Nurses to vote on pay deal as potential strike looms
Almost 350,000 nursing staff in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be asked to vote from Monday on a 3.6% pay increase.
The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has already dismissed the award as "grotesque" and says the vote will be crucial in determining the next steps which could include a ballot for strike action.
A bitter pay dispute saw nurses striking in England, Wales and Northern Ireland from late 2022 and through the winter. Some members of other health unions also staged walkouts over pay.
With the possibility of another round of industrial action looming, the vote is being billed as the biggest single vote by the profession ever launched in the UK.
Ministers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland all announced pay awards following review body recommendations.
There was a 5.4% average increase for resident doctors, formally known as junior doctors, 4% for consultants and other senior doctors, and 3.6% for nurses and other health workers.
RCN General Secretary Professor Nicola Ranger said that the government had "once again put nursing at the back of the queue when it comes to pay".
"Nursing is an incredible career, but despite being the most valued profession by the public we continue to be weighted to the bottom of the NHS pay scale and are set to receive one of the lowest pay awards."
According to the Ranger, nursing staff in England have endured "over a decade of pay erosion", which has resulted in "skyrocketing" numbers of nurses quitting.
"It is time to show that nurses are valued and, from today, hundreds of thousands of nursing staff working in the NHS will give their verdict on whether 3.6% is enough," Ranger will say.
Resident doctors in England are already being balloted on strike action over pay. Other health unions are organising votes on the pay awards.
All this may cast a shadow over a government 10-year plan for the NHS in England due in the next few weeks.
The Scottish government has already agreed a two-year 8% pay offer with health unions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reeves's public sector obsession will crush the economy
Rachel Reeves has cemented 'historic changes' to enlarge the British state, according to one of the nation's leading economists, with the battered private sector now looking at permanently higher taxes to support it. Paul Johnson, the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, says it is hard to overstate the scale of the shift taking place in the economy this decade, as government spending mounts on public services, welfare and debt interest – and taxes rise to match. 'These are historic changes in the size of the state and the size of taxation in this country,' says Johnson. 'Over all of my lifetime up until 2020, taxes hovered around 33pc of national income. By the end of this decade they will be 38pc of national income. I cannot see them coming down. 'In economic history terms I think this decade will be seen as the decade in which the British state grew.' An older and sicker population suggests the state will only get bigger. Analysis by the Resolution Foundation, a think tank, shows that Reeves has put health spending on course to gobble up half of all the money spent on day-to-day services by the end of the decade. This is up from a third in 2010 and roughly a quarter in 1999. 'That is a huge increase. Everything else pales a bit in significance,' says James Smith, an economist at the Resolution Foundation. 'We are becoming ever more a health state.' The proportion may rise even more after Labour publishes its 10-year plan for the NHS later this year. Previous proposals outlined by the Tories suggested that making the health service fit for the future would require a 50pc rise in the number of staff to 2.4m by 2037. Such an increase would mean one in 11 workers in England would be employed by the NHS, compared with one in 17 in 2021, according to the IFS. Ruth Curtice, the Resolution Foundation chief executive, said the clear shift towards higher health spending constituted a 'major reshaping of the state'. Labour is using its gigantic parliamentary majority to push through such seismic change. Yet at the same time the economy is weakening, undermining Reeves's ability to pay for her grand spending plans. GDP dropped by 0.3pc between April and March, suggesting the strong growth seen during the first three months of the year was not the start of a sustained recovery. The Chancellor has blamed Donald Trump's trade war for knocking Britain off course, and it undoubtedly had an effect. However, there is no sense that Reeves has adapted her plans to cope with Trump's crusade, which has been known about for months. Furthermore, April's GDP numbers also show clear signs that it was Reeves, not Trump, who was to blame for the slowdown. The services sector performed particularly poorly, with retail struggling amid the sharp rise in employers' National Insurance contributions, the tax bosses pay on workers' wages, and the minimum wage. Unemployment is up and the number of people in work is down, another sign that this 'jobs tax' is weighing on hiring. Worryingly, Britain is relying more and more on public spending to keep the economy afloat. Recent analysis by the Bank of England shows that activity has essentially been driven by the public sector over the past two years. That's not a sustainable model for growth, particularly given the dire productivity in the public sector. Businesses are increasingly frustrated. Simony Emeny, the chief executive of pub group Fuller's, argues the private sector is being forced to work far harder than the public sector. 