Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial LIVE updates: Judge gives instruction jury must disregard major argument as trial hits final days
22:15
Patterson judge tells jury when it's their time to decide accused killer's fate
Justice Christopher Beale commenced his address to the jury - or 'charge' - on Tuesday after giving jurors a four-day weekend to prepare for the closing stage of the marathon Erin Patterson murder trial.
On Thursday, Justice Beale indicated that his address will conclude on Monday and then two jurors will be balloted out before the remaining 12 decide Patterson's fate,
Patterson, 50, is accused of murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, after allegedly serving them a beef Wellington lunch made with death cap mushrooms.
Patterson is also accused of attempting to murder Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, who survived the lunch after spending several weeks in an intensive care unit.
The court heard Patterson's estranged husband, Simon (pictured), was also invited to the gathering at her home in Leongatha, in Victoria's Gippsland region, but didn't attend.
Witnesses told the jury that Patterson ate her serving from a smaller, differently-coloured plate to those of her guests, who ate off four grey plates.
Patterson told authorities she bought dried mushrooms from an unnamed Asian store in the Monash area of Melbourne, but health inspectors could find no evidence of this.
22:16
Patterson wanted to be 'truthful and accurate' about mushroom source
Patterson agreed she never mentioned dried mushrooms to Dr Webster but she did mention them when phoned by Matthew Patterson later.
The jury heard Patterson said she knew it was important to be 'truthful and accurate' because she knew Don's health was at stake
Justice Beale said Patterson gave evidence she later provided more information on the mushrooms to other doctors.
Patterson also agreed she told paramedics she spoke of the dried mushrooms but couldn't remember where she'd got them.
The jury heard Patterson agreed she told several others she believed she bought the mushrooms from an Asian grocer.
Patterson claimed on August 1, while at the Monash Medical Centre, she mentioned to Ms Cripps several locations where she may have purchased the dried mushrooms.
Justice Beale also said Patterson accepted the mushroom source was a 'public emergency' while the jury was reminded about the various different locations Patterson told different people.
22:15
Jury told about Patterson's 'alleged incriminating conduct'
Towards the end of Wednesday's proceedings, Justice Beale spoke to the jury about the topic of Patterson's 'alleged incriminating conduct'.
'The prosecution (Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC pictured) argued Patterson knew she was guilty and did what she did to conceal her guilt,' Justice Beale said.
However, Justice Beale told the jury the defence has reasons for Patterson's behaviour.
'The defence claimed there were innocent explanations for that behaviour,' he added.
Justice Beale listed some of that alleged 'incriminating' conduct:
1. She lied about being unwell after the lunch
2. Patterson lied about the Asian grocer mushrooms
3. She refused treatment at hospital and left against medical advice
4. She had reluctance to accept treatment the second time at hospital
5. Patterson was reluctant to get kids treated on July 31
6. Why would she have fed the kids leftovers?
7. She reset Phone B multiple times on August 2
8. She dumped the dehydrator
9. On August 5, she provided Phone B instead of Phone A
10. Patterson lied to cops about her phone number
11. She lied about foraging
12. She lied about owning a dehydrator
Justice Beale has been going through the topics listed with the jury.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NSW Police detective's sick act when a 19-year-old woman came forward to report a crime
A jailed sex crimes investigator has lost an appeal against his convictions for sexually touching a 19-year-old woman who came forward to report a crime. Former NSW police detective Glen Coleman was jailed for at least two years after he was found guilty of twice sexually touching the teenager without her consent in 2022. The 58-year-old met the teenager when she attended a police station to report her cousin had threatened to distribute naked images of her online. The jury was persuaded the married detective asked to see the woman's breasts, and touched them in a police station interview room and at a local park. He also asked for sexual favours in exchange for money, attended a strip club to see her dance, and on one occasion placed $70 on the interview room table before they had sex. Coleman was convicted, and jailed three years and seven months, with a non-parole period of two years and two months. His appeal against the convictions was heard in May. But his bid for freedom was dismissed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal on Friday in a judgment by Chief Justice Andrew Bell, Justice Anthony Payne and Justice Natalie Adams. His convictions were upheld and he will remain behind bars until at least mid-2026. Coleman's lawyer argued the jury's findings were inconsistent because it found his client guilty of two sexual touching offences and acquitted him of seven other offences. But crown prosecutor Carl Young said the jury's verdicts showed it had confronted difficult issues in assessing the teenager's ability to consent and Coleman's knowledge of consent. The jury did not pick one of the lesser counts from each incident when determining its verdicts and instead based its findings on the supporting evidence for each count. 'The acquittals do not necessarily mean that the jury rejected (the teenager) as a witness or her evidence,' Mr Young said.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Furious footy fan vandalises Carlton AFL team's headquarters with a message that has a surprising twist
