logo
‘Fundamental duty of judiciary, executive to reach out to last citizen who needs justice': CJI B R Gavai

‘Fundamental duty of judiciary, executive to reach out to last citizen who needs justice': CJI B R Gavai

Indian Express2 days ago

CHIEF JUSTICE of India (CJI) Justice Bhushan Ramakrishna Gavai on Saturday said that whether it is the judiciary or the executive, 'it is our fundamental duty to reach out to the last citizen of this country who needs justice.'
CJI Gavai was speaking at an event in Prayagraj.
He inaugurated the newly constructed advocate chambers and multilevel parking building on the Allahabad High Court premises. Supreme Court judges Justice Suryakant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice J K Maheshwari, Justice Pankaj Mittal, Justice Manoj Mishra, Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Justice Arun Bhansali, Delhi High Court Chief Justice Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay were among those present on the occasion.
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal were also present at the event.
Justice Gavai highlighted that over the 75 years since the Constitution was adopted, the judiciary and executive have enacted numerous laws that have significantly advanced social and economic equality in India. 'Land has been taken from landlords and transferred to the people. Farmers have become the rightful owners of their land. Many such laws have empowered the working and labour classes of the country.'
Thanking Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, the Chief Justice acknowledged the funding provided for this expansive facility dedicated to lawyers. He noted that the inauguration coincides with the birth anniversary of Ahilyabai Holkar, a figure who championed social justice in India, calling it a 'proud moment'.
Justice Gavai recalled Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar's presentation of the final draft of the Constitution to the Constituent Assembly on November 25, 1949, describing Ambedkar's speech as a 'guiding beacon for the nation.' He emphasized Ambedkar's warning that true democracy could not be established without eliminating social and economic inequality.
'Today, after 75 years, our executive and judiciary have made significant contributions toward achieving social and economic equality across India,' he said.
'Our Constitution has firmly propelled the country toward progress during these 75 years. When the Constitution was drafted, critics said it was too federal. Baba Saheb responded that it is a Constitution designed to keep India united and strong, both in normal times and emergencies,' the CJI remarked.
He added, 'Looking at the situation in our neighbouring countries today… India not only continues to progress after 75 years but also remains strong and united during times of crisis. The credit for this should be given to the Constitution.'
Justice Gavai said, 'I am pleased that after becoming the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, my first official programme is here, in the sacred land of Prayagraj. We have always shared a close connection with Prayagraj.'
He mentioned that Union Minister Meghwal described Yogi Adityanath as the 'most powerful and hardworking Chief Minister in the country.' 'I would like to add that the land of Allahabad belongs to powerful people,' he said. He highlighted Prayagraj's distinguished contribution to the history of Uttar Pradesh, noting that this land's name is inscribed in golden letters in the field of law. Before Independence, some of India's finest lawyers hailed from here, including Motilal Nehru, Jawaharlal Nehru, Tej Bahadur Sapru and many others. Similarly, Prayagraj's literary heritage is rich with figures such as Mahadevi Verma, Harivansh Rai Bachchan, Sumitranandan Pant, Suryakant Tripathi Nirala and Subhadra Kumari Chauhan. The entire nation also honours the sacrifice of Chandrashekhar Azad in India's Independence struggle.
He congratulated the Allahabad High Court, its Chief Justice, all the judges and the members of the Bar Association, saying, 'You now have a magnificent building that will make Bar Associations across the country envious.' He added, 'I travel extensively across India and abroad but I have not seen such a large facility with so many amenities for advocates anywhere else in the world.'
He said the government and the High Court have ensured care not only for judges and lawyers but also for the litigants. 'We have been informed that a large construction will take place on the adjacent plot, providing excellent facilities for the litigants who visit there. Special amenities will be available for all, including persons with disabilities and women.'
He also took the opportunity to commend the High Court judges who 'sacrificed their bungalows for this building,' calling it 'a unique example of cooperation between the bar and the bench.' He emphasised, 'Unless the bar and bench work together, the chariot of justice cannot move forward.'
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, in his address at the ceremony, said, 'In the rule of law, the litigant is as important as the bar and bench.'
Adityanath said that when his government took office, ten districts in UP did not have district courts. 'At times, either the Chief Justice or we did not approve the proposed designs. Eventually, we instructed the executing agencies to create a model that could serve as a standard. Along with integrated court complexes, provisions for parking and advocate chambers were included. Of the proposals we submitted, approvals have been received for seven districts from here, and Rs 1,700 crore has been released for those.'
He highlighted that the Advocate Fund amount has been increased from Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs 5 lakh, and the age limit raised from 60 to 70 years. Additionally, a separate corpus fund of Rs 500 crore has been established. In case of an accident involving an advocate, the trustee committee will utilise this fund to support the affected family. New advocates are also receiving assistance for journals, magazines, and books during their first three years.
The CM said that the infrastructure would accelerate the pace of justice delivery and add a new dimension to progress.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal procedures followed while arresting female influencer: Kolkata Police
Legal procedures followed while arresting female influencer: Kolkata Police

