Trump's latest pardons benefit an array of political allies and public figures
WASHINGTON (AP) — A governor who resigned amid a corruption scandal and served two stints in federal prison. A New York Republican who resigned from Congress after a tax fraud conviction and who made headlines for threatening to throw a reporter off a Capitol balcony over a question he didn't like. Reality TV stars convicted of cheating banks and evading taxes.
All were unlikely beneficiaries this week of pardons, with President Donald Trump flexing his executive power to bestow clemency on political allies, prominent public figures and others convicted of defrauding the public. The moves not only take aim at criminal cases once touted as just by the Justice Department but also come amid a continuing Trump administration erosion of public integrity guardrails, including the firing of the department's pardon attorney and the near-dismantling of a prosecution unit established to hold public officials accountable for abusing the public trust.
'He is using pardons to essentially override the verdicts of juries, to set aside the sentences that have been imposed by judges and to accomplish political objectives,' said Liz Oyer, who was fired in March as the pardon attorney after she says she refused to endorse a recommendation to restore the gun rights of actor Mel Gibson, a Trump supporter. 'That is very damaging and destructive to our system of justice.'
To be sure, other presidents have courted controversy with their clemency decisions. President Gerald Ford famously pardoned his predecessor, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton pardoned fugitive financier Marc Rich just hours before the Democratic president left office. More recently, President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, sparing the younger Biden a possible prison sentence for federal felony gun and tax convictions and reversing his past promises not to use the extraordinary powers of the presidency for the benefit of his family.
But the pardons announced Wednesday are part of a pattern of clemency grants that began in Trump's first term and has continued in the current one in which bold-face names, prominent supporters and defendants whose causes are championed by friends time and again have an edge on ordinary citizens who lack connections to the White House.
In 2020, for instance, he pardoned allies convicted in the Russia election interference investigation that shadowed his first term as well as his son-in-law's father, Charles Kushner, who was later named ambassador to France.
On his first day back in office, he pardoned, commuted the prison sentences or vowed to dismiss the cases of all of the 1,500-plus people charged with crimes in the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, using his clemency powers to undo the massive prosecution of the unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy.
Twice indicted by the Justice Department, and entangled in criminal investigations in the White House and in his post-presidency life, Trump has long conveyed public suspicion about prosecutorial power and found common cause with politicians — including on the other side of the aisle — he sees as having been mistreated like he believes he was.
In February, for instance, the Republican president pardoned former Democratic Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich after having earlier commuted his 14-year sentence on political corruption charges. Blagojevich, he said, 'was set up by a lot of bad people, some of the same people I had to deal with.'
The most recent pardon beneficiaries include former GOP New York Rep. Michael Grimm, who pleaded guilty in 2014 to underreporting wages and revenue at a restaurant he ran in Manhattan. The former Marine and FBI agent resigned from Congress the following year and served eight months in prison. Grimm tried to reenter politics in 2018 but lost a primary for his old district.
Others include former Republican Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, whose once-promising political career was cut short by an investigation into gifts and favors from state contractors. Rowland was convicted and imprisoned a second time for conspiring to hide his work on political campaigns and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison.
The White House also announced pardons for rap artist NBA YoungBoy on gun-related charges and TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, famous for 'Chrisley Knows Best,' a reality show that followed their family and extravagant lifestyle that prosecutors said was boosted by bank fraud and hiding earnings from tax authorities. The couple was convicted in 2022 of conspiring to defraud banks out of more than $30 million in loans by submitting false documents.
The latest pardons unfold as Trump has departed from the norms and protocols of the clemency process and as the Justice Department has signaled a tweaked approach to public corruption and white-collar fraud.
The department, for instance, has long had a pardon attorney tasked with sifting through applications from defendants and recommending clemency to the White House for those seen as having served their debt to society and accepted responsibility for their crimes, including drug offenders serving long sentences and not generally known to the public or connected to the powerful.
In place of Oyer, the fired pardon attorney, the administration installed Ed Martin, a Trump loyalist who briefly served as interim U.S. attorney in Washington. He has already pledged to scrutinize pardons that Biden issued on his way out of the White House and has said he would take a 'hard look' at two men who are serving long prison terms for leading a conspiracy to kidnap Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
Meanwhile, the department's vaunted public integrity section, created in the post-Watergate era to investigate and prosecute public officials for abusing their powers, has been dramatically slashed, whittled down to just a handful of lawyers.
