&w=3840&q=100)
Supreme Court lets Trump's transgender military ban take effect, for now
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump's administration to enforce a ban on transgender people in the military, while legal challenges proceed.
The court acted in the dispute over a policy that presumptively disqualifies transgender people from military service and could lead to the expulsion of experienced, decorated officers.
The court's three liberal justices said they would have kept the policy on hold.
Just after beginning his second term in January, Trump moved aggressively to roll back the rights of transgender people. Among the Republican president's actions was an executive order that claims the sexual identity of transgender service members conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honourable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life and is harmful to military readiness.
In response, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a policy that gave the military services 30 days to figure out how they would seek out and identify transgender service members to remove them from the force.
No More Trans @ DoD, Hegseth wrote in a post on X following Tuesday's Supreme Court order.
Three federal judges had ruled against the ban.
In the case the justices acted on Tuesday, US District Court Judge Benjamin Settle in Tacoma, Washington, had ruled for seven long-serving transgender military members who say that the ban is insulting and discriminatory and that their firing would cause lasting damage to their careers and reputations. A prospective service member also sued.
The individual service members who challenged the ban together have amassed more than 70 medals in 115 years of service, their lawyers wrote. The lead plaintiff is Emily Shilling, a Navy commander with nearly 20 years of service, including as a combat pilot who flew 60 missions in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
The Trump administration offered no explanation as to why transgender troops, who have been able to serve openly over the past four years with no evidence of problems, should suddenly be banned, Settle wrote. The judge is an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush and is a former captain in the US Army Judge Advocate General Corps.
Settle imposed a nationwide hold on the policy and a federal appeals court rejected the administration's emergency plea. The Justice Department then turned to the Supreme Court.
The policy also has been blocked by a federal judge in the nation's capital, but that ruling has been temporarily halted by a federal appeals court, which heard arguments last month. The three-judge panel, which includes two judges appointed by Trump during his first term, appeared to be in favor of the administration's position.
In a more limited ruling, a judge in New Jersey also has barred the Air Force from removing two transgender men, saying they showed their separation would cause lasting damage to their careers and reputations that no monetary settlement could repair.
The LGBTQ rights group Lambda Legal called the high court order a devastating blow to dedicated and highly qualified service members.
"By allowing this discriminatory ban to take effect while our challenge continues, the court has temporarily sanctioned a policy that has nothing to do with military readiness and everything to do with prejudice. Transgender individuals meet the same standards and demonstrate the same values as all who serve. We remain steadfast in our belief that this ban violates constitutional guarantees of equal protection and will ultimately be struck down, the group said in a statement.
The federal appeals court in San Francisco will hear the administration's appeal in a process that will play out over several months at least. All the while, though, the transgender ban will remain in place under the Supreme Court order.
In 2016, during Barack Obama's presidency, a Defense Department policy permitted transgender people to serve openly in the military. During Trump's first term in the White House, the Republican issued a directive to ban transgender service members, with an exception for some of those who had already started transitioning under more lenient rules that were in effect during Obama's Democratic administration.
The Supreme Court allowed that ban to take effect. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, scrapped it when he took office.
The rules the Defense Department wants to enforce contain no exceptions.
The policy during Trump's first term and the new one are materially indistinguishable, Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices, though lawyers for the service members who sued disagreed.
Thousands of transgender people serve in the military, but they represent less than 1 per cent of the total number of active-duty service members.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Donald Trump warns no ‘immediate peace' in Ukraine afer call with Vladimir Putin
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) he had spoken again to Russian President Vladimir Putin, but warned that a Ukraine ceasefire remained distant and said the Kremlin leader vowed to retaliate after Kyiv attacked Russian bombers. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Mr. Trump said on his Truth Social network. The call that lasted for an hour and 15 minutes was Mr. Trump's first known with Mr. Putin since May 19, 2025. Mr. Trump said he and Mr. Putin also discussed Iran's nuclear programme.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple and Alibaba's AI rollout in China delayed by Trump's trade war: Report
Apple and Alibaba's rollout of artificial intelligence services in China is being delayed by a Beijing regulator, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday, as the partnership becomes the latest to take a hit due to US President Donald Trump's trade war. The tech companies in February announced a deal to support iPhones' AI services offering in China, a move likely to help the US company ease falling smartphone sales in its key market. But their applications have been stalled at the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), FT reported, citing two people familiar with the matter, due to increasing geopolitical uncertainties between China and the US. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Neem voor het slapengaan 1 kopje en val snel af Beauty Ideas Meer lezen Undo AI features are especially important in China and consumer-facing AI products require regulatory approval. Apple and Alibaba did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment, while the CAC could not immediately be reached. Live Events A delay in the rollout of the features could prove costly for Apple, which is facing declining iPhone sales in China amid growing competition from domestic rivals, particularly Huawei, which has integrated DeepSeek's AI models into its cloud services and devices. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Industry analysts have pointed to the absence of advanced AI features - a key selling point in latest-generation smartphones - as a significant disadvantage for Apple in the Chinese market. The iPhone maker has also been slow in rolling out Apple Intelligence, a set of features with access to ChatGPT, with several advanced AI tools available on competing Android smartphones. Trump in late May said that Apple would pay a 25% tariff on iPhones that are sold in the United States but not made in the country. Apple will hold its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) from June 9 to 13, and it will highlight updates to the software powering iPhones, iPads and other Apple devices.


Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump reveals 75-minute call with Vladimir Putin, says, ‘not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace'
US President Donald Trump revealed he had a 75-minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The conversation, according to Trump, centered on recent Ukrainian attacks on docked Russian military aircraft and broader military escalations in the region. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. While describing the exchange as 'a good conversation,' Trump added it would not lead to an immediate resolution. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace,' he said. Trump noted that Putin expressed strong displeasure with Ukraine's recent assault on Russian airfields and suggested retaliation is imminent. 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump stated. The two leaders also reportedly discussed Iran's nuclear ambitions, an issue Trump characterised as urgent. 'Time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly!' Trump warned. He said he pressed Putin on preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, and claimed both leaders were in agreement. I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement.' According to Trump, Putin indicated a willingness to help resolve the standoff with Iran. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion,' Trump wrote. Trump did not mince words about Iran's diplomatic posture, accusing Tehran of stalling. 'It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter,' he said, adding that 'we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!'