logo
Bureau of Land Management approves construction of Millard County potash mine

Bureau of Land Management approves construction of Millard County potash mine

Yahooa day ago

FILLMORE, Utah () – The Bureau of Land Management near Sevier Lake in Millard County. Plans for the mine have been in the works for years.
Peak Minerals is developing the 124,223-acre Sevier Playa Project, which is billed as the largest producer of sulphate of potash outside of China.
In a news release, the Bureau of Land Management said the approval comes as part of President Donald Trump's orders to boost domestic mineral production. Potash is a key ingredient in agricultural fertilizer and Utah has vast reserves of the mineral necessary for production.
RELATED: BLM to remove over 3,000 wild horses from Wyoming land
describe wells, trenches and ponds to be built for the process of extracting and processing subterranean brine. Roads, building and electrical infrastructure would also be built. Planners say the lifespan of phase one of the project would be about 25 years.
Environmental advocates have fought the project for years. In 2023, the (SUWA) sued to stop it from moving forward. In the suit, the group insisted the project would harm groundwater, which is increasingly taxed by consumption in the drought-stricken West Desert.
In a statement to ABC4 on Tuesday, the group expressed disappointment and alarm.
'The area—currently wild and remote—would become an industrial zone filled with evaporation ponds, dikes, roads, powerlines, a processing plant, and a rail loadout facility,' said Hanna Larsen, Staff Attorney for SUWA. 'The impacts of this industrialization would be clear on both the lakebed and the surrounding public lands, significantly impairing important habitat for migratory birds, ruining incredibly dark night skies, and adversely affecting air and water quality for decades to come. We'll continue to work to protect this area.'
These Utah ponds aren't a trick of the eye, and you should stay away from them
Indeed, the area around Sevier Lake is unique. The lake itself is a saline lake, not unlike the Great Salt Lake. It is fed by the Sevier River, and upstream water diversions cause the lake to dry out during certain times of the year. When surface water is available, migratory birds use it as a stopover and feeding ground.
Environmental advocates point out the area is special because it is almost entirely devoid of light and noise pollution. Critics worry a large potash operation will destroy those qualities. But proponents of the project insist the economic benefit to the community will be worth it. In a advocating for the project, Peak Minerals claims the site would be an 'outstanding project with significant logistic advantages' with a 'skilled workforce ready to commute.'
Company documents show the potential for lithium extraction in the future, which they say could add more economic value to the project. However, lithium extraction is water intensive and pressure on Utah's water reserves is only increasing with overuse and drought made worse by climate change.
Bureau of Land Management approves construction of Millard County potash mine
November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum 'not off the table,' Cox says
Family, police seeking information on missing 15-year-old girl from West Jordan
RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season
Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Sell America' is in full force for elite investor Jeffrey Gundlach, who warns of a US debt 'reckoning'
'Sell America' is in full force for elite investor Jeffrey Gundlach, who warns of a US debt 'reckoning'

Business Insider

time34 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

'Sell America' is in full force for elite investor Jeffrey Gundlach, who warns of a US debt 'reckoning'

Investor Jeff Gundlach expressed caution over the US debt load in recent remarks. He said the "untenable" debt burden in America is heading for a "reckoning." The so-called "King of Bonds" said his firm is starting to introduce foreign currencies to its funds. Elite investor Jeffrey Gundlach is doubling down on the '" Sell America" trade. The DoubleLine Capital CEO, previously coined as the "King of Bonds," raised concerns about dollar-denominated assets when speaking at the Bloomberg Global Credit Forum on Wednesday. At the core of his comments is growing concern over America's swelling debt load, which is expected to get even bigger if President Donald Trump's " Big Beautiful Bill" eventually passes. "There's an awareness now that the long-term Treasury bond is not a legitimate flight-to-quality asset," Gundlach said, warning that a "reckoning is coming." He's referring to recent volatility in long-dated government bonds, like 30-year Treasurys, which haven't been trading like the sure-thing safe bet they're supposed to be. And Gundlach's firm has been putting its money where its mouth is. The DoubleLine CEO said his firm has been allocating more fund holdings to foreign currencies, and recommended that investors broadly start to think about boosting non-dollar-denominated holdings. Gundlach also sees the tide turning in the global stock market. "Things always take longer than people think, but it's happening in real-time, and the next one will be selective emerging market equities as opposed to the US," Gundlach said. 2 signs of stress Reuters Gundlach highlighted multiple unusual patterns that have been flashing in US markets this year. He sees these as signs that markets are likely concerned about the US debt, and that faith in US assets is starting to fade, he added. The US dollar and stocks. When the S&P 500 falls, the value of the dollar typically moves higher relative to other currencies, Gundlach said. But in April, when the S&P 500 tanked 20% amid the turmoil from Donald Trump's tariffs, the US dollar also weakened in value. The US Dollar Index, which weighs the greenback against a basket of foreign currencies, traded around 97.8 on Thursday, down 9% from levels at the start of the year. US Treasurys. When the Fed cuts interest rates, the 10-year US Treasury yield, which is tied to long-term interest rate expectations in the economy, typically falls. But the 10-year yield has climbed around 74 basis points from its low in September, around the time the Fed issued its first rate cut. "So I think what we have is recognition is that the interest expense for the United States is untenable if we continue running a $2.1 trillion budget deficit and we continue to have sticky interest rates," Gundlach said of the market shifts. Foreign investors have steadily added exposure to the US market over the last 17 years, Gundlach said, noting that the foreign net investment position in the US currently hovered around $25 trillion. "It's not inconceivable that some of the $25 trillion that came in just a couple — not even two decades — could go out," Gundlach said. "You should be thinking about increasing your allocations to non-dollar investments. And it's already working." Where to go if you're "selling America" Gundlach said there were several areas where investors could find safety away from US assets. Gold. Gundlach said he's continued to hold gold when it reached the level around $3,000 an ounce, and that he also holds stakes in gold miners. Previously, he's said that he believes gold could rally to as high as $4,000 an ounce as concerns swirl over tariffs, geopolitical conflict, and rising debt levels in the US. "I think gold is a real asset class. It's no longer for lunatic survivalists and wild speculators," he said. India. Gundlach also said investors should look into Indian assets, suggesting that India could see a similar run-up in economic growth that China has seen over the past three decades. India is riddled with many of the same economic issue China faced 35 years ago, Gundlach said, though be believed many of those issues can be fixed. "I don't know how long it will take, but that's one you buy," he said. Gundlach has consistently sounded the alarm on rising deficits in the US for years, and encouraged investors to pile into safe-havens. But forecasters on Wall Street have cast doubt on the "Sell America" trade, which is hinges on the idea that US will stop outperforming other assets in the world. JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley are among those who have said that they believe US assets will continue to dominate global markets.

Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel
Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel

As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, Cappelletti reported from Washington, D.C. Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

As the Middle East teeters on the brink, Trump could be forced into war with Iran
As the Middle East teeters on the brink, Trump could be forced into war with Iran

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As the Middle East teeters on the brink, Trump could be forced into war with Iran

US president Donald Trump faces a make or break moment in his long-running confrontation with Iran. The UN's nuclear watchdog has just reached the damning conclusion that Iran is in breach of its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. Trump has been personally responsible, in recent years, for the significant rise in tensions in Washington's decades-old feud with the ayatollahs. Having taken the decision in 2018 to end American participation in the Iranian nuclear deal, negotiated by former president Barack Obama, Trump has invested a great deal of political capital in his second term in an effort to resolve the issue once and for all. Trump's offer to reopen talks with Tehran, made in a personal letter sent to Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei shortly after the president returned to the White House this year, held out the prospect of lifting the punitive sanctions imposed against Tehran during his first term in office. This would be in return for Iran curbing her nuclear ambitions. There were even suggestions that Trump, following several rounds of talks between American and Iranian officials in the Gulf state of Oman (another session is due to take place in Muscat on Sunday), might be prepared to agree a 'soft' deal with Tehran. This would allow Iran to continue work on its nuclear programme on condition that tight safeguards were in place to prevent the production of nuclear warheads. Such an outcome would bear little difference to the deal Obama negotiated in 2015, and would be sure to cause outrage in Israel, where prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu insists that only the complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear programme would be acceptable. Trump's hopes of achieving a breakthrough, though, now appear to have been torpedoed by the alarming evidence produced by the latest report published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN body responsible for monitoring Iran's nuclear activities. Apart from confirming the existence of three previously undisclosed nuclear sites in Iran, it says that unexplained traces of nuclear material have been found at these and another site. This suggests Tehran's nuclear activities are far from peaceful. The report has prompted the IAEA's 35-member Board of Governors (which includes the UK) meeting in Vienna this week that Iran has broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years, and to demand that Iran provide answers 'without delay' in the IAEA's long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location'. Suddenly, Trump's hopes of achieving a peaceful resolution of the Iran issue lie in tatters, with fears that the IAEA's uncompromising condemnation of Tehran's conduct could ultimately provoke a regional war. Western security officials have expressed concern that Israel is preparing to launch unilateral military action to nullify Iran's nuclear facilities, while Washington has responded to the deepening crisis by ordering the removal of non-essential staff from the US Embassy in Baghdad. Other diplomatic and military missions in the region have been ordered to undertake urgent risk assessments of the vulnerability to possible Iranian attacks. The latest Iran crisis certainly means the US leader, whose natural instinct is to avoid military action, is in a difficult dilemma. Having made clear that he is totally opposed to the ayatollahs developing nuclear weapons, Trump cannot ignore the clear-cut evidence that Iran is in breach of its nuclear obligations. Indeed, there were already indications that Trump was losing patience with Tehran prior to the IAEA's demarche. The president told a US podcast on Wednesday he was 'less confident' about the prospects of a deal, and accused Tehran of adopting a hardline position during the recent negotiations in Oman. By the same token, Trump has little appetite for engaging in military action unless there is absolutely no alternative, an attitude that the Iranians have no doubt taken on board in their approach to the latest round of nuclear talks. Even if Trump is unwilling to hold Tehran to account for its constant defiance of the IAEA, there are others, especially the Israelis, who are. So the American president could soon find himself involved in a direct confrontation with Iran, whether he likes it or not. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store