Sanders and Kennedy Trade Barbs on Vaccines and Health Care
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, sparking a heated exchange between the two at the end of the Senate health committee hearing Thursday.
Mr. Sanders pushed Mr. Kennedy again on his past support for the claims that vaccines caused autism. He also mentioned Mr. Kennedy's praise for Andrew Wakefield, the British scientist whose research fueled speculation that immunizations and autism were linked. His work has since been debunked.
When Mr. Kennedy offered that he wouldn't 'rest on a single study,' Mr. Sanders sought to introduce into the record 16 studies that concluded vaccines do not cause autism.
Mr. Sanders held up the papers and asked, 'Are you happy?'
Mr. Kennedy asked the senator if he included an analysis by the Institute of Medicine, indicating that it would support his position. But that report said the body of evidence favored rejecting a direct link between some vaccines and autism.
As Mr. Kennedy tried to elaborate, Mr. Sanders waved his hand to stop him, saying 'don't have a lot of time.'
Later, Mr. Sanders questioned Mr. Kennedy about his previous remarks calling the coronavirus vaccine one the deadliest vaccines ever made. Early estimates found that Covid vaccines and other mitigation measures saved 800,000 lives in the United States, and that Covid death rates were 14 times higher among unvaccinated people compared to those who received the Covid booster shot.
Mr. Kennedy said he drew his conclusion from the Vaccine Adverse Events Surveillance System, which anti-vaccine groups often cite as proof that vaccines cause injuries. But V.A.E.R.S., as the system is known, includes reports from anyone who wants to file a suspected adverse event — without verification. The reports are not proof that an injury or death was caused by a vaccination.
Mr. Sanders again pressed him on whether he disagreed with scientists who have said the Covid vaccine saved lives.
'I'm agnostic because we don't have the science to make that determination,' Mr. Kennedy responded.
At various times during the exchanges between the two, the ranking Democrat on the health panel said that he shared the views of both Mr. Trump and Mr. Kennedy that the health care system in the United States is broken. It's a point Mr. Sanders often makes.
'Problem is, their answers will only make a bad situation worse,' Mr. Sanders said, raising his voice as he wrapped up his remarks.
Lastly, the senator asked whether Mr. Kennedy would guarantee health care to every American, protections that many other countries already provide. Mr. Sanders has long fought for Medicare for all.
'I'm going to make America healthier than other countries in the world right now — we're the sickest,' Mr. Kennedy said, before Mr. Sanders cut him off to repeat his question.
Mr. Kennedy pivoted, addressing Mr. Sanders as 'Bernie' and attacking lawmakers who have accepted millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. He accused Mr. Sanders of doing the same. The crowd cheered.
'Oh no, no, no,' Mr. Sanders raised his hand to hush the crowd.
He responded, 'I ran for president like you,' adding that he took contributions in his 2020 presidential campaign from employees of drug companies, but stressed that he received 'not one nickel of PAC money from the pharmaceutical industry.' More applause ensued.
Mr. Sanders' face turned red as the two began to yell back and forth, speaking over one another.
Senator Markwayne Mullin, Republican of Oklahoma, cut Mr. Sanders off and accused him of 'battering the witness.'
'I'm not battering the witness, I'm trying to get an answer,' Mr. Sanders said, just before the panel's chairman stepped in to say the committee was running over time.
The chairman, Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana, said in his final remarks that Mr. Kennedy has a lot of influence.
