Mayor Brandon Johnson to appoint Ald. Carlos Ramirez-Rosa to lead Park District
Mayor Brandon Johnson plans to appoint a top City Council ally to helm the Chicago Park District, making good on his promise to reset his administration by elevating loyal faces midway through his term.
The mayor will recommend Ald. Carlos Ramirez-Rosa, 35th, to be Parks superintendent after Rosa Escareno submitted her resignation letter Wednesday, Ramirez-Rosa told the Tribune.
Escareno's exit, effective March 31, will cap off four years of leading the Park District and came in the wake of Johnson's earlier warnings this month of a firing spree apparently focused on holdovers from past mayoral administrations.
The Park District Board of Commissioners on Friday will approve Ramirez-Rosa's appointment, effective April 1. His ascension would further increase progressive representation within Johnson's leadership team, as the mayor hinted was the goal in his Feb. 10 remarks.
'If you ain't with us, you just gotta go,' Johnson said then.
It would also open up a midterm vacancy in City Council that provides Johnson his first chance to exercise his mayoral powers to appoint an alderman. And while the mayor will surely seek a candidate who shares his progressive, pro-labor stripes, Ramirez-Rosa's departure would likely shake up the power dynamic in City Council, especially on the left.
The three-term Logan Square alderman would be vacating his seat during an uncharted moment for the progressive faction of City Council that he's invested much time in shaping.
The first Democratic Socialist elected to the body in 2015, Ramirez-Rosa quickly carved a space as the body's most outspoken voice on the left — and a consistent thorn in the side of his moderate colleagues.
Five more Democratic Socialists joined him on the council in 2019.
Four years later, Johnson's historic 2023 election would pave the way for Ramirez-Rosa to rise to the plum gigs of Zoning committee chair and the mayor's floor leader, the latter of which is tasked with whipping support for his agenda. Ramirez-Rosa helped secure a trio of early wins for the administration that summer in abolishing tipped minimum wage, expanding paid time off and placing Bring Chicago Home on the March 2024 ballot.
But he would only benefit from half a year of being the mayor's chief proxy on council. In November, he resigned from his two leadership roles after Ald. Emma Mitts and other colleagues accused him of using his Zoning post to intimidate them — allegations he denied but grew into a political liability for Johnson.
'I felt like I was back in the south,' Mitts, currently the council's longest serving Black female alderman, said on the floor during an emotional debate over whether to formally censure Ramirez-Rosa.
She later voted against the item — which would have made Ramirez-Rosa the first Chicago alderman to be censured in modern history. Instead, the body deadlocked 24-24, and Johnson had to come to his ally's rescue and cast his first tie-breaker as mayor.
Since then, Ramirez-Rosa has remained one of the mayor's most reliable council votes. That the sun is apparently setting on his aldermanic career less than two years after he rose to the most influential perches in City Council spells a remarkable sea change for not just Ramirez-Rosa's political trajectory but also the fragility of Johnson's progressive coalition that ushered him into office.
The move to the Park District would also open up the City Council's first midterm vacancy in three years and allow Johnson his first mayoral appointment to the body. Whoever is tapped to replace Ramirez-Rosa would need a majority of aldermanic approval.
Chicago is one of the few Illinois governments where — depending on timing — the mayor has the power to appoint replacements for City Council vacancies rather than hold a special election, thanks to a 1978 state law. Mayors have often wielded that tool for allies on the council to time retirements strategically so they can be replaced with another friendly face.
Lightfoot made four aldermanic appointments to fill vacancies upon retirements or, in the 11th Ward's case, Ald. Patrick Daley Thompson's federal tax fraud conviction booting him from holding office. But those four appointees found that being tied to an unpopular incumbent was a liability when it came time to run for a full term in 2023.
Ramirez-Rosa has had an eye on posts outside the council for a while. He ran as Daniel Biss's running mate in the 2018 governor's race, but was dropped from the ticket over his support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel. And he ran for former U.S. Rep. Luis Gutiérrez's open seat that same year before withdrawing to endorse Jesus 'Chuy' Garcia.
One of the youngest aldermen elected to City Council, Ramirez-Rosa played a key role in sharpening the current sanctuary city ordinance that prevents Chicago police from cooperating with federal immigration cases during Republican President Donald Trump's first time. It was that policy he was seeking to protect when he landed in hot water over blocking Mitts from entering the council chambers.
He has been a staunch voice on police reform, including as a supporter of the 'defund the police' movement in the wake of the 2020 George Floyd's police murder in Minneapolis and, before that, the 'No Cop Academy' campaign to stop the creation of a Chicago police training facility on the West Side.
