logo
Beyond reach: Why America's ‘Golden Dome' may be powerless against Russia's doomsday missile

Beyond reach: Why America's ‘Golden Dome' may be powerless against Russia's doomsday missile

Russia Today29-04-2025

Earlier this year, US President Donald Trump launched the ambitious 'Golden Dome' initiative – a sweeping plan to build a national missile defense system capable of shielding America from modern threats: ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons, and advanced cruise missiles. Designed as a next-generation shield, the Golden Dome aspires to close gaps in the nation's defenses and guarantee security against a broad range of airborne dangers.
But even the most sophisticated defense can face a threat it wasn't designed to stop. As Washington doubles down on its plans for a new shield, Russia is preparing a weapon unlike anything currently in existence – a nuclear-powered cruise missile with unlimited range. And it's a threat the Golden Dome may struggle to counter.
Russia is on the verge of deploying an entirely new class of cruise missile that could fundamentally alter air defense paradigms: nuclear-powered, unlimited-range cruise missiles. Chief among them is the Burevestnik.
It's only logical that US missile defense planners are thinking ahead to such unconventional threats. Open-source intelligence researchers like MT_Anderson have recently shared satellite imagery revealing suspected construction of Burevestnik launch facilities near Vologda. If verified, this would mark the next phase in the deployment of a weapon capable of shaking the foundations of global strategic stability.
🇷🇺Burevestnik Launch Site🇷🇺Looking back to last summer, one can tell the pace at which they've built it out. They've been busy bees...@SkyfiApp | @planet imagery from Jun / Oct 2024, respectively https://t.co/hQB2UnY9Repic.twitter.com/1REcKvY77M
Russia first revealed the Burevestnik missile during President Vladimir Putin's address to the Federal Assembly on March 1, 2018. Dubbed SSC-X-9 'Skyfall' in the West, the missile has been cloaked in secrecy ever since. The commonly used designation '9M730 Burevestnik' is actually a misnomer, as the 9M730 label originally referred to a version of the Iskander-M missile system – but that's a minor detail in the larger picture.
Reports suggest that Burevestnik testing has been ongoing for years at sites like Novaya Zemlya, the Nenoksa naval testing range near Severodvinsk, and the Kapustin Yar missile complex – the latter featuring specialized infrastructure operated by Rosatom. As recently as two years ago, it seemed Russia was still far from completing development. Now, however, signs point to a major shift: operational launch sites are reportedly under construction.
Visually, the Burevestnik resembles a traditional cruise missile, with folding wings for compact launch storage. It launches from a ground platform using a solid-fuel booster, then switches to an air-breathing nuclear-powered jet engine once it reaches cruising speed. In theory, this engine heats incoming air via a compact nuclear reactor, allowing the missile to stay airborne for weeks or even months without refueling.
Sources estimate the missile's operational range at 22,000km, though in practice it may be virtually unlimited. Such a missile could patrol potential conflict zones indefinitely, awaiting launch commands. Upon receiving orders, it could maneuver toward targets from unpredictable vectors, making interception extraordinarily difficult.
Effectively, the Burevestnik is designed to serve as a 'doomsday weapon' – a guaranteed retaliatory strike platform in the event of nuclear war.
A nuclear-powered cruise missile would be capable of striking anywhere on the globe from any direction. It could exploit satellite communications to update flight paths, evade interception, and even receive new target information mid-flight. Naturally, preventing accidents is critical, but it's likely that specialized recovery systems – possibly involving parachutes – have been developed.
The ability to safely operate a nuclear-powered engine stems from technological breakthroughs achieved in the 1990s and 2000s, when Russian scientists successfully built compact nuclear reactors. These advancements paved the way not only for the Burevestnik, but also for other projects like the Poseidon underwater drone.
Notably, the US and the Soviet Union both explored nuclear-powered aircraft concepts during the Cold War. Despite extensive research on platforms like the B-36 and Tu-95, both nations ultimately abandoned the projects due to insurmountable engineering challenges, astronomical costs, and radiation safety concerns.
Today, with more advanced reactor technology, Russia seems poised to achieve what Cold War engineers only dreamed of: a practical, nuclear-powered, unlimited-range missile.
Can the Burevestnik be considered operational? Full details remain classified, but tests in 2020–2021 at Kapustin Yar and Nenoksa strongly suggest significant progress. The completion of permanent launch sites points to an impending deployment phase.
According to some reports, Russia could begin fielding Burevestnik missiles as early as 2025-26 – potentially in large numbers. Thanks to their nearly limitless range, these missiles could patrol vast areas, including the Arctic, Siberia, or the Pacific Ocean, remaining invisible to conventional defense systems.
A major challenge for America's Golden Dome initiative will be detecting and tracking such missiles – no easy task. It would likely require unprecedented coordination with the US Navy and the full use of space-based tracking systems.
Ultimately, defeating a weapon like the Burevestnik would demand a fully integrated space-based missile defense component. Satellite tracking, rapid identification of launch zones, and intercept capabilities far beyond current systems would be necessary. Even advanced naval assets like Aegis-equipped ships would face a monumental challenge.
For now, there is no simple solution. And while Washington scrambles to prepare, Moscow holds a major advantage – especially when considering additional next-generation weapons like the Poseidon nuclear drone.
In this high-stakes race, Russia may have already moved the strategic chessboard – and set up a checkmate that America's Golden Dome might not be able to prevent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine failed to destroy Russian planes in drone raid
Ukraine failed to destroy Russian planes in drone raid