Business Standard

time44 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Legal procedures followed while arresting female influencer: Kolkata Police

Kolkata Police have dismissed criticisms that they have "unlawfully" arrested a 22-year-old female Instagram influencer for allegedly uploading a video with communal comments, and claimed that all legal procedures were followed. They defended the arrest of influencer Sharmistha Panoli saying that the case was "duly investigated and adhering to legal procedures". "Kolkata Police acted lawfully according to the procedure established by law. The accused was not arrested for expressing patriotism or for personal belief; legal actions were taken for sharing offensive content which promotes hatred among the communities," Kolkata Police posted on Facebook on Sunday. "The case was duly investigated and adhering to legal procedures, several attempts were made to serve notice u/s 35 of BNSS to the accused but every time she was found absconding," the Kolkata Police stated. "Some social media accounts are spreading false information that Kolkata Police has unlawfully arrested a law student for opposing Pakistan. This narrative is mischievous and misleading," the Kolkata Police added. A case against the woman was lodged at the Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 based on allegations that she posted a video that Kolkata Police claimed: "was insulting to the religious belief of a class of citizen of India and amounted to promoting disharmony and hatred between different communities". The case was registered under the appropriate section of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Hate speech and abusive language should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, the Kolkata Police stated, further urging all "concerned to act responsibly and refrain from doing anything that would benefit our enemies". The accused woman, booked under relevant sections for promoting enmity between different groups, malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, apart from intentional insult, provoking breach of peace, has been sent to judicial custody till June 13 after her bail petition was rejected by a Kolkata court. BJP West Bengal president Sukanta Majumdar criticised the Kolkata Police for their "overactiveness" in arresting the woman for allegedly posting the video. The BJP leader has alleged that the arrest was made "not for justice, but for appeasement" keeping in mind the "vote-bank vendetta". "Sharmistha Panoli, 22, a law student, arrested for a now-deleted video and a public apology. No riots. No unrest. Yet Mamata Banerjee's police acted overnight not for justice, but for appeasement. But when TMC leaders insult Sanatan Dharma mock Maha Kumbh and push communal poison there's no FIR, no arrest, no apology. This is not justice. This is vote-bank vendetta," Majumdar posted.

Why was Sharmistha Panoli arrested? Kolkata Police's clarification amid row
Why was Sharmistha Panoli arrested? Kolkata Police's clarification amid row

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why was Sharmistha Panoli arrested? Kolkata Police's clarification amid row

