Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claims ‘historic victory' in conflict with Iran
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed a 'historic victory' in its conflict with Iran, but warned it will 'strike again' if Tehran restores its nuclear program, as the nation's shaky ceasefire appears to stand up.
Speaking in a televised address, Mr Netanyahu detailed Israel's achievements in the war, including its attacks on top generals and nuclear scientists, hailing a historic victory.
The Prime Minister also said Israel destroyed nuclear sites in Arak, Natanz and Isfahan, but emphasised it must also complete its campaign against Iran's axis, defeat Hamas and coordinate the return of all hostages in Gaza.
'For dozens of years, I promised you that Iran would not have nuclear weapons and indeed... we brought to ruin Iran's nuclear program,' Mr Netanyahu said.
'We have dismantled the Iranian nuclear project and if anyone in Iran thinks of rebuilding it, we will strike again.'
Mr Netanyahu claimed Israel's attack on Iran, named 'Operation Rising Lion', would be 'recorded in the annals of Israel's wars, and will be studied by armies all over the world.'
During his speech, the Prime Minister thanked US President Donald Trump for standing by Israel.
'Our friend President Trump has stood by us in an unprecedented way – under his direction the US military destroyed the deep-earth enrichment site at Fordow,' he said.
The address follows reports of Israeli Air Forces intercepting two unmanned aerial vehicles on Tuesday evening (local time) that were heading towards the country's territory.
The Israeli Air Forces posted on X that they were likely from Iran and that the interceptions were executed outside the country's territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Ruling shows need for a truly impartial ABC
Antoinette Lattouf's court victory over the ABC has exposed terrible misjudgment by senior management and opened the door to emboldening staff and contracted talent to publicly express political opinions. Such a development would sit uncomfortably on a public broadcaster that wears impartiality on its sleeve as 'Australia's most trusted source of news and current affairs'. Justice Darryl Rangiah on Wednesday found that the ABC contravened sections of the Fair Work Act and an enterprise agreement by terminating Lattouf's employment for reasons including that 'she held political opinions opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza'. He ordered the ABC pay $70,000 compensation but rejected allegations that the reasons for termination included her race or national extraction. Lattouf was removed as a fill-in host of ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023 after privately posting Human Rights Watch comment about the Israel-Gaza war on social media. The same story had already been reported by the ABC. She expressed no views while on air. Justice Rangiah said that amid an 'orchestrated campaign of complaints against her by pro-Israel lobbyists', she was dropped three days into a five-day shift. Lattouf took her case to the Fair Work Commission, which ruled she had been fired, and then to the Federal Court. The case provided entertainment aplenty, with senior ABC executives tripping over themselves. For example, the then ABC managing director David Anderson admitted a 'step missing' in the way the broadcaster handled her exit, and former ABC chair Ita Buttrose emailed senior managers asking 'has Antoinette been replaced? I'm over getting emails about her' before plaintively asking 'why can't she come down with flu? Or COVID. Or a stomach upset? We owe her nothing.' In his judgment, Justice Rangiah acknowledged concerns surrounding Lattouf's impartiality, saying that, as an employee of the ABC, her private social media post was bound to be controversial. 'It was ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer,' he said. 'It was one thing for the ABC to publish the report as a news story: it was quite another for Ms Lattouf, having already made social media posts complained of as reflecting anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views, to repost the story.' Loading But the case exposed the ABC's highly stressed culture. Under sustained attack by governments and media rivals, the ABC has walked wounded for a decade, retreating from cultural and light entertainment only to make experienced staff redundant, and instituting a 'star' system that often encouraged personality over reportage. Meanwhile, executives with little public broadcasting experience were hired. Most ABC executives involved in the Lattouf imbroglio have departed. Buttrose went in early 2024, Anderson and chief content officer Chris Oliver-Taylor left this year. Former ABC Radio Sydney station manager Steve Ahern, responsible for hiring Lattouf, resigned last year.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
We've never had a Middle East war like this. Many will regret ‘going all the way'
For all of these reasons, I'm convinced that some very big internal debates are coming – if the wars really stop. For autocratic movements like Hamas or countries like Iran, history teaches us that internally driven regime change happens only after the war is over – and without foreign interventions, said pollster and political scientist Craig Charney. It has to happen organically by a change in the relationship between the leaders there and those they are leading. Loading 'In Serbia in 2000, nationalist President Slobodan Milosevic fell after losing wars in Bosnia and Kosovo when he tried to steal the next election,' Charney said in an interview. 