In world first, Mexican voters to elect all judges
Mexico is set to become the world's only country to let voters elect all of their judges, sparking sharp disagreement about whether the reforms will diminish or strengthen criminal influence over the courts.
The government says the unprecedented popular vote for judges and magistrates at all levels -- including the Supreme Court -- is needed to address rampant corruption and impunity.
Critics argue it will undermine the judiciary's independence and warn the participation of controversial candidates -- such as a former lawyer for notorious drug lord Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman -- means it is doomed to backfire.
On Sunday, voters will choose several thousand federal, district and local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027.
Not just anybody can run for one of these jobs. Candidates must have a law degree, experience in legal affairs, what is termed "a good reputation," and no criminal record.
Opponents, including judicial workers, have held a series of mass street protests in an unsuccessful attempt to stop the reforms.
"Justice is not something you vote for" and it needs people with experience and specialized knowledge, said Olimpia Rojas Luviano, a 28-year-old lawyer.
But Maria del Rocio Morales, a judge who is standing to be a magistrate in the capital, said she was happy to take part.
"For the good of my city and my country, I will do it," she said.
President Claudia Sheinbaum has played down signs that many voters are unlikely to take part in the vote .
"People are very intelligent and know who they are going to vote for," the veteran left-winger said.
According to surveys by the El Universal and El Pais newspapers, only half of voters know the election date, and only four out of 10 are certain they will participate.
- 'Rotten' judiciary -
While judicial elections are not new -- the United States and Bolivia, for instance, allow voters to pick some judges -- Mexico will be the only nation to elect them at all levels.
The reform was championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who criticized the judicial system as "rotten," corrupt and serving the interests of the political and economic elite.
Mexico has a long history of human rights violations that remain unpunished, including the disappearance of 43 students from a teacher training college in 2014, allegedly at the hands of drug traffickers and corrupt authorities.
Despite dozens of arrests, there have been no convictions.
Mexico's criminal justice system "is profoundly ineffective at ensuring accountability for criminal violence and abuses by security forces," according to New York-based Human Right Watch.
Lopez Obrador frequently clashed with the judiciary, in particular the Supreme Court, which impeded some of his policies.
Sheinbaum, who replaced him in October, is a staunch supporter of the sweeping changes. Her opponents say they will eliminate democratic checks and balances.
Sheinbaum's ruling party already dominates both houses of Congress.
Opponents warn that elected judges could be more vulnerable to pressure from criminals, in a country where powerful drug cartels regularly use bribery and intimidation to influence officials.
Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers "high risk" for reasons including allegations of cartel links, corruption and sexual abuse, even though one of the requirements for running is to have no criminal record.
These people include Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for "El Chapo," the Sinaloa cartel co-founder imprisoned in the United States.
Defensorxs describes her as a candidate who "defends alleged drug traffickers."
Delgado, who is standing to be a judge in the northern state of Chihuahua, told AFP: "Every person has the right to counsel."
Another controversial candidate seeking to be a district judge in the northern state of Durango served prison time in the United States for drug crimes, according to Defensorxs.
A major concern for voters is the complexity of a vote that will require people in Mexico City to mark nine ballots for local and federal judges.
"I think even the people who devised it don't know how to do it," said Rojas Luviano.
jla-dr/dw
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alberta government walks back beer tax hike citing tariffs, need to support business
EDMONTON — Alberta's government has ditched a new fee schedule for breweries that would have seen the province's oldest beer maker pay significantly more in taxes. The schedule was introduced in February and it substantially lowered the production threshold breweries needed to hit before they had to pay higher fees to the government. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said at the time that the fee hike was supposed to protect small breweries and that "99 per cent" of companies wouldn't pay more. Calgary-based Big Rock Brewery didn't fall under the 99 per cent, and the company calculated it was going to pay $1.4 million more every year. Nally's office says the government decided to lower the fees in light of U.S. tariffs and to ensure small breweries are supported as they grow. The province replaced the fee system as of June 1 in favour of a schedule of more gradual increases. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025. Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press


Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
Experts Warn Of Decade-Long Setback After Trump Cuts HIV Vaccine Research
NEW YORK - DECEMBER 1: Marina Kemelman, Research Associate at the AIDS Vaccine Design and ... More Development Laboratory, collects bacteria transfected with DNA as part of research at the laboratory's campus in the former Brooklyn Army Terminal December 1, 2008 in New York City. The laboratory, seeking a vaccine to prevent the spread of AIDS, is part of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (or IAVI), a global not-for-profit, public-private partnership working to accelerate the development of a vaccine to prevent HIV infection and AIDS. December 1 is the 20th annual World AIDS Day around the world. (Photo by) It was a rare moment of bipartisan unity. Standing before a joint session of Congress in January 2019, President Donald Trump boldly pledged to eradicate a disease that claims one life every single minute: HIV/AIDS. 'Scientific breakthroughs have brought a once-distant dream within reach,' Trump exclaimed. 