logo
Freshman Kansas senator ‘trying to stop bad stuff' while pressing for property tax relief

Freshman Kansas senator ‘trying to stop bad stuff' while pressing for property tax relief

Yahoo03-03-2025

Freshman Sen. Patrick Schmidt, a Topeka Democrat, appears at a Feb. 28, 2025, recording of the Kansas Reflector podcast to talk about his desire for property tax relief, legislative priorities, and the condensed schedule for this year's session. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
TOPEKA — The way freshman Sen. Patrick Schmidt sees it, a shorter legislative session isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Republican legislative leaders condensed the schedule this year to complete work by the end of March, then come back for just a couple of days in the middle of April to consider any vetoes by Gov. Laura Kelly and make last-minute budget adjustments. That's a significant departure from the schedule most years, where the session bleeds into April and lawmakers return around the start of May for another week or two of action.
But Schmidt, a Topeka Democrat, said the shortened timeline for passing bills could work in Democrats' favor. As he put it during a recording of the Kansas Reflector podcast: 'We're trying to stop bad stuff.'
'It might not be the worst thing if we can run out the clock on some of these extremist ideas that they are always presenting,' Schmidt said.
Schmidt's journey to the Statehouse was preceded by his time as a U.S. Navy intelligence officer. He said he 'spent a lot of time sailing in circles in the South China Sea,' and served with special forces in Bahrain before going to work in the Pentagon.
But after he witnessed the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection while living across from the U.S. Capitol, he was motivated to enter the political arena.
'I was close enough to smell the tear gas and bear spray and to see the people violently assaulting law enforcement officers,' Schmidt said. 'And I'm really saddened, especially by what we saw last month at the pardons of people that violently attacked law enforcement officers. And I think that it's a sad day. I think it's a dangerous day for the country.'
Schmidt ran for a U.S. House seat in 2022, when he lost to an incumbent Republican, then in 2024 won an open 19th District seat that stretches from East Topeka to northwest Lawrence.
The district shouldn't even exist, Schmidt said. He blames GOP gerrymandering for a disconnect between the priorities of legislators and the needs of Kansans who are hurting. Republicans last fall expanded their supermajority ranks to 31 seats in the 40-member Senate.
'Moses did not come down from the mountain with 40 Senate districts in Kansas drawn exactly so to ensure only nine Democrats and 31 Republicans,' Schmidt said. 'These are wholly artificial creations that I think really distort democracy in this state.'
Schmidt said he is disappointed that lawmakers haven't given more attention to providing property tax relief to homeowners, as voters urged them to do last fall. Since the session began in January, Schmidt said, he has heard from people on fixed incomes who are 'crying to me' about the possibility of being driven from their home.
He was dismayed that the first vote in the Senate this year was for legislation that would eliminate property taxes for private jets and yachts. Senate Bill 10 passed 37-3. And the only bill the Legislature has passed into law so far, Senate Bill 63, bans gender-affirming care for minors.
Another bill that passed the Senate would allow educators to misgender trans kids. Schmidt said Senate Bill 76 equates to 'legalized bullying' of kids who are already struggling with suicidal thoughts.
He wondered: 'Is passing these bills worth one more suicide in Kansas?'
Also: 'Why are we spending time on this instead of giving Kansans a solution for property taxes?'
Schmidt broke from party ranks to support Senate Concurrent Resolution 1603, which would ask voters to consider a constitutional amendment that limits taxable property valuations from increasing by more than 3% annually. An amendment made the adjustment retroactive to 2022, which means some people could actually see an immediate decrease in taxes.
The legislation requires two-thirds support in both the Senate and House before it would be placed on the November 2025 ballot. Schmidt was one of two Democrats who voted in favor of the resolution when the Senate passed it 28-11 on Feb. 6. So far, the House has shown no interest in the idea.
'I've spoken with my Democratic colleagues, I've spoken with the governor, I've spoken with my Republican colleagues, and they didn't all agree with me,' Schmidt said. 'But I'm very confident that when it comes to best outcomes for the 19th, and I think best outcomes for the state, the people want to vote on this. And I think if they want to vote on it, if they want to vote themselves to lower their property taxes, we need to give them that opportunity and trust the voters.'
His hope is that lawmakers return their focus to property taxes before the clock expires on the condensed legislative session.
'I would love to see real property tax relief for Kansans,' Schmidt said. 'I think that would help the most people all across, you know, regardless of location or socio-economic status. That would help the most people.
'But we need to be having serious conversations about why our population is not growing and why so many people struggle to see their future here. And you know, again, I think it gets back to these issues where we have a pretty good understanding of what people want, and the Legislature owes it to them to start delivering.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Granholm: Democrats would ‘welcome' Musk ‘helping us out'
Granholm: Democrats would ‘welcome' Musk ‘helping us out'

