Starmer condemns ‘attack on our democracy' after fires at homes linked to PM
Arson attacks on properties linked to the Prime Minister are 'an attack on all of us, on democracy and the values that we stand for', Sir Keir Starmer has told the House of Commons.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch condemned the attacks as 'completely unacceptable' as the two party leaders began their weekly clash at Prime Minister's Questions.
'I think I speak for the whole house when I say that this wasn't just an attack on him, but on all of us and on our democracy,' the Tory leader added.
Sir Keir thanked the opposition leader for contacting him 'pretty well straight away' to lend her support.
The Prime Minister added: 'I really do appreciate that, and she's absolutely right that this is an attack on all of us, on democracy and the values that we stand for.'
Police are continuing their investigation into the attacks on the properties and a car linked to Sir Keir.
A 21-year-old was arrested at an address in Sydenham, south-east London, in the early hours of Tuesday on suspicion of arson with intent to endanger life, the Metropolitan Police said.
On Wednesday officers were granted permission to hold him for another 36 hours after applying to magistrates for a warrant of further detention.
Counter-terrorism officers are working 'at pace' to establish the cause of the fires and 'any potential motivation', Scotland Yard said.
In the Commons, other political leaders also offered their support to the PM amid the ongoing investigation.
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'Can I offer our support to the Prime Minister and his family after the appalling arson attacks on his home.
'And can I echo his thanks to our brilliant police and firefighters.'
The 21-year-old suspect remained in custody at a London police station as of Tuesday evening.
Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Met's counter-terrorism command, acknowledged the probe may cause concern to MPs.
'I would encourage any MP who is concerned about their own safety to get in touch with their dedicated local Operation Bridger officer, who can provide further advice and support,' he said in a statement on Tuesday.
On Monday, a police cordon and officers, as well as investigators from London Fire Brigade (LFB), could be seen outside the Kentish Town property where the Prime Minister used to live.
The Met said residents could expect an increased police presence in the coming days.
Neighbours described hearing a loud bang and said police officers were looking for a projectile.
Police were alerted by the LFB to reports of a fire at the residential address at 1.35am.
Damage was caused to the property's entrance but nobody was hurt.
In the early hours of Sunday, firefighters dealt with a small fire at the front door of a house converted into flats in nearby Islington, which is also linked to Sir Keir.
One person was assisted to safety via an internal staircase by crews wearing breathing apparatus, LFB said.
The car fire broke out in the early hours of Thursday May 8, in the same street as the Kentish Town property.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lisa Nandy hits out at BBC leadership over Glastonbury live stream
It came after rapper Bobby Vylan led crowds at the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)' on Saturday. Ms Nandy said the Government is 'exasperated' with the 'lack of account from the leadership', as MPs from across the chamber called for accountability. Bobby Vylan performing at Glastonbury Festival (Ben Birchall/PA) In a statement on the BBC and Glastonbury, she said 'problems with broadcasts' at the festival 'should have been foreseeable'. Labour MP Peter Prinsley (Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) said: 'How are Jews such as myself, in this country, to be reassured about the editorial processes of the BBC? And who on Earth will be held accountable for this error?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He makes an extremely important point about accountability, and that is something that is not lost on me as the Secretary of State, and something that I've impressed upon the BBC leadership as well. 'When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership.' Conservative former minister John Glen said: 'I think we all in this place understand the fine editorial judgments that the BBC and their staff have to make, but this is of a completely different order, and when people are losing faith in the great institutions of this country, could I urge the Secretary of State, in her follow-up conversations that … the BBC actually identified accountability to individuals?' He added: 'Somebody didn't follow that guidance, and I think the country expects people to be held individually to account for why they fail to do their job properly.' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think people do expect people to be held to account for the way that they do their jobs, be that on the front line or at senior levels. It's a point that I've made to the BBC. 'They will have heard what he said and what (Mr Prinsley) said as well about accountability, and it's a point that I will continue to press.' Jim Allister, TUV MP for North Antrim, described the live stream as 'an appalling pro-terrorist broadcast', adding: 'The BBC deliberately chose not to cut the broadcast, perhaps therefore it's time for Government to consider cutting the licence fee?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He will know that this Government supports the BBC. We believe it is an important institution. 'That is why we are so disappointed that this has happened, why we have been so exasperated with the lack of account from the leadership, not just about this, but about a previous Gaza documentary and a number of other issues as well. 'The BBC is one of the most important institutions in our country, and that is the reason why it is held to the highest of standards.' Conservative MP Dame Caroline Dinenage, who chairs the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said: 'I wonder if the Secretary of State could say what explanation the BBC has given for why this live stream wasn't cut? 'Now it can't be for lack of staff on the ground. They took a reported 400 people to Glastonbury at the weekend. What were they all doing?' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think she's right to raise the question of what the number of staff who were present at the Glastonbury Festival, or working on the broadcast, were doing. 'But I do think this also raises very, very serious questions at the highest levels of the BBC about the operational oversight and the way in which editorial standards are understood and reflected in the decisions that are made by individual staff.' Shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew called for an independent inquiry, claiming the BBC 'has repeatedly failed to call out antisemitic rhetoric, when it emerges under the guise of political commentary, and has faced serious allegations of minimising attacks on Jewish communities'. Ms Nandy replied: 'What I want to see from the BBC, and I know he shares this, is rapid action to make sure this cannot happen again.' She also claimed an Independent MP was 'aligning himself with antisemites'. Ayoub Khan, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, had accused the Government of 'hypocrisy' because it did not make a statement when Israeli football fans 'were chanting 'death to all Arabs'' in November last year. Ms Nandy said she 'could not disagree more', adding: 'I think every member of this House will utterly condemn chants of 'death to all Arabs' – it's disgusting and disgraceful.' She continued: 'The reason I have brought a statement to the House today is because our national broadcaster, which is funded by the licence fee, which is paid by the public in this country, has broadcast something that is deeply, deeply offensive to a community in this country, that has made many, many people feel and may actually have made them unsafe. 'Can I just say to him that as a longstanding supporter of justice for the Palestinians, he does nothing for the Palestinian cause by aligning himself with antisemites.' In a point of order, Mr Khan said: 'At no stage have I said in my question or statement that I was aligning myself to anyone at that Glastonbury event.'
