Fired Starbucks manager claims he faced ‘egregious' discrimination for being heterosexual
A longtime Starbucks manager is suing the coffeehouse chain for discrimination, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, accusing his bosses of ignoring the 'extreme and outrageous' harassment he claims he suffered on the job because he is straight.
Christopher Thevanesan, a 'heterosexual, gender typical man' in Rochester, New York, claims supervisors at his location treated him 'in a materially different manner' than employees who were 'not heterosexual and/or gender typical men,' according to a lawsuit filed under New York State's Human Rights Law and obtained by The Independent.
The suit, which was served on Starbucks in late February, describes the 47-year-old Thevanesan as 'a model employee who performed the essential functions of his employment in an exemplary fashion.' However, it contends, his LGBTQ+ coworkers created a 'hostile' work environment for Thevanesan due to his 'gender typicality and sexual orientation,' and higher-ups allegedly fired him when he complained.
Reached by phone on Thursday, Thevanesan — a person of color who now works at a bank — said he was reluctant to comment before consulting with Neil Flynn, the attorney who filed the lawsuit on his behalf.
In a subsequent call, Flynn told The Independent that he believes Thevansan's heterosexuality had been 'weaponized' against him.
'Management was indifferent to his complaints,' Flynn said, claiming Starbucks workers in the store and surrounding area were attempting to drive out their straight colleagues.
Thevanesan has now 'moved on,' according to Flynn, asserting that the experience 'took a toll' on his client 'personally and professionally.'
Messages seeking comment sent to a Starbucks spokesperson and the legal team defending the company against Thevanesan's suit went unanswered.
Thevanesan's grievance in many ways mirrors a high-profile case brought by Marlean Ames, an Ohio woman who sued her employer, the state Department of Youth Services, arguing she was denied a promotion because she is heterosexual, after which she was demoted and replaced by a gay man. Following a decision in favor of the state agency by Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ames took her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the high court now rules with Ames, it could open the door for those from so-called majority backgrounds, such as straight, white individuals, to sue on the basis of 'reverse discrimination.'
Ames has received support from America First Legal, the right-wing public interest group headed by Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff to President Donald Trump. On January 21, Trump's second day in office, he signed an executive order seeking to dismantle the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives meant to level the playing field for minority groups, calling such well-meaning equal rights practices 'illegal' and 'pernicious.' Last month, the State of Missouri sued Starbucks, claiming its DEI hiring practices were actually slowing down orders, an assertion the company called 'inaccurate.'
Thevanesan began managing Starbucks store #47825 in 2014, according to his LinkedIn profile. The employees who worked at the store he oversaw 'were members of the LGBQT+ community,' says his complaint.
Starbucks management, along with store staff, 'were aware of [Thevanesan's] gender typicality and sexual orientation' from the start, the complaint goes on.
'At all relevant times, [Thevanesan] was harassed by the staff due to his sex, sexual orientation and/or gender in the course of [his] employment.' the complaint states.
Management had a duty to provide Thevanesan with 'a safe environment in which to do his job free of harassment,' according to the complaint. However, it claims, they 'breached that duty.' The complaint contends Thevanesan reported the alleged harassment to his superiors, but that they 'aided, abetted, tolerated, condoned and facilitated the harassment.'
The harassment about Thevanesan's sexual preference 'was so frequent, pervasive, and severe that it altered [Thevanesan's] employment conditions and created a hostile work environment,' the complaint states.
Thevanesan's complaint accuses upper management of 'negligently' failing to properly supervise the workers, thus exposing him to harassment 'so extreme and outrageous, as to be unacceptable in contemporary society.'
In February 2022, Thevanesan was terminated for ginned-up, unspecified violations, according to the complaint, which calls them pretextual and 'intended to hide the real reason for doing so.'
'He was given several different conflicting reasons for why he was discharged,' Flynn told The Independent. 'We're in the course of discovery, so we're still trying to verify what their claims are.'
In fact, the complaint argues, Thevanesan was let go 'because he is a heterosexual, gender typical man.'
All told, Thevanesan says he sustained emotional, psychological, and economic damages, along with 'serious, permanent physical harm and emotional distress.'