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Granholm: Democrats would ‘welcome' Musk ‘helping us out'

Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said Tuesday that Democrats would 'welcome' tech billionaire Elon Musk 'helping us out' after an intense clash between Musk and President Trump last week. 'I think the Democrats would welcome him helping us out, politically, but — financially, etc.,' Granholm said at Politico's 2025 Energy Summit. 'But, maybe, maybe not, I don't know. I'm not running.' Last Thursday, a fight between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier in the week escalated rapidly on Musk's X platform and Trump's Truth Social platform. The president said the tech billionaire 'just went CRAZY!' and threatened Musk's government contracts. Musk alleged that Trump had ties to convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein on X. The public spat followed the end of Musk's recent service in the Trump administration and an alliance with the president that appeared to start off strong. Musk endorsed Trump in July 2024 in the wake of Trump surviving an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Musk's administration service was marked by intense backlash from those on the left and Democrats over actions taken by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the federal government. Trump's ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen on Saturday said that Trump isn't done with tech billionaire Elon Musk yet. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country, because they can,' Cohen told MSNBC's Ali Velshi.

Judge strikes reference to ex-Illinois speaker Madigan's personal fortune from sentencing record
Judge strikes reference to ex-Illinois speaker Madigan's personal fortune from sentencing record

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge strikes reference to ex-Illinois speaker Madigan's personal fortune from sentencing record

CHICAGO — A federal judge on Tuesday struck from the court record a reference to former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan's personal net worth of more than $40 million, agreeing with the Democrat's defense team that it should have been kept private, even as the attorneys acknowledged the move was 'hollow' given that it was already widely publicized. U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey said he didn't find any 'bad faith' on the part of the federal prosecutors who included the figure in a filing last week ahead of Madigan's highly anticipated sentencing on Friday, but found that common practice would be to file such personal information under seal. Blakey's ruling came before the attorneys delivered arguments over sentencing guidelines at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, technically kicking off the sentencing process. Blakey took the matter under advisement until Friday's hearing. Federal prosecutors made Madigan's net worth public for the first time in a response to a sentencing memorandum filed by his attorneys, arguing that the defendant's 'greed is even more appalling given his law firm's success.' Daniel Collins, an attorney for Madigan, called the inclusion of the former speaker's personal fortune improper and a 'gratuitous effort' to publicly identify his net worth. 'It is not necessary to include the number in order for the government to make an argument about greed,' Collins said. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker countered to the judge that the defense left the door open by arguing in filings that Madigan was solely motivated by a desire to help people. She also said the figure is relevant as the government seeks a fine in the case. 'It's fair for the government to rebut that narrative and show the defendant was motivated by greed not need,' Streicker said. 'This is a defendant that enjoyed every advantage and significant financial wealth and still turned to bribery and fraud.' In February, Madigan was convicted of 10 of 23 counts, including marquee allegations that he agreed to squeeze lucrative, do-nothing contracts from ComEd for pals such as former Ald. Frank Olivo and Ald. Michael Zalewski and precinct captains Ray Nice and Edward Moody, all while the utility won a series of major legislation victories. Madigan was also convicted on six of seven counts — including wire fraud and Travel Act violations — regarding a plan to get former Ald. Daniel Solis, a key FBI mole who testified at length in the trial, appointed to a state board. Jurors deadlocked on all six counts related to Madigan's co-defendant former ComEd lobbyist Michael McClain. _______

