U.K. parliament votes to bar prosecution for abortions in England, Wales
LONDON — British lawmakers voted Tuesday to decriminalize the termination of pregnancies after 24 weeks in England in Wales, marking the biggest change to abortion laws in England and Wales in decades.
Lawmakers voted 379 to 137 in favor of an amendment that would prevent the criminal prosecution of someone suspected of having an unlawful abortion.
Abortion in England and Wales is illegal under the 1861 Offences against the Person Act — a Victorian-era law that makes abortion a criminal offense that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. That bill was written at a time when women could not vote, own property after marriage, or access higher education.
Tuesday's vote follows an increase in recent years in investigations and prosecutions of people suspected of having illegal abortions.
That abortion is technically illegal in England and Wales surprises many people, including those living here, as access to the procedure is widespread. The amended 1967 Abortion Act carved out exceptions, allowing abortions at up to 24 weeks if approved by two doctors. But outside of specific criteria, it is still a criminal offense.
Tuesday's vote will remove the criminal penalties for having an abortion, even outside of these parameters.
Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour lawmaker who championed the amendment, said it was a 'once in a generation' opportunity and the 'right change at the right time.' Antoniazzi also insisted that the rules under the 1967 Act for how abortion services are provided will not change.
Until recent years, prosecutions were almost unheard of. But campaigners say that around 100 women over the past decade were investigated for suspected unlawful abortions. Since December 2022, six have been charged.
Among them was Nicola Packer, 45, who was arrested in a hospital after taking abortion pills during the coronavirus lockdown. She denied knowing that she was 26 weeks pregnant. Four years later, after a trial in which intimate details of her personal life were examined, a jury found her not guilty. But the case sparked calls to update abortion laws.
'There must be no more Nicola Packers,' Antoniazzi told the House of Commons on Tuesday.
Louise McCudden, U.K. head of external affairs for MSI Reproductive Choices, one of Britain's biggest abortion providers, called the prosecutions 'a real anomaly in our law. Even in places like Texas, they don't tend to prosecute the woman herself.'
'The investigations themselves have been horrific,' McCudden said. 'In some cases, women have been separated from their children, their names made public, they've received death threats, they didn't take pills but had a stillbirth or a miscarriage.'
The rise of investigations coincided with a legal change that allowed access to abortion pills that can be taken at home at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.
Surveys show that the overwhelming majority of Britons favor making abortion legal. But polls also show that most people don't support extending the legal time limit beyond 24 weeks' gestation.
Critics of the amendment argued that it would effectively legalize self-induced abortion at any point up until birth.
Rebecca Paul, a Conservative member of Parliament, told the House of Commons that the change would mean 'fully developed babies up to term could be aborted by a woman with no consequences.'
Many European countries in recent years have expanded abortion rights. Denmark and Norway recently extended the legal limit from 12 to 18 weeks. Last year, France enshrined abortion as a 'guaranteed freedom' into its Constitution, and Ireland liberalized its laws after a public referendum in 2018.
Other countries have maintained or tightened access. The current Polish government has failed to deliver on a pledge to liberalize the country's extremely restrictive laws. In 2022, Hungary made it mandatory for those seeking an abortion to listen to fetal vital signs.
Campaigners on both sides of the debate have said they have been energized by the rollback of abortion rights in the United States.
Stella Creasy, a Labour lawmaker who has been pushing for a more comprehensive reform of abortion law, told Parliament on Tuesday: 'Listen to our American counterparts who bitterly regret not having acted under Biden and Obama … and now find themselves with medics being prosecuted and dragged across state lines.'
