Pixel phones may finally get native flashlight brightness controls, years after Samsung and Apple
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
TL;DR Google may add native flashlight brightness controls to Pixel phones in the next quarterly release of Android 16.
While the hardware has long supported it, Pixel users currently need to use an app to adjust the flashlight's intensity.
The new feature, discovered in the latest beta, will likely make the Quick Settings flashlight tile expandable.
Nearly every smartphone has an LED flash on the rear that you can use as a flashlight in a pinch, but most don't let you adjust its intensity, leaving you stuck with a light that's either too dim or too bright for the situation. Google Pixel phones currently lack a flashlight brightness slider in the Quick Settings panel, but that could finally change in the next quarterly release of Android 16.
While Samsung Galaxy devices have offered flashlight brightness controls for years, stock Android only added support for the underlying functionality with the Android 13 release in 2022. This update introduced an API that allows apps to control flashlight brightness, provided the phone's hardware supports it.
Most Pixel devices already support brightness control at the hardware level, but Google has yet to provide a built-in way to access it. As a result, Pixel users must turn to third-party apps like FlashDim or Google's Magnifier app to adjust the flashlight brightness, both of which use the Android 13 API to provide a brightness slider. This workaround is especially needed on newer Pixel phones, which oddly default to 50% brightness when the flashlight is toggled from the Quick Settings panel.
It was always strange that Google's own Magnifier app provides a UI for adjusting the flashlight brightness while the Android OS doesn't, but Google is finally rectifying this discrepancy. While digging through the latest Android 16 QPR1 Beta 2 release, we spotted new code that hints at a 'Flashlight Strength' dialog being added to the System UI.
Code Copy Text Flashlight Strength
Although there aren't many references to this dialog yet, we believe Google will make the flashlight tile expandable, similar to the Internet and Bluetooth tiles. Thanks to tipster Nail Sadykov who managed to activate the dialog, we can confirm this will be the case. Sadykov first revealed the existence of the feature in a post on his unofficial Google News Telegram group a few weeks ago, and he shared some images with Android Authority that show the feature in action.
Nail Sadykov
Tapping the tile's icon will toggle the flashlight, while tapping its text label will open the new 'flashlight strength' dialog with a slider. When the flashlight is enabled, the brightness level will be shown underneath the text label in the tile. If the tile has been shrunk, the brightness level won't be shown and a long press will be required to open the dialog.
The dialog is quite basic in its current form and lacks the visual polish found in Apple's version of the feature. We don't know if Google plans to add a more refined interface later, but it wouldn't be surprising given the competition.
Once this feature rolls out, Google will be joining other manufacturers like OnePlus and Xiaomi in finally offering native flashlight controls. OnePlus quietly introduced this feature to some of its flagships in the past year, and Xiaomi recently did the same for some of its devices.
Flashlight brightness controls in One UI 8 (Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra)
Flashlight brightness controls in HyperOS 2 (Xiaomi 15 Ultra)
Flashlight brightness controls in OxygenOS 15 (OnePlus 13)
It's surprising it has taken this long for many Android phones to add what's considered a basic function, but the addition is welcome nonetheless.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
21 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Google Home's latest bug: Setting an alarm for this time is nearly impossible
Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR A recent Google Home bug prevents smart speakers and displays from setting alarms for 12:30am. Google Assistant-equipped Home devices like the Nest Hub and the Nest Audio recognize standard alarm command phrasing, like 'Okay Google, set an alarm for twelve thirty am,' but they set the alarm for 12:30 p.m. instead. Saying 'zero zero thirty' aloud appears to be the only working time input for setting an alarm for 12.30am. Google Home is no stranger to more than the occasional bug like bricked Nest Hubs and gimped Thermostat commands. To Google's credit, the company does roll out updates that fix the issues, but these issues are often embarrassing to have occurred in the first place. You can now add another bug to the list, with Google Home smart speakers and smart displays strangely unable to set a very specific alarm. Reddit user ReddBroccoli infuriatingly points out that their Google Assistant-equipped Nest Hub fails to set an alarm for 12.30am. Strangely, no matter which variation you try, the Nest Hub will set an alarm for 12.30pm. Here's a video from the Reddit user showing their Google Home smart display's inability to set an alarm for 12.30am: I tried out the basic alarm command 'Hey Google, set an alarm for twelve thirty am' on my Google Nest Audio, and sure enough, Google Assistant keeps setting an alarm for 12.30pm. Even saying 'half-past midnight' for the time doesn't work. The only command that works for this particular hour is saying 'zero zero thirty' out loud. You'd think the smart speaker/display is set to accept time in only the 24-hour military time format, but my Nest Audio replies back, 'Okay, alarm set for 12.30am,' acknowledging and using the 12-hour time system. The Reddit user mentions the command used to work, so something changed in the backend recently. We've contacted Google for comments on the above issue. We'll keep you updated when we learn more. Until then, we recommend using your phone to set an alarm, as your Google Assistant-equipped smart home clearly isn't up to the task. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IBM, Google Emerge As Top Investors In Quantum Computing With Most Patents Issued In 2025: 'Only Two Companies Seriously Investing,' Says Martin Shkreli
