
Anti-indy media fears success shows Scotland trumps Westminster
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has announced that the Scottish Government will end the two-child benefit cap in March next year. While Keir Starmer hums and haws and gets his minions to leak to the press that he is looking at lifting the cap without committing himself to anything concrete, the SNP and the Scottish Government get on with doing it.
Somerville said: "The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two-child cap. Reports suggest that they are looking at the impact it is having. But the evidence is clear, and families and Scotland can't wait any longer for the UK Government to make up its mind to do the right thing and scrap the cap once and for all.'
READ MORE: We must show voters how things would be different with independence
The controversial cap was introduced by the Conservatives under Theresa May (below) in 2017. It denies child allowances in Universal Credit and tax credits to third or subsequent children born after April 2017. The cap has been blamed for being the single biggest factor in the rise in child poverty in the UK.
(Image: Hannah McKay/PA Wire)Almost one third of children across the UK are classified as living in relative poverty, 70% of whom live in households where at least one parent is in work. According to anti-poverty charity the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, current levels of poverty are around 50% higher than they were in the 1970s.
Thanks to the Scottish Child Payment, introduced in February 2021, Scotland is the only part of the UK where the rate of child poverty is decreasing. The Scottish Government is hamstrung by the limitations of the devolution settlement and cannot mitigate entirely the pernicious effects of UK Government tax, benefit, and economic policies.
While child poverty in Scotland remains a serious problem, 22% of Scottish children were assessed as living in poverty in 2023/24, down from 26% the previous year. This is significantly lower than the child poverty rates in other parts of the UK. 31% of children in England and Wales are assessed as living in poverty, a figure that increases to 36% in the West Midlands. Unlike in Scotland, the rate of child poverty in England and Wales continues to rise.
The reduction in child poverty in Scotland is a remarkable success for the Scottish Government. It is largely due to the introduction of the Scottish Child payment, which, unlike Westminster administered benefits, is not limited to the first two children in a family.
READ MORE: UK 'feeding Scotland poison pills', John Swinney says
Professor Danny Dorling of Oxford University said that the Scottish Child Payment was responsible for the biggest reduction in inequality caused by a single policy change since the collapse of the Berlin Wall. He said that he was unable to find any other policy which has had as big an impact on reducing inequality as the Scottish Child Payment.
Yet the Scottish Government gets very little credit for this in the Scottish or British media, as Professor Dorling noted: "It's a remarkable story and the second remarkable story is how it hasn't been reported."
It's not reported in England because Scotland might as well be the moon as far as the London-centric media is concerned. It's not reported in Scotland because Scotland's laughably imbalanced anti-independence media has an existential terror of reporting anything successful in Scotland for fear this might lead people to believe that Scotland can actually do better than Westminster at governance.
Or worse, lead them to think that perhaps with independence Scotland could do even better. Note how BBC Scotland framed the news earlier this that Scotland is the only part of the UK where the rate of child poverty is falling. The BBC's headline was "Scotland misses targets on reducing child poverty."
The news that the rate of child poverty in England and Wales was much higher and was rising was buried deep within a piece which did not explicitly spell out that Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling; a Scottish success was spun as a failure.
READ MORE: 2031 Scotland census planning underway as public input sought on new questions
This tells us that a policy of boosting support for independence through good governance in a devolved government is never going to succeed, because the anti-independence media in Scotland, which is the overwhelming majority of media outlets in Scotland, will continue to loudly trumpet all the Scottish Government's failures and will either ignore its successes or find some angle to spin those as failures too. No doubt the same will happen with the new Two Child Limit Payment.
The Scottish media has almost ignored the introduction of the Scottish Adult Disability Payment, whose streamlined, medically based assessment system is far less stressful and demeaning for disabled people than the complex and unnecessarily cruel assessment for the Personal Independence Payment which it replaced. No doubt the same will happen with the new Two Child Limit Payment, unless there are teething problems with the new benefit, in which case the Scottish media will be screaming SNP failure from the rafter
In another Scottish success story which is being ignored, a new study has found that Scotland has been the top destination for foreign direct investment in the UK outside of London for a decade.
