Teaching unions are guilty of a great betrayal
The NEU was formed in 2017 from the merger of the National Union of Teachers and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers. The latter was the major union operating in the private sector and, thus, the NEU has over 34,000 members teaching in independent schools.
Ampleforth College, Charterhouse School, Christ's Hospital, Merchant Taylors' School, St Mary's School Ascot and Winchester College are among the leading public schools that recognise the NEU for collective bargaining purposes.
The NEU leadership may not be entirely delighted with this situation. Whilst the NEU and the other main teaching union, National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT), are not affiliated to the Labour Party, the far-Left have long had a dominant presence in the former and are fast replicating this in the latter.
Daniel Kebede, the NEU general secretary, is an avowed Marxist, who has spoken on Socialist Workers Party platforms. Much to the anger of some of its members, Matt Wrack, the acting general secretary of NASUWT, is a fireman, not a teacher.
He headed up the far-Left Fire Brigades Union – they disaffiliated from the Labour Party in 2004 in opposition to Tony Blair and only rejoined in 2015 when Jeremy Corbyn became leader – for 20 years before being challenged and defeated.
Wrack is a past member of the Trotskyist Militant tendency.
The NASUWT has moved a long way in its 100-year-plus history. It is one of the few organisations operating today that was set up with an explicitly sexist purpose, as the history of the union by Nigel de Gruchy, its former general secretary, sets out.
During the First World War, as men went to fight, more women became teachers. The NAS part of the union was set up to demand that the returning men should not have female superiors, and that pay differentials between the sexes be maintained (the UWT part of today's union was only set up when that battle was lost).
Perhaps in our era where apologies for past wrongs are so popular, it is time for NASUWT to take the knee and make amends. After all, the Garrick and other formerly men-only clubs were not set up to do down women. This union was.
The NEU's conference this year had time to pass motions condemning Israel. Last month, the union supported a 'Nakba 77: workplace day of action for Palestine' and a 'solidarity' march. Its actions have been anything but 'behind the scenes'.
When Wrack was asked about his support for Corbyn and Labour's anti-Israel turn, he acknowledged with admirable understatement that he 'would not describe [himself] as a Zionist'. Whether Britain's teaching unions can really do much to achieve Middle East peace may be rather in doubt.
But there is an issue which affects every one of their members teaching in the private sector – VAT on school fees. This Labour imposition will mean some of these members will lose their jobs as schools close.
But what it will inevitably mean for many more teachers is that their conditions of employment will worsen, or at the very least, not improve as they would have done without it.
While some schools including Eton have passed the full 20pc levy on to parents, many more have tried to ameliorate the full impact of Labour's onslaught. To balance their budgets, these schools will inevitably have to cut costs elsewhere. This will certainly mean that pay increases will not be as generous as they would otherwise be.
It will also undoubtedly lead to more independent schools leaving the Teachers' Pension Scheme. Historically, most independent schools have been part of the state's generous, pay-as-you-go unfunded scheme.
Back in 2012, the employer contribution to the pension scheme was 14.1pc. Michael Gove as education secretary then hiked the cost, and this year it has reached 28.68pc. This is largely a charge on the independent schools who are members of the scheme as, for state schools, the contributions are paid for by the Government and it is really just a matter of churning.
Private schools have already been planning to leave the unaffordable scheme – it led to industrial action at the Girls' Day School Trust in 2022, the first independent school strikes in memory. But many more will be heading for the exit.
So there can be no doubt that VAT on school fees is a direct assault on the interests of members of the teaching unions.
What did the NEU do about it? They stated that whilst their focus rightly was on 'protecting members' jobs and conditions', they would not be campaigning against the move. Their excuse was that 'independent schools have their own influential lobby'.
Not nearly influential enough, as it turned out. The schools failed to resist Gove's pension raid in 2012 and have achieved nothing to ameliorate the full impact of VAT and the scrapping of mandatory business rate relief for those schools with charitable status.
In contrast with its attitude to Palestine, the NEU has stated that it could best 'use our influence behind the scenes'. The Labour Government's Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill – reversing many of the Tories' laudable education reforms and constraining academies and free schools – shows that this influence is indeed great.
