logo
Indian-Origin Techie Vaniya Agrawal Disrupts Microsoft Event Over Gaza, Again

Indian-Origin Techie Vaniya Agrawal Disrupts Microsoft Event Over Gaza, Again

NDTV22-05-2025

Quick Read
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Pro-Palestine protests have occurred at Microsoft's Build 2025 conference.
Former Microsoft engineer Vaniya Agrawal led protests against tech deals.
Agrawal interrupted sessions, criticizing Microsoft's ties with Israel.
Microsoft's Build 2025 conference in Seattle has been marred by consecutive days of protests led by pro-Palestine activists, including former Microsoft engineer Vaniya Agrawal.
Agrawal, an Indian-American software engineer, has been a vocal critic of Microsoft's ties with Israel and has disrupted major events, including the company's 50th anniversary celebration in April. During the Build 2025 conference, Agrawal and fellow ex-employee Hossam Nasr interrupted a session on AI security, shouting down Microsoft's Head of Security for AI, Neta Haiby, and Head of Responsible AI, Sarah Bird.
The protest was part of a larger movement within the tech sector, with activists demanding accountability for Microsoft's tech deals with Israel. Agrawal, who was fired shortly after her April protest, has become a visible face of tech-sector dissent, sharing ongoing protest imagery from Build 2025 on social media.
In her resignation letter, Agrawal denounced Microsoft's alleged $133 million deal with Israel's Ministry of Defence, claiming the company's AI and Azure cloud services were actively supporting military operations against Palestinian people.
"Microsoft cloud and AI enable the Israeli military to be more lethal and destructive in Gaza," Agrawal wrote in a company-wide email. The protests reflect rising internal dissent over Microsoft's role in supplying cloud infrastructure to the Israeli Ministry of Defence, amid heightened scrutiny over the humanitarian toll of the Gaza conflict. Microsoft has not publicly commented on the protests or the employees' dismissals.
The disruptions began on May 19, when an employee interrupted CEO Satya Nadella's keynote by shouting "Free Palestine" and demanding accountability for Microsoft's tech deals with Israel. The following day, a Palestinian tech worker stormed executive Jay Parikh's Azure AI presentation, declaring, "Cut ties! No Azure for apartheid!"
Agrawal's actions have sparked a wave of protests, highlighting the growing tensions between tech companies and their employees over issues of social responsibility and human rights.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

palantir technologies stock news: Palantir CEO Alex Karp predicts U.S.-China AI race will have one winner as GOP slams Trump's data deal
palantir technologies stock news: Palantir CEO Alex Karp predicts U.S.-China AI race will have one winner as GOP slams Trump's data deal

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

palantir technologies stock news: Palantir CEO Alex Karp predicts U.S.-China AI race will have one winner as GOP slams Trump's data deal

Why does Alex Karp believe the U.S.-China AI race will have only one winner? Is the West falling behind in AI innovation? What's the controversy surrounding Palantir's government work? ADVERTISEMENT How much government work has Palantir secured under Trump? ADVERTISEMENT How has Palantir's stock performed in the last year? ADVERTISEMENT What's next for Palantir and U.S. leadership in AI? FAQs: Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: PLTR) CEO Alex Karp has issued a strong warning about the ongoing artificial intelligence race between the United States and China. Speaking on CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street' Thursday, Karp stated bluntly that the AI arms race 'will have one winner,' and he urged Western countries to act quickly or risk falling behind. While he highlighted the benefits of AI, he also underscored its risks, warning that failing to innovate responsibly could put democratic nations at a disadvantage. His comments come amid political criticism and a dip in Palantir's emphasized that the global competition in artificial intelligence is not just about technology—it's about values, power, and national security. According to Karp, 'either you win or you lose in this game.' He made it clear that the AI race isn't like traditional markets where multiple players can thrive; instead, there will likely be one dominant power, and he believes it's crucial that Western democracies lead that credited American corporate culture for fostering rapid innovation, saying that U.S. companies are uniquely positioned to adapt quickly and push tech boundaries. 'No other economy has corporate leaders as adaptable and tech-savvy while remaining deeply grounded in industry expertise,' he warning wasn't just for the U.S. government—it was a message for all Western allies. He urged countries in Europe and beyond to learn from America's aggressive innovation approach. He expressed concern that without similar urgency and investment, other democratic nations could lose ground in AI development, making the global balance of power increasingly tilted in China's urgency he stressed reflects a broader concern among policymakers and tech leaders about China's rapid advancements in AI, especially in military and surveillance Karp made headlines with his AI warnings, Palantir is also facing political heat. Some Republican lawmakers are criticizing the Trump administration's expanding deals with the company, citing concerns over surveillance and data privacy. There are reports alleging that Palantir helped gather information on Americans during Trump's directly addressed these claims, calling them 'ridiculous.' He denied that Palantir surveilled U.S. citizens to aid the federal government, insisting that the company operates within strict legal and ethical the pushback from GOP lawmakers has had a market impact. On Thursday, PLTR stock fell by 7.77%, closing at $119.91, following reports of criticism over the company's government the controversy, Palantir has significantly expanded its footprint in the federal government. Since Donald Trump took office, the company has secured over $113 million in new or extended contracts, not including a massive $795 million deal with the Department of Defense. These contracts span across various government departments, including defense, intelligence, and public growing role in national security, and its work with the U.S. military, puts it at the center of both innovation and political recent criticism and Thursday's stock dip, Palantir has seen a 435% surge in its stock value over the past 12 months. Investors have largely backed the company's strong positioning in AI and defense technologies, as well as its growing list of public sector and private sector Karp's comments—and the political tension around federal contracts—signal that volatility may continue. As the AI race intensifies, Palantir's future may depend just as much on public trust as it does on government countries like China investing billions into AI, Karp's call for the West to 'keep up' isn't just a company pitch—it's a broader plea for urgency. Whether it's through policy changes, public-private partnerships, or stronger investment in AI research, the next few years could decide who leads the global tech the AI landscape evolves, Palantir Technologies remains at the center of the debate—balancing innovation, ethics, politics, and national security. Karp's stark message is clear: the AI race isn't slowing down, and only the most prepared nation will win.A1: He believes AI dominance will go to one nation, urging the West to move faster.A2: No, CEO Alex Karp denied all surveillance claims linked to the Trump administration.

