Government plan to keep Pip payouts for 13 weeks ‘not very much', says MP
A Labour MP has described the Government's plans to avert a rebellion on welfare cuts as 'not very much really'.
Dr Simon Opher, a GP and the MP for Stroud, told the BBC he is 'going to rebel' in a vote and 'a number of colleagues are in the same situation'.
The 'non-negotiable' protections that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is to include in the Welfare Reform Bill are understood to include a guarantee that those who no longer qualify for personal independence payments (Pip) will still receive the payments for 13 weeks.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday, Dr Opher said: 'It's a slight delay in the disability cuts – it's 13 weeks rather than four weeks – so it's something, but not very much really.
'And it doesn't change the basic fact that they're… planning to cut disability payment to quite a lot of people really.
'So not terribly impressed, but it's something at least.'
The Government has faced a backlash from its own MPs over the package of measures, aimed at reducing the number of working age people on sickness benefits.
Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'.
Asked whether he would rebel if the measures came to a vote in the Commons, Dr Opher told the programme: 'I am going to rebel.
'And this comes hard to me, I've never actually voted against the Government and I know a number of colleagues in the same situation.
'So I just urge the Government really to just consider parts of this again.'
A Green Paper laid out proposals for a 'transitional protection for those who are no longer eligible for Pip', but the Government's plans revealed this week clarify the 13-week length.
Ms Kendall told The Guardian earlier this week: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work.
'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on.
'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes.
'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.'
A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned that 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP's nuclear stance costing Scotland jobs, says UK minister
While energy is largely reserved to the UK Government, the Scottish Government effectively has a veto on new nuclear power developments through planning regulations. Last week, in her Spending Review, Rachel Reeves unveiled a multi-billion-pound investment programme in new nuclear energy. The Chancellor said £2.5 billion of the £8.3bn set aside for Great British Energy would be redirected to support new nuclear technologies, including small modular reactors, and a new plant in the south of England. READ MORE: In an interview with BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, Mr Shanks was asked about why the money had been redirected, particularly given the party's manifesto made no mention of nuclear, but instead focussed on onshore wind, solar, and hydro power. 'Well, it's not an exclusive list, because there's a lot of other clean energy technologies,' Mr Shanks said. 'Nuclear is part of our energy mix. 'I'm not going to make any apologies for the government investing in nuclear where thousands of highly skilled jobs can be delivered, including in Scotland if it wasn't for the ideological position of the SNP to block new nuclear, could be delivering those well paid skilled jobs here in Scotland. 'They turned their face against that, and they will have to answer for that.' He added: 'The broader point here is Great British Energy is all about harnessing the power of the public purse to invest not just in clean power projects directly but supply chains that drive them. 'Because unlike the previous government, we want to see those well paid, industrialised jobs coming alongside us, not towing in offshore wind and switching it on, but building it in this country and getting the manufacturing jobs that go with it. "That's how we deliver the jobs of the future.' The Herald revealed at the weekend that unions are calling on the Scottish Government to end its longstanding resistance to new nuclear power. Louise Gilmour, from GMB Scotland, has written to Energy Minister Gillian Martin calling for an urgent rethink. She said: 'Amidst broken promises on a green jobs revolution, the Scottish Government cannot afford to scoff at the offering of nuclear energy on the table. An offer that would in large part be funded by the UK Government. The ban against new nuclear – especially SMRs – must be lifted.' Responding to Ms Gilmour's comments, a Scottish Government spokesperson told The Herald: 'The Scottish Government is focused on supporting growth and creating jobs by capitalising on Scotland's immense renewable energy capacity rather than expensive new nuclear energy which takes decades to build, creates toxic waste which is difficult and costly to dispose of and does not generate power at a cost that will bring down energy bills.' READ MORE: Meanwhile, during the interview with the BBC, Mr Shanks was pressed on the impact of oil and gas job losses in Aberdeen. Companies in the north east have blamed the UK Government's Energy Profits Levy, which means the effective rate of tax on oil and gas companies is 78%. Mr Shanks said: 'Every single job loss is hugely distressing for the individuals and for their families and communities. 