Booing at Anzac Day dawn service condemned
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here LIVE Watch Anzac Day coverage live on 9Now here Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles has led condemnation of "terrible" booing by agitators at the Melbourne Anzac Day dawn service. Marles was among the dignitaries, spectators and veterans early today listening to Indigenous elder Uncle Mark Brown giving the Welcome to Country acknowledgement at the Shrine of Remembrance when shouting by a group people began. Marles told Today this morning he felt a "sense of outrage" over their actions but added it shouldn't detract from the importance of Anzac Day. Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles witnessed the booing at the Melbourne Anzac Day dawn service. (Nine) "Look, what we saw was obviously terrible. And it is deplorable. "But in a sense, I don't want to give that any more air time than it deserves, because this is a day to acknowledge those who have worn our nation's uniform." Marles stressed only a small number of people among the many attending started booing. "I absolutely feel that sense of outrage. And I know that people in the crowd did today as well," he said. The Anzac Day dawn service in Melbourne was disrupted by boos. (Getty) Opposition Leader Peter Dutton also slammed the protesters' actions. "Our Diggers fought against the Nazis and (that) this movement of neo-Nazis has any presence in our country at all is just an outrage and a disgrace," he told Today . He praised the swift intervention by police and suggested anyone who followed Nazi ideology in Australia must be mentally unstable. "And you read the history of the Nazi regime and Hitler's evil and those around him, and that it could be glorified by Australians here shows that these people are mentally unwell, and it should be condemned." Veterans and spectators at the Melbourne Anzac Day dawn service. (Simon Schluter ) Booing broke out again when the Governor of Victoria, Margaret Gardner, gave a Welcome to Country address. The agitators were eventually escorted out by event officials and police. They included Jacob Hersant, the first Victorian to be convicted of performing an illegal Nazi salute, who spoke with 9News before he was escorted away by police. "I can express my point of view to the public if I wish," he said. Police said in a statement they were aware of a small group of people disrupting the service and had interviewed a man over the incident. "Police identified a 26-year-old man from Kensington in relation to the behaviour," Victoria Police said in a statement. "He has subsequently been interviewed for offensive behaviour and police will proceed via summons. "The male has been directed to leave the Shrine of Remembrance." The protesters were escorted from the Melbourne Shrine of Remembrance by police. (Nine) The booing and protests were condemned by Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan. "It's beyond disappointing," she told the ABC. She said the protesters' actions "runs counter to why we gather at the Shrine at dawn (with) hundreds of thousands people across the country simultaneously". "They gather to never forget what war is like and why it is so important so we can gather peacefully today because of that sacrifice." ANZAC Day
Melbourne
Indigenous Australians
Protests
Victoria
Australia
national CONTACT US
Property News: The Perth suburbs where residents rarely leave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Government relying on Latham for workers' compensation reforms
Maverick MP Mark Latham has indicated he is open to supporting the government's workers' compensation reforms, but only with a raft of amendments, while the Coalition hopes it can roll back a tightening of criteria for long-term payouts. The public accountability and works committee received a confidential briefing from Treasurer Daniel Mookhey and bureaucrats on Thursday, aiming to allay concerns about the drivers of Labor's plan to curtail access to compensation for psychological injuries. Two years after Premier Chris Minns refused to work with Latham, the dynamics of the seven-person committee have left the rogue MP with the casting vote on whether the legislation will return for a vote during budget week, in late June, or whether the inquiry continues indefinitely. After the government's reforms were referred for a second interrogation by a parliamentary inquiry, their fate hinged in part on Thursday's briefing. Mookhey has said that without reform the system will collapse while rising premiums push businesses under. But the Coalition, Greens and upper house independents have questioned government efforts to jam the legislation through parliament, particularly given a key plank of the reforms would cut off compensation for some of the state's sickest workers. Loading The second inquiry was established to allow crossbenchers to interrogate assumptions underpinning Mookhey's reforms. A public hearing will take place on Tuesday, a month after a snap inquiry heard only 27 of the hundreds of employees impaired by workplace psychological injury each year would be eligible to claim long-term benefits under the minimum 31 per cent Whole of Person Impairment (WPI) rating proposed by the government. Describing Thursday's briefing as 'fairly useful', Latham said some aspects of the workers' compensation reforms introduced by the Victorian Labor government in March 2024 were superior as they dealt with the long-term structural problem of nebulous claims, where the link between injury and a claimant's work is unclear. While he would prefer the bill to be voted on by June's end, Latham said he would not rubber stamp the legislation, seeking to amend it to include the 'best of the Victorian reforms', including tightening definitions around bullying and harassment to restrict claims.
The Advertiser
12 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Crossbenchers pressure Labor to launch 'urgent' AUKUS inquiry
ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent. ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent. ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent. ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent.
News.com.au
18 hours ago
- News.com.au
Australia to pay ‘very high price' if AUKUS falls through
Australia will have 'a very high price to pay if AUKUS fails', opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor says. The warning came after the US Department of Defence launched a review of the pact to ensure it aligned with Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The Albanese government has brushed off concerns the move signals waning US support for the alliance with Canberra, with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles saying it was 'natural that the (Trump) administration would want to examine this major undertaking'. But with AUKUS the centrepiece of Australia's defence strategy over the first half of this century, it has offered little reassurance. 'This is an incredibly important alliance,' Mr Taylor said on Friday. 'It's an incredibly important capability, both in terms of the submarine capability and the technology capability … and this must be a top priority of the government.' He said the Albanese government had 'many questions to answer'. 'What discussions has Richard Marles already had? To what extent is our lack of defence spending a driver of this review? When will the Prime Minister meet with the President to actually discuss this face-to-face?' he queried. 'These are questions we need answers to, and they're questions that go to the heart of making sure that AUKUS is a success and that we ensure that we have peace through deterrence in our region.' But US State Department sources said a time had not been set and the situation was 'fluid'.
