Angel Reese Gives Nickname to Coco Gauff After Chicago Sky's Blowout Loss
Angel Reese Gives Nickname to Coco Gauff After Chicago Sky's Blowout Loss originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
The Chicago Sky may have taken a hard hit on the scoreboard Tuesday night, but forward Angel Reese still found a way to shine.
Advertisement
After the Sky's 85-66 loss to the undefeated New York Liberty, Reese shared a heartfelt moment with tennis star Coco Gauff.
Gauff, fresh off winning her second Grand Slam title at the French Open, was sitting courtside at the Barclays Center. She was seen enjoying the game with Vanessa Bryant and her daughters, making it a special night for sports fans.
During a timeout, cameras zoomed in on Gauff and the crowd erupted with cheers. She was also greeted by Ellie the Elephant, the Liberty's mascot, and visited the Liberty locker room after the game.
But the real crossover moment happened after the final buzzer. Reese posted a video on Instagram Story showing her meeting with Gauff.
'The QUEEN,' Reese added a caption, tagging Gauff directly.
Advertisement
Despite the tough loss, Reese appeared unfazed. In fact, she seemed more excited to meet Gauff than discouraged by the outcome of the game. Her warm gesture came shortly after the tennis champion was honored with loud cheers by Liberty fans.
Meanwhile, Reese recorded her 30th career double-double with 17 points and 11 rebounds, making her the fastest player in WNBA history to reach that mark.
Chicago Sky forward Angel Reese in the first quarter against the New York Liberty at Barclays Center.Wendell Cruz-Imagn Images
On the other hand, Gauff had earned her spotlight just days earlier by beating world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka at Roland-Garros. At only 21 years old, she became the youngest American woman since Serena Williams in 2002 to win the French Open.
Advertisement
It was her second Grand Slam title after winning the 2023 US Open. Following the match, fans gave her a new nickname: 'Queen of Clay.' Now, Reese has added her own spin to that crown.
The Chicago Sky will try to bounce back on Friday when they face the Atlanta Dream. But even in defeat, Angel Reese made headlines not just for her stats, but for her shoutout to a fellow queen in sports.
Related: Liberty Reacts to Coco Gauff's Appearance at Chicago Sky Game
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 11, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
How do Sidney Crosby, Connor McDavid compare all-time?: Penguins mailbag
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for the wonderful array of questions, as always. Hopefully you're enjoying the Stanley Cup Final and the U.S. Open, if you've got tickets. We'll start in that direction before moving to more Penguins-centric questions. Part 2 of this mailbag is coming soon. Away we go. Do you think it's silly to root against McDavid to win a cup to keep him a peg below Sid? —@beancantfly No, not really. I get it. If you're from Pittsburgh and/or a Penguins fan, you aren't just rooting for championships. You've had the privilege of watching some of the greatest players of all time, from Mario Lemieux to Jaromir Jagr to Sidney Crosby to Evgeni Malkin. It's completely natural to get territorial and to want your guy to be considered the best. And if you're a Sid fan and are very prideful in him being the best player of this century, then I imagine you feel a bit threatened by Connor McDavid. Deep down, you know McDavid's overall talent probably exceeds Sid's. But then again, Lemieux was twice as talented as Gretzky, and most hockey experts like to say Gretzky is the greatest player of all time. I was so, so happy when the Canadiens beat the Kings in the 1993 Stanley Cup Final. I just didn't want Gretzky to get another one. Mind you, I was 13, but still, it's fair. Advertisement While McDavid might be more talented than Sid, the fact is, Sid's accomplishments in terms of winning utterly dwarf McDavid's. I believe the five greatest players who ever lived are Lemieux, Gretzky, Bobby Orr, Crosby and McDavid. I can't imagine anyone else cracking that top five, with all due respect to Gordie Howe, Jagr, Alex Ovechkin, Rocket Richard or whomever else you want to put on this list. You can make an argument for anyone in that top five. There's no right or wrong answer. It's yet to be seen, but if McDavid wins the Cup this year, does he jump over Sid as an all-time great, or does it take more? How many Cups do you think McDavid wins before he retires? — @skiab94 Well, we're talking about public opinion now. Many people these days like to say, 'McDavid is the greatest player of all time!' And hey, maybe he is. He's remarkable. But I also think we fall into the trap of always wanting the person we're