Charlie Rennie Mackintosh painting of French village fetches £150,000 at auction
A watercolour painted by Charlie Rennie Mackintosh of a French village just three years before he died has sold at auction for £150,200.
The Design Since 1860 auction by Lyon & Turnbull included watercolours, cutlery and furniture designed by artist and architect Mackintosh, who died aged 60 in December 1928 in London, a year after returning from France.
Mackintosh and his wife, artist Margaret Macdonald, moved from London to south-west France in 1923 for a cheaper lifestyle after a downturn in demand for work.
The watercolour, titled Bouleternere, was painted in 1925 with sparing use of colour and depicts the hillside town.
It sold for £150,200, including buyer's premium, on Thursday as part of the two-day sale.
Bouleternere was previously acquired by Ronald WB Morris of Kilmacolm after a memorial exhibition of the couple's work at the McLellan Galleries in Glasgow in 1933, after the death of Margaret Macdonald Mackintosh.
Morris was an executor of the estate, a decade after the couple moved to the Pyrenees-Orientales at Amelie-les-Bains in 1923.
Encouraged to go to France by Scottish colourist JD Fergusson and his partner Margaret Morris, Mackintosh was drawn to the way the town's buildings had organically grown on a sloping hill with a small church at the top.
In 1925, at the time Bouleternere was painted, Margaret wrote in a letter to artist and embroiderer Jessie Newbery: 'The buildings here are a perpetual joy to us.'
The couple returned to the UK in 1927 when Mackintosh began suffering symptoms of cancer, and he was diagnosed in London and later died there.
Head of sale at Lyon & Turnbull John Mackie described it as an 'amazing watercolour' and said it 'shows a different side to a multi-talented man who mastered many different art forms during his relatively short lifetime'.
He added: 'The paintings were part of a series of watercolours created in France towards the end of his life and are considered extremely important in terms of his artistic development and maturity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
8 hours ago
- STV News
Charity refused access to land next to waste recycling plant after buying it
A charity which bought vacant land next to a waste recycling plant have been refused permission to create an entrance to it as it included chopping down 38 trees. WAFA EL, whose objectives are described as tackling poverty, advancing religion and providing recreational facilities, applied for permission to create an access road onto the site after it was revealed the sale did not include permission to use a nearby entrance. However the plans included cutting down the trees, removing 40 metres of stone wall and gave no indication of what they wanted to use the land for. A report by planning officers said the applicants argued they needed access to maintain the site which has a septic tank on it and would mitigate for the loss of trees in future plans. The report said: 'The council's biodiversity officer has advised that notwithstanding that the applicant has stated that mitigation for the loss of the trees would form part of a future application without mitigation being proposed within this application then it can not be supported and is not acceptable.' The land lies to the east of Kinwegar recycling centre off the A199 and property known as Irene's Haven. Planning officers said the site was previously owned by a private individual who retained a private access lane serving both his property and the land adding 'Since purchasing the site a few months ago, the applicant no longer has any right of access via this lane and therefore requires their own access to the site'. The planning application called for a change of use of land and the public footpath on the other side of the wall from the site to form a new vehicle and and pedestrian, as well as creating hardstanding areas, and erecting a new wall, fencing and gates. Applicant WAFA EL gave an address in Motherwell and registered with the Scottish charity regulator OSCR in November last year. Its main operating area is given as Edinburgh. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Edinburgh Reporter
9 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Charity refused access to land after buying it
A charity which bought vacant land next to a waste recycling plant have been refused permission to create an entrance to it as it included chopping down 38 trees. WAFA EL, whose objectives are described as tackling poverty, advancing religion and providing recreational facilities, applied for permission to create an access road onto the site after it was revealed the sale did not include permission to use a nearby entrance. However the plans included cutting down the trees, removing 40 metres of stone wall and gave no indication of what they wanted to use the land for. A report by planning officers said the applicants argued they needed access to maintain the site which has a septic tank on it and would mitigate for the loss of trees in future plans. The report said: 'The council's biodiversity officer has advised that notwithstanding that the applicant has stated that mitigation for the loss of the trees would form part of a future application without mitigation being proposed within this application then it can not be supported and is not acceptable.' The land lies to the east of Kinwegar recycling centre off the A199 and property known as Irene's Haven. Planning officers said the site was previously owned by a private individual who retained a private access lane serving both his property and the land adding 'since purchasing the site a few months ago, the applicant no longer has any right of access via this lane and therefore requires their own access to the site'. The planning application called for a change of use of land and the public footpath on the other side of the wall from the site to form a new vehicle and and pedestrian, as well as creating hardstanding areas, and erecting a new wall, fencing and gates. Applicant WAFA EL gave an address in Motherwell and registered with the Scottish charity regulator OSCR in November last year. Its main operating area is given as Edinburgh. By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
Scotsman
9 hours ago
- Scotsman
Paws in the door: Dogs Trust backs pet-friendly proposals – but says 'more must be done'
Dogs Trust, the UK's largest dog welfare charity, believes the Housing (Scotland) Bill is a step in the right direction for renters with pets. However, the charity is urging the Scottish Government to go further to ensure people with dogs are properly supported in the rental market. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Currently, many renters across Scotland face significant barriers when trying to secure pet-friendly accommodation. Alarmingly, around 15% of handover enquiries received by Dogs Trust cite accommodation issues as the reason for needing to rehome their dog. Dogs Trust, which rehomed more than 600 dogs across Scotland last year, has welcomed the inclusion of pet-friendly provisions in the Bill, which completed Stage 2 in the Scottish Parliament last week. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Crucially, this will give tenants in both the private and social rented sectors the right to request to keep a pet in their property without fear of the request being unreasonably refused by their landlord or housing provider. The Bill also includes a time limit within which a landlord must respond to a tenant's request to keep a pet. Dogs Trust Backs Pet-Friendly Proposals to the Housing (Scotland) Bill but says "more must be done" The charity is particularly pleased that the Scottish legislation has gone further in extending these rights to those in social housing than the Renters' Rights Bill – which is currently progressing through Westminster. However, Dogs Trust believes stronger protections and clear guidance are needed to ensure no one has to choose between a place to live and their much-loved pet. Dogs Trust is now calling on dog owners and supporters across Scotland to write to their MSPs asking them to support amendments to the Bill that will better safeguard the rights of renters with pets. These amendments include: A reduction in the number of days in which a landlord should respond to a tenant's request to keep a pet. A protection that if a landlord fails to respond to a tenant's request to keep a pet within the response period, it can be treated as unreasonable refusal, which would allow a tenant to make an appeal. The inclusion of pet ownership as a provision under a written tenancy agreement once consent to keep a pet has been granted. To write to your MSP, visit: Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Owen Sharp, Chief Executive of Dogs Trust, says: "The Housing (Scotland) Bill is a huge step forward in addressing the need for greater availability of pet-friendly accommodation in Scotland. Sadly, the struggle to find suitable accommodation is still very real for many dog owners. Too often, people face the heartbreaking decision to give up their beloved pet simply because they can't find a home that allows dogs. 'We hope MSPs will support amendments to strengthen the Bill and that once passed, the Bill will mark the start of a culture shift in attitudes towards renting with pets, meaning no one is denied the joys of dog ownership simply because they rent a home.' Dogs Trust has also welcomed the decision by the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee that guidance must be developed alongside the Bill and hopes that this will provide greater clarity for tenants and landlords around definitions in the Bill. This includes what is 'reasonable' grounds for a landlord to deny a tenant's request to keep a pet and what are 'reasonable' conditions for a tenant to be able to keep a pet.