'Because of what the Chancellor announced last year, we have had to work really hard to make our businesses as efficient as possible and use technology well and to make sure that we are in a position where we can absorb some of these cost increases,' he says. 'If I look at the Government, I don't see that same drive to improve efficiency coming through.' He cited the rise in the number of civil servants, which has soared from below 420,000 in 2016 to 550,000 today. 'The [hospitality] sector is having to be forensic about costs just to navigate the challenges we face and I'm not seeing that same scrutiny from the Government. [They] need to be consistent about this,' says Emeny. 'They're putting a lot of pressure on business with extra costs. We're having to absorb that this year, and so is everybody else.' Fuller's and other businesses may have to absorb even more costs later this year. With pressure to spend yet more on healthcare and benefits, and amid scepticism that many of the plans set out in the spending review are realistic, economists believe more tax rises await in the autumn. Johnson, at the IFS, suspects the long freeze on income tax thresholds will be extended – a classic stealth tax, as workers end up paying more tax even if their pay only rises in line with inflation – meaning they become worse off over time. But that alone may not be enough. Andy King, a former senior official at the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Government's spending watchdog, says it is almost certain to slash its growth forecasts at the Budget in the autumn, in part because of Reeves's own policies. 'The immigration policy looks net negative for growth, employment rights need to be scored, the employer NICs and national living wage rises look to have done much more damage to employment than was allowed for,' he says. 'The writing seems to be on the wall for another fiscal hole in the autumn.' That points to yet another tax raid, despite the record-breaking £40bn of tax increases in the Budget last October, which was supposed to put the finances back on an even keel for the rest of this parliament. King suspects the Chancellor will have to ramp up the big taxes she has promised not to touch: VAT, National Insurance or income tax. 'Now that the spending plans have been inked in, it leaves fewer levers for restoring fiscal headroom. So it looks like a rock and a hard place for the autumn. Something important may have to give if there is a material fiscal hole to fill,' he says. 'That means either loosening the fiscal targets, which look very risky given the way the bond market is viewing the UK relative to its peers. Or it means breaking manifesto tax commitments which looks, as Sir Humphrey might say, brave, bordering on courageous.' Whatever form tax rises end up taking, it will extend what has become a well-established pattern under Labour: raid the private sector to pay for ever higher state spending. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
RCGP Urges Support to Save Declining GP Partnership Model
The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has warned that GP partnerships are under threat, as the number of partners in England has dropped by 25% over the past decade. In a new report, the college urged action to 'break down barriers to partnership' and called for modernisation of the model to make it more attractive to younger doctors. While the RCGP reaffirmed its support for the independent contractor model, it said there was 'room for modernisation and innovation', and backed ' a mixed economy' of contractual models to deliver general practice. Shift in Workforce Between 2015 and 2025, the number of GP partners in England fell from 24,491 to 18,367. Over the same period, the number of salaried GPs rose by 81%, from 10,270 in September 2015 to 18,557 in December 2024. As of June 2024, GP partners were a minority among fully qualified GPs for the first time. The most significant drop in partnership was seen in younger doctors. Among GPs aged 30-34, numbers fell by 72.9%. The only age group to show growth was those aged 60-64, up by 19.5%. Barriers to Partnership Rising workload, administrative burdens, and concerns about financial risk were cited as major deterrents to partnership. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, RCGP chair, said that many GPs were discouraged by the unlimited personal liability that comes with being a partner. She also pointed to the responsibilities of owning or leasing premises and managing staff, especially as patient demand increases. Exploring Alternatives The RCGP report explored alternative business models that could support general practice, including limited companies, limited liability partnerships (LLPs), and community benefit societies. The college maintained that partnerships still offered flexibility and potential for innovation, particularly if financial and workload pressures could be reduced. In 2024, more than half (55%) of RCGP members said they would be more likely to consider partnership if financial risks were lower. A review by Lord Darzi highlighted the financial discipline of GP partnerships, noting that they could not run large deficits like other parts of the NHS. Earlier this year, the Nuffield Trust described the current GP partnership model as 'withering'. The health think tank warned that the government's plans to improve GP access were at risk due to the fall in partner numbers. Thea Stein, chief executive of the Nuffield Trust, told Medscape News UK : 'It is hard to see partnership being the dominant model in the future.' She called for support where the model works well, but said new models must also be explored. Hawthorne maintained that 'there are elements of the traditional GP partnership that can be improved and modernised, while retaining its core strengths'. The GP partnership model has huge benefits for the NHS and for patients, she added. Government Response A Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson acknowledged the strengths of the partnership model, including efficiency, innovation, and continuity of care. 'However, we also recognise that this is not the only model delivering general practice,' the spokesperson told Medscape News UK . 'GP practices can choose to organise themselves in different ways and also provide good outcomes in terms of staff engagement and patient experience.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