currently watching to be the greatest. There's no real joy in taking your son or daughter to a game and saying, 'Look at that, the eighth-greatest player who ever lived!' We tend to forget how great Crosby was in his prime. His prime was cut terribly short because of concussions. But I suspect that McDavid will exceed him in the opinion of many if indeed he does win the Cup. What was your favorite Stanley Cup Final series that did not involve the Penguins? — @cgibson724 Other than this one? Because this one has been insanely entertaining. I'd probably say the 2015 series between Chicago and Boston. That was great stuff with a stunning ending. Josh, how surprised were you that Dan Muse was the coaching choice? Where does it rank among surprise coaching and management hires in Penguins history? — @jlkaplan7 Oh, I was surprised, Jake. Many people in my line of work like to come across as knowing everything and refuse to act surprised as a result. But yeah, I was surprised. Advertisement I knew Muse was interviewed early on, so I guess it didn't come as a total shock. I never sensed he was a front runner and I was certainly not expecting him to be the choice. Do you think one of Rust, Rakell, or Karlsson will be moved this offseason? Kyle Dubas acknowledged he's getting tons of calls on them. — @DustinDiGenio Anything is in play with all three of them. Of the three, I think the most likely to be dealt this summer is Karlsson. My guess is all three will be with the Penguins when next season begins but at least one will be dealt before the deadline. I think Rust is the most likely to finish his contract in Pittsburgh. The Penguins could certainly receive plenty in return for him, but I wouldn't be surprised if he's a lifer. They really love him. As for Rakell, he could go at some point. Interestingly, there wasn't the level of interest in him before the deadline that you would have expected. I struggle with the segment of Pens fans who are dying to just make the playoffs. We rightly criticize the Steelers for their perpetual 10-7/9-8 records while never winning playoff games. Why not strive for a return to a Cup contender like KD wants? The Penguins should always shoot for cups — @nathan_lewy Everyone has their opinion on this topic. Personally, I agree with Dubas' line of thinking. He's shooting big. He doesn't just want to be a wild-card team. I get it, and I like it. That's what I would do if I were the GM. That said, nothing is much worse than a spring without playoff hockey. Do you think that, with the new coaching staff, the Pens give Tristan Jarry and Ryan Graves 'one last chance' to get back to the level of play that won them those contracts? — @TheAndoman I don't think they have any choice. No one is going to trade for them, and the Penguins don't want to buy them out. Advertisement It will be very interesting to see how Graves plays with a new set of eyes on him. Expectations will be disturbingly low, mind you, but it can't hurt to have some new coaches working with him. For the last three seasons, the Pens have lost so many games while leading. I'm certain this was very frustrating to players and coaches. Do you believe Dubas thought Sully's methods had anything to do with this? This team had enough talent to get leads just couldn't hold them…. — @cooljerdoc I have no doubt that the Penguins' defense has been troubling to Dubas since he took over two years ago. But I don't think he ever blamed Sullivan for it. I truly believe he thinks Sullivan is a great coach. What do you think is the best path forward for the Penguins on goalie? Sit tight and hope someone develops? Ride out Jarry's contract then trade for a 1G? Draft more? — @Lemieux67 Sergei Murashov is the future. At least, that's what the Penguins are hoping for. He's probably one year away from being NHL-ready. Playing Jarry heavily this season probably makes sense. As putrid as he was for most of the last season, he actually was the Penguins' best goalie and, to his credit, was good in the season's final month. I think you play Jarry until Murashov is ready, and you hope Murashov is the guy. If he's not, worry about it at that point. A good goalie is often the last thing a hockey team needs. It's like a closer in baseball. You don't really need a great one until you're ready to win. The Penguins just aren't there yet. Is Doc Emrick as awesome in real life as he was on the call? — @LetangCult Oh yeah. One of the kindest people I've ever met. In May 2020, I showed him a Pirates face mask that my girlfriend's aunt had made. She was selling them, and he asked me if he could have one. Naturally, I mailed him one and told him not to worry about the money. Advertisement A week later, I received $30 in cash in an envelope and a handwritten note on a PNC Park letterhead. Doesn't get any