South Wales Argus
21 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Action needed to reopen public toilets in Newport
Cllr Matthew Evans said the matter is 'not difficult to sort out', and argued better provision was needed to reflect the council's ambitions for the city centre. Earlier this year, cabinet members confirmed they would spend £15,000 on exploring the reopening of public toilets, as part of 'bread and butter' budget proposals that focused on residents' key issues. 'I questioned the costs at the time – because £15,000 was what the council said it would save closing the public toilets in Caerleon (in 2018),' said Cllr Evans, who leads the Conservative opposition group in Newport. 'Clearly you've got to find a lot more money than that. It's woefully inadequate. Where's the progress?' he asked. Local Conservative campaigner Michael Enea has called the project a 'mystery' and claimed other councils across Britain had spent sums ranging from £60,000 to £400,000 on building or reopening public toilets. He also expressed surprise there was not more detail on public toilets in the city centre's new placemaking plan, which the council recently unveiled. A Newport City Council spokesperson said the funding set aside in this year's budget, for the proposal to reopen public toilets, was 'sufficient'. 'Plans are progressing and further details will be made available when those are finalised', the spokesperson said, before noting there are public toilets available in 'several city centre locations including Friars Walk and the Kingsway Centre, as well as some other businesses, and in venues across the city'. The spokesperson also said councils 'do not have a statutory duty to provide public conveniences, but we do provide them in many of our buildings and parks'. However, Cllr Evans called public toilet provision a 'necessity' and said he had 'lost count of how many' public toilets have closed in Newport. He argued the council should 'start' its plans to reopen some sites by looking at the commercial centre. He said: 'The city centre functions 24 hours a day, and we need to provide that service 24 hours a day.' The council said providing public toilets comes 'with an ongoing cost for maintenance and cleaning, and that would be significant if they were open 24 hours a day'. 'We will continue to monitor the situation in relation to public toilets more generally,' the council spokesperson added. Cllr Evans also suggested developers could be compelled to build public toilets on some sites, as part of conditions attached to planning permission. 'It's quite easy to put as a planning condition, and something that should be an easy way of dealing with the issue – a quick win', he claimed, adding: 'The population is growing, we need to provide essential services.'
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Andy Burnham urges MPs to vote against Labour's welfare reforms
Andy Burnham has called on Labour MPs to vote down the government's welfare reforms as Sir Keir Starmer attempts to stave off a backbench rebellion. The Mayor of Greater Manchester said the prime minister said the changes to the welfare system will create "unfairness and divide" amongst disabled people. He also said the prime minister had only performed a 'half U-turn' which did not go far enough. Mr Burnham's comments will be seen as a direct challenge to the PM and an indication of his possible future leadership ambitions. Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall confirmed a number of concessions to the government's welfare cuts on Monday in an effort to head off a major rebellion by Labour backbenchers, including protecting people who claim personal independence payments (Pip) from new eligibility criteria. The U-turn means those currently in receipt of PIP and Universal Credit will not be affected by proposed cuts, but those claiming in the future will receive less money. However, speaking at an event at Glastonbury festival, Mr Burnham said: 'What's been announced is half a U-turn, a 50% U-turn. In my view, I'd still hope MPs vote against the whole bill when it comes before parliament.' He said Labour MPs 'face the prospect, if they accept this package, someone could come to their surgery in two years saying 'why did you vote to make me £6,000 worse off than someone exactly the same, but who was protected because they were an existing claimant'?' The Manchester mayor added: 'I hope they think carefully before the vote, because the vote will create that unfairness and divide in disabled people.' His intervention comes as ministers hope the concessions will be enough to avert defeat when MPs vote on the reforms on Tuesday, although Downing Street remains braced for a substantial revolt. A 'reasoned amendment' proposed by senior Labour backbencher Dame Meg Hillier had received support from 126 Labour MPs, enough to overturn Sir Keir's majority. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch also confirmed that her party would vote against the government's proposals, saying they were 'not serious welfare reform'. On Monday, modelling from the Department for Work and Pensions suggested the government's proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030. Ms Kendall also told the Commons on Monday that the U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers around £2.5 billion by 2030. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their dismay at the reforms. Sir Sadiq said the watered-down welfare Bill will drive people into poverty and remove safety nets. 'I've met too many Londoners who have dignity, who do work, who through no fault of their own, need support from the state, and they're really worried they'll lose that,' he said. The London mayor added the government's concessions had not yet gone 'far enough' to address concerns among MPs opposing the Bill. The U-turn will also cause problems for chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will now have to find a way to cover the shortfall between the amount the Government had expected to save, and the new, lower figure.
