‘No Kings' protest: Schedule, locations and more details about anti-Trump rallies in the US
People in large numbers are expected to take part in rallies against US President Donald Trump across hundreds of cities in the US on Saturday, June 14. Dubbed as the "No Kings" protests, these take on the Donald Trump administration and counter the military parade, marking 250 years of the US Army.
Also, June 14 is commemorated as Flag Day in America, recognizing the adoption of the US flag on June 14, 1777.
The demonstrations have been described as a "day of defiance" against the US President and his allies, with some asking for Trump to be "dethroned," Fox News reported.
The rallies have been called by several overlapping organizations, including Indivisible, a progressive group, the American Civil Liberties Union and 50501, which was formed earlier this year when Trump became the US President for the second time.
Notably, 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests and one movement. It organized the "Hands Off" protests on April 5, highlighting a wide range of grievances against the Trump administration.
The protesting organizations have said that they want to defend democracy by opposing Trump's "authoritarian rule." One of their major issue is the mass deportation programs. This comes after protests against the immigration crackdown turned violent in Los Angeles last week, forcing Trump to call in the National Guard.
Trump, celebrating his 79th birthday today, will remain present in Washington, D.C. to watch the US military parade that features nearly 6,600 troops and 150 military vehicles.
Also Read: Trump military parade 2025: Check the entire schedule, route map and other key details here
Through these demonstrations, the protestors look forward to portraying Trump as a king who rules the nation with unchecked power, bypassing all the laws and court rulings.
On its official site, 50501 states that the Trump administration has "defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services".
Their flagship march and rally is slated to take place in Philadelphia.
Slamming the protesting organisations, Trump earlier this week said he does not feel like a king and is required to "go through hell to get stuff approved".
FAQs
1. What does the 'No Kings' protest mean?
The demonstrations are taking place against US President Donald Trump and his administration to reject 'authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarisation" of US democracy.
2. Where are the 'No Kings' protests taking place?
These are being organized in more than 2,000 cities across all 50 states in the US, besides several international locations.
3. Why is it taking place on June 14?
Protesters view Donald Trump's military parade as an extension of his authoritarian rule so the No Kings event is also taking place on June 14.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
On same day: Massive military parade in DC, 'No Kings' protests sweep US - how the day unfolded
'No Kings protest' sweep US while Trump goes to military parade on his 79th birthday Anti-Trump protests erupted across all 50 US states on Saturday as President Donald Trump presided over a grand military parade in the capital, marking both the US Army's 250th anniversary and his 79th birthday. Thousands took to the streets in a coordinated wave of demonstrations under the banner of 'No Kings,' decrying what they called authoritarian symbolism and condemning the administration's immigration and domestic policies. While Trump reviewed troops and delivered a short patriotic address accompanied by First Lady Melania Trump, cities nationwide saw tense clashes between protesters and police. Parade goes ahead despite weather Held on the National Mall, the military parade featured troop formations, heavy artillery, and flyovers, though the latter was limited due to cloud cover and light rain. The event was postponed by several hours to avoid worsening weather conditions. Military bands played patriotic music, and select servicemembers shared tributes to American legacy and service. Trump kept his remarks brief, hailing the strength and resilience of the US military. Nationwide protests turn volatile and chaotic As the parade took place in Washington, protests surged coast to coast. In Los Angeles, demonstrators clashed with police after authorities deployed tear gas and flash bangs near City Hall, where families had gathered. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo LA, which saw violent anti-immigration protests recently, also took to streets for this protest. A police spokeswoman told local TV channel KTLA that a "small group of agitators" threw rocks, bottles and fireworks at officers, prompting authorities to order the crowd to disperse. She added, "If people refuse to leave, we will make arrests. We have been patient all day." In Phoenix, panic erupted when a man waved a handgun in the crowd before being subdued by officers. Philadelphia saw persistent street marches, with crowds chanting and waving placards even as police attempted to disperse them. In Virginia, a driver was arrested after recklessly plowing into a group of demonstrators but didn't cause any injury. In Texas, a credible threat forced authorities to shut down the state Capitol grounds temporarily. One suspect was arrested in connection with the incident, though details remain limited. Leaders urge calm amid unrest Congressional leaders from both parties urged peace and unity in the wake of the unrest. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer both condemned violence and called for Americans to safeguard democratic institutions while expressing dissent peacefully.