Ramirez-Rosa is a longtime ally of the Chicago Teachers Union, which has contributed to his political fund over the years. He spoke out in support of the labor group throughout its struggle with former Mayor Lori Lightfoot over returning to in-person classes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Higher bills ahead: Honolulu City Council OKs sewer fee hike in $5.1B budget
HONOLULU (KHON2) — The city's $5.1 billion budget passed after a marathon city council session that ended at 9 p.m. June 4. Some of the additions include money for expanded ambulance service, traffic safety upgrades near schools and fully funding the new Department of Ocean Safety. Justice found for victim of viscous dog attack in Manoa But it's a controversial sewer fee increase that was the biggest issue debated. The city administration earlier had proposed a 115% increase over the next 10 years, starting at a 10% hike. What passed by a slim five-to-four vote was a measure proposed by the city budget committee to minimize the impact on consumers. The new payment schedule will split sewer bills between a 40% base rate for sewage services and a 60% variable rate based on water usage, as an incentive to reduce water consumption.'The lower the amount of water that you use, the lower your bill is going to be. But the fact of the matter is, most people use about 6,000 gallons a month, or 9,000 gallons a month, so it's going to affect the most amount of people at that level,' said City Council Chair Tommy Waters. The rate schedule assumes yearly increases for the next six years of 6%, 7.5%, 8.5%, 9%, 9% and 9%. An annual 3% increase would kick in starting in 2033. The increases are required to pay for $2.5 billion upgrades to Oahu's largest sewage treatment plant on Sand Island and $10 billion for improvements to the island's sewer lines and pump stations. Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news Waters had proposed moving money from the Transit Accommodations Tax and unused funds from vacant city department positions to help lower the sewer fees. But the city's budget director warned it could negatively impact the city's bond rating, making it harder to borrow money. 'I couldn't convince my colleagues to do that this year. It was a bold step. The administration did not support it. And you know, I'm not going to give up, though this is too important to give up.' Waters said. The mayor is expected to sign the full budget into law. The new sewer fee structure would take effect starting January 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Op-Ed: Care For Constituents Or Chaos? Medicaid Cuts Will Devastate All Of Us
Source: Jemal Countess / Getty In our country, which has so much abundance, poverty shouldn't be a death sentence. However, proposed cuts to Medicaid will cause many individuals, families and communities to suffer for that very reason–poverty. Significant and potentially massive cuts to Medicaid will cause irreparable harm. Shockwaves will reverberate in rural, urban, and suburban communities, and impact individuals, working families, many of our most fragile elderly and our most vulnerable young and disabled. I offer this perspective as a public health practitioner. I have spent my career supporting and advancing health systems in our country, across Louisiana, the Gulf Coast, and in our nation's capital, Washington, D.C., Medicaid supports our workforce and health systems (hospitals and clinics), in addition to individuals, families, and communities Medicaid provides insurance to people with low incomes and people who have disabilities. This includes many individuals who work, but still don't work jobs with health insurance, work part-time, or don't make enough to cover insurance. It is the nation's single largest health insurance program. And it is wildly popular. More than 96% of Americans believe the program is important in their communities and recent national polls from January 2025 found that 80% of Americans have a favorable view of Medicaid. Some may wonder if I am overreacting. I'm not. More than 70 million Americans receive health care coverage under the Medicaid program. In Louisiana, where I live, one-third of our adult population is on Medicaid, and the percentage of coverage is even higher in rural areas. In fact, Medicaid plays a much larger role in covering rural communities in Louisiana and across our country than it does in metro/areas. In other parts of the South, like rural Kentucky, more than 40% of the population is on Medicaid. These individuals, like all of us, want nothing more than to live healthy and thriving lives while making ends meet for their families and making their children's futures more prosperous. The public may envision people on Medicaid as unworthy of receiving assistance. But there is no one profile of a Medicaid recipient. They come from all backgrounds, all races and ethnicities, all ages and all communities. In fact, most low-income Americans, whether rural or urban, Black or White, Republican or Democrat, share an economic fate impacted by hardship, and the solution to their support and prosperity is also shared. For instance, 'The number of people earning less than $25,750 for a family of four is rising in both Republican and Democratic districts, and across racial and geographic lines.' It's also important to understand the range of services people receive from Medicaid. Services include everything from general health services, to behavioral health (mental health and substance use) services, disability services, maternal health supports and more. Impacts across all of these areas could be devastating with federal and state cuts to beneficiaries or benefits. For example, maternal health outcomes, particularly maternal mortality, continue to devastate families and communities across our country. Louisiana had the nation's fourth-highest maternal mortality rate in 2021 at 60.9 deaths per 100,000 births, but I know this is not just a Louisiana problem; it's a national one. The March of Dimes reported that '870 maternal deaths