Proposed changes to space requirements in nurseries ‘could lead to overcrowding'
The Government's proposals to change minimum space requirements in early years settings to help with the expansion of funded childcare could result in 'overcrowding', a charity has warned.
The 'quality of provision' in early years and childcare settings could be affected if the implementation of proposed reforms are not properly monitored, according to the Early Years Alliance (EYA).
The Department for Education (DfE) has launched a consultation on possible changes to the indoor floor space requirements per child in the early years foundation stage (EYFS) frameworks in England.
It comes as the expansion of funded childcare – which was introduced by the Conservative government – began being rolled out in England in April last year for working parents of two-year-olds.
Working parents of children older than nine months are also now able to access 15 hours of funded childcare a week, before the full roll-out of 30 hours a week to all eligible families in September.
The DfE consultation is seeking views on whether or not 'free-flow' outdoor areas should be able to be included in floor space measurements for two-year-olds and above.
Currently, outdoor areas cannot be included in the EYFS indoor space measurements where indoor activity in a building forms the main part of, or is integral to, the early years provision.
Neil Leitch, chief executive of the EYA, said: 'While we recognise that some settings may welcome the additional flexibility that would be created by this change, we remain concerned about the impact that such a policy could have on the quality of provision – and in particular, the risk that these reforms could result in overcrowding in some settings if the implementation, assuming these proposals go ahead, is not properly monitored.
'We're clear that ensuring the safety and well-being of young children must always be at the heart of early years education and care.
'And yet, as we get closer to the final stage of the entitlement expansion, it appears that the need to create new places is constantly being prioritised over and above the need to ensure the consistent delivery of high-quality early years provision.'
From Monday, working parents of children who turn nine-months-old before September 1 can apply to access up to 30 hours of funded childcare per week.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said women would be given added 'freedom' to have more children by expanded government-funded childcare.
She told the Daily Mail: 'They will be able to make choices about the career that's right for them, the hours that they want, but also (have) the freedom to think about family size and how many children they want to have, with support from the Government around childcare hours.
'That brings huge benefits to working women and this is a generational shift in terms of the new funding that's been put in place.'
Purnima Tanuku, chief executive of the National Day Nurseries Association, said: 'Consulting on the use of outdoor space is a positive step that recognises changes in research and best practice about how children can learn and develop in the outdoor environment.
'It will be important to ensure that this approach is based on best practice and what is best for children.
'There is also a need to review the indoor space requirements because no-one knows how they were defined and have not been reviewed in living memory.
'However, even if providers can increase capacity based on space, providers are still telling us that they need more staff to be able to meet local demand for places.'
A DfE spokeswoman said: 'As we deliver on our ambitious Plan for Change to get more children ready for school at age five, we are exploring new ways to help providers offer more high-quality childcare places for working families, that include access to outdoor space.
'Outdoor play provides huge benefits to children, providers strongly support these proposals and the consultation is clear we would include safeguards to prevent overcrowding and to make sure any outdoor space used is high quality and beneficial to children's development.
'This comes alongside over £8 billion in funding, our rollout of school-based nurseries and new early years qualifications to help deliver an early years system that gives every child the best start in life.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Kemi Badenoch to give speech on the ECHR
Kemi Badenoch is set to use a major speech to declare she is 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. The leader of the Conservative Party is expected to set out a plan to launch a commission into whether Britain should quit the treaty. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Mrs Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Critics of the treaty want to leave it because it has been used to frustrate attempts to deport migrants from Britain. Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that she is 'increasingly of the view that we will need to leave, because I am yet to see a clear and coherent route to change within our current legal structures'. 'I have always been clear that if our national interest means that we need to leave the ECHR, we will leave,' the Conservative leader will say. She will add: 'But I say that not because of any particular obsession with international law or with our treaty arrangements. I say that because for me, the most important thing is making our country safer, richer and fairer.'
