China accuses US's Hegseth of ‘vilifying' remarks at security forum
China has protested to the United States over 'vilifying' remarks made by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the foreign ministry said on Sunday, while accusing it of deliberately ignoring calls for peace from regional nations.
China has objected to Hegseth calling it a threat in the Indo-Pacific, the ministry added, describing his comments at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday as 'deplorable' and "intended to sow division.'
'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat',' the ministry said on its website.
'The United States has deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea and kept stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific, which are turning the region into a powder keg,' the ministry added in the statement.
Hegseth had called on allies in the Indo-Pacific region, including key security ally Australia, to spend more on defense after warning of the 'real and potentially imminent' threat from China.
Asked about the call to boost defense spending, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government had pledged an extra A$10 billion to defense.
'What we'll do is we'll determine our defense policy,' he told reporters on Sunday, a transcript of his remarks showed.
As part of Washington's longstanding defense ties with the Philippines, the US military this year deployed Typhon launchers that can fire missiles to hit targets in both China and Russia from the island of Luzon.
China and the Philippines contest sovereignty over some islands and atolls in the South China Sea, with growing maritime run-ins between their coast guards as both vie to patrol the waters.
The ministry also warned the United States not to 'play with fire' on the Taiwan question.
In his speech at Asia's premier forum for defense leaders, military officials and diplomats, Hegseth said any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences.'
China has vowed to 'reunify' with the separately governed island, by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
19 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Defense plan will ensure UK is ready for war, minister says
LONDON — The government will invest billions of pounds to move the UK to "war-fighting readiness" in the face of a new era of threats from nuclear powers like Russia and China, the defense secretary has said. The government has accepted all 62 recommendations set out in a long-awaited Strategic Defense Review (SDR), including building 12 new nuclear-powered submarines, six new munitions factories and embracing technologies like artificial intelligence. Britain's army needs to become "10 times more lethal" to face a "new era of threats", John Healey told MPs on Monday. Conservative shadow defense secretary James Cartlidge called the plans a "damp squib", which was "underfunded and totally underwhelming". The SDR, carried out by former Labour Defense Sectary Lord Robertson, found the UK's armed forces are "not currently equipped" to fight opponents like Russia or China, with inadequate stockpiles of weapons, poor recruitment and crumbling morale. The report warned the UK is already experiencing daily attacks on its critical national infrastructure, testing the economy's vulnerabilities and "and challenging its social cohesion". Russia is "an immediate and pressing threat", as the invasion of Ukraine "makes unequivocally clear its willingness to use force to achieve its goals", the report finds. Meanwhile, China is a "sophisticated and persistent challenge", the review warns, and is "likely to continue seeking advantage through espionage and cyber attacks" and is expected to have 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030. Iran and North Korea are also highlighted and described as regional disruptors. To fight this, the Ministry of Defense must embrace new technologies such as artificial intelligence, robots and lasers, the review recommends. In a Commons statement, Healey said: "The threats we face are now more serious and less predictable than at any time since the end of the Cold War. "We face war in Europe, growing Russian aggression, new nuclear risks, and daily cyber-attacks at home. "Our adversaries are working more in alliance with one another, while technology is changing the way war is fought. We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defense." Other announcements in the review include: A new "hybrid Navy" with Aukus submarines and autonomous vessels that can patrol the North Atlantic £15bn to be spent on new nuclear warheads Commitment to £1.5bn to build six new factories to enable an "always on" munitions production capacity Building up to 7,000 long-range weapons including missiles or drones in the UK, to be used by British forces Pledge to set up a "cyber and electromagnetic command" to boost the military's defensive and offensive capabilities in cyberspace Extra £1.5bn to 2029 to fund repairs to military housing £1bn on technology to speed up delivery of targeting information to soldiers Healey said the changes would help "create a British Army which is 10 times more lethal". He also signalled the government planned to increase the size of the Army from 74,400 to at least 76,000 full-time soldiers after the next election. The UK's Cadet Forces — voluntary youth organizations — will expand by 30% by 2030, with a "gap year" offered to people interested in sampling military life. Some 30,000 highly-skilled jobs would also be created through increased investment in research and weapons manufacturing, Healey said. The review was drawn up with the expectation that defense spending would rise to 2.5% of national income or GDP by 2027 — up from around 