logo
How will Gavin Newsom's return-to-office order affect California state telework stipends?

How will Gavin Newsom's return-to-office order affect California state telework stipends?

Yahoo11-03-2025

While there are still many questions lingering about how California will bring its workforce back to primarily in-person work in the coming months, the impact on state workers' telework stipend is clearly defined.
After California directed its public employees to work from home to limit the spread of COVID-19, the state paid those public servants stipends beginning October 2021 to help cover expenses workers needed to do their jobs remotely, such as the internet.
The stipend applies to all departments and all employee classifications as long as they work remotely for some part of the week. Those who work primarily from home, known as 'remote-centered,' receive $50 a month. Those primarily in state building, 'office-centered,' get $25 a month.
With Gov. Gavin Newsom directing departments to increase the number of days state workers are expected to be in offices — from two to four — public employees can expect a change to their telework stipends.
Sign up here to get our weekly newsletter for California employees.
As it stands, state workers receiving $50 a month to work primarily from home will see that payment cut in half come July, when the governor's return-to-office directive takes effect. Those already working at least three days from state buildings will continue to receive $25 a month as long as they work remotely part of the week.
The California Department of Human Resources said individual departments determine which employees are eligible for the stipend based on the telework agreements. CalHR said the pay differential that outlines the stipend already considers changes to departments' hybrid work policies, like the transition from two days to four days in office.
The state stands to save millions of dollars in paying only half of the 'remote-centered' telework stipend.
In January, California paid $5.2 million in telework stipends to its employees. Of the 115,000 employees who received those payments, 81% receive the full $50 payment.
If the state paid the same number of employees in January the $25 payment, instead of the 'remote-centered' stipend, the state would have saved $2.3 million.
But whatever the amount saved by paying a smaller stipend, it would only be a fraction of the state's payroll expenses. In 2023, California paid over $22 billion in total wages to state employees.
Unions representing state employees are hoping to leverage this coming reduction to workers' paychecks to block Newsom's return-to-office mandate.
In challenges filed with the state's labor relations board, SEIU Local 1000 and Professional Engineers in California Government claimed that forcing workers back to offices four days a week violated the the Ralph C. Dills Act, which outlines labor regulations between the state and public employees.
The unions argue that the governor's order will effectively shift telework employees from 'remote-centered' to 'office-centered.' By making this change, which is subject to negotiation, the union said Newsom infringed on workers' rights.
'The Governor imposed this order unilaterally, without negotiation, without consideration for its impact on state workers, and without following the law,' Anica Walls, president of SEIU Local 1000, said in a statement announcing the union's challenge last week. 'We're demanding that (the Public Employment Relations Board) rescind this illegal order immediately and return decision-making on telework and return-to-office policies back to individual departments, where it belongs.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marines arrive in LA under Trump orders as protests spread to other cities
Marines arrive in LA under Trump orders as protests spread to other cities

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Marines arrive in LA under Trump orders as protests spread to other cities