Trump's Double Standard On LA's Protests Couldn't Be More Glaring
Trump's Double Standard On LA's Protests Couldn't Be More Glaring

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Double Standard On LA's Protests Couldn't Be More Glaring

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is warning those protesting against his unprecedented immigration crackdown in Los Angeles against targeting police officers and thousands of National Guard troops he's deployed there, promising to exact retribution on anyone who commits violence against them. 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Trump told reporters on Monday, before posting on his social media website: 'IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!' But Trump felt differently about violence against law enforcement when he issued blanket pardons earlier this year for hundreds of people who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 in an effort to keep him in office after his loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. His pardons included those convicted of assaulting or interfering with police officers, roughly 1,000 nonviolent offenders and around 200 people accused of assaulting police. A number of those pardoned have reportedly since been rearrested for other alleged crimes. 'These are the hostages. Approximately 1,500 were pardoned. Full pardon,' Trump said after issuing the pardons on his first day in office. About 140 police officers were injured in the attack on the Capitol, something that Trump has called a 'beautiful day' despite being impeached by the U.S. House for inciting an insurrection by spreading lies about election fraud. 'Their hypocrisy just smacks you in the face,' Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who investigated the Capitol attack as a former member of the House, told HuffPost in response to Trump's response to LA's unrest. 'Violence is never appropriate. It wasn't appropriate on Jan. 6 and it's not appropriate in LA or anywhere else. We need to be consistent about that.' Trump quickly deployed thousands of troops to California over the weekend — including 700 U.S. Marines — despite no request from the state's governor, Gavin Newsom, who has warned the president's actions will further inflame the unrest. The protests initially began after Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents executed raids at a Home Depot store in Los Angeles at the direction of the White House. As president on Jan. 6, 2021, however, Trump issued no order or formal request for National Guard troops to aid beleaguered U.S. Capitol police who were overrun by hundreds of his supporters. 'On Jan. 6, both the Democratic and Republican leadership in Congress were begging Donald Trump to make a statement, to call off the MAGA mob that invaded the Capitol,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told HuffPost. 'People were begging him to call out the National Guard, and he sat there and did nothing, and now he's acting in a situation where the officials in charge are telling him that federalizing the National Guard and sending in the Marines will only exacerbate a situation which is under control.' Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the House speaker at the time, also slammed Trump for federalizing the National Guard and sending troops to Los Angeles, something he refused to do when Congress was under attack. 'We begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it,' Pelosi told reporters on Tuesday. 'And yet, in a contra-constitutional way, he has sent the National Guard into California. Something is very wrong with this picture.' While Democrats have slammed Trump's response to the protests, Republicans are broadly welcoming the federal intervention in California — even those who have long espoused the importance of state's rights and the ability of local governments to enforce their laws. In 2024, for example, a group of 24 conservative House Republicans warned then-President Joe Biden not to federalize the Texas National Guard as some Texas Democratic lawmakers had been urging him to do, saying it would be an 'encroachment on Texas' constitutionally protected sovereignty.' Asked Tuesday if Trump is being inconsistent by sending troops to Los Angeles after pardoning Jan. 6 rioters, meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) dodged the question entirely. 'The issue that's in front of us is the chaos in LA. The political leadership there wasn't up to the task,' he said at his weekly press conference. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who has disagreed publicly with Trump's pardons of Jan. 6 rioters, said Democrats aren't being consistent on the issue by not sufficiently condemning violence in Los Angeles. 'I think Democrats who feel like the president is wrong to bring out force would be on firmer ground if they denounce the actions of violence in Los Angeles, Kenosha, and Portland,' he said, without specifying which Democrats have refused to speak out. Even Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a Libertarian-leaning voice in the Senate, suggested Trump was within his rights to federalize the National Guard and send troops into California without approval from the state's governor. 'Democrats have failed to have law and order,' Paul said. 'I've always preferred local law enforcement to federal but this is a time in which it looks as though the state government is resisting enforcing federal law.' It's not clear what federal law the senator is referring to. Newsom has also condemned violent protesters and urged the demonstrations to remain peaceful. 'The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle,' Newsom said Sunday. 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully,' he added. Arthur Delaney contributed reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store