logo
Contradicting RFK Jr., CDC says the COVID vaccine protects pregnant women, babies, and children

Contradicting RFK Jr., CDC says the COVID vaccine protects pregnant women, babies, and children

Here's how one of the well-laid plans of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went blooey.
Earlier this month, Kennedy dismantled the all-important Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and remade it into the spearhead for his anti-vaccination campaigns.
The rejiggered committee met for the first time Wednesday. Unfortunately for Kennedy's goals, the very first presentation it heard from CDC scientists involved the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly for pregnant women, infants and children.
CDC studies found 'no increased risk' that the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines caused adverse effects during pregnancy, Sarah Meyer, director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office, said at the meeting, citing data from 28 analyses of 68,000 pregnant women. The data showed no increases in miscarriages, stillbirths, preterm births, major birth defects, neonatal ICU admissions, infant deaths, abnormal uterine bleeding or other pregnancy-related conditions.
In fact, the CDC found that 'maternal vaccination is the best protection against COVID-19 for pregnant women and infants less than six months of age,' CDC immunologist Adam MacNeil told the panel. The COVID vaccines aren't approved for infants younger than six months, so maternal immunization is their only protection.
That's important because Kennedy, on May 17, removed the vaccines from the recommended list for pregnant women and children. 'It's common sense and it's good science' to remove the recommendation, Kennedy said in a 58-second video posted on X.
'We're now one step closer to realizing President Trump's promise to make America healthy again,' Kennedy crowed, flanked by Marty Makary, the newly appointed commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, and Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed director of the National Institutes of Health.
Neither body plays a role in issuing vaccine recommendations for the government. That's the job of the CDC, which has been operating without a director, and which didn't have a representative on the video.
Pediatric and obstetric organizations decried the decision, which ran counter to the findings of extensive research. 'Clear benefits of maternal immunization versus COVID in terms of dramatic reductions in maternal mortality and protecting the newborn infant ... has been detailed in the biomedical literature,' vaccinologist Peter Hotez told me by email.
I asked Kennedy through his agency's public information team for comment on the CDC presentation, but received no reply.
On June 9, Kennedy fired all 17 members of ACIP of the immunization advisory committee and replaced them with eight handpicked members, a cadre that includes 'antivaxxers, the antivax-adjacent, and the unqualified,' as veteran pseudoscience debunker David Gorski noted.
The COVID vaccines have been a leading target of anti-vaccine activists, including Kennedy, since they were introduced in 2021. They've been blamed for a host of purported health harms, most of which have been found by researchers to be largely imaginary.
The anti-vaccine camp maintains that the vaccines weren't adequately studied before rolling them out to the general public and haven't been sufficiently monitored for adverse effects since then.
The CDC officials' presentation debunked almost all these claims. Indeed, Meyer said, the COVID-19 vaccines have been subjected to 'the most extensive safety monitoring program in U.S. history.'
The CDC has investigated more than 65 possible adverse effects of the vaccine, Meyer said, including heart attacks, meningitis, spontaneous abortion, seizures and hospitalization.
Other than pain at the injection site, fainting and other transitory conditions common to most vaccines, it has found evidence for one condition — myocarditis, a heart inflammation seen especially in men aged 12 to 29.
That appears to be a short-term condition, with 83% of patients recovering within 90 days of onset, and more than 90% fully recovered within a year. No deaths or heart transplants are known to have occurred, the CDC data show. No confirmed cases were seen in children younger than 5.
The myocarditis rate among vaccine recipients aged between 6 months and 64 years appeared to spike in 2020-22, when it seemed to be related to the original vaccine and the original booster. After the booster was reformulated, the rate among those aged 12 to 39 fell to about one case per million doses in 2024-25 — half the rate found in the general population.
Despite the relative rarity of myocarditis, the condition has underpinned a campaign by anti-vaccine activists to take the vaccines off the market. Among them is Joseph Ladapo, the Florida surgeon general, who in 2022 advised males aged 18-39 not to get the COVID vaccine.
His advisory earned him a crisp upbraiding from the then-heads of the FDA and CDC, who informed him by letter that 'the known and potential benefits of these vaccines clearly outweigh their known and potential risks.... Not only is there no evidence of increased risk of death following mRNA vaccines, but available data have shown quite the opposite: that being up to date on vaccinations saves lives compared to individuals who did not get vaccinated.'
And on Wednesday, just as the CDC team was telling ACIP that the myocarditis effect had ebbed to insignificance, the FDA announced that it was expanding the warning label on the mRNA vaccines to increase the caution about myocarditis — a change with the potential to undermine acceptance of the vaccines.
Overall, the rate of death seven days after mRNA vaccinations has been lower than the background rates among the general population for the most common causes of death — such as heart disease, cancer and stroke.
I've written before that Kennedy's anti-science campaign against vaccination — or more properly, his science-free campaign — has set the stage for a public health crisis in the U.S. Videos posted on X citing nonexistent evidence is no substitute for medical judgments based on science. They won't make America healthy, but will make Americans much sicker. Kennedy's actions are potentially deadly, and the CDC has the data to prove it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New CDC vaccine committee OKs Merck RSV shot for infants
New CDC vaccine committee OKs Merck RSV shot for infants

