
Universal school voucher bill passes Wyoming Senate, heads back to House
CHEYENNE — A controversial universal school voucher bill was the subject of more long debate over its constitutionality in the Wyoming Senate on Wednesday before passing its third and final reading by a vote of 20-11.
House Bill 199, 'Wyoming Freedom Scholarship Act,' will now go back to the House of Representatives for a concurrence vote before heading to the governor's desk.
However, several senators said they received hundreds, if not thousands, of text messages, emails and phone calls from their constituents, urging them not to pass the bill.
Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper (2025)
Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper
'The money, according to my emails, is the biggest issue for folks back in my district. It's a big deal,' said Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper. By 2026, the universal school voucher program would cost the state $44.3 million, according to the Legislative Service Office. 'They want to know why we're going to come up with whatever amount we're going to come up with, and we're going to pay folks to keep their kids at home.' Landen voted against passing the bill.
Last year, lawmakers passed a bill to set up the state's first-ever education savings account (ESA) program. It sets aside state funds so that parents can send their child to a non-public K-12 school.
Currently, the Cowboy State's ESA program, which started accepting applications in January, has a family income requirement at or below 150% of the federal poverty level and allows for reimbursement of qualifying expenses up to $6,000 per child per year to attend a private school of the parent's choice.
HB 199, sponsored by House Majority Whip and Wyoming Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ocean Andrew, R-Laramie, guts key parts of the program that some lawmakers argue made it constitutional in the first place.
Originally, Andrew's bill eliminated the program's nationally normed assessment and certification requirements, removed preschool eligibility for ESAs and changed the funding source from the general fund (Wyoming's main spending account) to federal mineral royalties (FMRs), which also fund public K-12 schools.
As the bill made its way through the House of Representatives, however, legislators reinserted the certification process for private schools receiving ESA funding and added vague language related to assessment requirements.
It passed the House on a third and final vote of 39-21, with two members excused.
The bill has not escaped the attention of President Donald Trump, who spotlighted it in a Sunday post on his social media platform, Truth Social, urging Wyoming lawmakers to pass the legislation.
'This would be an incredible Victory for Wyoming students and families. Every Member of the Wyoming Senate should vote for HB 199,' Trump wrote. 'I will be watching!'
However, some Wyomingites appear less eager to see the universal school voucher bill signed into law. Critics of the bill, and other controversial education bills sponsored by Andrew, even called for a boycott of the House majority whip's food truck business, On the Hook, according to WyoFile.com.
Changes in the Senate
Senators passed a total of six amendments to the bill, both in committee and on the Senate floor. However, some adopted amendments canceled out those adopted in previous readings of the legislation.
For example, during the bill's first reading, Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston, brought an amendment to reinstate an income-based requirement for the program. Schuler's amendment broke down how much each child would receive based on varying levels of household income.
Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston (2025)
Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston
In her amendment, families at or below 150% of the federal poverty level would receive $6,000 per child; families at or between 200% and 150% of the federal poverty level would receive $4,800 per child; and families at or between 250% and 200% of the federal poverty level would receive $3,600 per child.
Household incomes above 250% of the federal poverty level would not qualify for an ESA.
'Going back to this income base, and having it based on the poverty level, will get us where we need to go to get past the constitutional issues,' Schuler said.
The Evanston senator said she is supportive of school choice, but only if it's done right. Adding an income-level requirement was the best way Schuler said she could get behind HB 199.
Senators adopted Schuler's amendment in a tight vote, but the work was quickly undone in an amendment brought by Sen. Evie Brennan, R-Cheyenne, during the bill's second reading. Her amendment deleted Schuler's amendment, removing the income-based provision, and opening it back up to $7,000 per child for all families.
Sen. Evie Brennan, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Sen. Evie Brennan, R-Cheyenne
'This is for the education of our next generation, and it's about all of our students having equitable access to the same scholarship and the same amount of money,' Brennan said, 'so that they can all get educated in the environment that best suits them.'
Supporters of Brennan's amendment criticized the income-based requirement as 'discriminatory.' Sen. Charles Scott, R-Casper, said this requirement sets a 'dangerous precedent' for school funding.
Sen. Charles Scott, R-Casper (2025)
Sen. Charles Scott, R-Casper
'Education, Mr. Chairman, is one of the most fundamental services that our state and local governments provide,' Scott said. 'We have never had a means test on education.'
One amendment that managed to stick through the bill's final reading in the upper chamber, proposed by Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, was to add back the eligibility of pre-kindergarten schools for ESA funds.
'It simply, in my view, puts the best part of the program back in place,' Rothfuss said.
Other successful changes to the bill include changing the source of funds from FMRs back to the state's general fund, requiring either a nationally normed or statewide assessment for ESA students and changing the name to the 'Steamboat Legacy Scholarship Act.'