AI versus first jobbers: Here are six tips for bright young students as AI threatens entry-level jobs
AI versus first jobbers: Here are six tips for bright young students as AI threatens entry-level jobs

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

AI versus first jobbers: Here are six tips for bright young students as AI threatens entry-level jobs

ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT founder Dario Amodei has set the cat among the pigeons by predicting that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level, white-collar jobs within five years. Aneesh Raman, a senior leader in LinkedIn, sees 'the bottom rung of the job ladder breaking', with entry-level coding, para-legal and consulting analyst jobs under threat of being 'replaced with AI'.Molly Kinder of Brookings says, 'These tools are so good that I no longer need marketing analysts, finance analysts and research assistants.'Even in my tiny company, we have 'replaced' a couple of junior researchers with deep research AI agents from OpenAI and phenomenon of entrylevel jobs being under AI threat is not only anecdotal. Raman sees hard evidence of this on LinkedIn, with 63% of VPs and above agreeing that AI might eventually take on some of the entry-level roles and tasks. The latest US job data reveals that the unemployment rate for college grads has risen by 30%, compared with about 18% for all by big tech and consulting firms support this assertion. PwC recently laid off 1,500 US employees, most of them recent hires. Microsoft got rid of about 3% of its workforce, most of them software engineers and project managers. A now-famous memo by the Spotify CEO froze all hiring, insisting that employees must first prove that AI can't do that job before they hire a human has always impacted jobs, destroying many old ones, but also creating new, unexpected ones. The IT wave put old-school clerks and stenographers to pasture, but created millions of software developers and search engine marketers. Manufacturing went through a similar however, is different in the sense that it is a cognitive technology—one of the brain, rather than of the hand. So, it squarely takes aim at the knowledge worker and the creative seems different with AI is how it is impacting first jobbers and entry-level workers. This is dangerous, as it is in the formative years that youngsters learn skills and gain basic code and debugging are how they rise to become great software engineers; junior paralegals and associates draft clauses and contracts that prepares them for partner-level tasks; and retail and customer service agents learn the basics before they can rise up the hierarchy. These are, coincidentally, the tasks that AI can do best. Deep Research can do the job of researchers; vibe coding with Cursor AI of entry-level software; while Harvey AI and NotebookLM draft excellent curiously, AI seems to be favouring the older people—with their human qualities of judgement, experience, institutional memory and collaboration, sharpened over years. It is in these human skills that young people need to be groomed. But if entry jobs go away, it will create a massive unemployment and educational crisis, and choke the pipeline of young people who can replace the our obsession for software and STEM, it was not only computer or software engineering graduates who joined tech firms as software engineers. Legions of mechanical, electronics and even civil engineers did the same. There is a whole world to build out there outside of software. Manufacturing firms desperately need engineers to run their machines, there are bridges to be built, roads to be repaired and data centres to be run. For instance, Google recently announced a $10 million grant, among other things, to train electricians for the power plant and data centre boom that AI has sowed. This huge shortage means electrical engineers in data centre clusters in the US are earning significantly more than software engineers do. Simply put, say hello to the revolutionary idea that mechanical engineers do mechanical definition of literacy has changed. It was about reading, writing and arithmetic; now it is beyond that to working naturally with AI tools and agents. Young people, including those I teach at Ashoka and other universities, are fast adapting to be AI literate and use AI tools in everything they do, to get a leg up in their job search. At KPMG, recent graduates are reportedly leveraging AI tools and handling tax jobs that used to be done by employees with three-plus years' experience. Big legal firms are encouraging early-career lawyers to work on complex contracts that once senior people will have to rediscover humanities with subjects of logic, grammar, ethics, philosophy and literature to keep our competitive advantage. With AI agents increasingly handling the technical 'how-to' of tasks, the human edge will lie in the 'why' and the 'what next'. The 'humble' subjects of humanities like language, philosophy, grammar and the arts are the ones that provide us critical frameworks for understanding context, ethics, human motivation, creativity and critical judgment —skills that are inherently difficult for AI to replicate meaningfully. As answers become commoditised, questions or prompts become important, and increasingly employers will prefer graduates with a mix of humanities and technical and SMEs build economies, not large monolithic organisations. More and more first jobbers will choose to become entrepreneurs. The New York Times writes about how at Stanford University, fewer grads are considering tech and finance careers, and more of them are plunging into starting companies — 'on the theory that if humans are about to lose their labor advantages to powerful AI systems, they had better hurry and do something big'.There is no rule that people must do only one job at a time. As AI rolls in, multiple skills will become much more important. Be a software engineer and a chef; qualify as a designer and run a pet foster home; build websites as well as toys for children. Think of your career not as a linear progression in a single industry, but a portfolio you are before this era, young people entered jobs as apprentices. They would pay a master blacksmith or surgeon to teach them their craft, before setting up a practice of their own. The modern corporate organisation reversed that trend; young people were paid to learn during their initial years. As AI replaces basic skills and reinvents work, there could be a reversal. There could be a future where humans would invest to do our first job, before we claim the right to earn.