Tuesday's vote was a free one, allowing lawmakers to vote their conscience rather than in line with their party — as is customary with ethical issues such as abortion or assisted dying. The amendment is part of the Crime and Policing Bill, which is weaving its way through Parliament and is likely to become law later this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israel-Iran conflict exposes the true cost of North Sea decline
Israel's war with Iran is drawing attention to oil prices again, as the world watches nervously for disruptions to global supplies. The conflict has turned attention back to Labour's proposed ban on new drilling in the North Sea, one of the party's most eye-catching policies in last year's election. The pledge not to issue new oil and gas licences is based on 'science', according to Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, amid projections that licensing any new fields globally would be incompatible with net zero targets. In its election manifesto, Labour also argued that allowing more extraction from the North Sea 'will not take a penny off bills, cannot make us energy secure and will only accelerate the worsening climate crisis'. It was a premise that was questioned by some experts but won praise from others, as well as from environmental campaigners. But critics warn it risks leaving Britain more exposed to geopolitical crises. It's no secret that the North Sea is in decline. Whether Labour presses ahead with a ban on new licences or not, Britain's oil and gas output will continue to fall. But while that fall is inevitable, the rate of decline is not. The independent Climate Change Committee estimates that there will be demand for between 13bn and 15bn barrels of oil and gas in the UK over the next 25 years. Under current policies, less than one third of this overall demand is expected to be met by domestic production. That is equivalent to about 4bn barrels, with an estimated 3bn that could be exploited left underground. The balance would come from foreign imports. Mr Miliband has said boosting production would bring no material benefit to consumers because oil and gas prices are set by international markets and the output of the North Sea is too small to make a difference. But while many economists agree up to a point, some say this argument misses the importance of energy security. 'As long as you are a big importer, it doesn't make sense to reduce your production,' says Bjarne Schieldrop, analyst at SEB Research. 'What you need to do is to reduce your consumption as fast as possible. Energy has become more politically sensitive in recent years, with Russia using energy as a weapon. 'So actually, security of supply is extremely important. It's not just about the price.' Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Liberum, adds that if Britain and Europe produce more oil and gas collectively, they would be less dependent during a crisis on supplies shipped from the Middle East. In a global supply crunch, it is still unlikely that the UK would be at risk of shortages given its ability to outbid poorer countries for shipments when prices rise. However, French adds: 'Why would you leave yourself so exposed to doing that, when you potentially have the opportunity to divert your own domestic supply and give yourself more strategic resilience?' Producing more oil and gas domestically also brings other benefits in a crisis. In a scenario where the Iran-Israel conflict spreads, one of the biggest worries would be the prospect of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz seizing up. Around one fifth of the world's oil passes through this vital trade artery. 'If it's disrupted for any protracted period of time, then either global demand needs to fall substantially – which means a pretty deep recession – or the price of oil has to go up to ration it,' says French. In such a time, Britain would face higher oil and gas prices like every other country. But as a producer, it would also benefit from higher tax revenues, giving the Government more firepower to boost the flagging economy. For example, when the invasion of Ukraine sparked an energy crisis across Europe in 2022, the UK's tax take from company profits also jumped from £2.6bn to £9.8bn, providing valuable cash for schemes to support households with their bills. 'If the Exchequer feels that it needs to cap the price of energy, as it did previously, it rather helps if you're getting higher corporation tax receipts from the North Sea,' adds French. Another factor to consider is the impact the Government's windfall tax and licence ban will have on decommissioning, the process of safely retiring spent or uneconomical oil and gas wells. Analysts at Wood Mackenzie and Stifel have both argued that Labour's policies will speed up the rate of closures. This could make life harder for Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, because oil and gas firms can offset decommissioning costs against their corporation tax bills. As a result, squeezing the North Sea may deal a double whammy to tax receipts by cutting output and accelerating decommissioning. This is partly because oil and gas firms continuously drill new wells alongside old ones to improve the economic viability of their portfolios as a whole. Without the ability to keep drilling new wells, it becomes harder to continue drilling old ones economically. 'If you were to continue to licence, then that extends the life cycle of some fields, and therefore decommissioning comes later in the fiscal horizon,' says French. 'So you would start to rebuild more fiscal headroom than you might otherwise have – and one thing the Chancellor definitely needs, going into the autumn, is more fiscal headroom.' Mr Miliband's claim that cutting domestic oil and gas production is good for the planet may also be in doubt. This is because unless Britain also slashes demand for these fuels substantially, it will simply have to import larger quantities from abroad. And that could actually end up generating higher carbon emissions overall, if we continue to rely on larger and larger amounts of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the US and the Middle East. According to Rystad Energy, LNG can be up to 10 times more carbon intensive than pipeline gas. This is because while the emissions from burning it are the same, it requires energy to cool LNG to -160C and transport it by ship around the world. The analysis, reported by the BBC, found that piped gas from Norway generated around 7kg of CO2 per barrel, compared to an average of 70kg for LNG imported to Europe. Accelerating the decline of the North Sea may mean the UK also ends up with fewer green jobs. Academics at Robert Gordon University warned that oil and gas jobs were disappearing faster than new clean energy roles were being created as a result of the slower-than-expected deployment of wind farms. Whereas the offshore wind sector may only generate 29,000 jobs by 2030, some 58,000 disappear from oil and gas in the worst-case scenario. Paul de Leeuw, director of the university's Energy Transition Institute, said earlier this month: 'You have to wait pretty well to the back end of this decade before there's enough capacity in the renewables sector to take all the people coming out of oil and gas. 