UMN grad student remains in ICE custody despite immigration court ruling
The Brief
An immigration judge has ruled the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cannot deport University of Minnesota grad student Dogukan Gunaydin.
DHS is appealing the ruling.
Gunaydin remains in ICE custody at the Sherburne County jail as the appeal plays out.
An immigration judge has ruled the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cannot deport University of Minnesota graduate student Dogukan Gunaydin, terminating removal proceedings against him. Yet, Gunaydin remains in custody as DHS appeals the ruling.
What we know
An Immigration Court judge has ruled the government cannot deport University of Minnesota graduate student, Gunaydin, terminating removal proceedings against him.
FOX 9 has obtained Judge Sarah Mazzie's six-page ruling. In her ruling, Mazzie sided with the Turkish graduate student and his legal team, terminating deportation proceedings against him. DHS is appealing her ruling. So, for now, Gunaydin remains behind bars at the Sherburne County Jail in Elk River.
"The court concludes DHS has not met its burden to establish removability by clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence. Therefore, the court terminates removal proceedings," Judge Mazzie wrote.
Experts tell FOX 9 an appeals case in Immigration Court can take months to resolve.
Dig deeper
Gunaydin has been in ICE custody since Mach 27 after he was arrested near his off-campus apartment in St. Paul.
The government revoked Gunaydin's student visa and began deportation proceedings against him because of a previous drunk driving offense in which his blood alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit.
DHS argues the 2023 arrest makes him a risk to public safety and warrants returning him to his native Turkey.
Judge Mazzie acknowledged the seriousness of Gunaydin's offense, writing, "The facts of this case leave no doubt that [Gunaydin] engaged in dangerous activity. However, the evidence is insufficient to establish he placed a large segment of the general population at risk."
In conclusion, Mazzie found DHS did not meet its burden to deport Gunaydin.
What they're saying
"The Immigration Judge erred in failing to find that driving dangerously while severely intoxicated is criminal activity that endangers public safety and as a result erred in terminating the removal proceedings," wrote DHS attorney Laura Trosen.
FOX 9 previously reported a federal court judge has issued a temporary restraining order barring DHS and ICE from moving Gunaydin out of the district of Minnesota during his case proceedings.
What's next
In light of Judge Mazzie's ruling, a previously scheduled hearing for Gunaydin in immigration court on Tuesday has been canceled. The Board of Immigration Appeals has set a Thursday deadline for the two sides to submit their initial briefs in the appeal proceedings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
ICE directed to pause immigration arrests at farms, hotels and restaurants, sources tell CBS News
Wife of man detained by ICE in L.A. opens up about his arrest The Trump administration has directed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to halt arrests at farms, restaurants and hotels amid concerns that the president's crackdown on illegal immigration is hurting key industries, two sources familiar with the abrupt policy change told CBS News. The pause on worksite immigration enforcement operations applies to the agricultural, hospitality and restaurant industries, which rely in large part on labor from immigrants, many of whom are in the U.S. unlawfully, the sources said, requesting anonymity to discuss internal actions. The scaling back of some ICE operations reflects increased concern among industry leaders that the Trump administration's aggressive and government-wide immigration crackdown was hindering their businesses and the broader U.S. economy by spooking their workforce. It also marks a significant pivot for the Trump administration, which has vowed to deport millions of immigrants living in the country without legal status, regardless of whether they have criminal histories. And it comes amid a vast expansion in immigration arrests across the U.S. that has triggered protests against ICE activity in major American cities, including Los Angeles, where Mr. Trump has deployed the National Guardsmen and U.S. Marines in response to instances of violence. Asked about the catalyst for the sudden decision to limit ICE enforcement, one of the sources said the president was not aware of the scale of the agency's operations. "When it hit him, he pulled it back," the source said. Asked about the move, Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said, "We will follow the President's direction and continue to work to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off of America's streets." The New York Times first reported the move. Mr. Trump came into office in January promising to launch the largest deportation effort in U.S. history. His administration quickly reversed limits on ICE operations put in place by previous administrations and moved to revoke the legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants, greatly expanding the pool of those at risk of being arrested and deported. In recent weeks, ICE arrests have increased sharply, with the agency adopting more aggressive tactics, including efforts to arrest migrants and asylum-seekers attending their court hearings and check-in appointments. So far in June, ICE has averaged more than 1,300 arrests each day, a more than 100% increase from President Trump's first 100 days in office, when the agency recorded a 660 daily arrest rate, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News. On Saturday, ICE was holding more than 56,000 individuals in detention facilities throughout the country, a record high, the figures show. While ICE operations have expanded recently, the arrests recorded by the agency remain well below the 3,000 daily arrest rate pushed by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on Fox News.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A ‘concerned' Mainer's tip got an immigrant wrongly detained for 65 days