Gaza rescuers say Israel fire kills 36, six of them near US-backed aid centre
Gaza rescuers say Israel fire kills 36, six of them near US-backed aid centre

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Gaza rescuers say Israel fire kills 36, six of them near US-backed aid centre

Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed at least 36 Palestinians on Saturday, six of them in a shooting near a US-backed aid distribution centre. The Israeli military told AFP that troops had fired "warning shots" at individuals that it said were "advancing in a way that endangered the troops". The shooting deaths were the latest reported near the aid centre run by the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) in the southern district of Rafah and came after it resumed distributions following a brief suspension in the wake of similar deaths earlier this week. Meanwhile, an aid boat with 12 activists on board, including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, was nearing Gaza in a bid to highlight the plight of Palestinians in the face of an Israeli blockade that has only been partially eased. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that at around 7:00 am (0400 GMT), "six people were killed and several others wounded by the forces of the Israeli occupation near the Al-Alam roundabout", where they had gathered to seek humanitarian aid from the distribution centre around a kilometre (a little over half a mile) away. AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls compiled by the civil defence agency or the circumstances of the deaths it reports. Samir Abu Hadid, who was there early Saturday, told AFP that thousands of people had gathered near the roundabout. "As soon as some people tried to advance towards the aid centre, the Israeli occupation forces opened fire from armoured vehicles stationed near the centre, firing into the air and then at civilians," Abu Hadid said. The GHF said in a statement it had not distributed aid on Saturday because of "direct threats" from Hamas. It said it was adapting its operations to "overcome these threats" and planned to "resume distributions without delay". The GHF, officially a private effort with opaque funding, began operations in late May as Israel partially eased a more than two-month-long aid blockade. UN agencies and major aid groups have declined to work with it, citing concerns it serves Israeli military goals. On Saturday, the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said that the overall toll for the Gaza war had reached 54,772, the majority civilians. The UN considers these figures reliable. The war was sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people on the Israeli side, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. Israel has come under increasing international criticism over the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, where the UN warned in May that the entire population was at risk of famine. The aid boat Madleen, organised by an international activist coalition, was sailing towards Gaza on Saturday, aiming to breach Israel's naval blockade and deliver aid to the territory, organisers said. "We are now sailing off the Egyptian coast," German human rights activist Yasemin Acar told AFP. She said they expected to reach Gaza by Monday morning. The Palestinian territory was under Israeli naval blockade even before Hamas's October 2023 attack and the Israeli military has made clear it intends to enforce it. "For this case as well, we are prepared," army spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said on Tuesday. "We have gained experience in recent years, and we will act accordingly." A 2010 commando raid on the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara, which was part of a similar attempt to breach Israel's naval blockade, left 10 civilians dead. The Israeli military has stepped up its operations in Gaza in recent weeks in what it says is a renewed push to defeat Hamas, whose October 2023 attack sparked the war. On Saturday, the military issued evacuation orders for neighbourhoods in northern Gaza, saying they had been used for rocket attacks. Meanwhile the World Health Organisation said in a statement there were no functioning hospitals left in northern Gaza and said the healthcare system in the territory was collapsing. It also warned that the last two functioning hospitals in Khan Yunis in southern Gaza were at risk and called for them to be protected. Separately, in a special operation in the Rafah area on Friday, Israeli forces retrieved the body of Thai hostage Nattapong Pinta, Defence Minister Israel Katz said. Thai Foreign Ministry spokesman Nikorndej Balankura said the country was "deeply saddened" by his death. Also on Saturday, Hamas released a photograph of one of the remaining hostages, Matan Zangauker, appearing to be in poor health, with a warning that he would not survive. During the October 2023 attack, militants abducted 251 hostages, 55 of whom remain in Gaza, including 31 the Israeli military says are dead.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store