2.3% now. But what the review describes as a "small uplift" in the Army has not yet been funded. A defense source also told the BBC the commitment to build up to 12 new attack submarines would require an increase in defense spending to at least 3% of GDP. Ministers say they expect to spend 3% of GDP on defense by 2034 at the latest but have given no guarantees — and the run-up to the review's release has been dominated by a political row over when government will hit the milestone. The Conservatives say the move — which would hike spending by around £20bn a year — should be met by the end of the decade. Cartlidge said that "without the funding, [the review] is an empty wish list" and the "ships and submarines it talks of are a fantasy fleet". The government "wants to send a strong message to Moscow, but the messages he's sending are profoundly weak", Cartlidge added. "After so much hype, the SDR is a damp squib," he said. "It's overdue, underfunded and totally underwhelming. Our armed forces deserve better than this." But Sir Keir Starmer argued the review would help create a "battle-ready, armour clad" nation. Launching the review in Glasgow earlier, the prime minister said: "When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength." Lib Dem defense spokeswoman Helen Maguire said her party welcomed the government's plan, but warned "meeting generational risks will require generational commitments". "It is frankly staggering that we still do not have a clear answer to the vital question where is the money coming from to fund these ambitions," she added. — BBC
Al Arabiya
3 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Ukraine war has blurred lines, exposing global threats: Top defense officials
China and North Korea's support for Russia in its war against Ukraine has exposed how lines between regions have blurred, and the need for a global approach toward defense, top security officials said Sunday. North Korea has sent troops to fight on the front lines in Ukraine, while China has supported Russia economically and technologically while opposing international sanctions. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė told delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premiere defense forum, that if Ukraine were to fall, it would have a ripple effect in Asia and suggested it could embolden China in its territorial claims on Taiwan and virtually the entire South China Sea. 'If Russia prevails in Ukraine, it's not about Europe. It's not about one region,' she said. 'It will send a very clear signal also to smaller states here in Indo-Pacific that anyone can ignore their borders, that any fabricated excuse can justify invasion.' The comments echoed those from French President Emmanuel Macron as he opened the conference on Friday advocating for greater European engagement in the Indo-Pacific. On Saturday, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested European countries should focus their defense efforts in their own region and leave the Indo-Pacific more to the US, but Šakalienė said the regions were clearly intertwined. 'It's not a secret that when we talk about the main perpetrators in cyber security against Japan it's China, Russia and North Korea,' she said. 'When we talk about main cyber security perpetrators against Lithuania it's Russia, China and Belarus — two out of the three are absolutely the same.' She added that 'the convergence of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea into an increasingly coordinated authoritarian axis,' demands a unified response. Iran has been a key supplier of attack drones to Russia for its war effort. 'In this context, the United States' strategic focus on Indo-Pacific is both justified and necessary, but this is not America's responsibility alone,' she said. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told reporters on the sidelines that his main takeaway from the three-day conference, hosted by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, was the 'real intent in the way in which European countries have engaged' in the debates. 'It reflects the sense of connection, interconnectedness ... between Indo-Pacific on the one hand and the North Atlantic on the other,' he said. China sent a lower-level delegation from its National Defense University this year to the conference, but its Foreign Ministry on Sunday responded to comments from Hegseth that Beijing was destabilizing the region and preparing to possibly seize Taiwan by force. 'No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the US itself, who is also the primary factor undermining the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific,' it said, while reiterating its stance that the Taiwan issue was an internal Chinese matter. 'The US must neve play with fire on this question,' the ministry said. Philippines Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr, whose country has been involved in increasingly violent clashes with China over competing claims in the South China Sea, scoffed at the idea that the US was the problem. 'What the Chinese government considers fair and just may stand in stark contrast to the norms and values accepted by the rest of the world, especially the smaller countries,' he said. 'To envision a China-led international order, we only need to look at how they treat their much smaller neighbors in the South China Sea.' He also underscored the international implications of the tensions in the Indo-Pacific, noting that the South China Sea was one of several maritime routes that are 'arteries of the global economy.' 'Disruption in any of these maritime corridors triggers ripple effects across continents, impacting trade flows, military deployments, and diplomatic posture,' he said.