A fed up footy fan has resorted to vandalising Carlton's AFL headquarters after the Blues were hammered by Port Adelaide on Thursday night - but there was a twist. It seems the supporter in question - who Victoria Police would like to speak to following the 1am public protest - doesn't believe coach Michael Voss is the problem. The blunt message at IKON Park in Melbourne read: 'Sack the board, sack (Nick) Austin and (Brad) Lloyd. Keep (Michael) Voss. TDK (Tom de Koning) yes or no?' Austin is the club's list manager and Lloyd is the football manager, while de Koning is the young-gun ruckman whose future with the team is up in the air. The Blues sit 11th on the ladder following Thursday's 50-point defeat - and could drop further by the end of round 16. Voss' men need to win six of their remaining eight games to qualify for finals - but after a pedestrian performance against the Power, that is highly unlikely. 'We just didn't come with an appetite to the contest,' Voss said post game. 'What I feel right now as a leader is, I feel really disappointed for our people - we feel like we're creating a great environment but we're not getting the results we're after. 'We're enormously disappointed... but it's time to come together, not isolate.' AFL great Jason Dunstall was scathing in his assessment, labelling the playing group 'devoid of hope.' 'I'm really disappointed with the effort from the Blues,' he said on Fox Footy. 'It really was an insipid performance. 'They are devoid of confidence, they looked to be devoid of hope. 'It's like the football world has just caved in on top of them and they don't know what to do. 'The weight of pressure, they've just collapsed underneath it.' The Blues sit 11th on the ladder following Thursday's 50-point defeat - and could drop further by the end of round 16 (pictured, Carlton star Patrick Cripps leaving the field) The Blues' alarming lack of early fight will trigger fresh debate after Port booted the initial eight goals of a lopsided encounter. 'We just didn't come with an appetite to the contest,' Voss said. 'What I feel right now as a leader is, I feel really disappointed for our people - we feel like we're creating a great environment but we're not getting the results we're after.' Carlton, who next meet ladder leaders Collingwood and then reigning premiers the Brisbane Lions, slipped to 11th on the ladder with six wins and nine losses. The Blues, who will likely be three wins outside the top eight by round's end, also lost creative backman Adam Saad to concussion. Saad was felled by a shoulder bump from Port ruckman Dante Visentini which sparked a prolonged push-and-shove between a mass of players at halftime. Saad's injury came during Carlton's horror opening half - and instead of a steely response to last week's shock 11-point loss to North Melbourne, the Blues didn't offer a yelp.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Idaho judge rejects Bryan Kohberger's request to delay murder trial in college student stabbings
An Idaho judge says he won't postpone the quadruple murder trial of a man accused in the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. Fourth District Judge Steven Hippler made the ruling Thursday, telling Bryan Kohberger's attorneys that jury selection will begin in August and opening arguments will likely be held around Aug. 18. Hippler also rejected the defense team's request to present theories of four 'alternate perpetrators' to the jury, writing that evidence presented by the defense is 'entirely irrelevant.' 'Nothing links these individuals to the homicides or otherwise gives rise to a reasonable inference that they committed the crime; indeed, it would take nothing short of rank speculation by the jury to make such a finding,' Hippler wrote in the order. Kohberger, 30, a former graduate student in criminal justice at Washington State University, is charged with four counts of murder. Prosecutors say he sneaked into a rental home in nearby Moscow, Idaho, not far from the University of Idaho campus, and fatally stabbed Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves on Nov. 13, 2022. Kohberger stood silent at his arraignment, prompting a judge to enter a not guilty plea on his behalf. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. Defense attorney Anne Taylor had asked the judge to delay the proceedings. She said beginning the trial this summer would violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial in part because his defense team was still reviewing evidence and struggling to get potential witnesses to agree to be interviewed. She also said extensive publicity could taint the proceedings and that a cooling off period would help ensure an impartial jury. But Hippler noted that interest in the case has only grown and that previous delays have only given the media more time to 'provide coverage to a public audience which is clamoring for answers.' 'The longer the public is made to sit and wait for the facts to come out at trial, the more time there is for inflammatory, speculative stories, movies and books to circulate and more time for prior ones to be rebroadcast, purchased, viewed and consumed by the public,' he wrote. Hippler also denied the defense's request to present evidence of four 'alternate perpetrators' to jurors, after finding that evidence was flimsy at best and would lead to 'wild speculation," needlessly dragging out a trial that is already expected to last three months. The names of the four were redacted from the ruling, but Hippler briefly described them: Three of the people were socially connected to at least one of the victims, and interacted with them socially in the hours before the killings, lived within walking distance of the home and had been to the home before. The fourth person had only a 'passing connection' to one victim after noticing her at a store several weeks before the deaths, Hippler said. All four cooperated with investigators, and their DNA didn't match samples taken at the crime scene, Hippler said, and there is no admissible or significant evidence that any one of them had a motive, was present at the crime scene or was otherwise connected to the crime. 'There is not a scintilla of competent evidence connecting them to the crime,' Hippler said. Jury selection will begin Aug. 4, Hippler said, with the trial starting about two weeks later.
