'De-stressed' by hair loss? This anti-thinning set is down to $24 (over 40% off)
We've all been there, right? After a long, relaxing shower, discovering a clump of hair in the drain big enough to make a tiny wig can feel a bit disheartening, especially as we get older. But don't worry, we found a great option that thousands of shoppers say will help revitalize your hair without the fuss of transplants or harsh chemicals. The Luseta B-Complex Shampoo and Conditioner Set, a dynamic hair-growth-promoting duo with natural ingredients, high Amazon ratings and a low price — just $24 for the pair.
At over 40% off for the set, this duo is close to the lowest price we've seen this year. That means you're getting a great bargain, and at just $12 per bottle, the prices are comparable to other quality shampoos and conditioners ... and certainly less expensive than most salon-quality offerings.
This shampoo and conditioner set is designed to promote hair growth and thickening with a formula that contains biotin, caffeine, niacinamide and camellia extract, among other lock-loving components. Each of these natural ingredients has been extensively studied, and here's what researchers found:
Biotin: In a medical study testing the use of biotin for hair loss, investigators found that in all cases, subjects "showed evidence of clinical improvement after receiving biotin." Biotin is a popular supplement for those wanting to improve the look and feel of their hair and nails, and there have been many reports of users noticing a difference when incorporating it either internally or topically.
Caffeine: This staple of beverages like sodas and coffee has also been shown to encourage hair growth. Lab studies indicate that caffeine stimulates the hair follicles to remain in the growing phase for a longer period, resulting in reduced hair loss overall.
Niacinamide: A skin-care mainstay, niacinamide (also known as vitamin B3) helps increase blood flow to the scalp, strengthen existing strands and decrease hair fall.
Camellia extract: This lesser-known ingredient, an oil obtained from the leaves of certain tea plants, helps promote and regulate hair growth. It does this by moisturizing strands and restoring the health of dry, damaged hair.
Pretty legit, right? Even better, both the shampoo and conditioner are safe to use on color-treated and keratin-treated hair, contain no harsh chemicals, sulfates or parabens, and have not been tested on animals.
More than 10,000 Amazon reviewers have given the Luseta shampoo and conditioner line a fantastic five stars, with over 1,000 of those reviews for the B-Complex set alone.
"Ten days ago, my hairdresser trimmed my hair, and reported that I had new hair growth everywhere she looked," wrote a satisfied shopper. "And I can also see new growth right at the hairline on the top and sides of my head. ... By the time 14 days of use rolled around, I was stunned at the noticeable decrease in loose hairs running down the drain when I washed my hair each morning. ... As of this morning, no more than three or four hairs found their way to the bathtub drain."
This reviewer related: "I have struggled with hair loss due to medication for over 10 years. ... I noticed my hair seemed thicker and fuller after the first wash! I have tried other products that were full of chemicals, and they did not work nearly as well. I am seeing a lot of new growth over the past month since I started using this shampoo and conditioner. My hair is soft and feels healthy. Can't wait to see how much more it will grow. I will never use a different shampoo and conditioner again."
"After menopause and radiation for cancer, my hair was falling out when I showered," shared a final fan. "I purchased Luseta B-Complex ... I didn't notice anything for about two months. Then I noticed only a few strands being lost when I shower instead of a handful. ... It has helped my hair feel thicker and me feel more confident!"
"The smell is not bad, it is just not pleasing to me," sniffed one shopper. "The only thing is my daughter doesn't like the smell," observed another.
Another occasional criticism? Its consistency: "The shampoo is good, but it's so thick, it hardly comes out of the pump!"
If you have Amazon Prime, you'll get free shipping, of course. Not yet a member? No problem. You can sign up for your free 30-day trial here. (And by the way, those without Prime still get free shipping on orders of $35 or more.)
