North Carolina Gov. Stein vetoes his first bills. They are on concealed carry and immigration
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina Democratic Gov. Josh Stein vetoed his first bills on Friday, blocking for now Republican legislation that would let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit and make state agencies and local sheriffs more active in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
Stein, who took office in January, issued his formal objections to three measures backed by the GOP-controlled General Assembly presented to him last week. The former attorney general also had the option to sign any of them into law, or let them become law if he hadn't acted on the legislation soon.
The vetoed measures now return to the legislature, where Republicans are one House seat shy of holding a veto-proof majority. Its leaders will decide whether to attempt overrides as early as next week.
Voting so far followed party lines for one of the immigration measures, which in part would direct heads of several state law enforcement agencies, like the State Highway Patrol and State Bureau of Investigation, to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. But one House Democrat ended up voting for the other immigration bill that Stein vetoed. It toughens a 2024 law that required sheriffs to help federal agents seeking criminal defendants.
GOP prospects for enacting the permitless concealed gun measure, a longtime aspiration for gun-rights advocates, appear dimmer, because two House Republicans voted against the bill and 10 others were absent.
Gun bill would let 18-year-olds carry concealed handgun
In one veto message, Stein said the gun legislation, which would allow eligible people at least 18 years old to carry a concealed handgun, "makes North Carolinians less safe and undermines responsible gun ownership." Democratic lawmakers argued the same during legislative debate.
Current law requires a concealed weapons holder to be at least 21 to obtain a permit. The person must submit an application to the local sheriff, pass a firearms safety training course and cannot 'suffer from a physical or mental infirmity that prevents the safe handling of a handgun" to obtain the permit. No safety training would be required if getting a permit is no longer necessary.
'Authorizing teenagers to carry a concealed weapon with no training whatsoever is dangerous,' Stein wrote.
Gun-control groups praised the veto.
Conservative advocates for the bill say removing the permit requirement would strengthen the safety of law-abiding citizens.
'Law-abiding North Carolinians shouldn't have to jump through hoops to effectively exercise their Second Amendment rights," Senate leader Phil Berger said in a press release criticizing the veto and planning for an override vote in his chamber.
Permitless carry is already lawful in 29 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. North Carolina would also be one of the last states in the Southeast to implement that legislation.
Immigration bills focus on state agencies, sheriffs
One vetoed immigration bill would require four state law enforcement agencies to officially participate in the 287(g) program, which trains officers to interrogate defendants and determine their immigration status. An executive order by President Donald Trump urged his administration to maximize the use of 287(g) agreements.
Stein wrote Friday the bill takes officers away from existing state duties at a time when law enforcement is already stretched thin. The measure also would direct state agencies to ensure noncitizens don't access certain state-funded benefits. But Stein said that people without lawful immigration status already can't receive them.
The other vetoed bill attempts to expand a 2024 law — enacted over then-Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper's veto — that directed jails to hold temporarily certain defendants whom ICE believe are in the country illegally, allowing time for immigration agents to pick them up.
The vetoed bill would expand the list of crimes that a defendant is charged with that would require the jail administrator to attempt to determine the defendant's legal status. A jail also would have to tell ICE promptly that it is holding someone and essentially extends the time agents have to pick up the person.
Stein said Friday while he supports sheriffs contacting federal immigration agents about defendants charged with dangerous crimes that they are holding, the law is unconstitutional because it directs sheriffs to keep defendants behind bars 48 hours beyond when they otherwise could be released for a suspected immigration violation.
With the veto of this bill, House Speaker Destin Hall said, Stein sided with the 'most radical elements of his party's base over the safety and security of North Carolinians.'
Latino advocates and other bill opponents had urged Stein to veto both immigration measures. They say the legislation would cause Hispanic residents to feel intimidated and fear law enforcement.
Stein's vetoes help 'ensure North Carolina remains a safe state for everyone, including immigrants, who deserve equal treatment under the law," the group El Pueblo said in a news release.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
36 minutes ago
- CNN
Iran's nuclear weapon facility buried out of reach for most weapons
Retired Lt. General David Deptula weighs in on U.S. military capabilities in case tensions between Israel and Iran becomes a wider regional conflict.