India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
EU Struggles For Trade Deal With US By July 9 Amid Tariff Tensions
New Delhi: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has reiterated the European Union's (EU) commitment to reach a "good" trade deal with the US before July 9 during a phone call with US President Donald Trump. In a post on social media platform X, von der Leyen said on Saturday that she had a "good call with President Trump ahead of the G7 Summit". The US government's decision to raise tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50 per cent took effect earlier this month, escalating a trade dispute that has drawn sharp concern from European producers, who warn the steep new duties could cause significant harm to the sector, Xinhua news agency reported. On May 26, European Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic made similar comments after Trump said talks with the 27-member bloc were "going nowhere" and threatened to impose a 50 per cent tariff on all EU imports from June 1. Following a call from von der Leyen, Trump then agreed to delay the planned tariff hike until July 9. According to von der Leyen's post on Saturday, she and Trump also discussed the situations in the Middle East as well as in Ukraine during the phone call. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on June 11 that the European Union is likely to be among the last deals that the US completes, as the administration rushes to secure tariff agreements with other trading partners. Lutnick, who has long expressed frustration with the bloc, indicated on Wednesday that discussions intensified following President Donald Trump's threat to raise levies to 50 per cent -- which he delayed until July 9 to allow more time for negotiations -- but are still proceeding more slowly than others. The Commerce chief said "Europe was more than thorny" before Trump issued his ultimatum, then "all of the sudden they got a little religion and made a proper offer". The US and EU have been grappling over trade terms before the July cutoff. EU trade chief Sefcovic has been in regular communication with Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer since the partners agreed to fast-track negotiations two weeks ago. Still, the EU believes trade negotiations with the US could blow past the deadline and officials see an agreement on the principles of a deal by that date as a best-case scenario that would allow further time to work out details, according to people familiar with the matter. Trump administration officials have shown exasperation over talks with the EU, saying it is more challenging to negotiate an agreement with a group of 27-nations with differing priorities. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a May interview with Bloomberg Television said most US trading partners have been negotiating "in very good faith" but singled out the EU as an "exception". He also accused the bloc of having a "collective action problem". The EU has struggled to gain more clarity on what Trump is seeking in talks.
The Print
32 minutes ago
- The Print
Israel crushed Ayatollah's regime, but stopping Iran's nuke programme will need total overthrow
As the Americans and British did in 1953, Israel will likely need to go further and dismantle the regime for its strategy to succeed. The reason is simple: Israel has acted to ensure that no rival power in the Middle East can threaten its undisclosed nuclear arsenal. Nuclear experts like David Albright say there is so far little sign that deeply buried uranium enrichment facilities, such as those at Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz, have suffered severe damage . This week, precision Israeli air strikes blew apart the ferocious imperial façade of the theocracy that governs Iran, a system long sustained by bluff. Iran's doddering Cold War-era air force and much-hyped homegrown air defences failed to protect critical military facilities, and the country's highest-ranking officials were scythed through in precession attacks. Iran's retaliatory strikes, launched with a fleet of low-cost, homemade ballistic missiles, proved largely ineffective . When the assassins' knives had done their work, scholar, journalist, and diplomat Lawrence Paul Elwell-Sutton ruminated about why it had to be done : 'Really, it seemed hardly fair that dignified and correct Western statesmanship should be defeated by the antics of incomprehensible orientals.' In the summer of 1951, the radical Iranian politician Mohammad Mossadeq had nationalised the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, Britain's prized oil concession. Furious, the West began quietly plotting his downfall, fearing that Iran was sliding towards communism. Ending the war with the regime intact, then, could lead Iran to make the fateful decision to produce and test a nuclear weapon. That process could take far less time than most imagine. As physicist Hui Zhang points out, China could assemble a testable nuclear device in just three weeks in 1964, even without advanced equipment. Israel hopes its assault will open the door for Iranians fed up with their regime to bring down the Ayatollahs—or, alternatively, for groups like the Islamic State or ethnic Baloch insurgents to turn the regime's gaze inward. It's a high-stakes gamble—and one that could prove to be the undoing of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Also read: Attacking Iran's nuclear programme won't bolster Israel's national security A triumph foretold Even though Iran's missile capabilities have been talked up by experts across the world, the truth is the Ayatollah's military core is rusted through. Last year, a rare leak of radar-screen images aired on Iranian news channels revealed that Natanz was being defended by radar systems made by the Soviet Union in the 1970s, and homemade missiles lacked the capacity to effectively coordinate. Even the limited number of Russian-made S-400 systems supplied to Iran proved incapable of shielding against Israel's advanced F-22 and F-35 jets. To make things worse, Iran's air force still relies largely on the Cold War-era F-4 Phantom II and locally built derivatives of the Northrop F-5, both originally supplied by the United States. The air force also has a small number of MiG29 jets from the Soviet era. But neither China nor Russia has been willing to provide the Islamic Republic with modern fighter platforms or advanced missile systems. Iran's retaliatory missile strikes on Israel in 2024 exposed the limitations in its 'Atmanirbhar' missile programme. Many missiles failed to launch, were intercepted, or struck far off their intended targets. These shortcomings are largely because Iran has been denied access by sanctions to technologies needed for precision guidance. The Iranian response to Israel's strikes this week further demonstrated these