'Now you got a megaphone,' he chuckled. 'Maybe you and Bernie, you know, Bobby and Bernie. Of everybody in this room, the two of you have the biggest followings.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
Covid-19 India Cases 2025 Live Updates: Active cases cross 7,000-mark — not Delhi, West Bengal or Maharashtra but this state has most cases
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 12, 2025, 10:07 IST India has seen a fresh rise in Covid-19 infections with active cases crossing the 7,000 mark as of June 12, 2025. The country now has a total of 7,154 active cases, as per data released by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Importantly, six new Covid-related deaths have been reported in the last 24 hours — two from Maharashtra, one from Madhya Pradesh, and three others under review. Kerala leads the chart as worst-hit state Despite no recent headlines from major metros like Delhi, Kolkata, or Mumbai, it is Kerala that continues to top the active caseload in India with 2,165 active cases, accounting for over 30% of the national burden. Gujarat (1,281), West Bengal (747), Delhi (731), and Maharashtra (615) are also witnessing relatively high numbers. New Omicron variants fuelling mild surges Health experts attribute the recent rise to highly transmissible but less severe Omicron sub-variants such as JN.1, NB.1.8.1, LF.7, and XFC. These strains have been classified by the WHO as 'Variants Under Monitoring,' meaning they are not currently considered dangerous but are being tracked closely. Covid becoming part of seasonal cycles While SARS-CoV-2 has not disappeared, its pattern of recurrence has now become more predictable, similar to influenza. The ongoing infections mostly result in milder symptoms, but vulnerable populations are advised to remain cautious and follow preventive protocols. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP unveil long-awaited SNAP proposals for Trump bill
Senate Republicans on Wednesday rolled out a suite of proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as a key component of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill' – but it dials back some of the proposals sought by the House that drew intraparty concerns. The new legislative text from the Senate would require states to cover some of the cost of SNAP benefits, which are currently completely funded by the federal government, if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028, while allowing states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see its share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent to 15 percent. The House, by contrast, called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its agricultural proposal passed as part of a broader plan to advance Trump's tax agenda last month, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 to 25 percent. The softened proposal comes as Senate Republicans expressed concerns about how the House pitch would have impacted states. 'This bill takes a commonsense approach to reforming SNAP-cutting waste, increasing state accountability, and helping recipients transition to self-sufficiency through work and training,' Senate Agriculture Chairman John Boozman (R-Ariz.) said in a statement on Wednesday. 'It's about being good stewards of taxpayer dollars while giving folks the tools to succeed.' 'At the same time, our farmers and ranchers are facing real challenges,' he said. 'This legislation delivers the risk management tools and updated farm bill safety net they need to keep producing the safest, most abundant and affordable food, fuel, and fiber in the world. It's an investment in rural America and the future of agriculture.' Like the House bill, the Senate bill would also decrease the administrative cost the federal government is required to pay to help cover program operations in the states by 25 percent, but beginning in fiscal year 2027. The proposals in both chambers also seek to limit the federal government's ability to increase monthly benefits in the future and beef up work requirements, as well as farm provisions that GOP leaders have argued will make it easier to craft a bipartisan farm bill in the months ahead – although Democrats have said otherwise. Republicans on the Senate Agriculture Committee estimated the recent legislation would generate $144 billion in net savings in the years ahead as the party looks to ramp up cost-cutting measures in Trump's plan amid concerns about the overall deficit impact of his tax priorities. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Israel appears ready to attack Iran, officials in US and Europe say
Advertisement Trump waved off another plan by Israel several months ago to attack Iran, insisting that he wanted a chance to negotiate a deal with Tehran that would choke off Iran's ability to produce more nuclear fuel for a bomb. Two weeks ago, Trump said he had warned Netanyahu about launching a strike while U.S. negotiations with Iran were underway. It is not clear how much effort Trump made to block Netanyahu again this time, but the president has appeared less optimistic in recent days about the prospects for a diplomatic settlement after Iran's supreme leader rejected an administration proposal that would have effectively phased out Iran's ability to enrich uranium on its soil. Netanyahu has walked up to bombing Iran's nuclear facilities in the past, only to back off at the last minute. Advertisement Word of the U.S. decisions to withdraw personnel from the region, along with a warning from Britain about new threats to Middle East commercial shipping, came hours after Trump told The New York Post in a podcast released Wednesday that he had grown 'less confident' about the prospects for a deal with Iran that would limit its ability to develop nuclear weapons. American and Iranian negotiators have been planning to meet Sunday for another round of talks, although Trump told reporters