Arab News
3 days ago
- Arab News
Europe bristles at US proposals at Asian gathering, India-Pakistan hostility on show
SINGAPORE: The Shangri-La Dialogue security meeting in Singapore has long been marked by US-China rivalry but Beijing's relative retreat at the weekend exposed a new faultline — tensions between the US and Europe over Asia. Even as he warned in a speech on Saturday that China posed an 'imminent' threat, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made clear he wanted Europeans to concentrate on European security as they boosted military budgets. 'We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that that as we partner there, which we will continue to do, we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here,' he said. Hegseth also noted the absence of his Chinese counterpart Dong Jun, as Beijing instead dispatched a low-level team of military scholars to the annual event, which attracts top defense officials, diplomats, spies and arms dealers from across the world. The other highlight of the event was the presence of high-powered military delegations from India and Pakistan after four days of intense clashes between the nuclear-armed neighbors that were halted by a ceasefire on May 10. The delegations, in full uniform and bristling with medal and service ribbons, were led by India's highest-ranking military officer and Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. They pointedly kept out of each other's way in the corridors and meeting halls of the sprawling Shangri-La hotel. On engaging in Asia, at least some European nations signaled they would not be swayed by the US exhortations. They insisted they would try to stay in both the Asian and European theaters, noting their deep links and vital trade flows as well as the global nature of conflict. 'It is a good thing we are doing more (in Europe), but what I want to stress is that the security of Europe and the security of the Pacific is very much interlinked,' said Europe's top diplomat Kaja Kallas. 'If you are worried about China, you should be worried about Russia,' Kallas said, underlining the importance of Chinese assistance to the Russian war effort in Ukraine and Moscow's deployment of North Korean soldiers. FRANCE'S ASIAN TIES French President Emmanuel Macron insisted that his nation remains an Indo-Pacific power, alluding to its enduring colonial presence in New Caledonia and French Polynesia and the basing of over 8,000 soldiers across the region. 'We are neither China nor the US, we don't want to depend on either of them,' Macron said at a press conference on Friday, outlining a 'third path' coalition between Europe and Asia that avoided having to choose between Beijing and Washington. 'We want to cooperate with both as far as we can, and we can cooperate for growth and prosperity and stability for our people and the world order, and I think this is exactly the same view of a lot of countries and a lot of people of this region,' he said. Beyond the rhetoric, regional military attaches and analysts say the European regional presence — and ambitions — may not be easy to shift. Military deployments are mapped out over decades rather than months, and both commercial and defense relationships go back decades, some of them only rarely publicly acknowledged. The visit of a British aircraft carrier to Singapore later this month is part of a program first mentioned by then-Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson in 2017 to stress British support for freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. The carrier visit in part reflects Britain's commitments under the 54-year-old Five-Power Defense Arrangement that links its military with counterparts in Singapore, Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand. British ties with Australia have been bolstered with the recent three-way AUKUS submarine and advanced technology sharing agreement struck with the US — a move that could see British submarines visiting Western Australia. Singapore meanwhile keeps 200 personnel in France operating 12 of its light combat aircraft while Britain also has a jungle training camp and helicopters in Brunei and a 1,200-strong Gurkha battalion, according to International Institute of Strategic Studies data. A report last month by the London-based IISS highlighted European defense firms' long-standing and expanding defense ties to Asia, even in the face of competition, particularly from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as regional budgets rise. 'European companies, including Airbus, Damen, Naval Group and Thales, have a long-standing presence in Southeast Asia, and other European actors have established themselves in the market in the last decade, including Italy's Fincantieri and Sweden's Saab,' the IISS study said. Saab is close to securing a deal with US ally Thailand to supply its Gripen fighters, beating out Lockheed Martin's F-16s. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has reported that Asian defense spending rose 46 percent in the decade to 2024, reaching $629 billion. For Finnish officials at least, Hegseth's remarks resonated — it is Moscow rather than the Indo-Pacific that looms large for Helsinki given the country's long Russian border. 'When Europe's defense is in a good shape, then you will have resources to do something more,' Finnish Defense Minister Antti Hakkanen told Reuters. 'But now all the European countries must do their main focus on European defense so that the United States can do a bigger share in the Indo-Pacific area,' Hakkanen said.
