Vance Calls for ‘Normalize Indian Hate' DOGE Guy to Be Hired Back
JD Vance, whose wife is the daughter of Indian immigrants, advocated Friday for the rehiring of a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) engineer who was accused of posting 'normalize Indian hate' on X.
Vance acknowledged he disagreed with 'some' of what 25-year-old Marko Elez had reportedly posted on a burner X account but said he does not think 'stupid social media activity should ruin a kid's life.'
'So I say bring him back,' Vance said on X. 'If he's a bad dude or a terrible member of the team, fire him for that.'
A flurry of people rushed to remark that Elez's posts—in which he allegedly wrote someone 'could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity' and 'I was racist before it was cool'—were proof enough he was a 'bad dude.'
Others praised Vance for standing up for Elez, however, and Elon Musk appears to be at least considering hiring him back at DOGE.
Musk wrote in an X poll: 'Bring back @DOGE staffer who made inappropriate statements via a now deleted pseudonym?'
The overwhelming majority of users voted in favor of bringing Elez back.
Many in the poll's comments said they agreed with Vance, who also wrote of Elez's situation: 'We shouldn't reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever.'
The Wall Street Journal first revealed Elez's old posts on Thursday. The report said Elez had resigned after the White House was asked to comment about his possible ties to the account.
That account—username @nullllptr—disparaged Indians in the tech sector amid the MAGA civil war between Musk, who supports the H1-B foreign worker visa program, and Trump lackey Steve Bannon, who wants it abolished.
In a post that appeared to be directed at Indian software engineers amid the debate, the account reportedly wrote, '99% of Indian H1Bs will be replaced by slightly smarter LLMs, they're going back don't worry guys.' 'LLMs' stands for Large Language Models , which are artificial intelligence programs that use deep learning to process language.
Elez, a Rutgers University graduate, worked for Musk's SpaceX, Starlink, and X before he landed a gig at DOGE, where he was granted access to the Treasury Department's 'top-secret' payment system.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eater
22 minutes ago
- Eater
La Grenouille, Frozen in Time, Now Serves Fancy Food From a Chinese Chain
A Chinese chain has moved into Upper East Side icon La Grenouille – leaving the dining room pretty much as it has looked for the last 50 years, New York Post first reported. Chinese duck house iDen & Quanjude Beijing Duck House – with only one other location in North America – has opened in the former space, offering 80 seats and the same La Grenouille ambiance – with a very different menu and backstory. The original location of iDen opened in China in 1864 and now has around 50 locations there. Andy Zhang bought the La Grenouille building (3 E. 52nd Street, at Fifth Avenue) last year for an eye-popping $14.2 million; he also owns a location in Vancouver. A manager told t he Post they considered designing the interior like the Canada location, but 'people suggested not to do that, and to keep most of the old La Grenouille because it has so many good memories for New Yorkers,' he said. The restaurant's specialty is the 'Quanjude Signature Beijing Duck,' priced at $128, or a version with caviar for $268. Other items on the menu include an Indonesian bird's nest with malva nut($98) and a 24-inch sea cucumber ($88). Dhamaka (119 Delancey Street, at Essex Street) on the Lower East Side is rolling out a regional Indian brunch for $45 per person from 11:30 a.m. to 2:15 p.m. weekends. It starts with a journey through Kashmiri Wazwan, according to a spokesperson. Dishes include a choice of paneer Kanti with chiles or murg tujj, grilled yogurt-marinated chicken. Second-course choices are chaman kaliya, paneer in yellow gravy, or gushtaba, mutton meatballs. Another new brunch option comes from Preston Clark's Bar Mercer (24 W. Houston Street, at Mercer Street), with items like smoked salmon toast, buttermilk blueberry pancakes, hangover pasta, crab cakes Benedict, and a brunch burger topped with bacon and a fried egg. The menu runs Saturday and Sunday; doors open at noon. Döner Haus opens a Bayside, Queens (4004 Bell Boulevard at 40th Avenue) outpost on June 13, but today from 6 to 9 p.m., to celebrate the opening, the shop is offering döner sandwiches for $1. The sandwiches are listed as $12.99, filled with halal beef, chicken, or a combination of both. Döner Haus first opened in the East Village with a logo that Pornhub threatened to sue them over.