'I do not for a second discount the impact that job losses have, but I do not think that is an entirely fair assessment, because yes, there have been job losses recently announced, but there have also been thousands of jobs created.' He argued that transition involved movement from one part of the energy sector to another, and that support for workers was crucial. 'That is why we announced incredibly quickly that passporting support—where if you are an offshore oil and gas worker doing a particular job and you could do the same job in offshore wind, you should not have to requalify or have your skills reassessed. 'You should be able to move straight into that job. That is something the previous government talked about for a long time. We delivered it.' READ MORE: The Labour Energy Minister also said he was 'hopeful' that an announcement on investment in Grangemouth will be made soon. Mr Shanks said more than 80 potential investors had come forward since the UK Government pledged £200 million for the site. The Government is seeking a further £600m in private investment in the area, following the closure of Scotland's last oil refinery. Mr Shanks said the investment would help provide a 'long-term, sustainable future' for the site. Petroineos, the joint venture between INEOS and PetroChina, which owns the 100-year-old refinery, first announced plans to close in November 2023. They said the plant's future as an import terminal would 'require significantly fewer people to operate' and that there would need to be a 'net reduction of approximately 400 roles over the next two years.' Mr Shanks said the Government was engaging with businesses on new projects for the area. 'We have had some really positive meetings around potential investors,' he said. 'In fact, more than 80 potential investors have come forward. Scottish Enterprise is driving forward due diligence on that. There are a number of really credible projects that we are developing at the moment. 'We hope we will have some really positive announcements to make soon.' Mr Shanks said the 'unprecedented' £200m investment from the National Wealth Fund would help 'create the jobs of the future' while ensuring long-term investment security. He added: 'I am not involved in the due diligence, as you would not expect, but there are some really exciting, viable projects coming forward that will deliver jobs in Grangemouth long into the future.' Last week, Jan Robertson, Grangemouth director for Scottish Enterprise, said she had received a 'mixture of inquiries' from businesses—some interested in the site itself and others with 'a good opportunity to become projects in the relatively near term.' 'What I mean by that is the next three to four years,' she told Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee. 'Our approach at the moment is very much working with those and working as closely and quickly as we can to make the progress that we want to see in Grangemouth.' Ms Martin told the committee the 'door is not closed' to companies looking to work at the site, and said Petroineos had also received approaches. 'We could look back five years and start pointing fingers, but the most important thing is that in the last year—actually the last six months—Project Willow and the taskforce have moved things along in a way that has been swift, agile and focused,' she said. 'I am feeling so much more confident than I did this time last year in the prospects for that site.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Mapped: UK, US and French military base locations across the Middle East
Iran has threatened to target UK, French and US military bases across the Middle East if the help block the Iranian missile and drone retaliation for Israel's attack. Both countries have exchanged extensive aerial attacks after Israel launched a surprise missile assault on some of Tehran's nuclear facilities, uranium experts and high-ranking officials on Friday (13 June). Dozens of civilians have been killed in the crossfire. Sir Keir Starmer has announced additional British fighter jets are being deployed to the Middle East as a 'contingency support' in the region. Chancellor Rachel Reeves today insisted Britain is not at war despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East, but said the UK could play a military role defending Israel from ongoing Iranian attacks. US president Donald Trump, meanwhile, warned Iran that an attack on its military interests in the region would be met with the 'full strength and might of the US Armed Forces'. Below, The Independent looks at where the British, French and the Americans have a presence across the Middle East. Britain's military bases The UK has three permanent military sites in the Middle East, as well as an RAF base in Cyprus in the Mediterranean. The UK opened a permanent military centre at the Al Minhad Air Base in the United Arab Emirates last March. Named after a World War II pilot, William Donnelly, the centre is a relatively small military facility equipped with a headquarters, a welfare center and accommodation. It also operates a permanent military presence in Bahrain and Oman, both of which are used by the British Navy. Its main operating base in the region is RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, home to a number of fighter jets. It also has access to the US-run Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The American presence in the Middle East is considerably larger. It operates a broad network of sites across at least 19 locations in the wider region, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. Eight are permanent, including