The Kolkata police, being panned for arresting social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli, have claimed that the controversial action was taken after " duly investigating and adhering to legal procedures". The police claimed they acted lawfully against the 22-year-old woman as she had been sharing offensive content that promoted communal hatred. The police said Sharmistha Panoli wasn't arrested for expressing patriotism or personal belief. "Kolkata Police acted lawfully according to the procedure established by law. The accused was not arrested for expressing patriotism or for personal belief; legal actions were taken for sharing offensive content which promotes hatred among the communities," Kolkata Police posted on Facebook on Sunday. The police said all legal procedures laid down by the law were adhered to. They claimed in a post on Facebook on Sunday that they had issued notices to the influencer but she was allegedly found to be absconding. "Consequently, a warrant of arrest was issued by the competent court, following which she was apprehended lawfully from Gurgaon during the day. She was thereafter produced before the appropriate Magistrate and was granted transit remand as per due process of law. Later, the court sent her to judicial custody," it said. Also read: Who is Sharmishta Panoli, Instagram influencer held for controversial remarks linked to Op Sindoor? In her videos, Panoli had called out Bollywood actors for being silent on Operation Sindoor. The police termed the narrative claiming she was arrested unlawfully, "mischievous and misleading". "Some social media accounts are spreading false information that Kolkata Police has unlawfully arrested a law student for opposing Pakistan. This narrative is mischievous and misleading," the Kolkata Police added. They said they had filed a case on allegations that she posted a video which was "insulting to the religious belief of a class of citizens of India and amounted to promoting disharmony and hatred between different communities". Hate speech and abusive language should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, the Kolkata Police stated. BJP West Bengal president Sukanta Majumdar has alleged that the police's action was rooted in the state government's policy of appeasement and "vote-bank vendetta". "Sharmistha Panoli, 22, a law student, arrested for a now-deleted video and a public apology. No riots. No unrest. Yet Mamata Banerjee's police acted overnight — not for justice, but for appeasement. But when TMC leaders insult Sanatan Dharma… mock Maha Kumbh and push communal poison — there's no FIR, no arrest, no apology. This is not justice. This is vote-bank vendetta," Majumdar posted. With inputs from PTI

Key Witness in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case Receives Threats, Complains to Special Court
Key Witness in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case Receives Threats, Complains to Special Court

The Wire

timean hour ago

  • The Wire

Key Witness in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case Receives Threats, Complains to Special Court

Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Law Key Witness in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case Receives Threats, Complains to Special Court The Wire Staff 48 minutes ago The witness who has been threatened was crucial in identifying the accused and the place where the alleged conspiracy was hatched to murder Lankesh. Gauri Lankesh was shot at her home in September 2017. Photo: PTI Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: An important witness in the case pertaining to the murder of journalist-activist Gauri Lankesh has complained to the special court about receiving threats from people who told him not to identify the accused. The witness, a resident of Belagavi received the threats over a phone call on May 28 and submitted a written complaint on the same day, reported Deccan Herald. 'The witness received a phone call where he was threatened not to identify the accused. He filed a complaint before the court. Though he was disturbed and upset, he testified before the court on Thursday,' a source told the newspaper. A copy of the complaint and a memo by the special public prosecutor were submitted to the court. The witness who has been threatened was crucial in identifying the accused and the place where the alleged conspiracy was hatched to murder Lankesh. Well-known journalist and editor Lankesh, a household name for readers in Karnataka because of her sharp writing and bold views, was shot dead at her residence in Bengaluru late on September 5, 2017. She was editor of the weekly Lankesh Patrike – a magazine that has been described as an 'anti-establishment' publication – and had come under attack for her views against the communal politics of the Sangh parivar in Karnataka. The chargesheet in her murder case had said that the assassination was an 'organised crime' carried out by people associated with the Sanatan Sanstha, an extremist right-wing Hindutva organisation. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Petition in Madhya Pradesh HC Over Communal Coverage of Rape Case in Bhopal When the Supreme Court Echoes Populist Sentiments, It Risks Undermining the Constitution's Voice UP Deputy CM Backs Hindu Rashtra Call at Right-Wing Event in Lucknow US Jury Orders NSO Group to Pay $168 Million in WhatsApp Spyware Case Supreme Court Raps MP Govt for Shielding Police in Custodial Death of Pardhi Youth Agra Muslim Man Murder: Cops Shoot, Arrest Two, Person who Linked Event to Pahalgam Attack Also Held Supreme Court Flags ED's 'Pattern of Allegations Without Any Evidence' After 19-Month Freeze, Modi Signals Thaw with Canada Following Carney's Win Trump's Anti-Bribery Freeze Offers Adani Hope, But No Guarantee of Reprieve, Say US Legal Experts View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store