This name change is in honor of the famous Wyoming rodeo bucking horse, Steamboat, and its rider, which are seen on every Wyoming license plate and in many other places statewide.
Constitutional concerns
Before the vote that sent the bill back to the lower chamber, senators against the legislation made their final remarks on the bill's constitutionality. Rothfuss said, even with the pre-kindergarten language back in the bill, it still remained in violation of the Wyoming Constitution.
'The question is, do we want to provide $7,000 per year to individuals that are not in need?' Rothfuss said.
The Democratic senator pointed out that the ESA program is already in place — the question on the table is whether lawmakers supported turning it into a universal school voucher program. Schuler, who has previously mentioned her hangup with such programs, said she could not support the bill without the means testing.
Article 7, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution states no 'portion of any public school fund ever be used to support or assist any private school, or any school, academy, seminary, college or other institution of learning controlled by any church or sectarian organization or religious denomination whatsoever.'
'I was inching closer to where I could actually support this bill, until we took out the income-based tiers,' Schuler said.
However, senators in support of the bill argued the income-based tiers removed equitable participation for all Wyoming schoolchildren. Supporters said parents should be free to put their child in the learning environment that best supports them, regardless of their income.
'Our job is to make sure that our kids get an education, so that they are educated to their abilities and talents,' Brennan said. 'This is what this bill is about. It's not about a good system or a bad system. It's about what is the education environment that our children are going to best learn in?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
8 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is Elon Musk right to oppose the budget bill? What Americans said in a new poll
During his public falling out with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk slammed the president's proposed spending bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — claiming it will balloon the deficit. It turns out, most Americans agree with his critique, new polling reveals. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked to react to a statement from Musk on the GOP-backed spending bill, which passed in the House without a single Democratic vote. The legislation, Musk wrote on X on June 3, 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and burden (American) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' A majority of respondents, 56%, said they agreed with this statement, while just 17% said they disagreed. More than one-quarter, 27%, said they were unsure. The answers were largely linked to partisan affiliation, with Democrats largely siding with Musk for a change. Seventy-two percent of Democrats said they concurred with the billionaire's statement about the spending bill, as did 55% of independents. Among Republicans, a plurality, 44%, said they agreed. The poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6-9 — posed the same statement before the other half of respondents, but this time, it did not attribute it to Musk. Without reference to Musk, a slightly smaller share, 49%, said they agreed with the statement, while 23% said they disagreed. Smaller shares of Republicans, independents and Democrats agreed, though Democrats saw the largest decrease in support — from 72% to 60%. The poll has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The spending bill, which provides funding for fiscal year 2025, passed in the House in a 215-214 vote in late May and is now under consideration in the Senate. It contains many pieces of Trump's agenda, including a road map to extend the 2017 tax cuts, as well as an increase in funding for the Pentagon and border security, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. At the same time, it slashes funding for social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Further — to Musk's point — it would increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency. In addition to Musk, the bill has received criticism from several other prominent conservatives in Congress. One of the most vocal opponents has been Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wrote on X that 'the spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt.' Other Republican lawmakers have come out in defense of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has said the legislation will deliver 'historic tax relief, ensure our border stays secure, strengthen our military, and produce historic savings.' Meanwhile, Democrats have been united in their opposition. In a statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled the bill 'the GOP Tax Scam' and said it would rip 'healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.'


E&E News
24 minutes ago
- E&E News
Senate Republican questions megabill deadline — and says Musk ‘missed an opportunity' to shape it
Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis raised doubts on Tuesday the GOP could pass its megabill by its self-imposed Independence Day deadline. Curtis, speaking at the POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington, said, 'I think a lot of us would be surprised if it passed by July 4.' He added: 'I think that's a false deadline. I don't think that we need to put a specific deadline on it. Let's get it right.' Advertisement Curtis, who has been pushing for specific changes to the House-passed tax cut, energy and security spending budget bill, said the package would unfairly phase out tax credits from the Democrats' 2022 climate law. He said the rollbacks could harm energy workers and the economy.


E&E News
24 minutes ago
- E&E News
Tech giants want their say in megabill tax credit fight
The tech industry is weighing into the contentious tax credit debate on Capitol Hill, urging Republicans to make specific changes to the House-passed megabill. In doing so, the companies are relying on an a well-worn Republican talking point to make their case: beating China on artificial intelligence. In a new letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), the Data Center Coalition — a trade group that includes Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services and others — called for 'thoughtful and targeted changes' to help power data centers and emerging tech across the country. Advertisement 'We urge you to take a pragmatic approach to ensure we can meet the energy needs of data centers at a pivotal moment for our industry and country,' the trade group wrote.