The section endured an exodus of prosecutors after Justice Department leaders demanded the dismissal of a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams so he could assist in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
The pardons, said Princeton University presidential historian Julian Zelizer, fit 'within the fold of his presidency, where he uses a lot of his power either for retribution or reward rather than for just kind of pure policy-making. We have to understand the pardons in that framework.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
12 minutes ago
- New York Times
Nearly All Remaining Voice of America Employees Could Be Fired in Proposed Restructuring
The Trump administration notified Congress this week of a plan that would eliminate nearly all of the remaining employees at Voice of America, a federally funded news network that provides independent reporting to countries with limited press freedom. The staff count at Voice of America would shrink from roughly 1,400 journalists and administrative staff to less than 20 as part of the proposed restructuring, according to a letter dated Tuesday and addressed to Senator Jim Risch, Republican of Idaho and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. About a third of those 1,400 workers have already been laid off, however, as the administration has moved rapidly to dismantle a media organization President Trump has attacked as 'the voice of radical America.' The letter, reviewed by The New York Times, was signed by Kari Lake, a key ally of President Trump and a senior adviser for the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees Voice of America. The proposed reorganization is in line with Mr. Trump's orders to slash the size of the federal work force. But the president and his allies have also been harshly critical of the outlet's coverage. He accused the outlet, which delivers news in countries with authoritarian governments such as Russia, China and Iran, of spreading 'anti-American' and partisan 'propaganda.' The letter states that the latest round of firings would lead to 'the deletion' of other news services provided by Voice of America, which broadcast in 49 languages to nearly 100 countries for more than 350 million listeners and readers until March. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Motor 1
35 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Bollinger Motors Has Been Saved From the Brink of Death
Bollinger Motors has been saved. Mullen Automotive has acquired an additional 21 percent of the company, bringing its total ownership to 95 percent. Despite having complete control over Bollinger, Mullen said the automaker will maintain 'its own brand identity and focus.' Bollinger reportedly went into receivership earlier this year after company founder and former CEO Robert Bollinger sued the automaker, who left in 2024. He claimed Bollinger Motors owed him $10 million, but all that should be in the company's past. According to Mullen announcing the acquisition, it has 'resolved recent claims and debt that had led to a court-ordered receivership for Bollinger.' The court has discharged and removed the receiver and dismissed the case, Mullen says. Bollinger customers should expect 'business as usual,' which includes sales, services, and warranty coverage. The company will continue to develop the B4 chassis cab , its all-electric Class 4 commercial truck. Bollinger will utilize Mullen's resources to accelerate development and integrate the B4 into Mullen's EV ecosystem. Bollinger was founded in 2015 with initial plans to develop a mid-size electric pickup and an SUV. However, the B1 and B2 never entered production, and the company shifted focus to an electric commercial truck. Production for that began last September. More Cheap EVs Fiat's First Three-Wheel EV Is This Super Cute Delivery Truck Opinion: I Love and Loathe Bezos's Cheap Pickup Truck Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Mullen Automotive Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US State Department's planned layoffs may violate court order, judge says
By Daniel Wiessner (Reuters) -A federal judge in California on Wednesday said her recent ruling barring President Donald Trump's administration from laying off tens of thousands of federal employees likely blocks the U.S. State Department's reorganization plan that includes 2,000 job cuts. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco during a virtual meeting in a lawsuit by unions, nonprofits and municipalities said she was concerned that the State Department is flouting her May 22 order that broadly blocked government-wide mass layoffs. Illston temporarily blocked about 20 agencies, including the State Department, from carrying out plans to downsize and restructure federal agencies at Trump's direction. But the department told Congress last week that it still planned to notify about 2,000 employees this month that they were being laid off and would reorganize or eliminate more than 300 bureaus and offices. 'At this point there are some semantics being bandied about, but it appears to me that what is being implemented at the State Department now is covered by the injunction,' said Illston, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Illston ordered both sides to file briefs on the matter next week and said she would hold a hearing by June 13, the earliest date that State can issue layoff notices after it submitted its plan to Congress. In her May ruling, Illston said the White House cannot order the restructuring of federal agencies without authorization from Congress. The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause Illston's decision while it appeals, after a San Francisco-based federal appeals court refused to permit the pause. Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Musk last week said he was ending his stint with the administration, raising questions about the future of his Department of Government Efficiency. During Wednesday's 30-minute meeting, U.S. Department of Justice lawyer Andrew Bernie argued that the State Department's reorganization plan predated a February executive order and subsequent White House memo directing mass layoffs, placing it outside the scope of Illston's decision. 'We of course recognize and take with the utmost seriousness our obligation to comply with the injunction, and we are complying,' Bernie said, adding that 17 federal agencies have halted planned layoffs. But Danielle Leonard, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, countered that State Department documents and statements regarding the planned layoffs specifically reference orders from the White House. 'We've heard some things from Mr. Bernie today, but we haven't seen anything sworn under penalty of perjury saying this was … independently done,' she said. Illston had convened Wednesday's meeting after the plaintiffs in a filing late Tuesday accused the State Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of not complying with her decision. They said that HUD had fired about 80 employees who had not completed a probationary period, which Bernie on Wednesday confirmed. But he said that agencies have broad latitude to fire probationary workers, and those terminations were not the same as the mass layoffs of tenured employees that were blocked by Illston. Probationary workers typically have less than a year or two in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees in new positions. Illston said it was not clear to her whether the firings at HUD were covered by her injunction.