better than that. He's the epitome of class. How do you go about acquiring reliable sources as a sports journalist who specifically covers a team? — @BigSaveEh There's no direct answer to this one. Sometimes, when people start to learn who you are, they come to you with information. Sometimes, people want you to write nice things about them — assistant coaches who want to be head coaches are always great for this — so they'll give you information so that, in turn, you might write nice things about them. The ol' 'I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine' approach. (I absolutely hate this. It makes me feel dirty.) In other cases, you just treat people well and get to know them over the years, and they'll help you out. The best thing you can do is treat people with respect. Don't quote them when it's off the record. Use common sense. Check with them before you write something. Do that, and you'll be fine. Wings: Bone-in or boneless and what flavor? — @KMarker14 Bone-in, and with conviction. Are they really wings if they aren't bone-in? And I like flats better than drumsticks. I'm so boring and tame with sauces. The Big Sexy sauce (Mark Madden's trademark) at Big Shot Bob's is sensational. I like any kind of garlic parmesan as well. Or honey mustard. Anything but Cajun-y sauces. Not my thing. Thanks for all the great questions. Another mailbag is on deck. (Photo of Sidney Crosby and Connor McDavid: Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
The case for the WNBA extending its season into NFL territory
The case for the WNBA extending its season into NFL territory What we're all watching this summer is technically the longest WNBA season ever. All 13 teams across the league will play 44 games over 118 days, from May 16 to September 11. When it's all said and done, this will be the most games ever played in a WNBA season. As a fan, I'm thankful on one hand. The more WNBA the better. On the other, this new schedule already seems to be posing a problem for players around the league, and the season isn't even quite a month old yet. Players expressed their concerns about the schedule in an article from Front Office Sports' Annie Costabile. The crux of it is this: The WNBA's schedule has increased the number of games played over four years, from 32 in 2021 to 44 in 2025. While the league has added more games, it hasn't added the requisite amount of time in between these games for proper rest and recovery for its players. That packed schedule has resulted in stints where players are playing four games in six nights or, like in the Phoenix Mercury's case, nine games in 18 days. That's grueling and, really, unnecessary. That packed schedule is only going to get worse. The WNBA is adding two more teams next season, in the Toronto Tempo and the Portland expansion team. We're probably looking at another few games added to the schedule with those two teams coming. If that happens, an expansion on the season is desperately needed. The only argument against the expansion is that the WNBA will be encroaching deep into NFL territory, which is something essentially every league is afraid of these days. The NFL is a ratings monster. Go up against a football game — especially during primetime — and your audience is probably going to get cannibalized. It could also run up against the NBA, which could be a source of internal strife among the two organizations. MLB will also be playing the World Series around this time. However, I'd argue that these are not things the WNBA should be concerned with at this point. As far as TV ratings go, the WNBA should be confident enough at this point to believe it can hold its own against any other league it might run up against. And, yes, that includes the NFL. The W's most popular players are drawing nearly 3 million viewers to regular-season games at this point. You could argue that's a bit anomalous because it's Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese and people will watch every time they play. But when games are being played that late in the season in September and October, we're either talking about late regular-season matchups that have significance for playoff seeding or we're talking about playoffs outright. People will be drawn to these games. But, honestly, the ratings conversation doesn't even really matter here. We've said it once before and we'll say it again: The WNBA has already signed the biggest TV deal in the league's history. That deal is locked in for the next decade. Ratings no longer matter in conversations about this league. They won't until it's time to lock in the next deal, and once we arrive there, the league will likely be light years ahead of where it is today. In the end, ratings shouldn't take precedence over player health. We're only a few weeks into the season