By Brad Brooks, Jorge Garcia, Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Hundreds of U.S. Marines arrived in Los Angeles overnight and more were expected on Tuesday under orders from President Donald Trump, who has also activated 4,000 National Guard troops to quell protests despite objections from California Governor Gavin Newsom and other local leaders. The city has seen days of public outrage since the Trump administration launched a series of immigration raids on Friday, though local officials said the demonstrations on Monday were largely peaceful. About half of the roughly 700 Marines that Trump ordered to Los Angeles arrived on Monday night, and the remaining troops will enter the city on Tuesday, a U.S. official told Reuters. The U.S. military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told KABC that more than 100 people had been arrested on Monday but that the majority of protesters were nonviolent. Over the weekend, protesters threw rocks and other objects at officers and vehicles and set several cars ablaze. Police responded by firing projectiles like pepper balls as well as flash bang grenades and tear gas. Trump has justified his decision to deploy active military troops to Los Angeles by describing the protests as a violent occupation of the city, a characterization that Newsom and Bass have said is grossly exaggerated. Newsom said that Trump's deployment of National Guard troops has only inflamed the situation and made it more difficult for local law enforcement to respond to the demonstrations. In a statement on Monday, Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said the department had not been notified that any Marines were traveling to the city and that their possible arrival "presents a significant logistical and operational challenge" for police. Trump's decision to mobilize 700 Marines based in Southern California escalated his confrontation with Newsom, who filed a lawsuit on Monday asserting that Trump's deployment of Guard troops without the governor's consent was illegal. The Guard deployment was the first time in decades that a president activated the Guard absent a request from a sitting governor. While the Marines are only tasked with guarding federal property temporarily until the full contingent of 4,000 Guard troops arrives, the use of active military to respond to civil disturbances is extremely rare. "This isn't about public safety," Newsom wrote on X on Monday. "It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego." The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Jack Reed, said he was "gravely troubled" by Trump's deployment of active-duty Marines. "Since our nation's founding, the American people have been perfectly clear: we do not want the military conducting law enforcement on U.S. soil," he said. In a post on Tuesday morning on Truth Social, Trump claimed Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground right now" if he had not deployed troops to the city. DEMONSTRATIONS AND ARRESTS The raids are part of Trump's sweeping immigration crackdown, which Democrats and immigrant advocates have said are indiscriminately breaking up families. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged on Monday to carry out more operations to round up suspected immigration violators. Trump officials have branded the protests as lawless and blamed state and local Democrats for protecting undocumented immigrants with sanctuary cities. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on Monday outside a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles where immigrants have been held, chanting "free them all" and waving Mexican and Central American flags. National Guard forces formed a human barricade to keep people out of the building, and late on Monday, police began dispersing the crowd using gas canisters and arrested some protesters. At dusk, officers had running confrontations with protesters who had scattered into the Little Tokyo section of the city. As people watched from apartment patios above street level and as tourists huddled inside hotels, a large contingent of LAPD and officers and sheriff's deputies fired several flash bangs that boomed through side streets along with tear gas. Protests spread to neighboring Orange County on Monday night after immigration raids there, with demonstrators gathering at the Santa Ana Federal building, according to local officials and news reports. Protests also sprang up in at least nine other U.S. cities on Monday, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, according to local news reports. In Austin, Texas, police fired non-lethal munitions and detained several people as they clashed with a crowd of several hundred protesters.

This Is Not What the National Guard Is For
This Is Not What the National Guard Is For