occurred each year…and every year 50,000 women experience a life-threatening complication (sometimes called a near-miss)' or severe maternal health complication. With such high risk, good coverage and high-quality care is more important than ever, and over 42% of all births in our country are covered by Medicaid. Reducing these Medicaid benefits would be disastrous to mothers, babies and families. Chancing the lives of mothers and babies is simply too risky! While I referenced maternal health, Medicaid supports the existence of healthier communities. Beyond the immediacy of illness, sick people can't work, study, or play. They can't contribute to their families, our communities, and the country's economy—from kids, to employers, to the GDP, everyone loses. Our nation's health systems, from rural health centers to large urban hospital systems receive critical funding to cover the millions of peoples seeking care. The healthcare sector, one of the most important sectors of our economy overall, relies heavily on Medicaid reimbursement to sustain jobs and services. Cuts of great magnitude will threaten clinics, hospitals and medical providers. We will see the impacts of this immediately in rural regions with the shuttering of services, significant job losses, and further diminishing already challenged access to care. With health care shortages already existing, our conversations need to be continued around closing the gaps in access, not creating new chasms. Now more than ever, we need our leaders and legislative champions to protect our communities and their health and well-being! Given the adverse impact Medicaid cuts would have on the nation, we need to boldly reject proposals that will weaken the program and impact all of our communities. Given its importance, some may wonder why elected leaders would want to cut the program. Some legislators propose cutting Medicaid as part of a broader plan to give $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. Others want to lower the federal deficit, a $1.1 trillion deficit at the end of February 2025. Policymakers should not attempt to bring down federal spending with ill-conceived strategies that will only add to Americans' suffering. They should instead think strategically about taxation. Legislators can bring a great deal of confidence in their leadership by examining other alternatives to drastic Medicaid cuts, by reminding us that they care for all of their constituents, and that they are creating a vision for a healthier future based on their community's needs—timely doctors' visits, healthy births, high quality mental health care and substance use supports—not disregarding, or even worse targeting the thing that keeps us safe and well. Shelina Davis is the Chief Executive Officer of the Louisiana Public Health Institute. SEE ALSO: 'We All Are Going To Die': Joni Ernst's Chilling Defense Of Medicaid Cuts Sparks Outrage At Iowa Town Hall The Midnight Medicaid Cuts: Why The GOP's Reconciliation Bill Is A Raw Deal For The American People SEE ALSO Op-Ed: Care For Constituents Or Chaos? Medicaid Cuts Will Devastate All Of Us was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Leaves Democratic Party
Source: The Washington Post / Getty If you haven't grown tired of CNN host Jake Tapper, who has been on a crusade to bash the Democratic Party to help sell his book, wait till you hear from Karine Jean-Pierre. That's right, the first black person and the first openly LGBTQ person to serve as the White House press secretary has not only written a book bashing her time in office, but she's left the Democratic Party and is now an Independent, according to a press release announcing her new book, Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines . While Jean Pierre is not definitive over her reasoning for abandoning the Democratic Party, she did note that she's chosen to 'look beyond party lines' and is embracing 'life as an independent,' adding that this decision didn't come lightly, ABC News reports. 'Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States,' Jean-Pierre said in a statement, ABC News reports. 'At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country.' Jean-Pierre's departure comes as the Democratic Party is looking to gain any kind of traction following Donald Trump's election win in 2024. 'I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes,' she said in the release. 'We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically. We need to be clear-eyed and questioning, rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past.' 'Freeing ourselves of boxes is truly at the heart and soul of my new book, Independent,' she added. Jean-Pierre may be the highest-ranking Black woman to leave the Democratic Party, but she won't be the last. Many Black women have grown weary of supporting a party that blindly neglects their interests. Black women are not just supporters of Democrats; they are the backbone of the party. From The Guardian : Black women have been the most ardent supporters of the Democratic Party. Most recently, in the 2024 election, they voted for Kamala Harris at 92%. Since 1972, Black people's overall support for Democrats has stayed at about 90% during a presidential election, with Black women voting even more Democratic than Black men. No other demographic has maintained that level of voter loyalty for a political party. Publishers note that the book will provide a glimpse into the White House as Democrats pushed for President Joe Biden to drop off the 2024 ticket due to 'the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision.' ABC News notes that Jean-Pierre became White House press secretary on May 13, 2022, after Jen Psaki stepped down, and served in that role until the end of President Biden's term in office. She also worked under former President Barack Obama and Vice President Kamala Harris. The book is scheduled to be released on October 21. Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Leaves Democratic Party was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
