Some French Tesla drivers file lawsuit over harm allegedly caused by Musk's behaviour
PARIS, June 11 (Reuters) - A small group of Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab owners in France is suing the carmaker run by Elon Musk, alleging its vehicles have become "far-right totems" that are harming their reputation, the law firm representing the group said on Wednesday.
The group is seeking to terminate their lease contracts and recover legal costs at the Paris Commercial Court, citing the "direct and concrete" harm caused by Musk's public behaviour after he rallied in support of Donald Trump's presidential bid and Germany's far-right AfD party.
The group has launched the action against a backdrop of plummeting Tesla sales in core European markets including France, Britain, Germany and Italy, in some cases in protest at Musk's political activities and as customers favour Chinese electric vehicles because of their competitive prices.
"Tesla vehicles have become powerful political symbols and are now perceived as true far-right 'totems,' much to the dismay of those who purchased them solely as innovative and eco-friendly vehicles", the plaintiffs' lawyers Patrick Klugman and Ivan Terel at law firm GKA said in a statement.
Tesla Europe did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.
GKA said about 10 Tesla leaseholders had joined the lawsuit.
Musk helped bankroll Trump's presidential campaign and spearheaded Trump's efforts to cut federal jobs and slash what the administration perceived as wasteful public spending.
Musk's involvement in the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) saw him become a political lightning rod, fueling protests and vandalism at Tesla showrooms in the United States and Europe.
The GKA statement referred to a hand gesture by the billionaire during Trump's inauguration celebrations that drew online comparisons to a Nazi salute as an example of his harmful behaviour. Musk dismissed the criticism of the gesture as a "tired" attack.
Musk said on Wednesday he regretted some of the remarks he made on social media platform X, which he owns, during an acrimonious and very public falling out with Trump last week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
33 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump signs resolutions blocking California's pro-EV rules
President Donald Trump signed three resolutions on Thursday barring California from mandating electric vehicle sales and setting tailpipe emissions standards designed to galvanize the transition away from combustion engines. The resolutions undo California's 2024 landmark decision to ban new gasoline-powered car sales by 2035 and revoke the federal waiver that allows California to set its own tailpipe emissions standards under the Clean Air Act. Seventeen states representing 30% of the U.S. vehicle market had adopted the plan, which Trump has called California's 'EV mandate.' With Trump's move, the 17 states will no longer be able to enforce California's standards mandating electric vehicle sales by 2035. Trump also repealed California's plan requiring a rising number of zero-emissions heavy-duty truck sales. 'We officially rescued the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating the California electric vehicle mandate once and for all,' Trump said at a White House news conference. California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement that the state will be suing to 'stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.'
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Iran's nuclear programme may get bombed by Israel. That would be bad for America - but not Trump's friends
Donal Trump has a problem – his affections appear to have been divided - because of Iran. Vladimir Putin, who he sees as a model leader, and Benjamin Netanyahu, who has a tough guy vibe the US President finds irresistible, are on opposite sides over Tehran's march towards nuclear weapons. The UN's International Atomic Energy Authority has just announced that Iran is in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. Iran says it has been warned by a 'friendly country' that Israel may attack its nuclear facilities. Israel fears Tehran is building a Bomb and its leaders have frequently pledged to wipe the Jewish state off the face of the earth. The Trump administration has seen this coming. The defence department has re-routed 20,000 air defence missiles destined for Ukraine to US forces in the Middle East. The US is also drawing down on embassy staff, warning Americans to get out of Iraq, and generally bracing for what may be retaliation following a unilateral Israeli attack on Iran. Of course, such an attack would need to be supported by the US – not least in terms of air refuelling and logistical support. It would probably involve the use of US bombs and certainly US manufactured aircraft. Iran has ordered its armed forces are mobilized for drills focussed on 'enemy movements'. Gulf nations like Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates will be jittery – they've signed the Abraham Accords normalizing relations with Israel and, along with Qatar, have large US naval or air force bases on their territory. Trump has long derided the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action agreed with Iran which dialled back its nuclear ambitions and has frequently warned Iran not to try to develop a nuclear weapon. He would be happy to see Israel take the initiative – after all he has defended Netanyahu's actions in Gaza, even putting sanctions on the International Criminal Court because is 'abused its power by issuing baseless arrest warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant'. But Russia is deeply involved in Iran's nuclear programme. Moscow has a long-standing programme to develop Iran civilian nuclear power industry and has already built the Bushehr I plant, is building the Bushehr II reactor and is planning on more at Sirik and Karun. Iran also supplies drones, built drone factories in Russia, helps with missile technology and is bound into Moscow's military-industrial complex at deep levels that have grown deeper with the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Iran is a key ally in Russia's war in Europe. Trump has maintained staunchly pro-Russian positions on Ukraine in demanding that any future peace deal leaves Russia in control of about a fifth of Ukraine, and out of Nato. Trump has taken Russia's side at UN refusing to condemn Moscow's invasion. He has stopped allocating military aid to Kyiv. A large-scale Israeli attack on Iran aimed at its nuclear programme would also have to focus on its wider military capabilities. Those are capabilities that Russia draws on. Trump has little real influence over Netanyahu and will not try, publicly anyway, to hold him back for fear of rejection. The Israeli Prime Minister has repeatedly shown that he's largely immune to pressure from the White House. But as Trump's agenda so far this year has been to undermine long-standing alliances and friendships with the US in favour of Israel and Russia – the threat of conflict between Israel and Iran doesn't tear at his loyalties. Israel could remove a growing nuclear threat from Iran's regime which has threatened annihilation. Russia is already benefitting from Ukraine's loss of 20,000 missiles. And if Iran counter attacks with assaults on US targets in the Middle East the US president is confident his forces could defend themselves. But pressure to further downgrade US involvement in the region will grow in Washington – and that suits Putin just fine. None of this would be good for America. But at home and abroad, that doesn't look like a priority for Trump – who consistently favours men like Putin and Netanyahu and who both may gain from chaos in the Middle East.
Times
42 minutes ago
- Times
US reneging on Aukus submarine deal ‘would cost UK billions'
Britain would have to spend billions more pounds building its own submarines if the Aukus deal collapses, sources have said. President Trump's administration has thrown into doubt the future of the pact, struck between Britain, the US and Australia to build nuclear-powered attack submarines. The Labour government announced last week that it planned to build up to 12 of the submarines, which will come into service in the late 2030s, as part of the deal agreed in 2021. However, two sources close to Aukus said UK costs would rise by 60 per cent if the pact crumbled and Australia pulled out of the deal too. Producing a dozen submarines could be unrealistic given financial pressures, they warned. 'You can see a route to the point where the UK ends up with half of what it wants at a higher price,' said one of the sources.