and we've already seen so many players suffer from soft tissue injuries that you can't help but feel like they could've been avoided if not for so much wear and tear on the talent. If extending the WNBA's calendar out another month or so can alleviate some of that, then so be it. The league should do it, no matter what the NFL, NBA, or anyone else thinks. Bennedict Mathurin becomes Michael Jordan The Indiana Pacers are two wins away from winning an NBA championship and pulling off one of the biggest upsets in the league's history and it's all thanks to Bennedict Mathurin, who was the hero of Game 3 for Indy. The dude scored 27 points in 22 minutes, which is bonkers. But it gets even more bonkers when you see the conversation he just entered. Mathurin is only 22 years old. Here's the list of dudes who've scored at least 25 points in the NBA Finals at 22 or younger: There are a bunch of Hall of Famers on that list and then there's Mathurin, who is still charting his course. I have no idea where things go from here for the Pacers' forward, but that's a pretty good list to be on. Byron Buxton to the moon I don't even know what to say about Byron Buxton's 479-foot homer against the Rangers. The Twins' broadcast team didn't, either. All they could do was laugh. Here's Cory Woodroof on the moonshot: "It's one of the longest home runs of the 2025 MLB season, and it's one that left the Twins television broadcast in stitches over just how dominant it really was. I mean, he sent that baseball into another time zone. You don't often see an MLB player hammer a homer like this, but Buxton slammed this baseball in stride. You know you've done well when all your team's broadcast team can do is laugh at how great of a home run it was." Look at this thing. It truly is comical. Insane. Quick hits: A new consensus mock ... The Knicks get rejected again ... and more — Here's Bryan Kalbrosky with a new consensus NBA mock draft for you. Can't believe it's almost draft season. — The Knicks really need to go find a head coach who doesn't already have a team, man. Charles Curtis has more on their latest rejections. — Our Meg Hall had a nice chat with Sha'Carri Richardson! Y'all know you need to click this one. — A dentist is playing in the US Open. No, seriously. Charles Curtis has five facts you need to know about him. — Charles Barkley roasted the Knicks' coaching search. Absolutely love this. — Here's Robert Zeglinski on Kyle Shanahan being annoyed with how fans overreact to NFL practices. This is brilliant. That's a wrap, folks. Thanks for reading. Peace. -Sykes ✌️ This is For The Win's daily newsletter, The Morning Win. Did a friend recommend or forward this to you? If so, subscribe here.
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Questions To Ask Yourself To Boost Your Personal Brand
Who made Superman's personal brand what it is today? And what can you as an experienced leader learn ... More from that? Photo: Actor Brandon Routh launches the New Wax Figure of Superman from "Superman Returns" - June 27, 2006 at Madame Tussauds in New York, United States. (Photo by Michael Loccisano) As an experienced leader, your personal brand may not be as visible as Superman's. But just because you don't wear an S on your chest or a cape on your back, don't think your personal brand doesn't matter. In fact, if you suddenly find yourself job hunting, it's likely your personal brand that will determine whether or not you succeed. So what is your personal brand? And how do you boost it if it's not a matter of buying a shinier – and tighter – suit? In the movie, Batman Begins, Batman's alter ego Bruce Wayne argues that people need dramatic examples to shake them out of apathy – and that he can't do that as a man: 'As a man, I'm flesh and blood, I can be ignored, I can be destroyed. But as a symbol… As a symbol, I can be incorruptible. I can be everlasting.' Is that the answer to what your personal brand is? A symbol that makes you incorruptible and everlasting? As opposed to a man – or woman – of flesh and blood? With the promises of AGI flooding the news, it's tempting to say yes. After all, the job market is insatiable when it comes to people and machines that can out-think, out-pace, and out-perform other people and machines. And doesn't that call for super-human leaders who can shake everyone out of apathy? Before you rush to decide on a symbol that can neither be ignored nor destroyed, let's ask who made Superman and Batman's personal brands what they are today. Was it their alter egos, Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne? The comic book writers who invented the superheroes? The actors who embodied them on screen? Or the millions of readers and viewers who have followed them through generations? Of course, there is no single answer to who