Atlantic

time11 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

This Is Not What the National Guard Is For

Donald Trump just did what no other president has ever done in the context of urban unrest: He sent federal troops to a state without a request from the governor. By federalizing California National Guard members on Saturday, the president abrogated Governor Gavin Newsom's authority over his own Guard. During both previous instances of a presidential order to deploy National Guardsmen to American cities—the Los Angeles riots in 1992 and the Hurricane Katrina response in 2005—the state's governor was overseeing a public-safety apparatus that had been overwhelmed. Trump, seizing on unlawful behavior that included vandalism, violence, and refusing to disperse during protests against ICE raids in L.A., announced that 2,000 reservists would be deployed to the city, unilaterally and contra Newsom's advice. Trump's decision—to exercise his Title 10 authority to federalize the National Guard under his command—was not based on a careful assessment of the operational needs on the streets of Los Angeles. Even if the White House's escalating rhetoric and threats of full military deployment were justified by circumstances that merited overruling a governor, the notion that the armed services will stop protests and quiet widespread outrage about Trump's immigration-enforcement policies in California is naive and flawed. Implicated in Trump's decision was a lot of prior controversy—immigration and deportation, ICE raids, tension between blue states and the White House, a personal beef with Newsom—but the president's assertion that a troop presence is the answer to public unrest is particularly dubious. Historically, these deployments have proved of limited value even when the president and governor agree on goals. Sending in the military as a hostile force is a recipe for trouble. During the 1992 L.A. riots, after four white police officers were acquitted of assaulting Rodney King, 63 people were killed amid widespread arson and looting as rioting spread through the city. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina killed nearly 1,000 people in Louisiana and left New Orleans with no functioning government and little law enforcement. In each case, National Guard deployment was essentially a response to the incapacity of the local police force—either because the cops had become the focus of hostility or because they simply could not meet the demands of the crisis. And in both instances, the governor requested the federal intervention. David Frum: For Trump, this is a dress rehearsal One key lesson of the L.A. deployment was that a failure to define command-and-control responsibilities resulted in operational problems and delays. The National Guard under Governor Pete Wilson's authority was supposed to protect first responders (especially firefighters) and emergency work crews trying to fix critical infrastructure. Trained to help with crowd control, these troops also supported police patrols—to protect shopping centers from looting, for example. The soldiers' initial deployment was slow, and they were not fully prepared for the mission. But in the days that followed, the rioting subsided and the National Guard was able to perform much of its mission and provide relief to the overstretched police forces. By then, however, Wilson had lost confidence in the National Guard's leadership and was unnerved by the scale of disorder. He asked the White House for help, and President George H. W. Bush sent in 3,500 federalized troops. Despite deploying in a less demanding situation, these federalized soldiers were unable to provide the effective support required on the ground. In the end, the state Guard proved the more flexible and adaptable force. The new military task force formed by the federal deployment never satisfactorily resolved issues with its mission, its communications, and its rules of engagement. The problems of this uneasy collaboration with local and state police agencies filtered down, hampering the street-level response. The events of L.A. in 1992—and the explicit lessons that state, federal, and military authorities took from them—are why, until now, the task of dealing with civil unrest or natural disasters has remained largely with the National Guard acting under state jurisdiction. The National Guard has also been integrated into homeland-security efforts on the same basis. If one Guard force encounters a situation that exceeds its capacity, it can turn to another state's Guard under mutual-aid agreements. Mutual aid does not seem to have been on Trump's mind last weekend. The National Guard exists to provide governors with additional power to protect their citizens, and to do so in support of local first responders. Trump's hasty federalization of troops is unwise and unhelpful, before we even consider what malign political motive may lie behind the order. Right now, the Pentagon appears not even to have arranged sleeping arrangements for its troops, let alone determined the rules of engagement on the streets; the San Francisco Chronicle reports that the deployment was so 'wildly underprepared' that troops are sleeping in cramped quarters on the floor. At best, this deployment will be completely unnecessary. At worst, it will be deeply counterproductive. But Trump's motive is transparent—and he will surely engineer an occasion to keep escalating his power plays, until they seem normal.

Daily Digest: End of an era at Fisherman's Wharf, Scale AI eyes record funding from Meta
Daily Digest: End of an era at Fisherman's Wharf, Scale AI eyes record funding from Meta

Business Journals

time12 minutes ago

  • Business Journals

Daily Digest: End of an era at Fisherman's Wharf, Scale AI eyes record funding from Meta

