Three committees complain of ‘inadequate consultation' over welfare reforms
A letter to Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall also said there had been a 'lack of robust data' to allow parliamentarians in the three areas to 'effectively scrutinise' the potential impact of the changes.
The letter, sent by the Scottish Parliament's Social Justice and Social Security Committee together with the Equality and Social Justice Committee of the Welsh Senedd and the Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for Communities, comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs against the proposed changes.
We, alongside @nia_communities & @seneddequality, have jointly written to @leicesterliz, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, to share our concerns about a lack of meaningful engagement on proposed changes to the UK benefits system.
Read the letter: https://t.co/IKT4qGa4cy pic.twitter.com/EtDHwTU5Hw
— Social Justice and Social Security Committee (@SP_SJSS) June 25, 2025
A Commons vote on the plans to squeeze sickness and incapacity benefits is due to go ahead on Tuesday, despite 120 Labour MPs having publicly backed a move to block the legislation.
Meanwhile, the Work and Pensions Secretary was told there are 'significant concerns' about the Government's changes.
The letter from the three committees told how the 'economic backdrop' for many of those claiming disability benefits is 'already extremely challenging'.
And the committees added that the payments people receive 'are not symptomatic of a 'broken' system, but make a significant contribution to their health and wellbeing'.
They told Ms Kendall they were 'agreed that inadequate consultation and engagement by the UK Government with stakeholders and the devolved institutions has contributed to this sense of concern'.
Representatives from the committees added: 'In addition, the lack of robust data and jurisdiction-specific impact assessments presents significant challenges for our three committees to effectively scrutinise potential impacts.'
Here they insisted they have been 'constrained by the lack of quality information'.
They added: 'Our committees fully support the stated ambition that 'no-one should be consigned to a life on benefits just because they have a health condition or a disability, especially when they're able to and want to work with the right support in place'.
'However, in order to contribute meaningfully to the reform process, committees and citizens must be fully informed and offered every opportunity for meaningful engagement.'
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration slaps down UK after MPs pass assisted dying bill
The Trump administration has lashed out at the UK after MPs passed Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill - accusing Britain of 'standing for surrender and death'. The president's State Department said the US 'reaffirms the sanctity of life' in an attack on the Labour MP's Terminally Ill Adults Bill. 'The western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death,' it said in a social media post from its Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. It said the bill is 'euphemistically' said to be for terminally ill adults, but described it instead as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The attack comes a week after the bill, which would legalise assisted dying for those diagnosed with a terminal illness, passed with a slim majority of just 23 votes. Those with fewer than six months to live would be able to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. The bill is now heading to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, where it is set to face more opposition. The US intervention came after Sir Keir Starmer slapped down Wes Streeting for raising concerns over how assisted dying would be funded if it becomes law. The prime minister said he was 'confident we've done that preparation' and that it is his job to 'make sure the bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects'. Last week's crunch assisted dying vote, which saw the bill narrowly pass by just 23 votes, came after months of impassioned debate, culminating in a tense third reading debate on Friday. Ms Leadbeater described the passing of the assisted dying bill at third reading as a 'result that so many people need'. The Spen Valley MP added: 'When you've spent as much time as I have with people who have got experience of losing loved ones in very difficult circumstances, and you've spent time with terminally ill people who are just asking for choice at the end of their days, then this is absolutely the right thing to do.' Among the MPs who backed the bill were the prime minister and his predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, health secretary Mr Streeting and deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, meanwhile, voted against. The passage of the bill in parliament has put the UK at odds with the US, and marks the second time the State Department has criticised Britain under Sir Keir. The department's human rights arm previously warned of its 'concerns about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom' after the prosecution of anti-abortion campaigner Livia Tossici-Bolt.
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK PM Starmer's authority tested as domestic struggles overshadow summit diplomacy
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked in parliament on Thursday why he had not appeared in front of lawmakers for the past two weeks. His answer was simple - he had been busy with international affairs. The question underlines Starmer's awkward position - just a year after winning one of the biggest election victories in British history, his audience abroad is much less hostile than the one at home, where his party is divided over welfare reforms. With Starmer's Labour Party lagging behind Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK in opinion polls and the prime minister's own popularity tumbling, more than 100 of his lawmakers are threatening the biggest parliamentary rebellion of his premiership to kill off the government's plans to reform the welfare system at a vote due next week. On a trip to the NATO summit in The Hague this week, Starmer, 62, sat alongside U.S. President Donald Trump for talks and shared hugs and handshakes with other world leaders but was noticeably tetchy when asked if the rebellion brewing at home showed a lack of political judgment on his part. "I am comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs," he said as he vowed to lead his party into the next national election, which is not due until 2029. Downing Street officials say the vote is shaping up to be the biggest test of Starmer's authority to date. Were he to suffer his first parliamentary defeat, or were the government to pull the vote or make big compromises, his leadership would be undermined. More fundamentally, the officials say the reforms to save money and encourage more people back into work are an essential part of what Starmer sees as a decade-long project to fix Britain's problems. Annual spending on incapacity and disability benefits already exceeds the country's defence budget and is set to top 100 billion pounds ($137 billion) by 2030, according to official forecasts, up from 65 billion pounds now. Ministers are in talks with lawmakers to offer compromises to ensure the legislation is passed next Tuesday. One key area under discussion concerns the number of people who would lose access to benefits designed to cover disability-related costs. One of Starmer's ministers, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters he thought a deal to see off the rebellion would eventually be reached. But a Labour lawmaker, who also asked not to be named, said the government's best option would be to pause the legislation and rework it, adding that he would not vote for changes that could push tens of thousands of people into poverty. "People are very, very upset at the way the government has handled this," the lawmaker said. The decision to cut payments to some of the most vulnerable in society is particularly painful for politicians in the centre-left Labour Party, which founded the state-run National Health Service and traditionally sees itself as the protector of the country's welfare state built after World War Two. Rebels may have been encouraged after the government reversed another unpopular policy - cutting payments to millions of pensioners to help them pay energy bills each winter. Starmer told parliament on Thursday he wanted the "values of fairness" to be at the heart of his reforms and attempts to reach a consensus would continue over the coming days. ($1 = 0.7277 pounds)
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer says ‘fairness' will anchor welfare cuts in bid to cool Labour rebellion
Keir Starmer is in talks with Labour rebels to gain support for the government's welfare reform package, the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, ahead of its Commons vote. The proposed legislation aims to restrict access to sickness and incapacity benefits, with the government arguing it wants to get more people into work and save billions of pounds annually. Over 126 Labour MPs, alongside other parties, publicly oppose the bill, arguing it will cause significant harm to disabled people and that no concessions can make it acceptable. Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) projects that the reforms will lead to 800,000 fewer working-age people receiving Personal Independence Payment (PIP) by 2029–30, with most losing £3,850 annually. Public polling indicates low support for the reforms, with only 27 per cent in favour.