Russia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Ukraine failed to destroy Russian planes in drone raid

None of the Russian aircraft targeted in Ukraine's recent drone attacks were destroyed, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said. The aircraft sustained damage but will be repaired, he told TASS In an interview published on Wednesday. Ukrainian drones struck several Russian airbases on Sunday, in a coordinated assault across five regions, from Murmansk in the Arctic to Irkutsk in Siberia. Kiev has claimed that the strikes damaged or destroyed approximately 40 Russian military aircraft, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers. Moscow, however, has dismissed both the numbers and extent of damage. 'The equipment in question, as also stated by the Defense Ministry, was not destroyed, but damaged. It will be restored,' Ryabkov said, responding to a question about whether the strikes had affected strategic stability. Kiev's claims about the results of the attack have been inconsistent, Ryabkov claimed. 'There is nothing even remotely close' to the damage levels quoted by Kiev, he said, urging reporters to rely only on information shared through the Russian Defense Ministry's official channels. The official also stated that prior to the recent phone call between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Moscow had raised concerns with Washington that US officials had not responded to the attack. Trump had reportedly insisted to Putin that the US had no prior knowledge of Kiev's plans to strike Russian airfields, according to the Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov. On Thursday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also confirmed that Putin and had told Trump a Russian response to the strikes is inevitable and that it would be carried out at the discretion of the Russian military. Putin has accused the 'illegitimate regime in Kiev' of carrying out terrorist attacks and 'gradually turning into a terrorist organization.' Shortly after the Trump-Putin phone call on Wednesday, the US Embassy in Kiev issued a security alert, warning of a 'continued risk of significant air attacks.' The US State Department has advised Americans currently in Ukraine to identify shelter locations in advance and keep reserves of water, food, and medication. Moscow has repeatedly condemned Ukraine's continued drone strikes and acts of sabotage on Russian territories, claiming that they undermine ongoing efforts to find a diplomatic resolution to the conflict.

US blacklists seven African countries
US blacklists seven African countries

Russia Today

time7 hours ago

  • Russia Today

US blacklists seven African countries

US President Donald Trump has imposed a travel ban on nationals from seven African countries – Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. He cited alleged terrorism risks and high rates of visa overstays in explaining his decision, effective on June 9. The move was announced in an executive order published on Wednesday as part of broader immigration policy reform that targeted 12 countries; the seven African states and Afghanistan, Myanmar, Haiti, Iran, and Yemen. Burundi, Sierra Leone and Togo are also among seven other countries hit with partial restrictions under the directive, limiting entry through specific visa categories. The others are Cuba, Laos, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. 'The restrictions… imposed by this proclamation are necessary to garner cooperation from foreign governments, enforce our immigration laws, and advance other important foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives,' Trump stated. Trump has claimed that Libya and Somalia attract recruits for terrorist groups that pose a threat to US national security. The other countries face restrictions due to either 'unacceptable' visa overstay rates or the absence of a 'competent' authority for passport issuance and proper security vetting. 'I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people,' Trump said, adding that he remains committed to engaging with countries willing to cooperate and resolve the identified concerns. Somali Ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, said in a statement cited by Reuters that Mogadishu 'values its longstanding relationship' with Washington and 'stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised.' Trump previously imposed entry bans on several Muslim-majority and African countries during his first term, in 2017 and 2020. Those measures drew widespread legal and diplomatic criticism but were ultimately upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2018. Former President Joe Biden reversed the bans shortly after taking office in 2021, calling them discriminatory. On Wednesday, Trump accused the Biden administration of pursuing 'open door policies' that, he claimed, have allowed millions of undocumented immigrants to remain in the US unlawfully. In a video message published by the White House, Trump said a recent attack on a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado, had 'underscored the extreme dangers' posed to the US 'by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted.'

Trump views Zelensky as ‘bad guy'
Trump views Zelensky as ‘bad guy'

Russia Today

time12 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Trump views Zelensky as ‘bad guy'

US President Donald Trump is frustrated with Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, seeing him as a 'bad guy' who is pushing the world closer to nuclear conflict, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing sources. Unnamed Trump advisers told the NYT that the president is 'exasperated' with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky, but 'reserves special animosity' for the Ukrainian leader, who he has publicly criticized on several occasions. Although Trump has said it is 'understandable' that Ukraine wants to keep fighting, his stance toward Zelensky is notably harsher than toward Putin, the report says. The US president reportedly tends to be more deferential to his Russian counterpart, and previously believed that their 'very, very good relationship' would help end the conflict. Because of this, he has thus far refrained from imposing new sanctions on Moscow. On Wednesday, the two leaders held a 75-minute phone conversation in which Trump said they discussed Ukraine's recent attack on Russian airbases that reportedly host strategic aircraft. 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump said. The Kremlin confirmed the conversation. Russian presidential aide Yury Ushakov said Putin informed Trump of Ukraine's efforts to derail peace talks between Moscow and Kiev, including 'terrorist' attacks on civilian targets. Ushakov was apparently referring to incidents of railroad sabotage in the regions of Bryansk and Kursk in which seven people died and more than 100 were injured. Following the call, Zelensky posted a statement on Telegram, saying: 'If the world reacts weakly to Putin's threats, then he perceives this as the world's readiness to turn a blind eye to his actions… If the strong do not stop Putin, it means that they share responsibility with him.' Trump previously engaged in a public spat with Zelensky when the two met at the White House in late February. At the time, the US president accused Zelensky of 'gambling with World War III,' and of being 'disrespectful' and ungrateful for American support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store