Many big tech companies, including startups, are foraying into the emerging field of quantum computing. Out of the 300 quantum computing patents issued in 2025, two companies have received the most. What Happened: International Business Machines Corp. and Alphabet Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Google appear to have made significant investments in the quantum computing space on a year-to-date basis. According to the data shared by Martin Shkreli, there was a steep drop-off in issued patents after IBM and Google, suggesting that other companies are either smaller players or not prioritizing quantum computing as heavily. IonQ Inc., D-Wave Quantum Inc., PsiQuantum, Quantinuum, and Intel Corp., followed the first two firms. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Furthermore, he highlighted that Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE:WFC), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE:BAC), and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) also hold quantum patents, which he describes as 'big company spend.' Large corporations often invest in emerging technologies like quantum computing to hedge against future disruptions, even if they're not leading the field. Shkreli also notes that companies like Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) are working on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and quantum networking patents. QKD uses quantum mechanics to secure communications, offering theoretically unbreakable encryption. Lastly, Shkreli suggests that Microsoft Corp.'s patent output doesn't match its spending or public statements, implying they may be focusing more on development or partnerships rather than patenting their work. Why It Matters: The evolving quantum computing space relies on qubits, which, unlike classical bits in traditional computers, can superpose and entangle 0 and 1 to solve complex problems. While still in the development stage, many publicly listed firms are involved in their research and development. Here's a list of a few companies and an exchange-traded fund that tracks such YTD Performance One Year Performance International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM) 28.00% 66.58% Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) -6.21% -0.43% Intel Corp. (NASDAQ:INTC) 2.27% -32.77% Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) 8.61% 40.71% Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT) 12.91% 7.16% IonQ Inc (NYSE:IONQ) -7.89% 399.37% D-Wave Quantum Inc (NYSE:QBTS) 72.01% 1325.00% Rigetti Computing Inc (NASDAQ:RGTI) -37.40% 1127.45% Quantum Computing Inc (NASDAQ:QUBT) 1.12% 2864.06% Defiance Quantum ETF (NASDAQ:QTUM) 8.24% 38.92% The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSE:SPY) and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (NASDAQ:QQQ), which track the S&P 500 index and Nasdaq 100 index, respectively, fell on Wednesday. The SPY was down 0.29% at $601.36, while the QQQ declined 0.34% to $532.41, according to Benzinga Pro data. The futures of the S&P 500, Dow Jones, and Nasdaq 100 indices fell on Thursday. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Photo courtesy: JHVEPhoto / Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article IBM, Google Emerge As Top Investors In Quantum Computing With Most Patents Issued In 2025: 'Only Two Companies Seriously Investing,' Says Martin Shkreli originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
The True Cost Of Legacy Software: How To Understand The Full Picture
Eric Giesecke is the CEO of Planet DDS . getty As leaders, we often stick with what we know. It's comfortable, it's familiar and, most importantly, it seems reliable. But when it comes to legacy software systems, this comfort zone may be costing us more than we realize. Many executives focus on the upfront costs of new technology but fail to calculate the ongoing losses of sticking with outdated systems. As technology evolves, it's worth considering how legacy systems compare with modern cloud-based alternatives, particularly in areas such as scalability, integration and access to emerging innovations. The upfront costs of maintaining legacy systems don't take into account all the factors businesses should consider. These outdated systems, for example, often rely on on-site physical servers, requiring significant infrastructure investment. Setting up a new server typically can cost up to $10,000, and additional expenses for software licenses, maintenance and support can rack up quickly. These systems also come with additional operational expenses: increased power usage, heat output, supplementary cooling requirements and the constant strain on bandwidth during data backups. Another overlooked cost is the knowledge dependency these systems create. When key IT personnel leave, they take with them specialized