Axios
38 minutes ago
- Axios
MAGA courts the next generation of conservatives
Amid rising loneliness, economic anxiety and frustrations with the left, a growing share of Gen Z-ers are turning right. The big picture: The next generation of conservatives are in small towns and big cities, on college campuses and TikTok — and they're minting a new youth culture. "It's part of this shift among Gen Z post-Covid," says Rachel Janfaza, a youth political analyst."They got really tired of being told what they could or could not do and what they could or could not say." Stunning stat: Nowhere in the world are young men as lonely in comparison to other people in their country as they are in the U.S., per a recent Gallup poll. One in four U.S. men ages 15 to 34 said they felt lonely a lot of the previous day — a higher proportion than young American women (18%) and young men in other wealthy democracies. Economic anxiety is rampant. "More people who are Gen Zers, more men, than we might appreciate … aspire to a life that is not dissimilar, necessarily, from their parents and their grandparents in terms of the basic opportunity to meet someone, to fall in love, to create a life, have a family, have a home," says Harvard pollster John Della Volpe. "Each one of those things I just mentioned is probably more challenging today." In the middle of the chaos, many young men are courted by the right and feel alienated by the left. For a generation worried that typical milestones — like getting a job, finding a partner and buying a house — are out of reach, President Trump's campaign resonated. "I do think that what Republicans managed to communicate is, 'We like men, and we like the things men like,' whether that's UFC or whatever. And sometimes in politics, making people feel like you like them is kind of important," says Richard Reeves of the American Institute for Boys and Men. "Democrats didn't do any of those things. They didn't say 'we like you, we like the things you like.' In fact, sometimes there's even tendencies to say, 'We don't like the things you like, and we're not sure we like you.'" Case in point: Aidan Thompson, a 21-year-old undergraduate at Kansas, says he feels Democrats' message is that "the things that make men who they are are inherently evil" But Trump "seems like he's a billionaire that's just an American, like, he goes to UFC, he eats McDonald's, he watches wrestling and NASCAR, he knows tons of stuff about baseball," Thompson said. "He gets shot, and he immediately gets up and he holds up his fist like 'you can't kill me.' That's just so freaking awesome." Zoom out: Although there are more men than women in the conservative youth movement, plenty of young women are part of it too. By the numbers: 41% of 18- to 29-year-old women voted for President Trump in 2024, compared with 33% in 2020, per Tufts' Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. The intrigue: Many young men and women share similar frustrations with the Democratic Party — including gripes with political correctness and a sense that the left looks down on traditional gender roles. "The left has become the party of hall monitors, telling me no and giving me lectures," says Raquel Debono, an influencer and founder of "Make America Hot Again," a community of young conservatives in New York City. "There are a lot more conservative men than women. But people have neglected to mention that we've seen the counterculture rise from the feminist wave," she says. "Women want to feel like women again." Zoom in: This month, Turning Point USA's Young Women's Leadership Summit brought together thousands of conservative women in their teens and twenties. A common theme among speakers and attendees was that women should forego higher education and focus on becoming homemakers and mothers, The Cut's E.J. Dickson reports. "Feminism told women to chase their corporate dreams for their validation while their kids were eating seed oils and their marriages were collapsing," Alex Clark, a conservative influencer and one of the speakers at the event, said on stage. "Well, we're done pretending that a cubicle is more empowering than a countertop." Reality check: This brand of conservatism isn't the only option, Debono says. "What I don't like about the messaging on the right is that so much of the right has convinced young women that they have to give all of these things up to be a conservative woman," she says. Debono says she looks to working moms in Trump's administration, like press secretary Karoline Leavitt, as evidence that the "trad wife" model isn't the only way to be a woman on the right.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration: international students will face strict social media review
WASHINGTON — International students applying for visas to study in the United States will be subjected to stricter social media screening moving forward, the Trump administration says. Their entire online presence will be reviewed, including their social media media activity, during the visa application process for indications of hostility toward the country's citizens, culture, government, institutions and democratic principles. The State Department announced the policy on June 18, following the release of leaked guidance in May that signaled the changes were coming. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told embassies then about the enhanced social media vetting protocols, as he halted new student visa application interviews. The added screening initially affected students who applied to Harvard, which the administration has been fighting with over allegations of antisemitism. But in a message outlining the new screening measures that was obtained by multiple outlets in late May, Rubio said the review process was intended serve as a pilot program. At the time, the State Department told USA TODAY it had required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers since 2019 and that it continuously vets all visa holders for the duration of their stay. In a statement announcing the resumption of student visa interviews and the new online screening policy on June 18, the State Department said that under new guidance, consular officers will be conducting a comprehensive and thorough vetting of all student and exchange visitor applicants. Visa applicants who fall under these guidelines will be asked to make their social media profiles to public. Failing to do could be interpretated as an intent to hide activity or evade the policy and could lead to rejection, the administration signaled. The Trump administration previously yanked, and then reinstated, visas at an array of universities for more than 4,700 students this spring. The removal of their visas had sparked more than 100 lawsuits and many visa cancellations were blocked in court. The Trump administration has been aggressively introducing visa restrictions — fully or partially barring travelers to the United States from 19 countries, students from China and foreign nationals seeking to study at or visit Harvard over the last month. A judge has since stopped the administration from blocking Harvard's ability to enroll international students. The travel restrictions went into effect on June 9. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Foreign students will face stricter social media screening, U.S. says