Fox News
22 minutes ago
- Fox News
Reporter's Notebook: GOP lawmakers prepare to slash $9.1B from USAID, NPR and PBS in rare vote
DOGE targeted tens of billions of dollars in what it deemed waste, fraud and abuse. But that means nothing unless Congress acts. For the first time in three decades, lawmakers will vote today to claw back money already appropriated. This is money DOGE recommended eliminating, and since Congress has the power of the purse, that requires a roll call vote. Today's spending cancellation plan targets USAID, NPR and PBS. But it's about the math. There is some skepticism among Republicans who support public broadcasting or foreign aid programs. This bill amounts to cutting $9.1 billion in spending. That's a federal teardrop - as Republicans often talk about reining in federal dollars. This is their chance to do it. The vote will be tight, and it would be an embarrassment for House Republicans if the bill fails, and they stumble to implement even a pedestrian cut - especially since they historically talk a good game about the debt and deficits.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns
The spectacular falling out last week between U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire who became one of his closest aides, put the spotlight on two dangerous developments affecting U.S. national security. The breakup provided Schadenfreude to the two men's critics and delivered entertainment value to social media audiences across the world. But it also revealed crucial vulnerabilities deriving from the ways in which important elements of U.S. military and intelligence operations, among others, have been personalized in both men's hands. While this is particularly alarming for the U.S., its repercussions extend beyond U.S. borders, to U.S. allies and others. When the world's most powerful man and the world's wealthiest entrepreneur started lobbing verbal missiles at each other from the social media platforms they each own, the crossfire included threats with serious geopolitical consequences. It may have looked like a high-profile schoolyard scuffle, but the two people involved are so powerful that the clash was far more consequential. It all started when Musk blasted Trump's massive budget bill currently making its way through Congress. If approved, the legislation would add trillions of dollars to the national debt. That was anathema to Musk, whose ostensible role in the Trump administration was to strengthen the government's finances. He initially vowed to slash $2 trillion in spending, later lowering his sights to $1 trillion. Ultimately the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cut less than $200 million, and by some estimates it produced more costs than savings. Still, Musk lambasted the budget bill, and when Trump criticized him for that, it unleashed the furies, with Musk going as far as suggesting Trump should be impeached. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. Among the many threats the erstwhile allies traded was a warning Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that '[t]he easiest way to save money … is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' to which Musk responded on his X platform that his SpaceX company 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' The U.S. depends on the Dragon to send astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station, making it no small threat. Focusing on just these two posts, we can see the danger. First, there's the deeply alarming fact that Trump openly threatened to use the power of the presidency to exact personal revenge. We've seen this many times already since he returned to the presidency less than five months ago, but it's an undemocratic, corrupt practice that may be routine in dictatorships but should be unacceptable in solid democracies. Over the weekend, Trump once again threatened to use the power of his office against Musk, warning of 'very serious consequences' if Musk opted to fund Democratic candidates in next year's midterm congressional elections. In other words, he would use his office for political retribution, another affront against democracy. In addition to canceling contracts, as he suggested on Thursday when the war of words started, Trump could also unleash regulators on Musk's firms. As president, Trump's duty is to make decisions in the national interest. If the contracts made sense before the falling out, they should still make sense after it. But the contracts were actually deeply troubling before, and the dispute and threats highlight just how dangerously dependent the U.S., as well as other countries, have become on companies controlled by a single individual, and a volatile one with a troubling ideology at that. Musk retracted his threats to decommission Dragon, but the mere mention of the possibility alarmed NASA and shocked the space travel community. As mentioned, without Dragon, the U.S. has no way to send its astronauts and supplies to the ISS for now, as an alternative built by Boeing proved unreliable. But the threat to shut down Dragon is minimal compared to other off switches on Musk's console. The Pentagon and the entire U.S. security apparatus have become perilously dependent on Musk's companies. In addition to its contracts for the ISS, SpaceX carries out the overwhelming majority of all satellite launches around the globe, including those of military and intelligence satellites. Then there's the SpaceX subsidiary Starlink and its military version Starshield, both of which have become indispensable communications platforms, and not only for the United States. In 2022, when Russia launched its all-out invasion of Ukraine, Musk provided Starlink equipment to Kyiv, allowing Ukrainian troops to access the internet and communicate with each other and their commanders. A large part of the cost of that arrangement is borne by the Pentagon. The dangers of relying on Musk's company for such a fundamental function in the midst of an active war was already becoming evident when Musk started echoing Russian talking points. Then, a recently published biography of Musk claimed that when the Ukrainians asked for Starlink support in 2022 as part of an operation in Russian-occupied Crimea, Musk refused, saying that attacking the illegally annexed territory was 'going too far.' The revelation raised red flags at the Pentagon, where officials started speaking about the risk represented by Musk's ability to simply deny access to his products in the midst of a conflict. And yet, despite urgent calls by military officials for competitors to provide alternatives, few viable options have emerged. The Boeing space vehicle for taking astronauts to the ISS was a disappointment, and Eutelsat, a Franco-British competitor of Starlink, has launched only 600 satellites compared to Musk's 7,000, which represents the majority of the satellites orbiting Earth. What's more, Eutelsat's user equipment is more cumbersome. This March, while he was still working closely with Trump, Musk posted that 'Ukraine will inevitably lose' the war and noted ominously that Kyiv's 'entire front line would collapse' if he turned Starlink off. That's a not-so-veiled warning about Musk's power to cause havoc not only for Ukraine but for all of Starlink's users, of which the U.S. government is the biggest. The U.S. has a reported $22 billion in federal contracts with SpaceX. Musk already controls the launching of spy satellites as well as much of the communications systems the U.S. uses and would use should it go to war. If Trump launches construction of his promised missile shield, the Golden Dome, Musk would be a major player. This risky dependence on Musk is not the reason Trump has threatened to abuse his presidency against his former friend. That is all about revenge. But the U.S. should do everything in its power to ensure it can carry out its policies and objectives without being at the mercy of any single individual or company, even if that was not something Trump was concerned about before he had a reason to punish Musk. The acrimonious breakup, while entertaining, has also delivered two important warnings. It showed that Trump's use of his office for personal vendettas has become a regular, openly deployed practice in this presidency. And it has provided an urgent reminder that the U.S. and other countries have become dangerously dependent on the unpredictable and untrustworthy Musk. Frida Ghitis is WPR's senior columnist and a contributor to CNN and The Washington Post. Her WPR column appears every Thursday. You can follow her on Twitter and Threads at @fridaghitis. The post The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns appeared first on World Politics Review.