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform's Richard Tice doubles down on call for burqa ban debate after chairman quits
Reform's deputy leader has doubled down on calls for a debate on whether burqas should be banned in Britain after a furious row over the issue saw the party's chairman quit. Zia Yusuf resigned on Thursday after describing a call from the party's newest MP to ban the burqa as 'dumb'. Speaking as he entered the count for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Holyrood by-election, Richard Tice said MPs should 'discuss' a potential ban. 'Let's have a discussion about these things, all these important issues, as opposed to not discussing anything, smearing and labelling,' he said. Pressed on his personal view amid chaotic scenes, Mr Tice said there should be a 'national debate'. And, asked if Mr Yusuf's resignation implied the party was racist, the Boston and Skegness MP said: 'With the greatest of respect, that's nonsense.' It came after the new Runcorn and Helsby MP Sarch Pochin used her first Prime Minister's Questions question to call on Sir Keir to ban burqas 'in the interest of public safety'. She said: 'Given the prime minister's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he, in the interest of public safety, follow the lead of France, Belgium, Denmark and others and ban the burqa?' Sir Keir welcomed Ms Pochin to the Commons, but said 'I am not going to follow her down that line'. A Reform spokesman later clarified that banning burqas was not party policy, sparking calls from the far-right for Mr Farage to adopt the proposals. Later, Mr Yusuf said it was 'dumb for a party to ask the prime minister if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do'. He quit the party on Thursday saying 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office'. Asked on Wednesday night about Ms Pochin's comments on the burqa, party leader Nigel Farage also said he would welcome a broader debate about face coverings in public. He told GB News: 'I think this debate actually goes beyond the burqa… I was in Aberdeen Monday, there was a mob there to meet me, an organisation called Antifa, and half of them had complete face coverings on so they would be unidentifiable. 'I don't think face coverings in public places make sense, and I think we do deserve debate about that, which I see the burqa as being a part.' Denying his party was 'in chaos', Mr Tice paid tribute to the outgoing former chairman. 'As Nigel's said, as I've said, we're very sad that Zia has resigned,' he said. 'He's worked incredibly hard, he's been instrumental in driving the party forward. ' One of the reasons that this result could be really close – who knows which way it will go – is because of the success of what Zia has achieved.' He added: 'It's very sad, politics is difficult, it's time-consuming, but he's worked incredibly hard.'
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Illegal immigration is turning us into a lockdown society
The mild weather has, we are told, exacerbated the problem of small boats crossing the English Channel. The pledge to 'smash the gangs' is no longer being repeated endlessly by Labour spokespeople (perhaps the recent sunny weather distracted Border Force?) But fear not. The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, has a plan. She thinks a gigantic governmental IT project is what is now needed to get a grip on the explosion in immigration. Whenever politicians run out of road in trying to solve a problem, it's never long before the introduction of ID cards rears its ugly head. One might say this is an exercise using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, but that would be unfair. The issues at stake tend to be rather bigger than nuts – terrorism, mass uncontrolled immigration, widespread welfare fraud and the like. No, it's more like wildly swinging a sledgehammer in an idiotic attempt to repair a window. The way ID schemes work is to split the population into two cohorts – one which is entitled to something and one which isn't. You want to visit your local GP? You'd better whip out your digital ID card to do so. A police officer doesn't like the cut of your jib and wonders if you should be in the UK at all? You'd be advised to have data on hand to prove your citizenship. Three problems immediately emerge. First, the law-abiding majority are obliged to undertake an ever-increasing number of checks and tests to go about their ordinary lives. Second, it assumes that the people you want to collar are not adept at melting into the black market economy. How many employers are hiring large numbers of illegal immigrants unknowingly and were genuinely just about to get round to making sure they all had the right to work here? None. Third, it relies on the state actually operating a complex IT system successfully. We have surely learnt over recent years that in the vast number of ways the government is able to waste huge tranches of taxpayers' money, botched IT projects are probably top of the list. You can bank on a new digital ID system to break, be littered with errors or both. Ronald Reagan's old dictum – 'there are no easy solutions, but there are simple solutions' – is typically honoured in the breach. The Home Secretary is overreaching for a solution which is difficult and complex but – she is hoping – avoids being especially controversial. Instead, to tackle the immigration disaster, we need to get back to basics. The vast numbers of people coming to our shores are doing so because enforcement is weak, the legal system is soft and the incentives to come here are too great. If you are unwilling or unable to deal with those root causes, there is no database – however magical you may imagine it to be – that will be of much assistance. The reason we have failed to deport many undesirables is not because we are sitting across a desk from them and can't identify who they are or what they are entitled to. Rather it's because our asylum system works at a snail's pace, allows fatuous appeals under human rights legislation, and the package of goodies you receive while you are here is too good to resist. We need to speed up the system so claims take eighteen days (or, ideally, eighteen hours) to process rather than eighteen months. We must ensure that your child's preference for British-made chicken nuggets is not an admissible basis for resisting deportation. We have to find a more robust way of policing the English Channel. None of these are easy to achieve, but they are simple to grasp. Instead, the political elite – this time in the form of Yvette Cooper – prefers to rush down the rabbit hole of believing a flashy computerised system is the answer to our prayers. It probably won't happen. It certainly won't work.