I used our honeymoon fund to pay for my husband's funeral after he died unexpectedly
Laura Burr had only been married for six months when she held her husband's hand as he died from an undiagnosed heart condition. Now, the 31-year-old from Oxfordshire is campaigning for health MOTs to be offered from the age of 30 – something she believes could have saved his life. Currently, free NHS checks are only offered to people aged 40 and over, but Laura says that's too late for many. "If Ed had been tested earlier, even a basic blood pressure or cholesterol check might have given us a warning," she says. Laura, from Banbury, married her "funny, kind, and chaotic" soulmate Edward in April 2024 in a small ceremony surrounded by loved ones. But, just 186 days later she was holding his hand as doctors turned off his life support machine. Edward Burr, a 32-year-old primary school teacher, began experiencing flu-like symptoms the day after their wedding. Initially, it seemed like a bad cold. "He was getting hot and cold sweats, and couldn't sleep,' Laura recalls. 'We thought he just needed rest and vitamin C." Within weeks, Ed was struggling to breathe. A trip to A&E led to a diagnosis of pneumonia and heart failure – two serious conditions doctors struggled to treat at the same time. "We were told he'd be easier to treat if it was just one or the other," Laura says. "But because he had both, it was more complicated. They didn't know which was causing the most damage." Ed spent seven weeks in hospital before being discharged with strict monitoring instructions. After a brief return home, he was readmitted and fitted with a biventricular assist device (BIVAD) to help his heart pump blood. He was placed on the transplant list – but he never made it to surgery. If Ed had received a health MOT at 30, even if it didn't save him, I might have had more time with him In early October, Laura sensed something wasn't right. "The chaplain came to bless him like he always did, but that time I just broke down sobbing," she says. Just hours later, she got a call to say Ed had taken a turn for the worse. "They told us his BIVAD machine was failing and they couldn't keep him going. I played his favourite music and my sister read him a poem," Laura says. "And then, I held his hand as he died." Instead of spending their honeymoon fund on a trip to Disneyland the couple had dreamed of, Laura says she used it to pay for his funeral. Now, Laura is campaigning for change. She's calling for NHS health checks (currently only offered to people aged 40 and over) to be made available from age 30 – a move she believes could save lives. "If Ed had received a health MOT at 30, even if it didn't save him, I might have had more time with him," she says. "At his funeral, I kept thinking: how did we get here? We were newlyweds. We should've been arguing over dinner plans, not saying goodbye." Laura has teamed up with friend Gabriella Evans, who also lost her husband, Tom, 34, to an undiagnosed heart condition. Together, they are campaigning for earlier, routine health screenings including blood pressure and cholesterol checks. The pair released The Podcast That Shouldn't Exist earlier this month. In the first episode, Laura told how she walked down the aisle at the wedding and the funeral to the same music, from her husband's favourite film series Lord Of The Rings. "People in their 30s think they're too young for this stuff," Laura says. "But I'm living proof that you're not." The check is a free check-up of your overall health and sees everyone aged over 40 assessed for their risk of developing a heart or circulatory condition such as heart disease, kidney disease, type 2 diabetes or stroke in the next 10 years. Everyone aged 40-74 who does not have a pre-existing condition should be offered the NHS Health Check at least once every five years. If you have any of the following pre-existing conditions, the NHS says you're not eligible as you should be seen more frequently: heart disease chronic kidney disease diabetes high blood pressure (hypertension) atrial fibrillation transient ischaemic attack inherited high cholesterol (familial hypercholesterolemia) heart failure peripheral arterial disease stroke currently being prescribed statins to lower cholesterol Each year, around 20% of people eligible for one of these checks are invited to come forward, with a view to reach the entire eligible population in a five-year cycle. Additional reporting by SWNS Read more about heart health: 4 possible benefits of alcohol as champagne may lower risk of sudden cardiac arrest (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read) What to know about common heart defect as Emma Willis undergoes surgery (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read) People's heart health in the UK declining rapidly in 'worrying trend (PA Media, 3-min read)