The reviews quoted above reflect the most recent versions at the time of publication.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
37 minutes ago
- WIRED
Those Creatine Gummies You Bought Online Might Not Contain Any Creatine
Jun 18, 2025 6:30 AM Sales of the workout supplement are skyrocketing. But some of the most popular gummies available online contain little to no creatine at all. Gummy supplements are appealing for one obvious reason: Instead of choking down a chalky powdered drink or swallowing a dubious-smelling capsule, you essentially get to eat some candy. Unfortunately, when it comes to creatine, these products might not contain the essential ingredient they claim. Four of six popular creatine gummy products sold on Amazon contained almost no creatine or none at all when samples were tested by an independent lab. Creatine, a staple supplement for weightlifters and fitness buffs due to its impact on athletic performance, is experiencing a remarkable surge in mainstream popularity. In recent years, the wellness industry has been marketing the substance as a kind of health panacea. Sales are skyrocketing, especially among women. To appeal to as many customers as possible, companies have launched 'gummy' creatine products as an alternative to the traditional powdered format. 'It's really having a moment right now,' says Jordan Glenn, head of science at the supplement industry tracking and recommendation platform SuppCo, which ordered the creatine gummy tests. 'It's no longer just a gym bro supplement.' One of the products SuppCo had tested was the highest-ranked creatine supplement on Amazon. It's made by a brand called Happyummmm, and has been purchased over 50,000 times in the past two months (it even has an 'Amazon's choice' label). The gummy's label indicates that two gummies make up a 5 gram serving, but the lab SuppoCo hired found that two gummies actually contained .005 grams, under .1 percent of what was listed. This means that someone would have to eat 2,000 Happyummmm gummies to get the listed serving size. (Happyummm's Hong Kong-based parent company Happygummi Limited does not have a public email or phone number, so WIRED was unable to contact the company for comment.) A person attempting to use Happyummm's products for a creatine 'loading phase,' in which the typical daily dosage is around 20 grams, would need to eat 8,000 gummies a day to get their fill. SuppCo's testing found that a brand called DivinusLabs' gummy samples only contained .025 grams per serving rather than the 5 grams indicated on the label. 'We appreciate the role of independent testing in promoting transparency and have shared the information with our manufacturing and quality assurance teams. While we had not previously seen this data, we take all reports seriously,' says Ilya Sheleg, the founder from the brand's Brooklyn-based parent company Primerose Hill. Sheleg says the company plans to re-test its current batch of gummies with other independent labs. Other gummies fared even worse in tests. Two brands, Ecowise and Vidabotan, came back with 0 percent creatine. Despite these results, both brands have high ratings on Amazon. The headline for Ecowise's top review: 'Tastes great and actually works!' Like Happigummi Limited, Vidabotan does not list contact information online, so the company could not be reached for comment. When WIRED reached out to Ecowise, its founder and CEO Vladislav Shabanov promptly responded, expressing disbelief that his products tested so poorly, as his Colorado-based manufacturers have been Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) certified, which means they follow guidelines set by the US Food and Drug Administration. The company also tests its products in third-party labs at regular intervals. However, after WIRED sent Shabanov details about how SuppCo conducted its tests, he conceded that it's possible there may have been quality control issues with some of the product, and says the company is launching an internal investigation and had already made a decision to switch to a different manufacturer for some products. 'There's always a non-zero chance that manufacturers screwed up,' he says. 'Worst case scenario, we'll have to get the whole batch out of Amazon.' According to Amazon spokesperson Juliana Karber, the company requires dietary supplement sellers to submit third-party testing results to prove that they contain the ingredients on the label and are free from harmful contaminants. For the four products that failed SuppCo's test, she says 'three have valid test reports verifying their compliance with relevant standards and that they contain the advertised amount of creatine.' She noted that Amazon is going to do its own test of the products. 'Our teams are investigating the remaining product in question, and if we conclude it does not comply with Amazon's policies, it will be removed from the store,' Karber said in a statement. Amazon declined to share which of the supplements had not proffered a valid test report. Creating effective gummy supplements is a difficult task, since it requires distributing active ingredients evenly throughout individual gelatinous sweets. According to Shabanov, Ecowise spent months refining its processes because it was so hard to create a product that had the appropriate amount of creatine and also tasted good. What's more, since most methods of creating gummy candies involve heat, active ingredients can get damaged in the process. 