That Bill could almost have been dictated by the NEU. But over VAT? Nothing. It is as if the union leadership is so blinkered by socialism it does not have time to stand up for its members.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chancellor Rachel Reeves to meet Emma Little-Pengelly and John O'Dowd in Belfast
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will meet Stormont ministers on Tuesday to discuss how to grow Northern Ireland's economy, as part of her first visit to will also visit Studio Ulster, Northern Ireland's largest film and TV virtual production studio, to look at how government spending is helping the "creative industries".About a third of the funding for the £72m project came from the government's Belfast Region City is expected to meet Finance Minister John O'Dowd and Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly during her trip. Stormont's first and deputy first minister met Reeves last September, in a bid to lobby for "fairer" funding for public services in Northern then, the government has faced criticism over its plans and subsequent U-turns on winter fuel payments and changes to welfare reform, both of which would have had significant impacts in Northern the latest government Spending Review in June, the chancellor announced a 2% rise in funding for the Stormont Executive for next at the time, O'Dowd warned that Stormont would still be left in a "financially constrained position".Reeves is also expected to make a defence visit during her time in Belfast on Tuesday, and highlight how an uplift in defence spending across the UK will support jobs in Northern Ireland.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sturgeon: The Queen quizzed me on Salmond sex claims
The late Queen asked for 'gossip' about the Alex Salmond sex claims, the former First Minister has claimed. The Monarch immediately asked for details when the women met at Balmoral Castle a few weeks after misconduct claims against Mr Salmond first emerged in 2018. Claiming the Queen 'loved a bit of gossip', Ms Sturgeon wrote in her autobiography Frankly: 'She asked me about it almost as soon as I sat down. She wanted to know more of what was going on.' Describing herself as a republican 'at heart and by instinct', Ms Sturgeon lavishes praise on the late Queen as 'utterly fascinating' and 'an incredible woman'. She says she was 'struck by the aura' she 'exuded as she entered the room', and said she had 'a mystique' around her that no other member of the Royal Family has. Ms Sturgeon's 470-page book is officially released on Thursday, when she is due to talk about it at the Edinburgh Book Festival. But copies went on sale in branches of Waterstones across Scotland yesterday, with the company insisting no sales embargo was in place. Writing about a visit she and her husband Peter Murrell made to Balmoral in September 2018, Ms Sturgeon said she enjoyed her audiences with the Queen at the Highland estate. She wrote: 'She was always relaxed and chatty, and these sessions would typically last for around an hour.' She said chatting to the late Queen was like 'being given a window' onto all the major events of twentieth century history. Ms Sturgeon added: 'She also loved a bit of gossip. She always wanted to hear the stories behind the political headlines.' She said she had an audience with the monarch at Balmoral just a couple of weeks after the allegations about Alex Salmond emerged. Ms Sturgeon said she assumed she wouldn't mention it, but wrote: 'She asked me about it almost as soon as I sat down. She wasn't being trivial in any way, she wanted to know more of what was going on. I think she was also trying to put me at ease.' She said she felt she was 'able to talk freely', and 'open up and share whatever was on my mind'. Mr Salmond, who died aged 69 last October, always considered himself something of a favourite of the Queen because of their mutual love of horseracing. Ms Sturgeon insists in her book she is a republican, and describes kneeling and kissing the monarch's hand to join the Privy Council as somewhat 'strange'. But she is also clearly impressed by the late Queen, calling her time with her 'special'. She writes: 'I am not a monarchist by instinct, but the private time I spent with the Queen ranks as one of the great privileges of my life. 'It was clear from our first meeting that she was an extraordinary woman.' She is less flattering about Prince William, now Prince of Wales, complaining his office was 'disingenuous' about a 2021 private meeting in which she avoided politics. It later emerged he had met former Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown around the same time 'for balance' on the independence question. Ms Sturgeon said in her view 'it wasn't right to suggest' any balance was needed. In a statement, Waterstones said: 'The publication date does not necessarily equal an on-sale date unless the publisher puts an embargo in place. In other revelations in the new book, Ms Sturgeon: * Admitted that the controversy over her botched bid to force through gender reforms was 'one of the most bruising episodes' of her entire time in politics and that she 'lost the dressing room' over trans rapist Isla Bryston being sent to a women's prison. * Condemned JK Rowling's 'Sturgeon, destroyer of women's right' t-shirt as a 'stunt' and claimed it 'was never going to elevate the debate or illuminate the issues at the heart of it'. * Described a phone call with US President Donald Trump as being like 'a bad acid dream' * Revealed that the late Sir Sean Connery gave her speaking lessons and told her she should deepen her voice. * Said she 'felt sick' reading about sex pest minister Derek Mackay's approach to a schoolboy but still counts him as a 'friend'. Ms Sturgeon, who is standing stand down as an MSP next year, admitted she remained 'haunted' by the decisions she took - and didn't take - during the Covid pandemic. Even thinking about the period unleashed 'a torrent of emotion', she said. She described it as the hardest period of her career, adding: 'I still agonise over what I might have done differently. I think part of me always will.' But it would ultimately be for 'history' to judge whether the right calls were made on testing care home patients, infection controls and lockdown. Sexual misconduct allegations against Mr Salmond first emerged in late August 2018, when the Daily Record revealed he had been the subject of a Scottish Government investigation after complaints from two female civil servants. He later had the probe set aside in a judicial review at the Court of Session, showing it had been unfair, unlawful and 'tainted by apparent bias', getting back £512,000 in legal fees.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
