - in the case of Caoimhin Kelleher - need to be guaranteed much more playing time. Those close to the club stress there is not a transfer war chest to be splashed out on but recruitment will be backed by the owners, FSG, and sales. ‌ The mantra remains the same. Spend on what they believe is value rather than for the sake of it. That is why there must be huge belief within the club that Florian Wirtz is a sensational footballer with potential to be even better otherwise they would not be submitting eye-watering nine-figure offers. While the signing of Jeremie Frimpong, also from Bayer Leverkusen, in a £29.5m deal is more the deals we have been accustomed to seeing the Reds make. A low - in today's market - release clause being met to get a highly-rated player who is versatile enough to play in different positions, even if pushing Conor Bradley for a right-back starting spot may be the initial aim. It is clear that this is - while being led by sporting director Richard Hughes - the start of Slot putting his touches to the team after his first summer saw the only arrival being Federico Chiesa on a cut-price deal. For all the talk of last season being Slot turning the Reds more orchestral than the heavy metal football of Jurgen Klopp, those within the club felt the changes to the playing style were more subtle than that. Slot worked with what he had got. He shifted Ryan Gravenberch to the No.6 role while the full-backs were not given as much freedom to roam and more control was asked from the front line. It brought a 20th English league title when many expected them to be battling it out for a Champions League spot at best. Yet Slot was still not content. He wants to win the title again but also go further in Europe. The Dutchman knew against PSG that Liverpool struggled with their frantic press and pace with the Reds going through a slight lull at the time they faced the soon-to-be-crowned European kings. ‌ That could have been down to his own overreliance on the same players. He was also concerned about how Newcastle 's midfield in the Carabao Cup final were too physical for the Reds but he is not adding muscle to match that. Instead, it appears more pace, flair and creativeness is how Slot is going about it. Wirtz is a deal that is expected to get done given the Reds have elbowed in ahead of Manchester City to ensure they're the destination of choice for the Germany attacking star. ‌ Frimpong is done with Trent Alexander-Arnold going to Real Madrid, with £10m banked to end his contract early. Bournemouth left-back Milos Kerkez is wanted while a striker could be dependent on who leaves this summer. Slot is starting to structure his team with the rock-solid foundation of a Premier League title to build upon, along with Mo Salah 's goals, Virgil van Dijk's defensive prowess and Alisson's steady hands. It is why many across Europe believe Anfield is the place to be at the moment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store