Opinion: Cuts to language education programs jeopardize our government and society
A 2020 survey revealed that nearly 60% of Americans support increasing funding for foreign language education, underscoring public concern and the importance of these initiatives. Yet, despite widespread support, we are witnessing an alarming trend: funding cuts to language programs across the country. As a professor who has spent the last decade teaching in this field, I have seen this erosion firsthand. Over the past two years, these cuts have accelerated at an unprecedented pace.
The decision to reduce funding for language education programs in the United States is both shortsighted and counterproductive. These programs are not merely academic luxuries but strategic investments in our national security, economic competitiveness and cultural understanding.
In 2023, West Virginia University made drastic cuts to its world languages department, eliminating nearly three-quarters of its faculty positions and discontinuing all foreign-language majors. This is not an isolated case. In 2024, congressional budget reductions led to the U.S. Department of Defense withdrawing funding from nearly 40% of its language flagship programs nationwide, the majority of which were programs hosted at institutions in the southwestern United States, including the Chinese and Arabic Flagship programs at my home institution of BYU. These programs were designed to guide students toward professional-level proficiency in languages critical to U.S. national security. Cutting these programs undermines their mission and weakens our nation's linguistic capabilities.
At the state level, the picture is similarly bleak. In Utah, for instance, the Legislature recently considered defunding the state's world-renowned Dual Language Immersion program. This program has been celebrated for fostering bilingualism and biliteracy in young learners. Fortunately, the program was ultimately funded, but it's something that should never have been put into question.
These closures and funding cuts ignore the immense and wide-ranging benefits of second-language education. Second-language learning is not just a personal enrichment tool — it is a strategic asset for the government and society as a whole. Students who study a second language develop meaningful connections with the cultures and communities associated with their target language. They gain a deeper understanding of language's critical role in fostering mutual understanding and collaboration in a globalized world. These students are better equipped to thrive in an interconnected society.
Moreover, second-language education cultivates essential competencies such as communication, critical thinking and cultural navigation — skills that are vital for building a competitive workforce. Employers increasingly value individuals who can navigate diverse cultural settings and collaborate effectively across borders.
Programs like the Language Flagship were initially established in response to the heightened need for language and cultural expertise following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Today, the importance of language and cultural proficiency has only grown. Addressing global challenges, whether in diplomacy, national security or business, requires individuals who can communicate and collaborate across cultural boundaries.
While some may argue that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) can fill the gap left by funding cuts, this assumption is misguided. AI tools cannot replicate the deep understanding of cultural nuance or the human connection that comes with learning a second language. Relying solely on AI is not a sufficient replacement for the expertise and empathy cultivated through language education.
The continued cuts to language education programs reflect a misalignment with our national values and priorities. These reductions jeopardize our ability to address pressing global issues and weaken our national security. Congress must recognize the critical importance of second-language education and allocate funding that ensures these programs can serve our nation effectively in the long term.
Reducing funding for language education programs is penny-wise but pound-foolish. These programs are an investment in our future — one that we cannot afford to neglect.
I urge readers to advocate for strengthening our language programs. Support local administrative and political candidates who understand the critical importance of these programs. You can write to your local representatives, support school board candidates who prioritize language programs and participate in community initiatives that promote bilingual education. Together, we can ensure a future where language education remains a priority and a cornerstone of our national strength.
I am not an official spokesperson for BYU and am not authorized to speak on behalf of the university. My thoughts and comments are my own and do not reflect university policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?
New York Post
32 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters
Several Trump administration officials fired back at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Friday after she pledged to oppose federal efforts to nab illegal immigrants — as cops in her city had to use flash bangs to disperse the violent mob of protesters who descended on the arrest sites. 'We will not stand for this,' Bass said in a statement released after federal immigration authorities arrested 44 people in raids across Los Angeles. 'I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' the Democrat mayor fumed, noting that her office 'is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations.' Advertisement 4 Bass slammed the Los Angeles immigration enforcement raids in a social media post. AFP via Getty Images White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller quickly dismissed Bass' declaration. 'You have no say in this at all,' Miller shot back on social media. Advertisement 'Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced,' he noted on X. Miller was one of several Trump administration officials that took issue with Bass' statements. 'They're Illegals. Not 'immigrants.' One just tried to burn Americans alive in Boulder,' White House adviser Sebastian Gorka wrote on X, referring to Colorado terror suspect Mohamed Soliman. The Egyptian national overstayed his tourist visa before allegedly firebombing a peaceful march for Israeli hostages still held by Hamas on Sunday in a heinous antisemitic attack. Advertisement 'If you're aiding and abetting them you're a criminal too,' Gorka said in response to the LA mayor's comments. 'Are you ready to be treated as a criminal? 'Because we are ready to treat you as one if you commit a crime,' he warned. 4 Miller noted that Bass has 'no say' in federal immigration enforcement. Chris Kleponis – CNP / MEGA 4 Miller was one of several Trump administration officials who reacted strongly to Bass' statement on the ICE raids. Stephen Miller, /X Advertisement Justice Department official Harmeet K. Dhillon was stunned by Bass' understanding of the law. 'It's amazing the number of elected officials who don't grasp the basics of federalism, or federal sovereignty over immigration issues, or the First Amendment,' Dhillon tweeted. The Los Angeles immigration raids sparked protests at the arrest sites, and at least one person was taken into custody for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement. 'Federal agents were executing a lawful judicial warrant at a LA worksite this morning when David Huerta deliberately obstructed their access by blocking their vehicle,' US Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement. 'He was arrested for interfering with federal officers and will face arraignment in federal court on Monday.' 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are — if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted.' Huerta is president of the California branch of the influential Service Employees International Union. 4 The raids sparked protests in Los Angeles. AP Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin decried the city's response to protesters' clashes with federal agents – which escalated hours after the raids. Advertisement 'Assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings. 800 protestors have surrounded and breached the first layer of a federal law enforcement building in LA,' McLaughlin wrote on X. '@LAPD has not responded.' 'This violence against @ICEgov must stop.' Richard Grenell, President Trump's envoy for special missions, blamed Bass for the unrest. 'Karen Bass whipped all of this up. She attacked the rule of law. She undermined democracy,' Grenell wrote on X, sharing images of protesters attempting to block federal law enforcement vehicles. Advertisement 'The @MayorOfLA is creating chaos in LA,' he fumed. With Post wires
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alan Dershowitz: We're picking the wrong heroes
(NewsNation) — In recent months, the Trump administration has gone up against Harvard University and other Ivy League schools over on-campus protests and policies. The White House has recently frozen visa interviews with international student visa holders and has threatened to revoke the visas of Chinese students. Interviews were frozen because the agency wanted to expand social media screening and vetting. President Donald Trump said the move would determine whether foreign students being let into the country were 'troublemakers' and that he wants to ensure admitted students are those who 'love our country.' Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow gutting of Education Department Attorney Alan Dershowitz told NewsNation's Elizabeth Vargas that a lot of politicians and progressives who have stood behind the campus protesters have egg on their face, and that it was a bad look to support them. 'We are picking our wrong heroes,' Dershowitz said. Dershowitz added the Trump administration's measure of revoking student visas and canceling visa interviews is a good preventive measure in ensuring the safety of U.S. citizens. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