Monday that Iran had adopted an 'unacceptable' negotiating position. As of Wednesday, Trump's envoy to the talks, Steve Witkoff, was still planning to attend the negotiations in Oman, officials said. Asked about the reason for the departures of U.S. personnel and dependents from the region as he arrived at the Kennedy Center in Washington for a Wednesday evening performance of 'Les Misérables,' Trump told reporters, 'Well, you're going to have to figure that one out yourself.' The British warning came from a maritime trade agency that monitors Middle East shipping and that said in a public advisory that it had 'been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners.' The advisory urged commercial vessels transiting the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to use heightened caution. Iranian military and government officials have already met to discuss their response to a potential Israeli strike, according to a senior Iranian official. The official said that Tehran had devised a response plan that would involve an immediate counterstrike on Israel with hundreds of ballistic missiles. In October 2024, a major Iranian missile assault against Israel related to the war in the Gaza Strip inflicted limited damage, however, in part because of U.S. assistance in intercepting the missiles. Advertisement Trump spoke by phone Monday with Netanyahu, but the White House disclosed few details about the conversation. Trump had met on Sunday evening at Camp David with his national security team. Iran's defense minister, Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh, raised alarms Wednesday with a warning that, in the event of a conflict following failed nuclear talks, the United States would suffer heavy losses. 'America will have to leave the region because all its military bases are within our reach and we will, without any consideration, target them in the host countries,' he told reporters. Iranian officials also balked at remarks Tuesday by Gen. Michael E. Kurilla, the head of Central Command. Kurilla testified before a House committee that he had presented Trump and Hegseth 'a wide range of options' for a potential strike against Iran. Kurilla had been scheduled to testify again Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, but his testimony was postponed without explanation. Iran's mission to the U.N. denounced Kurilla's comments in a Wednesday social media post as 'militarism' that 'fuels instability.' The tough talk came amid a week of meetings in Vienna by the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors. The United States, Britain, France and Germany have submitted a resolution to the agency that would censure Iran for rapidly advancing its nuclear program and violating other commitments under a 2015 nuclear deal brokered with those countries, along with China and Russia. The board is expected to vote on the censure resolution on Thursday morning. Advertisement Censure could be grounds for the U.N. Security Council to restore, or 'snap back,' heavy economic sanctions on Tehran that were lifted as part of the 2015 deal, which was struck by the Obama administration. Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from that agreement in 2018, a move that Iran says gave it license to abandon its commitments to limit its nuclear activity. The deal's European parties insist that it remains enforceable through restored sanctions. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on social media on Wednesday that censure 'will compel Iran to react STRONGLY.' The State Department did not provide details on how many personnel would be removed from Iraq, or why. The Associated Press reported on Wednesday that nonessential U.S. personnel would be withdrawn from Baghdad, and that nonessential personnel and family members of diplomats had been authorized to depart from U.S. embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait. The military dependents authorized to depart the Middle East are largely from Navy and Marine families in Bahrain, home to a major U.S. naval base, a senior Navy official said. Iran's atomic program has progressed dramatically since Trump abandoned the 2015 deal. Analysts say that Iran is now on the brink of being able to manufacture enough nuclear material to fuel 10 nuclear weapons. Constructing a workable device, if Iran chose to pursue that option, could take several more months. But many top Israeli officials already consider Iran's progress to be unacceptable and have openly threatened military action against its nuclear facilities. Many Israeli officials believe they have a golden opportunity to solve a decades-long problem. Israel has recently decimated Hezbollah and Hamas, Iranian proxy groups that Tehran has long relied on as a deterrent to Israeli action. And Israeli airstrikes last year severely reduced Iran's air defense systems. Advertisement Some analysts warn that Iran has been restoring those defenses, making Israeli action against Iran's nuclear program riskier by the week. It is also unclear whether Israel can inflict decisive damage on Iran's nuclear program without U.S. military assistance. U.S. oil prices climbed above $68 a barrel on Wednesday afternoon, their highest level since early April, when Trump placed tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners. Fighting in the region could disrupt oil supplies, as could tougher American sanctions on Iran. The aircraft carrier Carl Vinson has been in the Arabian Sea for several weeks. More than 60 aircraft are aboard the Vinson, including advanced F-35 stealth strike fighters. The senior Navy official said there were currently no plans to change the carrier's position in response to the developing situation. The United States also has several dozen attack and fighter jets deployed in the Middle East. These aircraft were used extensively to defend Israel from Iranian strikes last year. This article originally appeared in
