SC committee recommends 10 more books be removed from K-12 public schools
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WCBD) – A state committee has recommended that multiple books be removed from public school libraries and classrooms across South Carolina.
The Instructional Review Materials Board voted Thursday to recommend that 10 books be pulled from K-12 shelves under a rule adopted last year that bars books containing descriptions or visual depictions of 'sexual conduct.'
The regulation also established a system in which parents can challenge materials in their child's school that they believe fail to meet the 'age and developmentally appropriate' standard. Parents must make a 'good faith effort' to address their concerns at the district level first but can appeal local decisions to the State Board of Education.
11 books have been pulled from public schools by the board since the regulation went into effect.
Trump wants to dismantle the Department of Education. What could that mean for South Carolina?
Among the books under review Thursday was 'Last Night at the Telegraph Club' by Malinda Lo, which follows a young Chinese American girl as she explores her sexuality in 1950s San Francisco.
In a March 11 letter, Lo told the committee the book is rooted in her own experience and urged them to 'trust the judgement' of local teachers and librarians.
'I'm a Chinese American lesbian myself, and when I was a teen growing up in the 1980s and 90s, I often felt alone and confused,' she wrote. 'I didn't have access to books like this that would have helped me better understand who I was. That's why I write books about LGBTQ+ and Asian American characters. I'm writing the books I needed as a teen.'
'While not every book is for every reader, every reader deserves the freedom to choose what they wish to read, not to have those rights taken away from them by the state,' the letter continued.
Ultimately, committee members voted unanimously to recommend the following books for removal:
Tricks by Ellen Hopkins
Lucky by Alice Sebold
Living Dead Girl by Elizabeth Scott
Last Night at the Telegraph Club by Malinda Lo
Kingdom of Ash by Sarah J. Maas
Identical by Ellen Hopkins
Empire of Storms by Sarah J. Maas
Hopeless by Colleen Hoover
Half of a Yellow Sun by Chimananda Ngozi Adichie
Collateral by Ellen Hopkins
The recommendations will come before the SC Board of Education for a final vote on April 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
I'm a Florida teacher. My passion to teach could be in violation of the law.
I'm a Florida teacher. My passion to teach could be in violation of the law. | Opinion This is the real damage: When fear begins to replace curiosity, and when silence replaces speech. Show Caption Hide Caption What we know now about President Trump's reshaping of education Education, especially higher education, has been a major focus of President Trump's term. Here is what we know now about his changes to education. As I prepare to teach a new literature course at Palm Beach State College (PBSC) this term, I find myself hesitating over something that, until recently, would have been routine: Selecting the works I assign to my students. The anthology adopted by our department includes powerful selections from African American, Latino, Asian American and LGBTQ+ writers – voices that capture the richness, contradiction and struggle of the American experience. These are voices I have taught for decades. But now I ask myself: Am I allowed to? Florida's 2023 legislation – most notably, Senate Bill 266 – prohibits instruction that espouses theories suggesting systemic racism, sexism or privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and that they were created to maintain social or economic inequities. The language is broad, and the intent seems clear: Restrict the way educators discuss identity, history and power. But what is less clear is what this means in practice for teachers like me, particularly in college classrooms. I am a lifelong educator. I spent 36 years in the New York City Department of Education as a teacher, department chair and supervisor. For the last 12 years, I have taught English literature at PBSC. Does my passion to teach violate the law? My passion has always been to encourage students to read deeply, think critically and reflect honestly – especially about the kind of country we live in and the lives we each bring to the table. That requires a broad and inclusive literary canon. It requires teaching James Baldwin and Langston Hughes not only for their artistry, but also for the searing truths they offer about race and belonging in America. It means examining the cultural double-consciousness in Sandra Cisneros, the generational trauma in Ocean Vuong, the gender defiance in Audre Lorde. Literature becomes real when it speaks both to and through the student reading it. That is the essence of education. Opinion: We desegregated schools 71 years ago. We still have more work to do. But now, when I consider assigning those same texts, I worry: Will presenting such works – even neutrally, even for discussion – be seen as violating this law? If I ask students to consider the historical roots of injustice in a work by August Wilson or Toni Cade Bambara, could that be construed as "promoting a theory" rather than simply exposing students to a reality reflected in literature? Worse, the chilling effect has begun to erode the classroom itself. Faculty colleagues increasingly wonder whether