logo
Trans young adults and parents sue over Trump's orders restricting transition care

Trans young adults and parents sue over Trump's orders restricting transition care

NBC News04-02-2025

Two transgender young adults and five families of trans minors filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday challenging two executive orders President Donald Trump issued over the last two weeks that aim to prohibit federal funding of transition-related health care for anyone under 19 and define sex as biological, only male and female and unchangeable.
'The Executive Orders were issued for the openly discriminatory purpose of preventing transgender people from expressing a gender identity different from their sex designated at birth—and expressing governmental disapproval of transgender people who, by definition, have a gender identity that does not align with their sex designated at birth,' the lawsuit states. 'These Orders are part of a government-wide effort by the Trump Administration to restrict legal protections and essential services for the transgender community.'
One of the plaintiffs, Kristen Chapman, said she and her family moved to Virginia in the summer of 2023 after their home state of Tennessee passed a law banning gender-affirming medical care for trans minors like her 17-year-old daughter, Willow. The family struggled to find a provider in Virginia who would accept Medicaid, which is a government health care program for people with limited income. Chapman said the family paid for Willow's care out of pocket, but it became 'prohibitively expensive.' After trying for a few months, she said they were finally able to schedule an appointment for Jan. 29 at VCU Medical Center in Richmond, which would take Medicaid.
'The day before our appointment, President Trump signed the executive order at issue in this case. The next day, just a few hours before our appointment, VCU told us they would not be able to provide Willow with care,' Chapman said in a statement shared by the ACLU. 'I thought Virginia would be a safe place for me and my daughter. Instead, I am heartbroken, tired, and scared.'
The lawsuit, filed in the District Court of the District of Maryland, requests that a judge immediately block the executive orders, which it argues are illegal and unconstitutional because the president does not have the authority to withhold federal funds that have been previously approved by Congress. The suit also argues that the order restricting transition care violates parents' fundamental rights and the rights of trans people under 19 by discriminating against them based on sex, as the order allows people under 19 who are not trans to continue receiving the same treatments for other medical conditions.
The White House and the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal, ACLU of Maryland and private law firms Hogan Lovells and Jenner & Block filed the suit on behalf of the families and young adults who are all members of PFLAG National, a nonprofit that supports the friends and families of LGBTQ people. PFLAG and GLMA, the largest national association of LGBTQ and allied health professionals, some of whom have had federal funds withheld under the orders, are also named as plaintiffs.
Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, senior counsel and health care strategist for Lambda Legal, called the orders 'morally reprehensible and patently unlawful.'
'The federal government — particularly, this administration — has no right to insert itself into conversations and decision-making that rightly belongs only to patients, their families, and their medical providers,' he said in a statement. 'This broadside condemns transgender young people to extreme and unnecessary pain and suffering, and for minors, it subjects their parents to agonized futility in caring for their child — all while denying them access to the same medically recommended health care that is readily available to their non-transgender peers.'
One of the orders, ' Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,' declared that the U.S. government will recognize only two sexes, male and female, and that 'these sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.' It prohibits agencies from promoting gender ideology and argues that it will 'defend women's rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.'
The other order at issue in the lawsuit, titled ' Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation,' prohibits federal funding from covering transition-related medical care — including puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgery — for children, which it defines as those younger than 19. Medical schools and hospitals receiving federal research or education grants also have to 'end the chemical and surgical mutilation of children,' the order states.
The sweeping order could affect more than just programs receiving federal funds. For example, it also directs the secretary of Health and Human Services to change section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits health care discrimination and, as a result, has required health insurance plans under the act to cover transition-related care. It also instructs the director of the Office of Personnel Management to bar trans care for minors in the Federal Employee Health Benefits and Postal Service Health Benefits programs for 2026.
The order argues that the country has an obligation to protect children from 'irreversible medical interventions.'
'Countless children soon regret that they have been mutilated and begin to grasp the horrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children through breastfeeding,' the order states, using inflammatory language to describe transition-related care. It goes on to allege without citing evidence that these youths' 'medical bills may rise throughout their lifetimes, as they are often trapped with lifelong medical complications, a losing war with their own bodies, and, tragically, sterilization.'
More than half of states across the U.S. have already enacted measures to restrict transition-related care for minors, but since Trump's order last week, a number of hospitals in states without these restrictions have stopped such care for patients under 19 or announced that they are reviewing it. The White House announced in a news release Monday that hospitals in New York City, Colorado, Virginia, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C., have either suspended or announced that they are reviewing their transition care programs for minors.
Though Trump's order seeking to restrict such transition care implies that it is a widespread threat to children, recent research has shown that a small number of minors actually access this type of care. A study published in JAMA Pediatrics in January found that less than 0.1% of adolescents with private insurance in the U.S. are transgender or gender-diverse and are prescribed puberty blockers or gender-affirming hormones.
Most major medical associations, such as the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychological Association, support access to transition care for minors and oppose restrictions on it.
Trump issued multiple executive orders during his first two weeks in office that seek to restrict trans rights. In addition to the two mentioned in the lawsuit, he also signed an order prohibiting trans people from enlisting and serving in the military. At least three other lawsuits have been filed against these orders — two from transgender women serving in federal prison who would be denied transition care under the order and transferred to men's prisons and one from transgender service members and those seeking to enlist. A judge blocked prison officials from transferring one of the trans inmates on Sunday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration to cut all USAID overseas roles and axe thousands of staff
Trump administration to cut all USAID overseas roles and axe thousands of staff