knowledge crucial for maintaining and troubleshooting these legacy systems. Equally concerning is the added IT complexity of maintaining server-based systems, especially as an organization grows and scales. Security and compliance risks are another concern. Legacy software is a prime target for cyberthreats. When sensitive data is stolen, the consequences can devastate a business, with recovery fees running into millions of dollars. This is particularly damaging for industries handling sensitive customer data, such as healthcare and financial services. The fallout extends beyond immediate costs to include increased cybersecurity insurance premiums, loss of business, potential class action lawsuits and reduced business value for future acquisitions. The physical security of on-premises servers presents another vulnerability. In the event of a fire, flood or other unforeseen disaster, these servers are susceptible to damage or destruction, leading to irreversible data loss and operational disruption. The financial toll of such an event can be catastrophic, with lost revenue and recovery costs multiplying quickly. While the drawbacks of legacy software are well documented, there are some valid reasons some organizations choose to keep it—at least for now. Regulatory or compliance frameworks may require on-premises data storage or auditing transparency that cloud providers can't yet fully guarantee. In these cases, modernization may be delayed by necessity rather than choice. Legacy systems can also offer more control over infrastructure and workflows, especially in highly customized environments. Businesses that have invested years in tailoring their systems may be hesitant to risk functionality loss or reintegrate complex tools. While cloud technology is helping to address these concerns, it's important to weigh the trade-offs carefully and factor in operational needs, regulatory requirements and long-term goals. The ROI Of Cloud-Based Platforms Think of modern cloud-based platforms as growth accelerators, not just cost-cutters. Cloud solutions give you access to scalability, AI and automation. According to McKinsey, companies that go beyond basic cloud adoption and strategically integrate cloud across their operations could unlock as much as $3 trillion in value globally through faster product development, better decision-making and improved operational resilience. Cloud solutions also unlock the potential to utilize open APIs, which allow businesses to integrate tools seamlessly. Unlike traditional software, where companies are locked into rigid systems, modern cloud platforms with open APIs enable custom technology stacks tailored to specific business needs. This shift gives organizations the flexibility to choose best-in-class tools for everything from finance and customer management to logistics and marketing automation. These capabilities are especially impactful in healthcare, where integrated systems can streamline operations and enhance patient care. According to another McKinsey report, 62% of healthcare leaders believe that generative AI has the greatest potential to improve consumer engagement, yet only 29% have started implementing it—highlighting a significant gap between opportunity and adoption. Cloud infrastructure plays a foundational role in enabling this transformation. With the right tools in place, AI can help personalize care, increase transparency and empower patients to make better healthcare decisions. McKinsey also estimates that adopting AI could lead to a 5% to 10% reduction in healthcare spending across both public and private sectors, demonstrating that cloud-enabled innovation isn't just about efficiency, but long-term sustainability and value creation. Making The Transition Despite the benefits of cloud-based solutions, there still might be resistance when transitioning from legacy software. This transition requires careful planning and execution. Here's what I've learned from overseeing successful digital transformations: • Secure team buy-in. Your team needs to understand why the change is necessary and beneficial. Without buy-in, undergoing such a significant change becomes pointless, and your team might feel disconnected as to why it matters. • Prepare for short-term disruption. Your team also needs to know that the transition might not be all smooth sailing. There will be a period of learning new software, auditing data and migrating data, but it is temporary. • Start with core operations. Focus first on critical business functions where modernization will have the most immediate impact. Businesses can begin by adopting cloud solutions in phases, such as integrating AI-driven analytics or cloud-based CRM tools first. The hidden costs of legacy systems are worth careful evaluation. While modernizing your technology stack does require upfront investment and thoughtful change management, it can also open the door to improved agility, security and long-term value creation. The organizations that take time to assess their systems will be best positioned to respond to changing market demands. For some, that may mean adopting cloud-based platforms now; for others, it may involve planning a phased transition or identifying ways to modernize selectively. The right path forward will depend on your industry, regulatory environment and appetite for transformation. But by understanding the true cost of maintaining the status quo, leaders can make more informed decisions about what modernization looks like for their organization. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