Happy Monday, Bay Area. Tensions remain high in Los Angeles as protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement took over the city this weekend, with demonstrators clashing with law enforcement as President Trump deployed 2,000 members of the National Guard to "address the lawlessness." The state of California will file a lawsuit on Monday challenging President Trump's use of the National Guard, Gov. Gavin Newsom stated on social media. Trump suggested Newsom should be arrested over his response. Protests also broke out in downtown San Francisco on Sunday with 60 arrests made, the Chronicle reports. Meanwhile in transportation, Alphabet-owned Waymo has suspended service of its ride-hailing service in downtown Los Angeles after some of its vehicles were set on fire during protests. Closer to home here in the city, S.F.'s first all-women's sports bar — Rikki's — is opening on Wednesday at 2223 Market St., an upper Market location that has seen a number of short-lived concepts over the past few years. And finally, the San Francisco-Marin Food Bank has announced the closure of all its farmers market-style pantries by June 30, as well as reductions to its home delivery service and staff. ABC7 also reports that 13 pantries closed for good Friday after the money ran out. Here's the rest of the local business news to start your week. GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY Find Local Events Near You Connect with a community of local professionals. Explore All Events Alioto's to be torn down at Fisherman's Wharf Alioto's Restaurant, the longtime waterfront seafood spot at Fisherman's Wharf that closed down in 2020, will be demolished and replaced by a new public plaza as part of a $10 million plan by the Port of San Francisco to reimagine the historic heart of Fisherman's Wharf, the Chronicle reports. Knocking down Alioto's and building a plaza are at the heart of a package of wharf upgrades, of which the port expects to complete the first phase by next year. expand The three-story, 11,000-square-foot Alioto's structure at Fisherman's Wharf will be torn down. Todd Johnson | San Francisco Business Times Business owners expect disruptions as wine and spirits distributor pulls out of California One of the nation's largest wine and spirits distributors recently announced it's pulling out of California, a move expected disrupt restaurant and bar operators and retailers statewide. Republic National Distributing Company, which operates in 39 states across the U.S., announced last week that it will exit the California market, effective Sept. 2, the Sacramento Business Journal reports. RNDC's remaining portfolio of wine and spirit brands will now be on the hunt for new distributors in California in order for their products to remain on shelves and in bars, according to local business leaders. Wild pigs are going hog wild in Santa Clara. Now authorities are going "Full Boar" Wild pigs are on the rise in Santa Clara County and have led to an uptick in property damage. As a result, the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, an agency in San Jose that has preserved 30,000 acres of land as outdoor public space, last month approved spending $243,000 to hire a contractor, Full Boar Trapping and Wildlife Control, based in Contra Costa County, to trap and shoot wild pigs over the next three years on its properties, the Mercury News reports. The report states that Russian boars were first introduced to the region in 1924 when eccentric Canadian millionaire George Gordon Moore purchased Rancho San Carlos, a 22,000-acre ranch in Carmel Valley. Some escaped and bred with the local pigs first brought by the Spanish in 1769. The pigs grow sharp tusks, weigh 250 pounds or more and have been known to attack hikers. Sign up for the Business Times' free morning and afternoon daily newsletters to receive the latest business news driving change in San Francisco. Download the free San Francisco Business Times app for breaking news alerts on your phone. People on the Move The National Venture Capital Association has named Vineeta Agarwala, general partner at A16z, as chair of the NVCA board of directors. In addition, Alex Doll of Ten Eleven Ventures has joined the NVCA board of directors. Mobilicom Limited (Nasdaq: MOB), a Palo Alto-based provider of cybersecurity and solutions for drones and robotics, named Guy Givoni to its board of directors. Givoni previously served on Mobilicom's advisory board from 2017 through 2023. Funding Watch San Francisco-based Scale AI is in talks to raise more than $10 billion from Meta, Bloomberg reports. The financing could exceed $10 billion in value, anonymous sources said, making it one of the largest private funding events of all time. The terms of the deal are not finalized and could still change and representatives for Scale AI and Meta declined to comment. The startup was last valued at about $14 billion in 2024, in a funding round that included backing from Meta and Microsoft. expand Alexandr Wang, co-founder and CEO of Scale AI David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images IPO Watch In case you missed it, check out these seven questions Senior Reporter Ron Leuty last week got to ask Sean Duffy, the CEO of newly public Omada Health. Final thought … Sometimes it's the small things that people in industry do that have the biggest impact. For example, making the home computer user-friendly. That was the genius of Bill Atkinson, the Apple designer who created the software pioneered by the company's Lisa and Macintosh computers that made the machines accessible to millions of users without specialized skills, the New York Times reports. RIP to Atkinson, who died on Thursday at his home in Portola Valley at the age of 74. DOWNLOAD the free SFBT app for breaking news alerts on your phone.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store