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Trump administration to cut all USAID overseas roles and axe thousands of staff

The Trump administration will eliminate all USAID overseas positions worldwide by 30 September in a dramatic restructuring of remaining US foreign aid operations. In a Tuesday state department cable obtained by the Guardian, secretary of state Marco Rubio ordered the abolishment of the agency's entire international workforce, transferring control of foreign assistance programs directly to the state department. The directive affects thousands of USAID staff globally, including foreign service officers, contractors and locally employed personnel across more than 100 countries. Chiefs of mission at US embassies have been told to prepare for the sweeping changes to occur within four months. 'The Department of State is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions,' the cable reads, adding that the department 'will assume responsibility for foreign assistance programming previously undertaken by USAID' from 15 June. The state department did not respond to a request for comment. Among those who cleared the cable was Howard Van Vranken, a former ambassador to Botswana. The decision to close the agency comes after the Trump administration – under the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) – eliminated 83% of USAID's programs in a six-week purge after Donald Trump took office. Rubio announced in March that 5,200 of the agency's 6,200 programs worldwide had been terminated, with the surviving initiatives being absorbed into the state department. The closures followed an executive order from Trump on his first day back in the White House on 20 January freezing foreign assistance pending a review. While a waiver was subsequently announced for humanitarian assistance, questions were raised about USAID's future after its website disappeared on 1 February. Two days later, staff received an email telling them not to come to work following a weekend during which its servers were removed and leadership and senior staff fired or put on disciplinary leave. Rubio declared himself that agency's acting administrator after staff were locked out of its Washington headquarters. Amid the cuts, Elon Musk, the billionaire tech entrepreneur and then de facto leader of Doge, gleefully boasted of feeding USAID 'into the woodchopper', while disseminating false claims about its programs – including one assertion that they included a $50m project to provide condoms in Gaza, a claim that was subsequently proved to be untrue.

Jon Stewart on Ice raids in LA: ‘Terrifyingly militarized sweeps'
Jon Stewart on Ice raids in LA: ‘Terrifyingly militarized sweeps'

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Jon Stewart on Ice raids in LA: ‘Terrifyingly militarized sweeps'