they should self-censor – not out of agreement with the law, but out of a desire to avoid trouble. This is the real damage: When fear begins to replace curiosity, and when silence replaces speech. I do not seek to indoctrinate my students. I never have. I seek to challenge them, to open doors through literature that lead into the complicated, layered and sometimes uncomfortable questions that make up life in a pluralistic democracy. That is not political. That is educational. Opinion: As a college professor, I see how AI is stripping away the humanity in education Forbidding certain materials only limits our understanding Let us be clear: Removing or discouraging the inclusion of marginalized voices in the classroom does not eliminate discomfort. It only eliminates understanding. If our students cannot engage with difficult truths in college classrooms, where are they to encounter them? If we cannot safely present a range of American experiences through our literary heritage, what remains of our intellectual freedom? I do not write this out of defiance, but out of love – for teaching, for literature and for the role education plays in shaping thoughtful citizens. The danger of this legislation is not only in its enforcement but also in its ambiguity. It turns teachers into second-guessers. It turns students into cautious bystanders. And it risks turning Florida's classrooms into places where only the most neutral, safest voices are heard. But the world is not neutral. Literature is not safe. And education, at its best, is a form of illumination, not erasure. Carmine Giordano is an adjunct lecturer in English at Palm Beach State College. This column originally appeared in the Palm Beach Post.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska Secretary of State announces re-election
LINCOLN, Neb. (KCAU) — Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen announced his re-election bid in Lincoln. He's served in his role since January of 2019. Evnen says if he's re-elected, he will work to make sure the state has free and fair elections, protect public safety on the Nebraska Board of Pardons, and cut the red tape for businesses. Story continues below Top Story: Local band to be featured on Saturday in the Park Main Stage Lights & Sirens: Part of roof collapses during fire at Dakota City boat dealer Sports: Falcons fly to history! West Sioux boys soccer wins first-ever IHSAA State title with 2-1 OT win against Van Meter Weather: Get the latest weather forecast here Evnen was previously a labor attorney and served on the State Board of Education for eight years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Immigration advocates say Charleston County sting operation unfairly targeted Latinos and Hispanics
North Charleston, S.C. (WCBD) — A massive sting operation involving multiple law enforcement agencies has come under scrutiny after immigrant advocacy groups and faith leaders raised concerns about civil rights violations during the arrests. Earlier this week, the Charleston County Sheriff's Office—along with Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and other agencies carried out 'Operation Last Stand,' arresting 80 people in a raid in Ladson. Officials say the raid focused on a location known as The Alamo, which had reportedly been under surveillance for a year due to suspected criminal activity. Authorities claim they arrested two high-level cartel members and an international murder suspect. But community members and immigrant advocates argue the sweep went too far. 'The narrative from the sheriff, governor, and attorney general is that they're targeting violent criminals,' said Will McCorkle, with the Charleston Immigrant Coalition. 'What they quickly overlook are the innocent people who were detained and are now facing deportation for no real purpose.' Two men facing state charges in ongoing investigation into unsanctioned Charleston County nightclub During a press conference held by local advocacy groups, speakers said many of those arrested were not involved in criminal activity and were instead racially profiled and swept up in a broader operation without just cause. 'Let me be clear. We do not condone criminal activity,' said Dulce Lopez, Civil Rights Strategist for the ACLU of South Carolina. 'But no one deserves to be criminalized by simply existing in communities and places. No one should be treated as guilty by association.' Some individuals present at the club that night allege they were lined up and questioned based on appearance alone. 'It didn't matter what we showed them,' said Alejandar Delaveea, an immigrant advocate who was there. 'They refused to believe our IDs were valid. People were lined up by skin color. Those with tattoos were separated and questioned as potential gang members.' Advocates are calling on the Charleston County Sheriff's Office to release the full incident report and provide clarity on how decisions were made during the raid. Many also demand the department cut ties with ICE to rebuild trust within the Hispanic and Latino communities. 'Charleston County's decision to align itself with ICE is a destructive one,' said McCorkle. 'It's already torn families apart and will continue to damage the trust between law enforcement and the people they're supposed to protect.' News 2 reached out to the Charleston County Sheriff's Office regarding these concerns, and the department has not commented on the allegations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