created Superman and Batman's personal brands. And the same goes for you and your personal brand. No matter how much time you spend defining who you are and what you want others to think and say about you, you cannot control how you are perceived. What you can – and should – do is ask yourself three questions that have guided flesh and blood humans for millennia. In the early 1700s, the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz came up with what is often described as the greatest philosophical question of all, namely: why is there something rather than nothing? This may seem like a peculiar question – not least in the context of personal branding. But reminding yourself of how Leibniz took the age-old question of why our universe is the way it is to the next level by asking why there is a universe at all can actually be a really good way to boost your personal brand. In addition to asking yourself questions about your personal values and career goals, asking questions that put you and your contribution as a leader in the greatest possible context will help you focus your efforts where they matter most. After all, if there is no industry, company, product, or customer demand for you to lead, your values and career goals will be as redundant as Batman without Gotham. So to boost you personal brand, don't focus on your personal brand. Instead, focus on why there is something rather than nothing for you to lead. And how you can help take industries, companies, products and customers to the next level. Great philosophical questions can be divided into three categories. Epistemological questions about how we know what (we think) we know – e.g. 'why is there something rather than nothing?' Ethical questions about what is the right thing to do. And existential questions about who we are as humans. Common to these three categories of questions is that no one – least of all a machine – can answer them for you. Also, they cannot be answered once and for all. And with ethical questions, like 'what is the right thing to do?', you must not only ask them again and again, you must ask them again and again – each day! While the advantage of being a symbol is that you can, in the words of Bruce Wayne, be incorruptible and everlasting, the advantage of being human is that you cannot. You can become corrupt, and you will eventually die. 'How is this an advantage?', you might ask. And you should. It only takes one bad decision to destroy your personal brand. And there are no guarantees. Even when you think you're making all the right decisions based on all the right answers, others may see it differently. And that's the advantage of being human: that your personal brand is negotiable. Changeable. Evolving. Just as it only takes one bad decision to destroy your personal brand, it only takes one question to start fixing it. It's not your answer to 'What is the right thing to do?' that make or break your personal brand. It's your willingness to keep asking it. Being corruptible, negotiable, and changeable is not only essential to your personal brand. It's essential to being you. Unlike Clark Kent and Superman, and Bruce Wayne and Batman, you and your personal brand are not two distinctive entities. Your flesh and blood is indistinguishable from your personal brand and vice versa. That's why you act differently in different situations. While Batman, who, in the words of the Joker, is destined to do the same thing forever, you are neither 'an unstoppable force' (like the Joker describes himself) nor 'an immovable object' (like Batman). You, like the people on the boats in The Dark Knight Rises, act according to who you are right here and right now. Sometimes you do as expected, sometimes you don't. Being a flesh and blood human as opposed to a symbol means asking the existential questions that help you assess and adapt to the situations you find yourself in. While the promise of AGI and superheroes is to out-think, out-pace, and out-perform everything and everyone, your job as a human leader is to see and hear the world from within. Like the industries, companies, products, and people you lead, you are a temporal being. You occupy a specific place at a specific time in history that enables you to see, hear, and act on some things and prevents you from seeing, hearing, and acting on others. It is because you are situated that you are able to take a position, make your perspective count, and build a personal brand. Not in spite of it. Because you cannot be everywhere at once, it matters where you choose to spend your time now. And now. Every moment, you prioritize and focus on something instead of something else. Someone instead of someone else. This prioritization and focus is what determines whether or not you succeed. In your job hunt and everything else.