Late-night hosts react to the Trump administration's brutal Ice raids in Los Angeles and the extraordinary mobilization of national guard troops in response to anti-Ice protests in the city. After protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) raids in Los Angeles over the weekend, in which at least one car burned, Jon Stewart had a question for Angelenos: 'Is your city ever not on fire?' 'Whether you win a basketball championship, a World Series championship, whether you have an exploding piñata gender reveal gone wrong, congratulations, it's a boy and an evacuation,' the Daily Show host joked on Monday evening. 'Or you're just protesting the Trump administration's expanded deportation raids. LA continues to be our most flammable city.' The unrest was, as Stewart said: 'the very predictable result of a liberal city reliant on an immigrant population colliding with a heavy-handed Maga migrant-trawling operation looking to hit its quota of brown Poke-men'. Stewart played a clip of Donald Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric started during his campaign: 'We're going to get the criminals, the murderers, the drug dealers.' He then contrasted it with the reality of Ice raids at a Home Depot parking lot in LA. 'A Home Depot? From 'the worst of the worst' to a fucking Home Depot?' he fumed. 'Jeez, Ice, if you need assistance in arresting people, those guys are looking for work.' 'It's an explosive situation, on the cusp of federalism v states' rights,' he continued. 'Border control v due process. Terrifyingly militarized sweeps v hard-working people in local communities. The United States marines v the Postmates guy who brought you an egg sandwich.' The brutal raids reportedly came after Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, screamed at Ice officials to arrest more undocumented immigrants. 'Yeah, that sounds like him,' said Stewart. 'Although I'm pretty sure Stephen Miller wasn't screaming. I think it's just his default tone is banshee. It's what happens when oxygen molecules are desperate to exit his unholy lungs.' 'Predictably, these non-targeted, much broader deportation efforts in cities that feel very connected to the immigrant population' are 'a tinderbox', Stewart concluded, 'and Trump happily lights the fuse'. On the Late Show, Stephen Colbert recapped Trump's shocking deployment of over 2,000 national guard troops to LA for relatively small anti-Ice protests. 'Oh lord, really? Is it too much to ask to have one weekend where I don't have to Google 'when count as martial law?'' Colbert said. Speaking on the White House lawn, Trump claimed that 'the people that are causing the problem are professional agitators' and 'insurrectionists' who should 'be in jail'. Colbert broke out his Trump impression: 'Yes, all the insurrectionists should be in jail, and I'll tell you folks, we have plenty of room, because I just pardoned 1,500 of them.' 'Trump's actions are shocking because this troop deployment is in defiance of the California government,' he added. The state is supposed to be in charge of the National Guard, and state and local officials in Los Angeles had not sought their help dealing with the protests. 'Nobody asked for this, and it's only going to make things worse,' he said. 'And in Los Angeles, there's a word for that – Transformers: Rise of the Beasts.' The last time a president bypassed a state government to send in the national guard was in 1965, when Lyndon B Johnson used troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. 'So we've come full circle,' said Colbert. 'Troops were deployed to protect protesters by Lyndon B Johnson, and now they're being used to threaten protesters by Donald B Dick.' And on Late Night, Seth Meyers relished the spectacular falling out between Elon Musk and Trump before turning to events in LA. 'The Trump-Musk feud was yet another spectacle brought to us by a presidency that is entirely about spectacle rather than substance,' he said. 'You need no further proof of that than what happened in LA this weekend, where the Trump administration sought to create a made-for-TV spectacle around their barbaric immigration raids.' One of the raids included former daytime talkshow host Dr Phil, indicating to Meyers that it was all for show. 'That's what the Trump administration wants: a spectacle for right-wing media. A climate of fear and chaos,' he said. 'And no one is better suited to achieve a climate of fear than Trump's creepiest aide.' That would be Stephen Miller, who 'wants terrifying mass immigration raids everywhere', Meyers explained. 'Regardless of whether the targets are people with criminal records or 4-year-olds, he's a rabid authoritarian who wants to create the feeling nowhere is safe, from courthouses to 7/11.' That is exactly what Ice created this weekend with sweeping raids in LA, which ignited the protests. 'If you only watch rightwing media, they would have you believe that the entirety of Los Angeles is currently under siege,' said Meyers. Trump himself posted on Truth Social that LA was 'invaded and occupied' by 'illegal aliens and criminals'. 'Trump is so detached from reality he sounds like he's writing a sci-fi screenplay,' Meyers noted.

US NIH director says hopeful will settle with universities over suspended grants
US NIH director says hopeful will settle with universities over suspended grants

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

US NIH director says hopeful will settle with universities over suspended grants

WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya told a U.S. Senate panel on Tuesday he was hopeful that President Donald Trump's administration would reach a settlement with universities that have had research grants suspended. "I'm very hopeful that a resolution being made with the universities where those decisions have been made, where those grants have been paused," Bhattacharya said while appearing at a hearing of the Senate Appropriation Committee's Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies on the NIH's 2026 budget request. The NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling about $9.5 billion and an additional $2.6 billion in contracts since Trump took office Jan. 20, dozens of scientists, researchers and other employees at the agency said in a public letter. The contracts often support research, from covering equipment to nursing staff working on clinical trials.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store