Figures from EY – one of the 'big four' accounting firms – showed that in 2024 Scotland attracted 15.8% of the UK projects targeted for foreign direct investment (FDI), up from 14.4% in 2023 and above its decade average of 11.5%.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
31 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
National grooming gang probe ‘must be extended to Scotland'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE national criminal investigation into grooming gangs must be extended to Scotland to avoid a 'missed opportunity', the peer in charge of a damning report into the scandal has said. Baroness Casey's report found victims were failed by cops and officials who were in 'denial' about the rape and abuse of white girls by disproportionately Asian men and called for a major UK-wide criminal probe into the issue. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Baroness Casey's damning report laid bare how the State was in 'denial' over the rape and abuse of white girls. Credit: PA 3 A national inquiry into grooming gangs has been announced Credit: Getty Asked whether Scotland should be part of it, she said: 'I would be disappointed if the opportunity of the national criminal investigation [was missed]. 'I can move from Scotland to England pretty easily and criminals do, so that would be a missed opportunity.' Sir Keir Starmer bowed to pressure at the weekend and ordered a national inquiry into mass child sex abuse ahead of the publication of Baroness Casey's review. Her devastating report on Monday laid bare how the State was in 'denial' over the rape and abuse of white girls. Dame Louise Casey found perpetrators — disproportionately involving Asian men, many of Pakistani heritage — got away with it because of fears about inflaming community tensions. And the Scottish Tories demanded the public inquiry into the scandal must also be expanded to cover Scotland. Shadow Scottish Secretary Andrew Bowie yesterday/today said: 'Now that the Labour Government has finally bowed to the huge public demand for a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal it is essential that it is truly national in scope. 'That means extending the remit to include Scotland, where there have been well-documented cases of gangs responsible for the rape and sexual abuse of young women.' The MP called on Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to work with Nats chiefs on what is covered by the inquiry to all the 'voices of Scottish victims of these vile gangs' to be heard. Mr Bowie added: 'We already know that vulnerable young women were appallingly let down by Labour-run councils, where it appears that partisan political considerations led to the cover-up of the issue. Ethnicity of child sex abuse suspects will be logged after truth about Asian grooming gangs was 'dodged for YEARS' 'It's essential to uncover if sensitivities over the racial make-up of the perpetrators was a factor in the Scottish cases too.' In 2020, it was revealed cops kept secret a huge asylum seeker grooming gang in Glasgow which had at least 44 victims. All the perpetrators were asylum seekers from the Kurdish, Afghani, Egyptian, Moroccan, Turkish, Pakistani or Iraqi communities. Speaking in Westminster, Baroness Casey said it was a 'matter for Scotland to decide' whether to take part. She added: 'Criminals move to wherever they can get their prey. And with the internet, they do that even quicker and easier. I mean, it's an issue internationally, not just between the devolved nations. 'I think it is really important that across certainly Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England, there's some join up around these sorts of issues.' Baroness Casey also urged Scots not to think grooming gangs could not be taking place in Scotland. She said: 'Don't just read this report and think it may not happen to you.' The Home Office was contacted for comment.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's platitudes show Britain frozen out of big decisions on Iran
Expressions of concern, calls for de-escalation. As the 20-year crisis over Iran's nuclear ambitions reaches its historic climax, Britain has resorted to a policy of platitudes. Sir Keir Starmer wants no part in Israel's offensive against the Iranian regime and its nuclear plants. He will keep Britain as far away as possible from this campaign, and there is no reason to suppose that his position will change even if American forces were to join the assault, as anonymous US officials have been hinting. That is an entirely defensible position. Israel's bombs could yet achieve nothing but impose a short delay in Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon. The uranium enrichment plant at Natanz has been severely damaged, wrecking thousands of centrifuges, but the second such facility, buried in a mountain at Fordow, seems to have escaped attack so far. If Iran's regime manages to survive the onslaught and then repair the damage in a few months before going for a nuclear weapon as rapidly as possible, then Israel will have failed and Britain's decision to stay out will look entirely sensible. But the campaign may not end that way and, in the meantime, Sir Keir's empty bromides doom Britain to diplomatic irrelevance. There is simply no reason for Iran or Israel – and certainly not the United States – to listen to a word that the Prime Minister or his Government say on this subject. Britain wishes to have nothing to do with the enterprise, and therefore it cannot expect to have any influence over what happens next. That leaves Sir Keir with one deeply traditional goal of British diplomacy: to avoid an open breach with America. Hence the Prime Minister's claims that Donald Trump is fully behind 'de-escalation' and has no intention of joining the military campaign. Having dined with Mr Trump at the G7 summit on Monday, Sir Keir declared: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict.' Alas, straight after the summit, Mr Trump said plenty to suggest exactly that. He declared variously that 'we' have 'total control of the skies over Iran' and 'we' know 'exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding' and Ayatollah Khamenei's only way out was 'unconditional surrender'. John Healey, the Defence Secretary, claimed heroically that Mr Trump was 'leading the calls for Iran to do a deal ', which is true if your definition of 'calls' includes issuing blood-curdling threats. If America now joins forces with Israel – and if this crisis ends with the total destruction of Iran's nuclear programme and perhaps the downfall of the regime – then Britain will have been a bystander in a moment of epoch-making importance. That is not necessarily a bad thing, but given that British diplomats and politicians have been deeply engaged in the Iran nuclear issue ever since the Natanz plant was first discovered in 2002, it seems strange, after all that effort, to choose irrelevance at the most decisive hour of the saga.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Ban Chinese companies from investing in British water utilities, ministers urged
Ministers are being urged to block Chinese firms from investing in water utilities after they were banned from involvement with the Sizewell C nuclear plant. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has been warned that allowing companies based in China or Hong Kong to buy crucial utilities would be 'negligent'. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband last week banned Chinese investment in the Sizewell C nuclear plant amid growing concerns over the country's involvement in key UK infrastructure. And it followed demands from CKI, which is owned by Hong Kong billionaire Li-Ka-shing and already holds a majority stake in Northumbrian Water, to be allowed to bid for Thames Water. The struggling utility was plunged further into crisis earlier this month after American private equity giant KKR – the Government's preferred bidder – abandoned a £4bn rescue plan. KKR's U-turn – which sources said was due to concerns about the risk of political interference – fuelled fears that taxpayers could be forced to bail out Britain's biggest water company. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has been warned that allowing companies based in China or Hong Kong to buy crucial utilities would be 'negligent' Tory MP Nick Timothy said Chinese companies should not be allowed to invest in Thames Water. In a letter to Reed, seen by the Mail, Timothy said Miliband's decision was 'correct, given the threat posed by China to the UK and the wider west'. He said: 'It would be negligent to hand over yet more of our critical national infrastructure on top of China's already extensive footprint. 'In light of the Government's ban on Chinese investment in nuclear power, will you impose a similar ban on further Chinese investment in the water sector?' Companies in mainland China 'are under various obligations to the Chinese state, such as requirements to support, assist and cooperate with national intelligence efforts', he said. He argued that those based in Hong Kong 'also pose a serious risk, since they are now subject to authoritarian National Security Laws which have increased Beijing's reach into the territory'.