Judge rules U.S. owes North Dakota $28M over oil pipeline protests
April 24 (UPI) -- A federal judge has ruled the U.S. government must pay North Dakota nearly $28 million in damages stemming from the Dakota Access oil pipeline protests in 2016 and 2017.
U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Traynor issued his ruling Wednesday, siding with North Dakota's claims of negligence, gross negligence, civil trespass and public nuisance against the United States in connection with the protests.
"This is a major win for North Dakota taxpayers and the rule of law," North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong and Attorney General Drew Wrigley, both Republicans, said in a statement in response to the ruling.
"As outlined in the trial testimony and Judge Traynor's ruling, decisions made by the Obama administration emboldened protesters and ultimately caused millions of dollars in damage to North Dakota, while endangering the health and safety of North Dakota communities, families and law enforcement officers who responded to the protests."
The protests by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against the pipeline garnered wide public and political attention from August 2016 through March 2017, as they erected encampments on land near the confluence of the Cannonball and Missouri rivers.
The state's claims focused on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers use of a Special Use Permit to allow the protesters to demonstrate on Corps land.
In his ruling on Wednesday, the President Donald Trump appointee said the Corps had not officially granted the SUP despite saying one had been issued, and this so-called de factor permit prevented law enforcement from taking action against the protesters.
Traynor described this action as the Corps having "invited and encouraged the DAPL Protesters and their violent and tumultuous behavior," leaving North Dakota to clean up the mess.
"The State of North Dakota needed the power of the federal government to protect its citizens from danger. The federal government abandoned its duty," he said.
He added that the damage caused by the protests was "unfathomable," highlighting there human excrement pits, makeshift housing structures and violent clashes with law enforcement.
"The bottom line: United States had a mandatory procedure, it did not follow that procedure, and harm occurred to the state of North Dakota," Traynor said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Bipartisan deals on voting and election changes are rare. It just happened in one swing state
LAS VEGAS — Facing a legislature dominated by Democrats, Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo stood before Nevada lawmakers earlier this year with a message that some did not expect to go far: 'Set aside partisan politics.' It was a plea that might have seemed more aspirational than realistic, given the country's deep polarization. Yet it set the stage for one of the session's most unexpected outcomes — a bipartisan agreement to bring voter ID requirements to the perennial battleground state by next year's midterm elections.
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jasmine Crockett mocks Trump, says he's threatened by her ‘effective' message
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, mocked President Donald Trump for insulting her, claiming it was because he 'knows my message is effective,' in a new podcast interview. The progressive congresswoman appeared on the iHeartMedia Podcast 'Outlaws with TS Madison' on Monday, where she addressed her rise to prominence in the Democratic Party and how that has made her a target for criticism. Crockett said she doesn't pay attention to those who question her credentials or insult her before specifically addressing her beef with Trump. 'Dealing with Trump —Trump likes to dog whistle. Essentially, what he's done is tried to put a target on my back,' she began. Crockett went on to mock Trump for paying attention to her, claiming it was because the president felt threatened by her 'effective' rhetoric. 'But Donald Trump, dropping the name of someone who literally is only just now entering her second term in Congress, kind of tells you who is trying to get on whose level, right? He's the president of the United States. I can guarantee you if I was somehow sitting in the White House I wouldn't be worried about no random nobody young person that is in the House,' she continued. 3 Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett attends the 29th Annual Webby Awards at Cipriani Wall Street on May 12, 2025 in New York City. Getty Images The Webby Awards 'But the reality is that he knows that my message is effective, he knows that the things I'm saying are true, and he knows that he can't just 'fake media' me, 'fake news' me.' 'He knows that people, even who aren't Democrats, listen to what I have to say, because No. 1, I make it plain, and No. 2, I always make sure I back up my information and challenge somebody to find what I'm giving them is false, and that is what's most threatening to him,' Crockett added. 'Because he's been used to Democrats who keep their heads down and do the work. But I do the work while also talking my talk and walking my walk.' 3 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing-in ceremony for the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 28, 2025. REUTERS On Sunday, Crockett told a surprised local reporter in Dallas that 'Republicans walk up to me and tell me how much they like me.' The left-wing lawmaker has frequently traded barbs with the president. On her X account, Crockett has gone as far as to label Trump a 'buffoon' and a 'mofo,' the abbreviated version of the word 'mother—-er.' Trump has mocked the idea of Crockett being the future of the Democratic Party and called her 'low IQ.' 3 Crockett said that Trump only pays attention to her because the president felt threatened by her 'effective' rhetoric. Fox News While speaking at the National Republican Congressional Committee Dinner in April, Trump took another swipe at the progressive lawmaker, saying her party was in 'serious trouble' if they were 'going to rely on Crockett to bring them back.' Crockett told late-night host Jimmy Kimmel in April, 'It says a lot when you're supposed to be the leader of the free world, and you're worried about a sophomore in the House. I'm just saying.' The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
GOP rage with Musk spills out privately after break with Trump
House Republicans' longstanding frustrations with Elon Musk are spilling out in an unprecedented way behind closed doors after he criticized them for supporting President Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill." Why it matters: In some lawmakers' telling, the internal GOP frustration didn't come about overnight. It's been stewing for months — and Musk has now opened the floodgates. "He's a complete joke. He had no idea what the f*** he was doing, whatsoever," said one House Republican, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation from the billionaire Tesla owner. The lawmaker added: "Nobody really wanted him here. We couldn't wait to get rid of him." A second lawmaker pointedly noted electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla benefit from tax credits the bill would eliminate: "Some of the things he's advocating for now serve his own purpose. So I guess he's now lobbying just like everybody else." State of play: Since Tuesday, Musk has been on a social media rampage against Republicans' marquee tax and spending cuts bill, arguing that it doesn't go nearly far enough in reducing the deficit. The recently departed Trump lieutenant wrote on his social media app, X, that the bill is an " disgusting abomination" and called to " fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." On Wednesday he took a step further — despite GOP efforts to talk him down — arguing that a "new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit." Spokespeople for Trump and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on this story. Between the lines: Musk has always had an uneasy relationship with Republican lawmakers, many of whom shuddered as he hacked and slashed spending in ways that negatively impacted their districts. But for the most part, they stayed mute and conciliatory for fear of antagonizing a man whose $420 billion net worth would be enough to foot the bill for the entire 2024 election more than 40 times over. Even now, many House Republicans expressed extreme reluctance to put their names to even mild criticism of the mercurial billionaire. What we're hearing: "He can say whatever he wants to. I don't care. I don't really pay attention," said the second House Republican. "He's not elected. He served at the pleasure of the president. He no longer does." A third called Musk's comments about the bill "ridiculous," venting, "He's never run for office. He's never been in elected office ... He's always been able to be a dictator." A fourth told Axios of Musk's call to oust those who supported the bill: "Many GOP members didn't boast Musk's support when he was in favor of the bill." "We are not deterred by his opposition now that he is against it," they added. The intrigue: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told House Republicans in a closed-door conference meeting on Wednesday that Trump himself is "pissed off" at Musk, according to a person familiar with the matter. Johnson said at a press conference after the meeting that he talks to Trump "multiple times a day" and that the president is "not delighted that Elon did a 180." The first House Republican backed up that assertion, telling Axios: "The president couldn't wait to get rid of him." "I knew it was a matter of time before the two alpha males would explode, fight each other," said a fifth House Republican. The other side: Musk still has a base of support in Congress, with many of House Republicans' more right-leaning fiscal hawks saying they are in accordance with his point of view.