'It's a timing issue.' To avoid heavy job losses, researchers said Mr Miliband needed to either attract a larger share of turbine manufacturing to the UK or reverse his ban on new North Sea drilling licences to temporarily boost oil and gas production. For example, the report found that even if Mr Miliband hits his clean power targets, he could boost the number of green jobs in 2030 by boosting oil and gas production. Production of 500,000 barrels per day leads to just over 150,000 jobs – whereas production of 700,000 barrels creates around 200,000 jobs. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero is consulting on a plan for the North Sea and says it envisions large numbers of jobs coming from offshore wind as well as more nascent industries such as carbon capture and hydrogen production. A department spokesman said: 'We are closely monitoring the situation in the Middle East. As the Chancellor said on Sunday: things are moving rapidly – we will follow that closely and will always do everything in our power to protect ordinary working people in this country. 'Increased domestic production of oil won't affect the price being set internationally. In fact, even if we extracted every drop of oil in the North Sea, this would not make any difference to the price people pay at the pump. 'Recent events underscore the importance of our mission to make the UK a clean energy superpower, to get off the roller-coaster of international fossil fuel markets, replacing it with clean homegrown power we control, to protect family and national finances.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Flagship welfare reform plans to be introduced in Parliament
The Government's flagship reforms to the welfare system are expected to have their first outing in Parliament on Wednesday. The Welfare Reform Bill will be introduced in the House of Commons, and its text will be published so MPs can begin scrutiny of the proposals. The major reforms are set to include the tightening of criteria for the main disability benefit in England, personal independence payment (Pip). I'll vote against these awful welfare reforms. A Labour government should lift people out of poverty, not put people into it. If you agree, then please write to your MP and tell them that. — Brian Leishman (@BrianLeishmanMP) June 17, 2025 Ministers also want to cut the sickness related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim it. The package of reforms is aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work, and the Government hopes it can save up to £5 billion a year by doing so. But ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. The Bill is set to be introduced as the latest benefits data has shown that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. The latest data, published by the Department for Work and Pensions on Tuesday, showed there were a record 3.74 million people in England and Wales claiming Pip as of April this year. The figure is up from 3.69 million in January and a jump of 200,000 from 3.54 million a year earlier. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Teenagers and young adults account for a growing proportion of those getting Pip. Some 16.5% of claimants in April this year were aged 16-19, up from 14.6% in April 2019. The 30-44 age group has similarly grown, while the number of 45-59 year-olds has fallen. The figure for 60-74 year-olds has risen slightly over this period, from 29.3% to 30.8%. It was reported in recent days that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has agreed to include 'non-negotiable' protections in the Bill, including a guarantee that those who no longer qualify for Pip will still receive the payments for 13 weeks, rather than just four weeks. The concession is seen as a move to avert a rebellion by Labour MPs opposed to the overall reforms, but have been described as 'not very much really' by one such parliamentarian. Downing Street insisted it was 'crucial to say we are committed to the reforms that we've set out'. A No 10 spokesman said: 'You've heard that from the Prime Minister, the Chancellor, the Work and Pensions Secretary, on the principles behind this and the urgent need for this. 'You have the statistics, they show we have the highest level of working age inactivity due to ill health in Western Europe. 'We're the only major economy whose employment rate hasn't recovered since the pandemic.' Pip will remain 'an important non-means-tested benefit for disabled people and people with long-term health conditions, regardless of whether they are in or out of work', he said, but added the Government would build a 'system that is fairer' through its reforms. It is thought the restrictions on Pip would slash benefits for about 800,000 people. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK economic growth downgraded due to tariffs and cost hikes
US tariffs and higher costs for firms mean the UK economy is set to grow at a slower rate than previously predicted, according to new forecasts. Rising costs are set to cause 'weak' business investment and weigh on the Government's ambitions to accelerate growth in the UK economy, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) said. The influential trade body's latest economic forecast indicated that the UK economy is on track to grow by 1.2% this year. It had previously predicted a rise of 1.6%. It also downgraded its growth forecast for 2026 from 1.5% to 1% for the year. The CBI highlighted that the UK has seen strong growth over the start of the year, rising by 0.7% in the first three months of 2025. But it suggested underlying activity 'remains sluggish' due to persistently weak demand and gloomy sentiment among businesses. It added that higher employment costs linked to the autumn budget, including rises to national insurance contributions and the increased national minimum wage, have impacted firms. It said this has fed into higher pricing and reduced capital expenditure and hiring among many firms. Meanwhile, higher US tariffs from President Trump's administration have also created headwinds for exports to the US and hindered investment from multinational companies in the UK. It comes after Donald Trump and the Prime Minister finalised a US-UK deal intended to slash trade barriers on goods from both countries while at the G7 summit in Canada earlier this week. Louise Hellem, chief economist at the CBI, said: 'Our latest economic forecast underlines the challenges facing businesses and the wider economy as they're buffeted by domestic and global headwinds. 'The unpredictable global outlook combined with rising employment costs, gloomy business sentiment, and subdued investment intentions means it's more important than ever that government pulls all the levers it can to set the UK on a path to sustainable growth. 'With GDP (gross domestic product) set to remain modest in 2026, there is an important opportunity for the government to fire up the growth agenda in the forthcoming Industrial Strategy. 'With the cumulative burden of increased costs being felt by firms across the economy, it is vital the Industrial Strategy helps drive a thriving environment for all businesses.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data