in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. US forces have been attacked on several occasions by Iran-backed forces since the outbreak of the latest war in Gaza and the subsequent conflicts with other state and non-state actors in the wider region. In January 2024, three American soldiers were killed and dozens more injured after a one-way attack drone hit the military base Tower 22 in Jordan, near the Syrian border. US officials blamed the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, for the attack. French military bases in the Middle East The French presence in the Middle East is primarily based at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE, where it has a permanent outfit stationed there. French troops in the UAE number about 650, according to the French Armed Forces Ministry. It has also periodically operated from Jordan, combating militia forces in Syria and Iraq.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Fewer than half of young men believe abortion should be legal, poll finds
Fewer than half of young men believe abortion should be legal, far less than the general population, a shocking new poll has found. Just 46 per cent of 18 to 36-year-old men believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, compared with 71 per cent among the general population. Amid concerns about the rise of the manosphere - a growing online community of hypermasculine influencers - the Ipsos poll showed a stark drop in support for abortion in those aged under 36. Eight in 10 55 to 75-year-old men support abortion being legal in all or most cases, while three-quarters of 35 to 54-year-olds do. And, among those aged 18 to 36, more than a third of men think abortion should be illegal in most or all cases, the poll found. Labour MP Stella Creasy, a prominent campaigner in parliament for abortion access, told The Independent: 'Those [who are] complacent that abortion access is supported in this country don't understand the culture war is chipping away at all women's rights, including healthcare.' The polling comes before MPs vote this week on decriminalising abortion through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. Currently, abortions can legally be carried out within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy in England, Scotland and Wales. They must be approved by two doctors, with the health professionals agreeing continuing with the pregnancy would be riskier for the physical or mental health of the woman than having an abortion. While this is what the law stipulates, in reality, abortions can be given, whatever the person's reasoning. But an amendment tabled by Ms Creasy would see abortion enshrined as a human right, as has been done in Northern Ireland. 'The only way we can stop women being targeted in this way and ensure they have safe and legal access is to designate abortion a human right as we have in Northern Ireland, and only new clause 20 to the policing bill will do that,' she added. A rival amendment tabled by Labour's Tonia Antoniazzi - which would mean women can no longer be prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy in England and Wales - is seen as more likely to get the backing of MPs. Ms Antoniazzi told The Independent the poll should serve as 'a reminder to male MPs for the vote on Tuesday that they can't just leave this work to women'. She urged colleagues to back her amendment and added: 'This is one poll. It's important to recognise that this poll, just like every other on abortion, shows that the country as a whole remains staunchly pro-choice.' But she said the findings were a 'clear example of the fact that women's hard-won rights can never be taken for granted'. It 'underscores why we must always keep fighting to preserve and advance them, as we do,' she added. It came as a row broke out in the final days before Tuesday's votes, with supporters of Ms Creasy's amendment accusing backers of Ms Antoniazzi of a campaign to get MPs to withdraw their support. Ms Creasy fears Ms Antoniazzi's amendment does not go far enough in enshrining and protecting the right to abortion, but the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) said it has 'profound concerns' about the drafting of Ms Creasy's amendment. It called on MPs to withdraw their support for Ms Creasy's proposal and refuse to support it. Ahead of the votes, Ipsos found broad support for abortion access except among young men. The pollster also found that around half of voters think the current 24-week time limit for abortions is 'about right', with a quarter saying it is too late and just 4 per cent saying it is too early. Nigel Farage said last month that it is 'ludicrous we allow abortion up to 24 weeks' and that the law is 'totally out of date'. And, asked about illegal abortions, just over half of voters said the person who performed an abortion should face a penalty, compared with under a third who think the woman having the abortion should. Ipsos Pollster Kate Duxbury at Ipsos said: "While the majority of Britons support legal abortion, with seven in ten in favour, our polling reveals a significant fault line: less than half of young men aged 16-34 agree. 'This divergence, coupled with the fact that around half of Britons think the current 24-week limit is 'about right', highlights the complexities facing policymakers as they consider decriminalisation. It's clear that public opinion is far from monolithic, demanding a nuanced approach to this sensitive issue."
