Trump secretly admired Ukraine's ‘badass' drone attack - but worries it'll make Russia ceasefire harder: report
President Donald Trump once accused Ukraine 's Volodymyr Zelensky of lacking 'cards' to play in his country's years-long fight against Russia, but now he's paying far more attention to what might be in Zelensky's hands.
In the wake of Ukraine's brazen, and successful, attack on multiple Russian air bases over the weekend, Trump was reportedly left marveling at the ingenuity and sheer chutzpah of Kyiv 's counteroffensive using dozens of armed drones launched from trucks traveling deep inside Russia, swarming over military airfields across the country and raining down onto nuclear-capable long-range bombers.
According to Axios, Trump has privately described it as 'strong' and 'badass.'
One of the president's advisers likened the audacious move to 'a chihuahua inflicting some real damage on a much bigger dog."
Dubbed Operation Spiderweb, by Ukrainian authorities, was carried out by the SBU, the secret service of Ukraine, and destroyed more than 40 such planes, a significant portion of Moscow 's strategic bombing capability.
Ukraine has claimed the attack — a homegrown operation in which drones were concealed in false compartments within lorry roofs, smuggled into Russia, then launched en masse simultaneously many thousands of miles apart – and many thousands of miles behind enemy lines — destroyed 41 Russian aircraft, causing $7 billion worth of damage to long-range bombers that carried the cruise missiles Putin has been using against Ukraine.
The president's laudatory characterization of the Ukrainian attack on the Russian bombers tracks previous reporting by The Independent on Trump's uncharacteristic silence in the days between the drone strikes and his call with Putin.
People close to him have suggested that worldview, forged in the days of Cold War-era nuclear tensions between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., has long led Trump to Russia as a strong country and Putin as a strong leader — a 'winner,' in his own parlance.
But the success of last weekend's Ukrainian attacks may have — for now — positively influenced his opinion of Zelensky. Put simply, it's because Ukraine's success makes Moscow look less like a winner and more like the thing Trump hates above all else: a loser.
Still, Trump remains concerned about the long-term prospects for his push to get Kyiv and Moscow to hammer out a ceasefire agreement, something he promised to accomplish on 'day one' of his presidency during last year's campaign.
One source who spoke directly with the president told Axios that he 'has concerns' about the chance that Putin will 'go crazy in response.' And a U.S. official said the disabling of part of Moscow's nuclear-capable bomber fleet has pushed things to 'a very dangerous point' and has Trump worried that such attacks will 'prolong the fighting.'
'He wants the fighting to stop, so it disappoints him whenever there is an attack like that," they said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump says Elon Musk ‘has lost his mind'
Donald Trump has escalated his public feud with Elon Musk, stating he is "not even thinking about" him and suggesting he may sell his Tesla Model S. The renewed hostility follows a social media spat where Musk criticised Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, complicating its passage in Congress. On Friday in Washington, Trump was asked about reports of a peacemaking phone call with Musk, to which he responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind? Shares in Tesla have dropped 14% after Trump threatened to cut off government contracts with Musk's companies, leading to a $150 billion loss in value. A prolonged feud could impact Republican control of Congress in the midterm elections if Musk withholds financial support, though Musk has indicated he plans to curtail his political spending.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Enrique Tarrio and other freed January 6 convicts sue over prosecutions
Enrique Tarrio, the former national leader of the far-right Proud Boys group, and four other members convicted of orchestrating the deadly 6 January 2021 US Capitol attack are suing the federal government for allegedly violating their rights. A lawsuit filed on Friday in federal court in Florida alleges that FBI agents and prosecutors acted with personal malice when they investigated and charged the five, who were all granted pardons or commutations when Donald Trump returned to office in January. Tarrio and fellow plaintiffs Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs and Dominic Pezzola are seeking unspecified compensatory damages, plus $100m each in punitive damages, according to the lawsuit filed in US district court in Orlando. Tarrio received a 22-year prison sentence in September 2023 for his part in organizing the attack, even though he was not present when Trump's supporters overran the Capitol building bent on keeping him in power after his defeat to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. Nordean, Biggs and Rehl were convicted of seditious conspiracy after the same trial – which lasted almost four months – and given lengthy prison terms. Pezzola was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but handed a 10-year sentence for convictions including destruction of government property. All four, along with 10 others, had their sentences commuted following Trump's sweeping action in January that also granted full and unconditional pardons for about 1,500 people involved in the violence, which was linked to several deaths and the injuries of about 140 law enforcement officers. Trump's order referred to the Capitol attack convicts as 'hostages' and stated: 'This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.' According to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which reported the lawsuit development on Friday, the plaintiffs claim the government lacked probable cause to raid their homes after they turned themselves in in connection with their indictments – and that FBI employees reviewed privileged communications with their attorneys. 'Through the use of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, violations of attorney-client privilege, and placing spies to report on trial strategy, the government got its fondest wish of imprisoning the [January 6] defendants, the modern equivalent of placing one's enemies' heads on a spike outside the town wall as a warning to any who would think to challenge the status quo,' the lawsuit states. The document also complains that the men were poorly treated during their time in detention, held for an extended pre-trial period without bond, and held in solitary confinement without cause. 'The plaintiffs themselves did not obstruct the proceedings at the Capitol, destroy government property, resist arrest, conspire to impede the police, or participate in civil disorder, nor did they plan for or order anyone else to do so,' the lawsuit continues, contesting evidence presented by prosecutors at their trial. 