'My budget will ask Democrats and Republicans to make the needed commitment to eliminate the HIV epidemic in the United States within 10 years. We have made incredible strides.' Then, he added, 'we will defeat AIDS in America and beyond.' That was then and this is now. Last week, a group of scientists working on promising HIV vaccine studies were reportedly informed that the administration plans to revoke their research grants in a move experts warn could set the movement back years. When the global AIDS crisis peaked in the early 2000s, roughly 5,000 people were dying every single day from the disease. Thanks to the leadership of governments, the private sector, and philanthropists, the world invested more resources into the AIDS fight than ever before. This spurred nearly two decades of progress—not just against AIDS, but across global health broadly. Since 2004, AIDS-related deaths have been reduced by roughly two-thirds. But recently, progress has slowed. Covid-19 proved a major health disruption that reversed years of hard-fought gains. Efforts to reduce mother-to-child transmission rates have slowed. Global health funding is now under siege not just in the United States, but across Europe, too. And the world is no longer on track to meet critical 2030 AIDS targets. The great paradox here is that never in human history has there been more tools available to fight AIDS. The cost of antiretroviral drugs has fallen from $27 a day in 2000 to as little as 10 cents a day. Now, experts say what's needed to get the fight back on track—and eventually end the threat for good—isn't just better diagnostics and therapeutics, but long acting preventatives. Fortunately, it's an area that's seen great progress. Dubbed the 'breakthrough of the year' in 2024 by the journal Science, Gilead Science's lenacapavir is a long-acting injectable vaccine that has proven incredibly effective at preventing HIV infections. It represents a major step forward from the prevalent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) pill and mitigates some of the major privacy, stigma, and adherence issues that come with taking daily medication. The next step forward could be a vaccine with even longer immunity—one that gives patients lifetime protection. Researchers have been pursuing this laudable goal for years, but last week, the Trump administration announced plans to terminate research grants at two preeminent institutions, the Duke Human Vaccine Institute and the Scripps Research Institute, totaling $258 million. The researchers were told that the administration wanted 'to go with currently available approaches to eliminate HIV.' On the other hand, global health experts are warning that without new resources, President Trump's promise to end HIV within ten years is destined to fail—and when combined with the administration's other actions to cut and halt global health programs, HIV infections and deaths could actually rise for the first time in decades under his watch. 'I find it very disappointing that, at this critical juncture, the funding for highly successful H.I.V. vaccine research programs should be pulled,' Dennis Burton, an immunologist at Scripps, told The New York Times. Meanwhile AIDS groups, including the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition described the decision as inconceivable and shortsighted. The grant news marks the latest blow to the HIV/AIDS community, which has endured devastating domestic and global funding cuts in Trump's second term. San Francisco, which was one of the first epicenters of the domestic AIDS fight, has long relied on funding from the federal government to support community-based health programs that help reduce HIV transmission. These initiatives have helped the city make outstanding progress against the disease, but Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) grant delays have threatened testing, treatment, and care continuity. Even southern states which President Trump won decisively, and which account for 50% of all new U.S. HIV infections, have not been spared. According to the Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR), cuts to domestic HIV prevention programs could spark over 14,000 additional deaths from AIDS-related causes and 143,000 new HIV infections. Earlier this year, HHS closed its Office of Infectious Diseases & HIV policy that quarterbacked the government's domestic AIDS response. Abroad, global health programs have fared even worse. In January, the Trump administration halted funding for The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a bipartisan program that has saved over 26 million lives. In a congressional hearing last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that, '85 percent of recipients are now receiving PEPFAR services.' He also said that no one has died as a result of the aid freeze, a notion journalists and health experts scoff at. According to Brooke Nichols, an infectious disease mathematical modeler and health economist at Boston University, over 57,000 adults and 6,000 children have died as a result of the PEPFAR funding freeze and the discontinuation of global health programs. Even if those numbers are inflated, as some have contended, the number of lives needlessly lost is still likely in the tens of thousands. While some experts remain hopeful that the recent cuts will eventually be restored, the prospect of an AIDS-free future that President Trump himself once espoused appears grim. "This is a decision with consequences that will linger. This is a setback of probably a decade for HIV vaccine research," Burton warned.


Fox News
40 minutes ago
- Fox News
ESPN's Stephen A Smith floats hypothetical Ukraine-Russia strategy if he were president
Stephen A. Smith had a tough question put onto his lap during Wednesday's edition of "First Take" – would he rather be president of the United States or the next New York Knicks head coach? Smith had to think about it as he's floated the possibility of running for president and has added his voice to some of the hot-button political issues debated in that particular arena. But the Knicks also fired Tom Thibodeau and have a position open. The ESPN personality didn't necessarily like the idea of working under Knicks team owner James Dolan and said he may like to be president more than the next head coach for the team in orange and blue. "Can you see Stephen A. trying to negotiate the Ukraine-Russia situation?" Chris "Mad Dog" Russo asked. "I wouldn't try to negotiate it. I would work with the European Union. I would work with the United Nations. I would do what I could to empower us. I don't want to give Ukraine unlimited funds, but I know that Russia's ultimate quest is to recapture Europe and I don't want that to happen. Therefore, I would help out Ukraine." Russo applauded Smith but hedged on going any further in the political realm. Smith told ABC News in April that he had no choice but to consider a presidential run. "I have no choice, because I've had elected officials — and I'm not going to give their names — coming up to me. I've had folks who are pundits come up to me. I've had folks that got a lot of money, billionaires and others, that have talked to me about exploratory committees and things of that nature. I'm not a politician. I've never had a desire to be a politician," Smith said. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.