Thevanesan is now demanding compensatory, liquidated, punitive, and statutory damages, in an amount to be determined in court, plus attorneys' fees, from Starbucks and five of his former coworkers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
The gaslighting of Alex Padilla is already in full swing on the right
Lunging men are perceived as dangerous. In an America that has long weaponized descriptions of how men of color look and move to justify use of force, that is especially true of dark men lunging at white women. So when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said after Sen. Alex Padilla interrupted her news conference Thursday that 'people need to identify themselves before they start lunging' — it's hard to believe it wasn't meant to be an intentionally loaded word, with loaded results. For those of you who don't watch Fox and other right-wing media, I'll fill you in on how Noem's description played out. Padilla, the Trumpian version of the story now goes, got what he deserved: He busted into a press conference uninvited, they say, pushed his way toward the stage and failed to identify himself. Just ask my inbox. 'Here is what your article should have said,' wrote one fan of my column about the incident. ''DEI appointee Senator Alex Padilla, dressed like a truck driver and acting like a potential attacker or mental case, burst into a press conference being conducted by a high ranking member of the Cabinet and started shouting and interrupting her.'' Another reader put that dog-whistle racism more succinctly. 'No Juan above the law,' the reader quipped. We'll get to whether Padilla lunged or not and just how dangerous a lunge really is. But the larger issue is the alternate reality the Trump administration is building to cultivate fear and build support for a military crackdown. The ask isn't that we believe Padilla was a threat, but that we believe that America has devolved into a immigrant-induced chaos that only the military can quell, and that Trump needs the powers of a king to lead the military to our salvation. So the question isn't really whether Padilla lunged or not — since, as the video shows, it's clear he was nowhere close to Noem and had no intent to harm — but rather why Noem chose to call it a lunge. 'It was very disingenuous of Kristi Noem to make the claim that he lunged at her,' Joan Donovan told me. She's an expert on disinformation and an assistant professor of journalism at Boston University. 'The Trump administration is salivating over a major contestation that would allow them to roll the military out into any old town,' she said. 'They are making it seem as if without this kind of major intervention and excessive force, that these people are ungovernable.' Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants, is known to be a level-headed guy. My colleague Gustavo Arellano describes him as a 'goody-two-shoes.' But these aren't level-headed days. Padilla said that he was in the federal building on Thursday for a briefing with a general, because for weeks he's been trying unsuccessfully to get answers about how deportations are being handled. That briefing was delayed by Noem's news conference, and so — escorted by federal authorities who knew exactly who they were escorting, Padilla said — he went to listen to Noem in the hopes of getting some information. Padilla said he got fed up listening to her remarks about criminals and invasions and tried to ask a question, while moving forward past the wall of television cameras. In the videos I've watched, multiple federal agents — seemingly some from Homeland Security and the FBI — block his way then begin pushing him back. Padilla seems to continue to push forward, but is overpowered and forced into the hallway. It's here where he's taken to the ground and cuffed. It's hard to see a lunge in there. And if there was one, it was from at least a good 10 feet away from Noem, at a minimum. Use-of-force expert Ed Obayashi told me that in situations such as this, law enforcement officers are expected to use their judgment on what is a danger. 'They were trying to keep him from approaching,' Obayashi said, pointing out it was the officers' job to protect Noem. 'They were trying to do what they could under the circumstances to prevent him from getting closer.' But, he added, from what we can see in the videos, it doesn't look like Padilla showed 'intent' to cause harm and he was really far away. Distance makes a difference when judging whether a lunge is a threat. 'It doesn't seem like he was going to rush up,' Obayashi said. So, to be fair to officers who may or may not have at first realized they were manhandling a U.S. senator, they had a job to do and were doing it, even if a bit zealously. But Noem knows better. It's hard to imagine she didn't recognize Padilla, who served on her confirmation committee and is the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship and Border Safety. And if she didn't, her confidant and close advisor Corey Lewandowski certainly did. Padilla told the New York Times that he was being detained in the hallway 'when of all people, Corey Lewandowski ... comes running down the hall and he starts yelling, 'Let him go! Let him go!'' And of course, Padilla was yelling that he was a senator, and forcefully denies any lunge. 'I wasn't lunging at her or anybody, and yes, I identified myself,' he said on CNN. Noem, of course, could have said something in the moment to defuse the situation. She could have asked Padilla back into the room to answer his question. Padilla said the two met after the news conference and spoke for about 15 minutes, which means Noem knew his intentions when she later accused him of 'lunging.' So what could have been handled as an unfortunate encounter was instead purposely upgraded for propaganda purposes. Shortly after Noem's statement, the White House press secretary posted on X that Padilla 'recklessly lunged toward the podium,' cementing that narrative into right-wing conscientiousness. For weeks, the Trump administration has been ramping up its war on dissent. Weeks before Padilla was handcuffed, U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was indicted by a grand jury for 'forcibly impeding and interfering' with federal law enforcement after a scuffle outside of a New Jersey ICE detention center. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested during the same incident, but charges were later dropped. In April, Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested inside her own courthouse after being accused of helping an immigrant appearing in her court to evade ICE officers by allowing him to exit through a public door. And just before the Padilla incident, Noem claimed that federal agents would remain in Los Angeles despite protests, where hundreds have been cited or arrested. By Friday, Marines had been deployed in Los Angeles, with little clarity on whether their guns contained live rounds and under what circumstances they were authorized to fire. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city,' Noem said, right before Padilla interrupted. Liberate an American city. With troops. Quash dissent. With fear. A survey last fall by PRRI found that 26% of Republicans say that 'it is necessary for the progress of this country that the president has the power to limit the influence of opposing parties and groups.' It also found that there is a 'strong overlap among Americans who hold Christian nationalist and authoritarian views.' 'If it is the case that Trump and Kristi Noem and Pete Hegseth are going to continue arresting Democratic representatives, then that is authoritarianism,' Donovan said. 'Those are the people whose job it is to represent the common man, and if they can't do that because they're so bogged down with false charges or trumped-up charges, then we don't live in a democracy.' Padilla may have lost his trademark cool during that press conference, but Noem did not. She knew exactly what she was saying, and why. A Padilla asking questions is a threat to Trump. A Padilla lunging becomes a threat to society, one that only Trump can stop.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starbucks Plans Price Cuts in China Amid Intensifying Competition
Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) is one of the best stocks for a . The company recently announced it will reduce the prices of several iced beverages in China by an average of 5 yuan (about $0.70) nationwide, starting June 10. The US coffee company shared on its Weixin account that the move aims to make a wide range of drinks, including non-coffee options and Frappuccinos, more affordable as market competition grows and consumers become more cautious with their spending. Although China is Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX)'s second-largest market after the US, the coffee industry there is fiercely competitive, and many consumers are cutting back due to economic uncertainty and job concerns. According to a recent update, some Starbucks beverages will now be available for as little as 23 yuan. A source familiar with the matter said the price adjustment isn't meant to match competitors, but rather to draw more afternoon traffic. While Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) has previously stated it would avoid price wars, it has introduced smaller drink sizes and offered coupons that effectively bring down costs for consumers. The company is also exploring ways to revitalize its operations in China, including selling stakes in the business. While we acknowledge the potential of SBUX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starbucks unveils generative AI assistant to support baristas
Starbucks has announced the launch of Green Dot Assist, a generative AI-powered virtual assistant designed to support baristas in real-time. The solution allows partners to ask questions on in-store iPads verbally or via the keyboard and obtain conversational and instant replies, streamlining access to information needed during work. Green Dot Assist offers guidance on drink ingredients, equipment troubleshooting and staffing issues. Starbucks is piloting the AI assistant in 35 coffeehouses, with more to follow. Its launch is a step forward in the chain's focus on decreasing friction, streamlining operations and providing time for partners to prepare beverages and connect with clients. The coffee giant showcased the technology to more than 14,000 North American store managers at its Leadership Experience in Las Vegas. A broad launch is planned across Canada and the US by the chain's fiscal year 2026. Starbucks chief technology officer Deb Hall Lefevre was quoted by CNBC: 'It's just another example of how innovation technology is coming into service of our partners and making sure that we're doing all we can to simplify the operations, make their jobs just a little bit easier, maybe a little bit more fun, so that they can do what they do best.' In addition to Green Dot Assist, Starbucks is previewing its next-generation point-of-sale (POS) system, which aims to improve order accuracy, uptime [the time in which machinery is in operation] and partner workflow. The chain is testing pilot menu innovations via the Starting Five programme, in which select locations in the US trial new products. The introduction of the AI assistant follows a recent leadership reshuffle at Starbucks, with North America chief coffeehouse officer Mike Grams promoted to chief operating officer (COO). The chain has also unveiled a strategic price decrease for its tea-based beverages in its second-largest market, China. "Starbucks unveils generative AI assistant to support baristas" was originally created and published by Verdict Food Service, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