'Rather, mere statements of approval, agreement, and enthusiasm are apparently enough to form a criminal conspiracy, provided the points of view are offensive enough to employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice, no matter how attenuated from criminal action they may have been.' Neither the FBI nor the justice department immediately responded to requests for comment. Both are now controlled by close Trump allies: Kash Patel, the FBI director, and Pam Bondi, the attorney general. Tarrio was arrested in Washington DC within a month of his release for allegedly striking a woman who was protesting against a gathering attended by Proud Boys members that received pardons. Two days later, he was captured in a video taken in the lobby of a Washington hotel haranguing officers who were injured during the insurrection as they attended a conference. In May, it was reported that the Trump administration had reached a $5m wrongful death settlement with the family of Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter who was fatally shot by a police officer as she attempted to break through a door into the speaker's lobby at the Capitol while participating in the attack. Tarrio, from Miami, told the WSJ in an interview on Friday that he believed the legal environment had changed since Trump's re-election. He said he had finally been able to find a law firm to take his compensation case after failing to find lawyers in Florida to represent him in legal action against social media companies and banks he said had 'deplatformed' people for their political beliefs.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
13 House Republicans urge Senate to scale back clean energy cuts in bill they voted for
WASHINGTON — Thirteen House Republicans who voted for President Donald Trump's " big, beautiful bill" sent a letter Friday urging Senate GOP leaders to scale back some of its clean energy cuts, sparking pushback from conservative hardliners. The unusual criticism of their own bill indicates a modicum of regret by the GOP lawmakers, whose votes were critical to the bill passing the House by a narrow margin last month. 'While we were proud to have worked to ensure that the bill did not include a full repeal of the clean energy tax credits, we remain deeply concerned by several provisions,' said the Republicans in the letter, led by Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Va. They cited provisions that 'abruptly terminate several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction,' and 'restrictions to transferability.' 'This approach jeopardizes ongoing development, discourages long-term investment, and could significantly delay or cancel energy infrastructure projects across the country,' the group of House Republicans said in criticizing the legislation they voted for, while suggesting some changes to 'mitigate' the harm it could cause. Kiggans, like most of the signatories, represents a competitive district that Democrats are targeting in the 2026 election. Other politically vulnerable members include: Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.; Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz.; Mike Lawler, R-N.Y.; Don Bacon, R-Neb.; Gabe Evans, R-Colo.; Young Kim, R-Calif.; David Valadao, R-Calif.; Rob Bresnahan, R-Pa.; and Tom Kean, R-N.J. The remaining three, who sit comparably safer seats, are Reps. Mark Amodei, R-Nev.; Andrew Garbarino, R-N.Y.; and Nick LaLota, R-N.Y. The 13 Republicans warned that 'the House-passed bill includes a phase out schedule for credits that would cause significant disruption to projects under development and stop investments needed to win the global energy race.' The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee mocked the letter and said the lawmakers will own their votes for the bill. 'These 13 Republicans promised not to support cuts to clean energy tax credits, then cast the deciding votes to raise energy costs on American families, kill tens of thousands of jobs, and undermine our nation's energy security. They are responsible for this Big, Ugly Bill and all the harm it will cause,' DCCC spokesperson Viet Shelton said. 'This toothless letter is the worst kind of political hypocrisy and voters will see it for what it is, a lie perpetrated by endangered House Republicans who caved to their D.C. party bosses at the expense of the American people.' Kiggans' office did not immediately return a request for comment on whether she was aware of the provisions when supporting the bill, or if she'd vote for one that falls short of her new demands. Senate Republicans are eying changes to the House bill to ease some of the negative impacts of the funding cuts. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, told NBC News her version of the bill will probably relax some of the deadlines to cut off funding. But she said Thursday that there probably won't be massive changes to the House-passed bill. 'I imagine it's going to track fairly similarly, but I think some of the deadlines are pretty tight in terms of when you have to have construction and those things,' Capito said. 'We've been approached by several employers who need some of those tax.' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he's willing to undo some of the clean energy funding, but he wants to make sure that existing business investments aren't harmed by the bill. 'What we're trying to focus on is to make sure that if businesses have invested and have projects in progress, that we do everything we can to hold them harmless,' he said. 'Whether or not we continue some of these programs out into the future — that's a separate question that I'm willing to entertain.' Meanwhile, the conservative group Club For Growth is running ads targeting Sens. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., John Curtis, R-Utah, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, for backing more modest rollbacks of the clean energy funding, which carries benefits for their states. There's another reason changing the bill is easier said than done: The speedy cuts to clean energy funding under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act were part of an House agreement to win the votes of conservative hardliners who want to reduce the bill's red ink. House Republicans have a majority of 220 to 212, meaning they can only spare three 'no' votes in their ranks to pass the bill when the Senate sends back their revised version. 'You backslide one inch on those IRA subsidies and I'm voting against this bill,' Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said Friday on the House floor. 'So you do what you want to do in the Senate, House of Lords, have your fun. But if you mess up the Inflation Reduction Act, Green New Scam subsidies, I ain't voting for that bill.'