'Since creatine gummies are often like other gummies, requiring moisture and heat to produce and having citric acid lowering the pH of the gummy, creatine can degrade faster than it would when just manufactured as a dry, unflavored powder,' says Kamal Patel, cofounder of the nutrient and supplement database Patel describes the task of making a good creatine gummy as 'a lot harder' than formulating a powder product. SuppCo also had the creatine gummies tested for levels of creatinine, a waste product created when creatine breaks down. All of the gummies that contained creatine also contained elevated amounts of creatinine, indicating that some of the active ingredients had been degraded. When the lab tested popular powdered creatine products, none had this issue. SuppCo's test wasn't the first attempt to gauge the potency of creatine gummies. In fact, testing competing brands of gummies has become a kind of tradition in the world of supplements. Last year, the supplement manufacturer NOW Foods tested a dozen popular creatine gummies brands and reported nearly as dismal results to the SuppCo findings—5 of the 12 samples failed, showing very little or no active ingredients. Earlier this year, fitness influencer James Smith sent a sample of gummies from a company called Ovrload that he had previously attempted to invest in out for tests. (Smith claims the investment offer fell through, after which point the company allegedly continued to use his image to promote the brand.) He posted a YouTube video detailing the failed results. Another British supplement company conducted a similar third-party test and also found that Ovrload gummies failed, leading the company to pause sales. (Ovrload didn't respond to requests for comment, but the founder recently posted on Instagram that he plans to resume sales, and will add a transparency portal where users can see exactly what is in the gummies). 'Gummies might not be the best way to take creatine,' says Shabanov. 'There's so much potential for human error.' Creatine gummies aren't the only gelatinous supplement with quality control issues. While some supplement makers have successfully created gummy-style formulas that work, it's a difficult product to produce correctly. 'I don't recommend taking supplements or medications in a gummy format, because the chance that the quality will be poor, though it will vary from gummy to gummy, is much greater than with capsules,' says Pieter Cohen, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School who studies supplements. Cohen's previous research has examined how the 'great majority' of melatonin gummies sold in the US are inaccurately labeled. In that case, the gummies were actually far more potent than the labels suggested. In the United States, supplements are regulated very differently than traditional medications. Products can be sold without first getting any approval from the Food and Drug Administration, and the companies selling them are charged with making sure they are safe and effective. Supplements that feature new dietary ingredients need to submit a notification to the FDA prior to launching, but with something like a creatine gummy, which uses established ingredients, that isn't necessary. 'FDA has no systematic way of knowing when new dietary supplements are introduced to the market or what they contain. Because of this, we are often at a disadvantage to identify unsafe or otherwise unlawful supplements,' Cara Welch, the director of the FDA's Office of Dietary Supplement Programs in the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, said in 2024. The loose rules have fostered an environment in which mislabeling is rampant. Many products sold as supplements actually contain pharmaceutical ingredients, including generic Viagra. While some sellers require third-party testing—CVS introduced its mandatory program back in 2019—other stores and marketplaces do not. The Trump Administration is unlikely to adopt a more critical approach to the supplements industry anytime soon. Last fall, prior to his confirmation, current Health and Human Services head Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that the administration would undo the FDA's 'aggressive suppression' of supplements. Cohen says that the best safeguard people have to buy supplements is to check to see if they've been certified by two independent nonprofit organizations, US Pharmacopeia and the NSF International, which test products for health and safety standards. 'As American consumers, right now, we have no idea if the supplement we've purchased is accurately labeled or not. Some are, many aren't. So we've got to work around this until the laws are changed,' he says.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
YouTube star Doctor Mike has warning for RFK Jr.'s MAHA movement