GRAHAM GRANT: Sturgeon's book is heavy on chat-show revelations but ignores the SNP's hubris, self-delusion and long record of failure
Nicola Sturgeon has had something of an epiphany in recent days – she shouldn't have pushed so hard on her calamitous gender reforms. The sound of a stable door slamming shut came as the former First Minister publicised her forthcoming memoir, optimistically entitled Frankly. She didn't anticipate how divisive gender self-ID would be – which is hard to swallow – but she still can't bring herself to disown the policy. The autobiography and the accompanying ITV interview are heavy on revisionism, as you'd expect, with a hefty dose of blame-shifting for good measure. Ms Sturgeon could have said sorry for the gender shambles and the damage it did to her party, and admit that she got it badly wrong. There are many in the SNP who would warmly welcome such a mea culpa, with an election in nine months, but they will have to keep waiting. True, she says she is 'partly responsible' for a loss of 'rationality' in the debate – but only 'partly'. Who else was First Minister at the time? Talking about transgender rapist Isla Bryson, Ms Sturgeon says anyone who 'commits the most heinous male crime against women probably forfeits the right to be the gender of their choice' – but only 'probably'. Ironically, the only thing she does take credit for is the White Paper on independence ahead of the 2014 referendum – she says Alex Salmond wasn't interested in helping her – but you'd think she'd want to distance herself from that particular work of fantasy. She's right to say that 'people with very low emotional intelligence are probably disproportionately attracted' to politics – though she doesn't seem to realise that she is one of them. Ms Sturgeon reflects and embodies the many deficiencies of the SNP: hubris, self-delusion, self-pity – and a long record of failure. Her patchy powers of recall while in office led to evasive performances before parliamentary committees. This social justice warrior is happy to bank the cash for a half-baked exercise in blaming everyone else for her own mistakes – heavy on chat-show revelations about her sexuality and even a new tattoo, and decidedly low on any hint of self-awareness. It's clear that she wants to stake a claim to some kind of political achievement and to be taken seriously – her book is part of a quest for relevance and credibility. Aside from the tawdry, confessional stuff about the difficulties of her private life, it's beyond sickening that Ms Sturgeon is desperately trying to craft for herself an elder stateswoman status for which she could never be eligible. She kept Scotland trapped in a constitutional doom-loop and left a devastating legacy in the form of a failing education system, stunted economic growth and punitive taxation. Drug deaths soared to record levels while policing was brought to its knees and our navel-gazing, laughing-stock parliament wasted valuable time on the SNP's gender obsession. Elsewhere in the UK, Ms Sturgeon was often regarded, inexplicably, as a safe pair of hands and even an inspirational figure. Her allies in the commentariat were blind to the truth – that she failed on every aspect of her government's domestic agenda and created a corrosive culture of secrecy in a vast civil service machine which has become hopelessly politicised under Nationalist control. Supporters point to Ms Sturgeon's handling of the Covid pandemic – she says the ordeal of giving evidence at the public inquiry drove her to the edge of a breakdown, though it's likely that the same could be said of many of the bereaved who lost relatives to the illness. In fact, many of the claims Ms Sturgeon made about Scotland's success in battling Covid were baseless, or hugely exaggerated. 'Zero Covid' was touted as a flagship SNP policy before being quietly binned as case rates rose, and we know that despite her denials at the time party hierarchs saw the national crisis as a good moment to push their independence agenda. Rightly, Ms Sturgeon faced a huge backlash over revelations that she and her senior mandarins deleted their WhatsApp messages during the pandemic. They claimed that mass deletion was in line with government guidance – but the families of Covid victims understandably alleged a cover-up. There were similar allegations when Ms Sturgeon clung to office after the Salmond debacle by citing the outcome of a report by a former prosecutor who cleared her of breaching the ministerial code – in perhaps the most heavily redacted report in Holyrood's history. There was no uprising among her acolytes who backed her in a confidence vote. The party rallied round Ms Sturgeon in a display of weapons-grade sycophancy – Jeane Freeman, Health Secretary at the time, hailed the then First Minister as 'most excellent' as she denied her boss had misled MSPs. In reality, it was a dismal period during which some of the key institutions of state were dragged into the mire to save Ms Sturgeon's neck. Now she has angered friends of her former mentor, Mr Salmond, by claiming he leaked details of a botched in-house probe into sexual harassment complaints against him. He's not here to give his side of the story, but what's indisputable is that he believed he was the victim of a conspiracy, and the ensuing fiasco – which saw him take the government he once led to court, and win – led to an eye-watering bill for taxpayers. Settling scores with someone who died nearly a year ago is unedifying, but don't forget that there are books to shift. Ms Sturgeon, bitter and isolated in the political wilderness, is still consumed by the psychodrama of the rift with her old boss – a pivotal moment in her life and career. The rest of us, who were forced to look on from the sidelines, are still counting the cost of Ms Sturgeon's reign. Her erstwhile deputy, lame-duck John Swinney, presents himself as a new dawn for a broken party and an exhausted country which longs for change. Yet he was an integral part of the Sturgeon administration – a loyal consigliere and enforcer who continues to back her radical stance on gender. Sturgeonism, such as it is, lives on in Mr Swinney, who was left to mop up a mess partly of his own creation. Doubtless he will turn quickly to the index of Ms Sturgeon's book, like many of his colleagues, searching for his own name. Memoirs are an act of remembrance – but for many Scots the Sturgeon years are better forgotten.