weaknesses. While drones like the HESA Shahed 136 have seen some success in Ukraine, that success comes in a vastly different battlespace—where adversaries are in close contact and not protected by air defences. Israel, in contrast, has been able to provide its thinly inhabited territories with a layered air defence network, helped by the vast distances that slow-moving drones have to travel from Iran. Iran's top leadership, The New York Times reporter Farnaz Fassihi noted, also miscalculated the risk of an Israeli strike, assuming Israel would not act just days before scheduled negotiations with the United States. This allowed Israeli special forces to target top officials using agents already stationed on the ground. What remains unclear, though, is the strategic question: Can Israel's strikes actually prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and what might happen if they do not? Also read: New round of Iran nuclear negotiations begins. Time to talk about Israel's atomic bombs too The Iran-Israel nuclear dyad Twin flashes of light over a remote island in the Indian Ocean, captured by an American spy satellite in September 1979, established to the world that Israel had become the sixth nuclear power, following the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, and China. French assistance, historian Avner Cohen writes, helped Israel overcome the substantial technical and financial barriers to developing nuclear weapons. France, ironically, also helped lay the foundation for Iran's nuclear programme. Faced with the threat of the Soviet Union and unpersuaded by Western security guarantees, Iran's monarch, Shah Reza Pahlavi, authorised a civilian nuclear programme that ran alongside a secret weapons project. In 1974, Iran signed contracts with the French company Framatome to build two pressurised water reactors, followed by a deal with Germany to construct six more. Throughout the 1970s, commercial competition among France, Germany, and the United States, scholar Mustafa Kibaroglu writes, enabled countries like Pakistan, South Africa, Argentina, Brazil, Iran, and Libya to access sensitive nuclear technologies with relative ease. Ironically again, scholar Trita Parsi records, Israel itself built the missile production facility that laid the foundation for Iran's modern guided missile programme. Following the 1979 Islamic Revolution that toppled the Shah, Iran also signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Pakistan in 1987. This agreement gave Tehran access to blueprints and equipment from the black-market network run by Abdul Qadeer Khan, as political scientist Molly MacCalman's authoritative work shows. These developments were driven by the regime's lessons from the savage war with Saddam Husain's Iraq, where it found itself facing a brutal conflict supported by the West. In response, then-Parliament Speaker and military chief Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani declared, 'We should fully equip ourselves both in the offensive and defensive use of chemical, bacteriological, and radiological weapons.' For Iran's clerical regime, these existential concerns made nuclear capabilities a necessity. For Israel, they created a rising threat that the country's leaders could not, and would not, tolerate. Also read: Analysis—Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger ambition: regime change The endgame in Iran Stolen documents acquired by Israeli intelligence make it clear that Iran made a firm political decision in the late 1990s to pursue nuclear weapons capability. Likely, multiple circumstances shaped the decision of Iran's clerical leadership. First, the Gulf war in 1990 had demonstrated that the United States could rapidly dismantle Saddam Husain's military—forces that were far superior to Iran's. Then, despite the war's end, Iran continued to face a threat from Iraq. The Iranian leadership ordered scientists to develop five 10-kiloton nuclear bombs as an initial deterrent. The events of 9/11, though, and the discovery of the Khan nuclear smuggling network changed the world. In an effort to seek a rapprochement with the West, Iran partially halted its nuclear weapons work and opened its nuclear facilities and uranium stockpiles to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In 2015, Iran finally hammered out a deal with the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany. In exchange for an end to sanctions, Iran committed to capping its uranium enrichment at 3.67 per cent—well below the 20 per cent threshold that allows for rapid refinement to weapons-grade levels. But in 2019, under pressure from Israel, President Donald Trump resiled on the agreement. Israel argued that Iran's missile programme gave it the capability to deliver a nuclear bomb, which—as its own experience showed—could be secretly assembled. Learning from that experience that sanctions didn't stop the development of an Iranian bomb, Trump's second term saw him reach out to reinstate the nuclear deal. Trump's public statements suggest he tried to delay an Israeli strike while using it as a tool to extract new concessions from Iran's leadership. Khalid Bin Salman, Saudi Arabia's defence minister and the son of its monarch, King Salman bin Abdulaziz, is also reported to have delivered a secret message to Iran in April, warning of Israeli military action if a deal was not made. Israel and the United States are now betting that Iran's leadership will acknowledge their military and economic weakness and return to the negotiating table. Trump, in particular, has held out an olive branch after Israel's strikes, promising Iran 'a second chance.' But like all gambles, the outcome of this one is impossible to predict. Iran's leaders may conclude that they're better off rapidly producing a nuclear weapon and then using it to secure a better bargain. And that could lead Israel to escalate its military campaign, with unpredictable consequences not just for Iran, but for global energy markets and Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Even if Iran's regime were to collapse, the new dispensation will be driven by the same existential anxieties that led the Ayatollahs to seek a nuclear weapon. The CIA-facilitated coup that overthrew Mossadeq might have beaten back the Left in Iran, but it also laid the groundwork for the very missile and nuclear programmes that now threaten Israel. The dangerous truth is that the breakdown of the world order—whether through Russia's war in Ukraine, or China's threats to countries like South Korea and Japan—is leading more and more states to wonder whether the nuclear weapons are worth the price. That is leading all into a new kind of world, with hazards we can now only dimly conceive. Praveen Swami is contributing editor at ThePrint. His X handle is @praveenswami. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