UPI

time5 minutes ago

  • UPI

New CDC vaccine committee OKs Merck RSV shot for infants

June 26 (UPI) -- Merck's Enflonsia vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus won approval from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The advisory committee on Thursday voted 5-2 to approve the monoclonal antibody-based vaccine for infants younger than 8 months old to protect them during their first seasonal exposure to RSV. The recommended dosage is one shot of Enflonsia for infants who have not already obtained RSV protection via a vaccine their respective mothers might have received during their pregnancies. The vaccine's active ingredient is the monoclonal antibody clesrovimab, which Merck created but faced some opposition before gaining the committee's approval recommendation. Most babies are infected by RSV by the time they turn 2 years of age, which causes cold-like symptoms and affects breathing by restricting airway passages and the lungs, according to the CDC. About 58,000 children younger than age 5 in the United States annually are hospitalized due to RSV, which kills hundreds of them. Merck's Enflonsia vaccine is the second RSV monoclonal antibody that is recommended for approval to prevent RSV. The Food and Drug Administration in July 2023 approved Beyfortus to prevent RSV from causing lower respiratory tract disease in infants. Sanofi and AstraZeneca developed that vaccine. Thursday's vote was the first by the newly seated advisory committee after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. dismissed the prior advisory committee due to what he called conflicts of interest among its members. Kennedy fired the committee's 17 members and replaced them with eight others, including some who are regarded as skeptical of vaccines. Earlier this week, Louisiana's Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy criticized the new panel members, saying they lacked needed experience in microbiology, epidemiology and immunology.

Dems: Medicaid cuts complicate health AI dreams
Dems: Medicaid cuts complicate health AI dreams

Politico

time23 minutes ago

  • Politico

Dems: Medicaid cuts complicate health AI dreams

WASHINGTON WATCH House Republicans and Democrats clashed during a Ways and Means Health Subcommittee hearing Wednesday over how to fund and advance the use of digital health technologies. 'We live in a time where Americans have access to better technology and more health information than ever to truly be the 'CEO of their health,'' subcommittee Chair Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.) said, noting that despite high spending on health care, Americans are getting sicker. Digital health tools and artificial intelligence are central to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s strategy to cure chronic disease and reduce costs. But Democrats warned that the GOP's proposed Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's megabill could hamper the adoption of AI and other innovations in health care. 'I'm a bit in the twilight light zone. At the same time that we're here talking about this issue, my colleagues on the other side just passed a bill that would effectively take away health care for 16 million Americans,' said Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev.). At the heart of the disagreement is cost. 'People cannot take advantage of technological advances in health care if they do not have health insurance coverage or face insurmountable financial barriers to health care services,' said Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University. For health systems, that means less revenue to invest in innovative technologies, especially ones with no or low reimbursement rates. A few ideas that were floated: — The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should set reimbursement rates for some digital technologies and raise the rates for technology that's already reimbursed. — Congress should expand tax-advantaged health savings accounts so Americans can use them to buy health and fitness wearables like WHOOP bands and Oura Rings. — Lawmakers should consider the impact Medicaid cuts would have on doctors' ability to implement AI. What's next: Republicans have waffled on whether to include an expansion of health savings accounts in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' because they'll add to the budget. But Senate Republicans are feeling pressure from their House counterparts to keep them in. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Life science company Verily is re-upping its work on the research platform that powers All of Us, a NIH-funded, big data project that seeks to understand risk factors for disease, better treatments, and how technology can help make people healthier. The contract with Vanderbilt University Medical Center, one of the NIH's key partners on the program, is for the next five years. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. CONNECTING THE DOTS Federal agencies developed or used more than 2,000 artificial intelligence tools or programs in 2024, according to an analysis by POLITICO's Rosmery Izaguirre. Agencies reported that, in about 16 percent of use cases, their tools or programs posed safety concerns or had the potential to infringe on users' civil rights or rights to data or privacy. The Department of Health and Human Services reported the highest total number of AI use cases among its agencies, with four use cases presenting rights or safety concerns. The Justice Department reported the second-highest number of AI use cases, with 124 use cases presenting concerns, and the Department of Veterans Affairs reported the third-highest number of AI use cases with 145 use cases presenting concerns. The Trump administration is poised to expand AI use across federal agencies. In January, President Donald Trump issued an executive order rescinding Biden-era legislation that promoted a more cautious approach to developing and testing use cases for AI. In an April memo, the Trump administration set its own disclosure requirements for agencies using AI, repealing the previous administration's conditions. Several rules were rescinded, including those related to rights and safety reporting, but the requirement for agencies to track and report their use of AI was maintained. What's next for HHS: AI is used widely across HHS, from analyzing big public health datasets and detecting health trends to more rote tasks like summarizing documents. But not all of the departments' AI efforts are rolling out smoothly. Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration deployed a general-use chatbot to shorten reviews throughout the agency. But two current and two former agency employees granted anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters told POLITICO that the bot isn't capable of meaningfully reducing review time.

RFK Jr. Says 'More Cavities' Due to No Fluoride in Water Is 'a Balance'
RFK Jr. Says 'More Cavities' Due to No Fluoride in Water Is 'a Balance'

Newsweek

time24 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

RFK Jr. Says 'More Cavities' Due to No Fluoride in Water Is 'a Balance'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that the U.S. would "see probably slightly more cavities" if fluoride is removed from drinking water. In an appearance on Fox News' "Faulkner Focus," Kennedy said, "Well, people will still get indemnified for it to the extent that they're already indemnified. But, you know, it is an issue, it's a balance. You're gonna see probably slightly more cavities — although in Europe, where they banned fluoride, they did not see an uptick in cavities. He continued to host Harris Faulkner, "The issue is, parents need to decide because the science is very clear on fluoride. The National Toxicity Program issued a report of a meta-review of all the science on it in August that said there's a direct inverse correlation between the amount of fluoride in your water and your loss of IQ." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store