'Iraq's defeat in the first Gulf War led to a massive revolt against Saddam Hussein that he had to brutally put down. When Argentina's military junta lost the Falklands War of 1982, it had to allow democracy's return. And after the Armistice marking Germany's loss in World War I came the November Revolution that toppled the kaiser. Strongmen don't look so strong when they're losers.' The limited polling we have from Gaza, Charney added, suggests a backlash against Hamas for the catastrophe people there have experienced. There is no polling yet from Iran since the current conflict began, 'but social media chatter was reportedly favourable when it began with strikes against unpopular regime figures – and then became more rally-round-the-flag as civilian casualties have mounted,' Charney said. Now let's see what happens if the ceasefire holds. All I know for sure is this: Israel is the kind of democracy that Iran's secular educated elite – part of a rich Persian civilisational legacy – hope this war will pave the way for in Tehran. But an Iranian-style theocracy is precisely what Israel's secular educated warriors, pilots, scientists and cyber experts want to make sure Israel's victory doesn't create in Jerusalem – if there are new elections soon and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition tries to ride this war to victory. As Ari Shavit, an Israeli writer, pointed out to me: The sector of Israeli society that did the most to win the war against Iran 'was precisely the same sector that for eight months went out to the streets every Saturday night to prevent Netanyahu's extreme-right government from destroying Israel's liberal democracy'. Loading In 1970, Shavit noted, Israeli historian Shabtai Teveth wrote a famous book: The Cursed Blessing: The Story of Israel's Occupation of the West Bank. It basically argued that the unintended consequence of the 1967 war was that it unlocked messianic forces in Israeli society. Once the West Bank, the heart of biblical Israel, was back in Israel's hands, these forces would never consent to return it and would instead insist on settling. And here it is now — still in Israel's hands 58 years later — with a soul-draining, democracy-eroding occupation. What if, as with the unintended consequences of 1967, Shavit concluded, 'we will look back in 20 years and see that this war made Israel more like Iran is today and made Iran more like the Israel that was before. Because the extremists in Israel were able to take the victory delivered by liberal, democratic, scientific and enlightened Israel and turn this nation into a dark place.' The Palestinian community is also sorely in need of a rethink. The 'curse' of the Palestinians is that because their enemy has been the Jews, their plight has always received an inordinate amount of international attention and support that other groups never enjoyed – like the Kurds, who got stuck fighting for a state against Saddam and Turkey's Tayyip Erdogan. It's been a curse because all of that attention as victims often blunted the will of many Palestinians to assume more agency and conduct the kind of hard introspection that repeated military defeats should have stimulated. When students on college campuses all over America are calling to 'globalise the intifada,' why bother calling for the return of Salam Fayyad, the most effective nation-building Palestinian leader. Will this time be different? Will the terrible defeat that Hamas' October 7 attack delivered to Gaza tilt Palestinians to clearly and unambiguously get behind institutional reform of the Palestinian Authority, a demand for professional leadership and support for a demilitarised state along the 1967 lines? I hope so. Will it produce the thing Netanyahu most wants to avoid the emergence of: a competent, compromising, legitimate Palestinian Authority — i.e., a real partner for peace? Wouldn't that be ironic. In sum, this regional war for the players in the Middle East was the equivalent of World War II for Europe: It completely shakes up the status quo and opens the way for something new. Whether that new thing will be better or worse within and between the parties to this war is what will be most fascinating – or depressing – for me to watch.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How Qatar helped broker the Israel-Iran ceasefire
As Qatar and the other Persian Gulf nations watched the Israel-Iran War unfold over the past two weeks, they worried that an escalation could result in Iran targeting their strategic energy resources, undermining a critical source of their revenue. If the Iranian government was set on targeting American soldiers in the Gulf, it may have viewed the base in Qatar as less likely to provoke an escalation or damage its relations with some other Gulf Arab countries, which had been warming in recent years. The wealthy emirate of Qatar has generally maintained closer ties with Iran than most of the other Persian Gulf countries. It has also played a leading role in mediating between Israel and Hamas, the Iran-backed Palestinian militant group, since the war in the Gaza Strip began in October 2023. If Iran had attacked another Persian Gulf nation, it might have run into more complicated territory. The headquarters of the US Navy's 5th Fleet, in Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia's oil installations could also have become targets. But Iran's diplomatic relations with these two other Persian Gulf nations are still new and relatively shaky. Loading The United Arab Emirates is one of Iran's largest trading partners, offering Iran a vital link to the global economy as it navigates long-standing Western sanctions. The prospect of missiles flying over Dubai, a glitzy metropolis in the UAE, would have alienated a neighbour that Iran depends on. Qatari officials intervened with Iran on behalf of the Trump administration, according to three diplomats briefed on the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. They said that Trump had told the emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, that Israel had signed off on a US ceasefire proposal. The president had asked Qatar to help bring Iran on board, the diplomats said. The Qatari prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, then persuaded Iran to agree to the truce proposal by late Monday in a call with the Iranian leadership, the diplomats said. A senior White House official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss the negotiations publicly, said the Qatari emir played a role in the ceasefire discussions. Loading The truce took effect early Tuesday morning and appeared to be holding as evening approached. Qatar's handling of the crisis illustrated the value the wealthy Persian Gulf emirate puts in its relationship with the United States, said Hopton, the former British diplomat.