Social media star Doctor Mike shared his thoughts in a new interview on the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement and how he believes the movement can be improved. Board-certified physician and YouTuber Dr. Mikhail Varshavski has been outspoken about his criticisms of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. However, he told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview that he would "without a doubt" be open to sitting with Kennedy if given the opportunity. The Make America Healthy Again commission chaired by Kennedy has been "tasked with investigating and addressing the root causes of America's escalating health crisis, with an initial focus on childhood chronic diseases," the White House explained to Fox News Digital at the beginning of the second Trump administration. Doctor Mike said of the MAHA movement, "I think the movement has ignited a good conversation in that we're talking about health. So I like it for that." But the physician is skeptical of the movement's methods. Doctor Mike applauded the desire to limit the amount of ultra-processed foods consumed by children, but believes the problems with these foods go beyond the ingredient list. "The reason why ultra-processed food has been so harmful to us as a society is not because there's one specific chemical found in each of these foods. It's because the foods have been engineered in a way where they make you feel hungry very soon upon eating them, so they don't satiate you," he said. "Two, they're usually empty calories, meaning that there are not good micronutrients in them." He believes the overconsumption of these foods is partially responsible for the obesity epidemic facing America today, and therefore argues that the problem is with overconsumption rather than simply what is in these foods. "I want to be as useful and practical as possible," he said. "That's what family medicine does. We find practical solutions for complex problems with our patients. And focusing and nitpicking on specific chemicals won't get us there." A board-certified family medicine physician with 14 million YouTube subscribers, he makes videos focused on providing entertainment, information and answering questions on a variety of health-related topics. Doctor Mike immigrated to the United States from Russia with his family at the age of 6. Doctor Mike doesn't believe focusing on ingredients will result in "drastic changes." "These manufacturers are still trying to get kids to consume ultra-processed foods. That's their fiduciary responsibility. They want to make money for their shareholders. But what we have to do is shift that incentivization away and actually put laws on the books, guidelines on the book, where it's not just a handshake agreement and saying, please phase out these ingredients, but make sure what we're phasing out will actually help," he said. Doctor Mike uses his YouTube channel to provide health information to millions of his subscribers, but also believes government agencies need to take a role in education to help Americans make better dietary decisions. "We need to bring back education surrounding nutrition labels. And this needs to happen on a massive scale. Like I can do it on my social media all day long. But if the government agencies are now participating in this research, if it's not making its way to middle schools, junior high schools, high schools colleges, we're doing a disservice to our children," he said. Doctor Mike wrote a Fox News op-ed in May about his opinions of RFK Jr. and the direction of the HHS, stating "our nation's health system is in shambles, and the leadership of HHS plays a pivotal role in fixing this disaster." Doctor Mike alleges that Kennedy, known for his vaccine skepticism, shares medical "misinformation," and doesn't believe he is the right person to lead the department. "Today, I say that Kennedy is the wrong person to lead HHS. The integrity of our nation's health agencies demands leadership grounded in facts, research, and transparency — not misinformation," Doctor Mike said. However, he is open to talking with him. "I think no matter how much you disagree with someone, the first step is to find common ground," Doctor Mike said. "And if there's truly an appetite for wanting to make people healthier, wanting people to make better decisions for themselves, I'm all for it." The MAHA commission is focusing on four policy directives to reverse chronic disease, including providing Americans transparency on health data to "avoid conflicts of interest in all federally funded health research;" prioritizing "gold-standard research on why Americans are getting sick" in all federally-funded health research; working with farmers to ensure food is healthy, as well as affordable; and expanding health coverage and treatment options "for beneficial lifestyle changes and disease prevention." Reached for comment, an HHS spokesperson told Fox News Digital, "Targeting harmful additives isn't 'nitpicking,' it is a necessary first step in confronting a broken food system that's fueling America's chronic disease epidemic. As highlighted in the MAHA report, our nation's children are increasingly neglecting the whole foods essential for their health as the consumption of ultra-processed foods has surged. More than 1 in 5 U.S. children over age 6 are obese—a 270% increase since the 1970s. "Meaningful, systemic change requires more than general advice; it demands bold action and accountability. That is exactly what Secretary Kennedy is delivering."
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?
The head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency told senators that Chinese swimmers would have had to eat around 11 pounds (5 kilograms) of food to test for the amounts of the performance enhancer that resulted in the much-debated positive drug tests from 2021 that were later disregarded. 'It's unbelievable to think that Tinkerbell just showed up and sprinkled it all over the kitchen,' Travis Tygart said in a Senate hearing Tuesday focused on the World Anti-Doping Agency's response to the doping case.