This story appears as part of a collaboration between The Maine Monitor and Maine Focus, the investigative team of the Bangor Daily News, a partnership to strengthen investigative journalism in Maine. You can show your support for this effort with a donation to The Monitor. Read more about the partnership. Border agents in Calais wrongfully arrested a Venezuelan man with lawful documentation to work and reside in the U.S. earlier this spring after a 'concerned citizen' reported his construction crew's van at a local gas station, according to court documents. Jeanfranco Alejandro Flores Salazar went on to spend 65 days behind bars in federal detention centers around New England without any legal basis for imprisonment, a period of detention that federal officials later acknowledged was an 'error' and 'oversight.' The details of his case demonstrate the kind of mistakes that some say are happening more around the country with immigration officials under pressure from President Donald Trump's administration to deliver on his campaign promise of record deportations. April apprehensions here hit a 24-year high, and the government has promoted arrests of alleged gang members. This very different type of case was detailed in filings in a U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, where Flores Salazar filed a petition seeking to be released from custody. He was freed May 10. This week, a judge issued a ruling outlining the errors and ordering the government to remove an ankle monitor and supervision provisions imposed when he was released. 'Put simply, the evidence overwhelmingly establishes, including through concessions by and , that Flores Salazar was detained without any lawful basis,' U.S. District Court Judge Leo Sorokin wrote in Wednesday's strongly worded decision. Spokespeople for CBP and ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the case. Flores Salazar's Massachusetts-based attorney, Claire Maguire, declined comment. Last July, Flores Salazar arranged for an interview with border agents in Texas after fleeing political persecution in Venezuela, hoping to seek asylum in the U.S., court documents say. Due to a lack of criminal history or previous immigration violations, the agents granted him parole, meaning he could remain free in the country for two years so long as he formally applied for asylum within a year. He later obtained authorization to work and got a job with a construction company that took him to job sites around the country. That job took him to Down East Maine. On March 4, a Calais resident called the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and reported a black van with out-of-state plates 'transporting approximately seven possible illegal aliens,' according to the judge's decision. Two agents found the van the following morning at the Calais Motor Inn, encountering six men loading into a truck on their way to a job site, including Flores Salazar. Flores Salazar and three others produced valid work permits. Even so, he and others were brought to the Calais station, where court records show the agents performed a records check revealing Flores Salazar's previous meeting with agents in Texas. An official at the Calais station authorized an arrest warrant for the man anyway, according to the filing. In federal court, the agency would later say the agents were not aware the parole granted to Flores Salazar was still in effect, calling the mistake an 'administrative oversight.' The judge in Massachusetts did not buy that: 'It is undisputed that Flores Salazar had permission to be in the United States on March 5, that he had committed no crime, and that CBP knew these things when it detained him,' Sorokin wrote this week. Flores Salazar then spent more than two months in detention in Vermont and Massachusetts in the custody of ICE. During that period, he received a notice that his parole had been revoked, though the judge who reviewed his detention would later acknowledge that federal officials were unable to later provide a reason for the revocation and cannot revoke it without one. An ICE official only conducted a review of his case after Flores Salazar filed a petition on April 29 challenging the legality of his imprisonment. In that petition, he claimed that the border agents who arrested him in Maine told him they were detaining him to see if his work permit and Social Security number were fake. An ICE official later attributed the man's detention to 'human error,' according to the judge's decision this week.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Trump Is Not Winning in Los Angeles
I wrote this week that Donald Trump's response to the Los Angeles protests demonstrates his weakness, not his strength. When I argued this point, there was some polling, but not a whole lot. Now, at the end of the week, we have a lot more data, and — White House spin notwithstanding — the politics of this action looks terrible for the president. Writing for his Strength in Numbers newsletter, G. Elliott Morris put together a useful chart of this week's polling as it relates to the L.A. protests, Trump and immigration. When asked if they approved of the way the president is handling immigration, majorities of Americans in polls from The Associated Press, Quinnipiac University and The Washington Post said no. Trump received a positive rating of 49 percent approval in a survey conducted by YouGov for The Economist. His average net approval on immigration is around -7 points. On the question of deportations, both YouGov and Quinnipiac find negative ratings for the president, for an average net approval of roughly -14 points. More Americans disapprove than approve of Trump's decision to send troops to Los Angeles, for an average net approval of nearly -8 points, and a solid majority of Americans, 56 percent according to YouGov, say that state and local officials should take the lead on responding to protests in Los Angeles, as opposed to the 25 percent who say it should be a federal responsibility. As for the protests themselves, more Americans disapprove than approve, for an average net approval rating of -5 points. What these numbers tell me is that with a more measured approach, Trump might have been able to win this confrontation and bring Americans around to his position. As it stands, a draconian use of force against largely peaceful protesters — in service of a brutal campaign of deportations — has turned the public against him, even as it dislikes the protests themselves. And I expect that the manhandling and handcuffing of Senator Alex Padilla of California during a news conference held by Kristi Noem, secretary of homeland security — a stunning abuse of power — will worsen the president's position with most Americans. Today, in cities and towns across the country, some number of Americans — maybe even you — will be protesting against the administration and in opposition to the White House's monarchical pretensions. As I am writing this, there is no way to know the scale of these demonstrations. But something tells me that the events of this week have activated many Americans in a way that will prove detrimental to the president's authoritarian goals. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
